Cargando…

Comparison of Combination Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy Plus High-Intensity Focused Ultrasound Ablation Versus Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy Alone for Massive Hepatocellular Carcinoma

BACKGROUND: Thermal high-intensity focused ultrasound ablation is a non-invasive treatment of massive hepatocellular carcinomas. In stereotactic body radiotherapy, ablative radiotherapy is administered to tumors in targeted, limited doses to minimize damage to nearby tissues. We evaluated the outcom...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wang, Lei, Li, Lingzhao, Wang, Xiaofang, Zhao, Di, Shan, Guoyong, Wu, Xiaodong, Wang, Mengli, Liu, Junqi, Li, Xingya
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: International Scientific Literature, Inc. 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6253983/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30448851
http://dx.doi.org/10.12659/MSM.910735
_version_ 1783373620140048384
author Wang, Lei
Li, Lingzhao
Wang, Xiaofang
Zhao, Di
Shan, Guoyong
Wu, Xiaodong
Wang, Mengli
Liu, Junqi
Li, Xingya
author_facet Wang, Lei
Li, Lingzhao
Wang, Xiaofang
Zhao, Di
Shan, Guoyong
Wu, Xiaodong
Wang, Mengli
Liu, Junqi
Li, Xingya
author_sort Wang, Lei
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Thermal high-intensity focused ultrasound ablation is a non-invasive treatment of massive hepatocellular carcinomas. In stereotactic body radiotherapy, ablative radiotherapy is administered to tumors in targeted, limited doses to minimize damage to nearby tissues. We evaluated the outcomes and survival of patients receiving stereotactic body radiotherapy (singular therapy) versus those receiving combination thermal high-intensity focused ultrasound ablation plus stereotactic body radiotherapy (combination therapy). MATERIAL/METHODS: We compared data of 160 patients with massive hepatocellular carcinomas (12.5–18 cm) who were treated with combination therapy to those treated with singular therapy between January 2009 and February 2016. RESULTS: Eighty-four patients were treated with single therapy while 76 were treated with combination therapy. Comparison of short-term outcomes and long-term survival between the groups revealed no significant differences in adverse events. In the combination group, the proportions of patients with complete response, partial response, stable disease, and progressive disease were 52.6%, 21.1%, 21.1%, and 5.3%, respectively; in the single therapy group, the corresponding rates were 0%, 23.8%, 50%, and 26.2%, respectively (P<0.0001). The 1-year, 3-year, and 5-year survival rates in the combination group were 33%, 20%, and 13%, respectively, while those in the single therapy group were 21%, 14%, and 1%, respectively. These data indicated no differences in complications between the groups except for a significantly higher level of skin edema in the combination group (P=0.015). CONCLUSIONS: Combination therapy is more effective than single therapy for the treatment of massive hepatocellular carcinomas, although rates of most complications appear to be similar.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6253983
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher International Scientific Literature, Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-62539832018-12-19 Comparison of Combination Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy Plus High-Intensity Focused Ultrasound Ablation Versus Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy Alone for Massive Hepatocellular Carcinoma Wang, Lei Li, Lingzhao Wang, Xiaofang Zhao, Di Shan, Guoyong Wu, Xiaodong Wang, Mengli Liu, Junqi Li, Xingya Med Sci Monit Clinical Research BACKGROUND: Thermal high-intensity focused ultrasound ablation is a non-invasive treatment of massive hepatocellular carcinomas. In stereotactic body radiotherapy, ablative radiotherapy is administered to tumors in targeted, limited doses to minimize damage to nearby tissues. We evaluated the outcomes and survival of patients receiving stereotactic body radiotherapy (singular therapy) versus those receiving combination thermal high-intensity focused ultrasound ablation plus stereotactic body radiotherapy (combination therapy). MATERIAL/METHODS: We compared data of 160 patients with massive hepatocellular carcinomas (12.5–18 cm) who were treated with combination therapy to those treated with singular therapy between January 2009 and February 2016. RESULTS: Eighty-four patients were treated with single therapy while 76 were treated with combination therapy. Comparison of short-term outcomes and long-term survival between the groups revealed no significant differences in adverse