Cargando…
Comparison of Combination Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy Plus High-Intensity Focused Ultrasound Ablation Versus Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy Alone for Massive Hepatocellular Carcinoma
BACKGROUND: Thermal high-intensity focused ultrasound ablation is a non-invasive treatment of massive hepatocellular carcinomas. In stereotactic body radiotherapy, ablative radiotherapy is administered to tumors in targeted, limited doses to minimize damage to nearby tissues. We evaluated the outcom...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
International Scientific Literature, Inc.
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6253983/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30448851 http://dx.doi.org/10.12659/MSM.910735 |
_version_ | 1783373620140048384 |
---|---|
author | Wang, Lei Li, Lingzhao Wang, Xiaofang Zhao, Di Shan, Guoyong Wu, Xiaodong Wang, Mengli Liu, Junqi Li, Xingya |
author_facet | Wang, Lei Li, Lingzhao Wang, Xiaofang Zhao, Di Shan, Guoyong Wu, Xiaodong Wang, Mengli Liu, Junqi Li, Xingya |
author_sort | Wang, Lei |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Thermal high-intensity focused ultrasound ablation is a non-invasive treatment of massive hepatocellular carcinomas. In stereotactic body radiotherapy, ablative radiotherapy is administered to tumors in targeted, limited doses to minimize damage to nearby tissues. We evaluated the outcomes and survival of patients receiving stereotactic body radiotherapy (singular therapy) versus those receiving combination thermal high-intensity focused ultrasound ablation plus stereotactic body radiotherapy (combination therapy). MATERIAL/METHODS: We compared data of 160 patients with massive hepatocellular carcinomas (12.5–18 cm) who were treated with combination therapy to those treated with singular therapy between January 2009 and February 2016. RESULTS: Eighty-four patients were treated with single therapy while 76 were treated with combination therapy. Comparison of short-term outcomes and long-term survival between the groups revealed no significant differences in adverse events. In the combination group, the proportions of patients with complete response, partial response, stable disease, and progressive disease were 52.6%, 21.1%, 21.1%, and 5.3%, respectively; in the single therapy group, the corresponding rates were 0%, 23.8%, 50%, and 26.2%, respectively (P<0.0001). The 1-year, 3-year, and 5-year survival rates in the combination group were 33%, 20%, and 13%, respectively, while those in the single therapy group were 21%, 14%, and 1%, respectively. These data indicated no differences in complications between the groups except for a significantly higher level of skin edema in the combination group (P=0.015). CONCLUSIONS: Combination therapy is more effective than single therapy for the treatment of massive hepatocellular carcinomas, although rates of most complications appear to be similar. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6253983 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | International Scientific Literature, Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-62539832018-12-19 Comparison of Combination Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy Plus High-Intensity Focused Ultrasound Ablation Versus Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy Alone for Massive Hepatocellular Carcinoma Wang, Lei Li, Lingzhao Wang, Xiaofang Zhao, Di Shan, Guoyong Wu, Xiaodong Wang, Mengli Liu, Junqi Li, Xingya Med Sci Monit Clinical Research BACKGROUND: Thermal high-intensity focused ultrasound ablation is a non-invasive treatment of massive hepatocellular carcinomas. In stereotactic body radiotherapy, ablative radiotherapy is administered to tumors in targeted, limited doses to minimize damage to nearby tissues. We evaluated the outcomes and survival of patients receiving stereotactic body radiotherapy (singular therapy) versus those receiving combination thermal high-intensity focused ultrasound ablation plus stereotactic body radiotherapy (combination therapy). MATERIAL/METHODS: We compared data of 160 patients with massive hepatocellular carcinomas (12.5–18 cm) who were treated with combination therapy to those treated with singular therapy between January 2009 and February 2016. RESULTS: Eighty-four patients were treated with single therapy while 76 were treated with combination therapy. Comparison of short-term outcomes and long-term survival between the groups revealed no significant differences in adverse events. In the combination group, the proportions of patients with complete response, partial response, stable