Cargando…
1044. Aztreonam (AZT) vs. Cephalosporin (CEP) Therapy for the Treatment of Gram-Negative Bacteremia
BACKGROUND: The IDSA recommends use of AZT in patients with a confirmed beta-lactam allergy for nosocomial Gram-negative infections. Despite this recommendation, there is limited data to suggest AZT is inferior to cephalosporins (CEP) for the treatment of Gram-negative infections. This study aims to...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Oxford University Press
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6254044/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofy210.881 |
_version_ | 1783373633685553152 |
---|---|
author | Shah, Sunish Krevolin, Kyle Bias, Tiffany |
author_facet | Shah, Sunish Krevolin, Kyle Bias, Tiffany |
author_sort | Shah, Sunish |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: The IDSA recommends use of AZT in patients with a confirmed beta-lactam allergy for nosocomial Gram-negative infections. Despite this recommendation, there is limited data to suggest AZT is inferior to cephalosporins (CEP) for the treatment of Gram-negative infections. This study aims to evaluate clinical outcomes in bacteremic patients treated with either AZT or CEP therapy. METHODS: A single-center, retrospective chart review of adult patients with positive blood cultures for Escherichia coli, Klebsiella pneumoniae or Pseudomonas aeruginosa was conducted to compare clinical outcomes between those who received ≥ 48 hours of AZT or CEP therapy (cefepime or ceftriaxone). The following clinical outcomes were assessed: clinical cure, in-hospital mortality, post-infection length of stay (LOS), post-infection intensive care unit LOS, microbiologic cure and leukocytosis resolution. RESULTS: One-hundred and twenty-nine patients met criteria for evaluation: 41 received AZT and 88 received CEP therapy. At baseline, patients who received AZT were more likely to have renal dysfunction (34.1% vs. 18.2%, P = 0.046), receive synergistic antimicrobials (61% vs. 28.4%, P < 0.001) and had a longer pre-infection LOS (1 day [0–2] vs. 0 [0–1], P = 0.032) compared with those who received CEP. Although in-hospital mortality rates were similar between both groups (2.4% vs. 3.4%, P = 1.000), there was a statistically significant difference in clinical cure rates (70.7% vs. 90.9%, P = 0.003), post-infection length of stay (7 days [5–10] vs. 5 [4–8], P = 0.007), and time to clinical cure (2.8 days (1.6–5.8) vs. 2.0 (1.2–2.9), P = 0.018) in the AZT and CEP groups respectively. In a multivariate logistic regression model, patients who received AZT were significantly less likely to achieve clinical cure (OR=0.187, 95% CI (0.058–0.597). In a pre-determined subgroup analysis, clinical cure rates varied in E. coli (72% vs. 94.4%, P = 0.009), K. pneumoniae (70% vs. 90.5%, P = 0.296) and P. aeruginosa (66.7% vs. 76.9%, P = 1.000) in the AZT and CEP group respectively. CONCLUSION: Patients who receive aztreonam for Gram-negative bacteremia may be more likely to experience clinical failure. Larger, prospective studies are warranted to confirm these findings. DISCLOSURES: All authors: No reported disclosures. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6254044 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | Oxford University Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-62540442018-11-28 1044. Aztreonam (AZT) vs. Cephalosporin (CEP) Therapy for the Treatment of Gram-Negative Bacteremia Shah, Sunish Krevolin, Kyle Bias, Tiffany Open Forum Infect Dis Abstracts BACKGROUND: The IDSA recommends use of AZT in patients with a confirmed beta-lactam allergy for nosocomial Gram-negative infections. Despite this recommendation, there is limited data to suggest AZT is inferior to cephalosporins (CEP) for the treatment of Gram-negative infections. This study aims to evaluate clinical outcomes in bacteremic patients treated with either AZT or CEP therapy. METHODS: A single-center, retrospective chart review of adult patients with positive blood cultures for Escherichia coli, Klebsiella pneumoniae or Pseudomonas aeruginosa was conducted to compare clinical outcomes between those who received ≥ 48 hours of AZT or CEP therapy (cefepime or ceftriaxone). The following clinical outcomes were assessed: clinical cure, in-hospital mortality, post-infection length of stay (LOS), post-infection intensive care unit LOS, microbiologic cure and leukocytosis resolution. RESULTS: One-hundred and twenty-nine patients met criteria for evaluation: 41 received AZT and 88 received CEP therapy. At baseline, patients who received AZT were more likely to have renal dysfunction (34.1% vs. 18.2%, P = 0.046), receive synergistic antimicrobials (61% vs. 28.4%, P < 0.001) and had a longer pre-infection LOS (1 day [0–2] vs. 0 [0–1], P = 0.032) compared with those who received CEP. Although in-hospital mortality rates were similar between both groups (2.4% vs. 3.4%, P = 1.000), there was a statistically significant difference in clinical cure rates (70.7% vs. 90.9%, P = 0.003), post-infection length of stay (7 days [5–10] vs. 5 [4–8], P = 0.007), and time to clinical cure (2.8 days (1.6–5.8) vs. 2.0 (1.2–2.9), P = 0.018) in the AZT and CEP groups respectively. In a multivariate logistic regression model, patients who received AZT were significantly less likely to achieve clinical cure (OR=0.187, 95% CI (0.058–0.597). In a pre-determined subgroup analysis, clinical cure rates varied in E. coli (72% vs. 94.4%, P = 0.009), K. pneumoniae (70% vs. 90.5%, P = 0.296) and P. aeruginosa (66.7% vs. 76.9%, P = 1.000) in the AZT and CEP group respectively. CONCLUSION: Patients who receive aztreonam for Gram-negative bacteremia may be more likely to experience clinical failure. Larger, prospective studies are warranted to confirm these findings. DISCLOSURES: All authors: No reported disclosures. Oxford University Press 2018-11-26 /pmc/articles/PMC6254044/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofy210.881 Text en © The Author(s) 2018. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Infectious Diseases Society of America. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial reproduction and distribution of the work, in any medium, provided the original work is not altered or transformed in any way, and that the work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com |
spellingShingle | Abstracts Shah, Sunish Krevolin, Kyle Bias, Tiffany 1044. Aztreonam (AZT) vs. Cephalosporin (CEP) Therapy for the Treatment of Gram-Negative Bacteremia |
title | 1044. Aztreonam (AZT) vs. Cephalosporin (CEP) Therapy for the Treatment of Gram-Negative Bacteremia |
title_full | 1044. Aztreonam (AZT) vs. Cephalosporin (CEP) Therapy for the Treatment of Gram-Negative Bacteremia |
title_fullStr | 1044. Aztreonam (AZT) vs. Cephalosporin (CEP) Therapy for the Treatment of Gram-Negative Bacteremia |
title_full_unstemmed | 1044. Aztreonam (AZT) vs. Cephalosporin (CEP) Therapy for the Treatment of Gram-Negative Bacteremia |
title_short | 1044. Aztreonam (AZT) vs. Cephalosporin (CEP) Therapy for the Treatment of Gram-Negative Bacteremia |
title_sort | 1044. aztreonam (azt) vs. cephalosporin (cep) therapy for the treatment of gram-negative bacteremia |
topic | Abstracts |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6254044/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofy210.881 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT shahsunish 1044aztreonamaztvscephalosporinceptherapyforthetreatmentofgramnegativebacteremia AT krevolinkyle 1044aztreonamaztvscephalosporinceptherapyforthetreatmentofgramnegativebacteremia AT biastiffany 1044aztreonamaztvscephalosporinceptherapyforthetreatmentofgramnegativebacteremia |