events. In the combination group, the proportions of patients with complete response, partial response, stable disease, and progressive disease were 52.6%, 21.1%, 21.1%, and 5.3%, respectively; in the single therapy group, the corresponding rates were 0%, 23.8%, 50%, and 26.2%, respectively (P<0.0001). The 1-year, 3-year, and 5-year survival rates in the combination group were 33%, 20%, and 13%, respectively, while those in the single therapy group were 21%, 14%, and 1%, respectively. These data indicated no differences in complications between the groups except for a significantly higher level of skin edema in the combination group (P=0.015). CONCLUSIONS: Combination therapy is more effective than single therapy for the treatment of massive hepatocellular carcinomas, although rates of most complications appear to be similar. International Scientific Literature, Inc. 2018-11-18 /pmc/articles/PMC6253983/ /pubmed/30448851 http://dx.doi.org/10.12659/MSM.910735 Text en © Med Sci Monit, 2018 This work is licensed under Creative Common Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) )
spellingShingle Clinical Research
Wang, Lei
Li, Lingzhao
Wang, Xiaofang
Zhao, Di
Shan, Guoyong
Wu, Xiaodong
Wang, Mengli
Liu, Junqi
Li, Xingya
Comparison of Combination Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy Plus High-Intensity Focused Ultrasound Ablation Versus Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy Alone for Massive Hepatocellular Carcinoma
title Comparison of Combination Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy Plus High-Intensity Focused Ultrasound Ablation Versus Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy Alone for Massive Hepatocellular Carcinoma
title_full Comparison of Combination Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy Plus High-Intensity Focused Ultrasound Ablation Versus Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy Alone for Massive Hepatocellular Carcinoma
title_fullStr Comparison of Combination Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy Plus High-Intensity Focused Ultrasound Ablation Versus Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy Alone for Massive Hepatocellular Carcinoma
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of Combination Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy Plus High-Intensity Focused Ultrasound Ablation Versus Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy Alone for Massive Hepatocellular Carcinoma
title_short Comparison of Combination Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy Plus High-Intensity Focused Ultrasound Ablation Versus Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy Alone for Massive Hepatocellular Carcinoma
title_sort comparison of combination stereotactic body radiotherapy plus high-intensity focused ultrasound ablation versus stereotactic body radiotherapy alone for massive hepatocellular carcinoma
topic Clinical Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6253983/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30448851
http://dx.doi.org/10.12659/MSM.910735
work_keys_str_mv AT wanglei comparisonofcombinationstereotacticbodyradiotherapyplushighintensityfocusedultrasoundablationversusstereotacticbodyradiotherapyaloneformassivehepatocellularcarcinoma
AT lilingzhao comparisonofcombinationstereotacticbodyradiotherapyplushighintensityfocusedultrasoundablationversusstereotacticbodyradiotherapyaloneformassivehepatocellularcarcinoma
AT wangxiaofang comparisonofcombinationstereotacticbodyradiotherapyplushighintensityfocusedultrasoundablationversusstereotacticbodyradiotherapyaloneformassivehepatocellularcarcinoma
AT zhaodi comparisonofcombinationstereotacticbodyradiotherapyplushighintensityfocusedultrasoundablationversusstereotacticbodyradiotherapyaloneformassivehepatocellularcarcinoma
AT shanguoyong comparisonofcombinationstereotacticbodyradiotherapyplushighintensityfocusedultrasoundablationversusstereotacticbodyradiotherapyaloneformassivehepatocellularcarcinoma
AT wuxiaodong comparisonofcombinationstereotacticbodyradiotherapyplushighintensityfocusedultrasoundablationversusstereotacticbodyradiotherapyaloneformassivehepatocellularcarcinoma
AT wangmengli comparisonofcombinationstereotacticbodyradiotherapyplushighintensityfocusedultrasoundablationversusstereotacticbodyradiotherapyaloneformassivehepatocellularcarcinoma
AT liujunqi comparisonofcombinationstereotacticbodyradiotherapyplushighintensityfocusedultrasoundablationversusstereotacticbodyradiotherapyaloneformassivehepatocellularcarcinoma
AT lixingya comparisonofcombinationstereotacticbodyradiotherapyplushighintensityfocusedultrasoundablationversusstereotacticbodyradiotherapyaloneformassivehepatocellularcarcinoma