disease, and progressive disease were 52.6%, 21.1%, 21.1%, and 5.3%, respectively; in the single therapy group, the corresponding rates were 0%, 23.8%, 50%, and 26.2%, respectively (P<0.0001). The 1-year, 3-year, and 5-year survival rates in the combination group were 33%, 20%, and 13%, respectively, while those in the single therapy group were 21%, 14%, and 1%, respectively. These data indicated no differences in complications between the groups except for a significantly higher level of skin edema in the combination group (P=0.015). CONCLUSIONS: Combination therapy is more effective than single therapy for the treatment of massive hepatocellular carcinomas, although rates of most complications appear to be similar. International Scientific Literature, Inc. 2018-11-18 /pmc/articles/PMC6253983/ /pubmed/30448851 http://dx.doi.org/10.12659/MSM.910735 Text en © Med Sci Monit, 2018 This work is licensed under Creative Common Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) ) |
spellingShingle | Clinical Research Wang, Lei Li, Lingzhao Wang, Xiaofang Zhao, Di Shan, Guoyong Wu, Xiaodong Wang, Mengli Liu, Junqi Li, Xingya Comparison of Combination Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy Plus High-Intensity Focused Ultrasound Ablation Versus Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy Alone for Massive Hepatocellular Carcinoma |
title | Comparison of Combination Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy Plus High-Intensity Focused Ultrasound Ablation Versus Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy Alone for Massive Hepatocellular Carcinoma |
title_full | Comparison of Combination Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy Plus High-Intensity Focused Ultrasound Ablation Versus Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy Alone for Massive Hepatocellular Carcinoma |
title_fullStr | Comparison of Combination Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy Plus High-Intensity Focused Ultrasound Ablation Versus Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy Alone for Massive Hepatocellular Carcinoma |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparison of Combination Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy Plus High-Intensity Focused Ultrasound Ablation Versus Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy Alone for Massive Hepatocellular Carcinoma |
title_short | Comparison of Combination Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy Plus High-Intensity Focused Ultrasound Ablation Versus Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy Alone for Massive Hepatocellular Carcinoma |
title_sort | comparison of combination stereotactic body radiotherapy plus high-intensity focused ultrasound ablation versus stereotactic body radiotherapy alone for massive hepatocellular carcinoma |
topic | Clinical Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6253983/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30448851 http://dx.doi.org/10.12659/MSM.910735 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT wanglei comparisonofcombinationstereotacticbodyradiotherapyplushighintensityfocusedultrasoundablationversusstereotacticbodyradiotherapyaloneformassivehepatocellularcarcinoma AT lilingzhao comparisonofcombinationstereotacticbodyradiotherapyplushighintensityfocusedultrasoundablationversusstereotacticbodyradiotherapyaloneformassivehepatocellularcarcinoma AT wangxiaofang comparisonofcombinationstereotacticbodyradiotherapyplushighintensityfocusedultrasoundablationversusstereotacticbodyradiotherapyaloneformassivehepatocellularcarcinoma AT zhaodi comparisonofcombinationstereotacticbodyradiotherapyplushighintensityfocusedultrasoundablationversusstereotacticbodyradiotherapyaloneformassivehepatocellularcarcinoma AT shanguoyong comparisonofcombinationstereotacticbodyradiotherapyplushighintensityfocusedultrasoundablationversusstereotacticbodyradiotherapyaloneformassivehepatocellularcarcinoma AT wuxiaodong comparisonofcombinationstereotacticbodyradiotherapyplushighintensityfocusedultrasoundablationversusstereotacticbodyradiotherapyaloneformassivehepatocellularcarcinoma AT wangmengli comparisonofcombinationstereotacticbodyradiotherapyplushighintensityfocusedultrasoundablationversusstereotacticbodyradiotherapyaloneformassivehepatocellularcarcinoma AT liujunqi comparisonofcombinationstereotacticbodyradiotherapyplushighintensityfocusedultrasoundablationversusstereotacticbodyradiotherapyaloneformassivehepatocellularcarcinoma AT lixingya comparisonofcombinationstereotacticbodyradiotherapyplushighintensityfocusedultrasoundablationversusstereotacticbodyradiotherapyaloneformassivehepatocellularcarcinoma |