Cargando…

Development and validation of a Self‐assessment Instrument for Perioperative Patient Safety (SIPPS)

BACKGROUND: Patient safety is a fundamental value of healthcare to avoid patient harm. Non‐compliance with patient safety standards may result in patient harm and is therefore a global concern. A Self‐assessment Instrument for Perioperative Patient Safety (SIPPS) monitoring and benchmarking complian...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Heideveld‐Chevalking, A. J., Calsbeek, H., Griffioen, I., Damen, J., Meijerink, W. J. H. J., Wolff, A. P.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley & Sons, Ltd 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6254004/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30511039
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/bjs5.82
_version_ 1783373625034801152
author Heideveld‐Chevalking, A. J.
Calsbeek, H.
Griffioen, I.
Damen, J.
Meijerink, W. J. H. J.
Wolff, A. P.
author_facet Heideveld‐Chevalking, A. J.
Calsbeek, H.
Griffioen, I.
Damen, J.
Meijerink, W. J. H. J.
Wolff, A. P.
author_sort Heideveld‐Chevalking, A. J.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Patient safety is a fundamental value of healthcare to avoid patient harm. Non‐compliance with patient safety standards may result in patient harm and is therefore a global concern. A Self‐assessment Instrument for Perioperative Patient Safety (SIPPS) monitoring and benchmarking compliance to safety standards was validated in a multicentre pilot study. METHODS: A preliminary questionnaire, based on the Dutch perioperative patient safety guidelines and covering international patient safety goals, was evaluated in a first digital RAND Delphi round. The results were used to optimize the questionnaire and design the SIPPS. For measurement and benchmarking purposes, SIPPS was categorized into seven main patient safety domains concerning all care episode phases of the perioperative trajectory. After consensus was reached in a face‐to‐face Delphi round, SIPPS was pilot‐tested in five hospitals for five characteristics: measurability, applicability, improvement potential, discriminatory capacity and feasibility. RESULTS: The results of the first Delphi round showed moderate feasibility for the preliminary questionnaire (81·6 per cent). The pilot test showed good measurability for SIPPS: 99·8 per cent of requested information was assessable. Some 99·9 per cent of SIPPS questions were applicable to the selected respondents. With SIPPS, room for improvement in perioperative patient safety compliance was demonstrated for all hospitals, concerning all safety domains and all care episode phases of the perioperative trajectory (compliance 76·1 per cent). SIPPS showed mixed results for discriminatory capacity. SIPPS showed good feasibility for all items (range 91·9–95·7 per cent). CONCLUSION: A self‐assessment instrument for measuring perioperative patient safety (SIPPS) compliance meeting international standards was validated. With SIPPS, improvement areas for perioperative patient safety and best practices across hospitals could be identified.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6254004
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher John Wiley & Sons, Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-62540042018-12-03 Development and validation of a Self‐assessment Instrument for Perioperative Patient Safety (SIPPS) Heideveld‐Chevalking, A. J. Calsbeek, H. Griffioen, I. Damen, J. Meijerink, W. J. H. J. Wolff, A. P. BJS Open Original Articles BACKGROUND: Patient safety is a fundamental value of healthcare to avoid patient harm. Non‐compliance with patient safety standards may result in patient harm and is therefore a global concern. A Self‐assessment Instrument for Perioperative Patient Safety (SIPPS) monitoring and benchmarking compliance to safety standards was validated in a multicentre pilot study. METHODS: A preliminary questionnaire, based on the Dutch perioperative patient safety guidelines and covering international patient safety goals, was evaluated in a first digital RAND Delphi round. The results were used to optimize the questionnaire and design the SIPPS. For measurement and benchmarking purposes, SIPPS was categorized into seven main patient safety domains concerning all care episode phases of the perioperative trajectory. After consensus was reached in a face‐to‐face Delphi round, SIPPS was pilot‐tested in five hospitals for five characteristics: measurability, applicability, improvement potential, discriminatory capacity and feasibility. RESULTS: The results of the first Delphi round showed moderate feasibility for the preliminary questionnaire (81·6 per cent). The pilot test showed good measurability for SIPPS: 99·8 per cent of requested information was assessable. Some 99·9 per cent of SIPPS questions were applicable to the selected respondents. With SIPPS, room for improvement in perioperative patient safety compliance was demonstrated for all hospitals, concerning all safety domains and all care episode phases of the perioperative trajectory (compliance 76·1 per cent). SIPPS showed mixed results for discriminatory capacity. SIPPS showed good feasibility for all items (range 91·9–95·7 per cent). CONCLUSION: A self‐assessment instrument for measuring perioperative patient safety (SIPPS) compliance meeting international standards was validated. With SIPPS, improvement areas for perioperative patient safety and best practices across hospitals could be identified. John Wiley & Sons, Ltd 2018-07-13 /pmc/articles/PMC6254004/ /pubmed/30511039 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/bjs5.82 Text en © 2018 The Authors. BJS Open published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of BJS Society Ltd This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made.
spellingShingle Original Articles
Heideveld‐Chevalking, A. J.
Calsbeek, H.
Griffioen, I.
Damen, J.
Meijerink, W. J. H. J.
Wolff, A. P.
Development and validation of a Self‐assessment Instrument for Perioperative Patient Safety (SIPPS)
title Development and validation of a Self‐assessment Instrument for Perioperative Patient Safety (SIPPS)
title_full Development and validation of a Self‐assessment Instrument for Perioperative Patient Safety (SIPPS)
title_fullStr Development and validation of a Self‐assessment Instrument for Perioperative Patient Safety (SIPPS)
title_full_unstemmed Development and validation of a Self‐assessment Instrument for Perioperative Patient Safety (SIPPS)
title_short Development and validation of a Self‐assessment Instrument for Perioperative Patient Safety (SIPPS)
title_sort development and validation of a self‐assessment instrument for perioperative patient safety (sipps)
topic Original Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6254004/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30511039
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/bjs5.82
work_keys_str_mv AT heideveldchevalkingaj developmentandvalidationofaselfassessmentinstrumentforperioperativepatientsafetysipps
AT calsbeekh developmentandvalidationofaselfassessmentinstrumentforperioperativepatientsafetysipps
AT griffioeni developmentandvalidationofaselfassessmentinstrumentforperioperativepatientsafetysipps
AT damenj developmentandvalidationofaselfassessmentinstrumentforperioperativepatientsafetysipps
AT meijerinkwjhj developmentandvalidationofaselfassessmentinstrumentforperioperativepatientsafetysipps
AT wolffap developmentandvalidationofaselfassessmentinstrumentforperioperativepatientsafetysipps