Cargando…

1044. Aztreonam (AZT) vs. Cephalosporin (CEP) Therapy for the Treatment of Gram-Negative Bacteremia

BACKGROUND: The IDSA recommends use of AZT in patients with a confirmed beta-lactam allergy for nosocomial Gram-negative infections. Despite this recommendation, there is limited data to suggest AZT is inferior to cephalosporins (CEP) for the treatment of Gram-negative infections. This study aims to...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Shah, Sunish, Krevolin, Kyle, Bias, Tiffany
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6254044/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofy210.881
_version_ 1783373633685553152
author Shah, Sunish
Krevolin, Kyle
Bias, Tiffany
author_facet Shah, Sunish
Krevolin, Kyle
Bias, Tiffany
author_sort Shah, Sunish
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The IDSA recommends use of AZT in patients with a confirmed beta-lactam allergy for nosocomial Gram-negative infections. Despite this recommendation, there is limited data to suggest AZT is inferior to cephalosporins (CEP) for the treatment of Gram-negative infections. This study aims to evaluate clinical outcomes in bacteremic patients treated with either AZT or CEP therapy. METHODS: A single-center, retrospective chart review of adult patients with positive blood cultures for Escherichia coli, Klebsiella pneumoniae or Pseudomonas aeruginosa was conducted to compare clinical outcomes between those who received ≥ 48 hours of AZT or CEP therapy (cefepime or ceftriaxone). The following clinical outcomes were assessed: clinical cure, in-hospital mortality, post-infection length of stay (LOS), post-infection intensive care unit LOS, microbiologic cure and leukocytosis resolution. RESULTS: One-hundred and twenty-nine patients met criteria for evaluation: 41 received AZT and 88 received CEP therapy. At baseline, patients who received AZT were more likely to have renal dysfunction (34.1% vs. 18.2%, P = 0.046), receive synergistic antimicrobials (61% vs. 28.4%, P < 0.001) and had a longer pre-infection LOS (1 day [0–2] vs. 0 [0–1], P = 0.032) compared with those who received CEP. Although in-hospital mortality rates were similar between both groups (2.4% vs. 3.4%, P = 1.000), there was a statistically significant difference in clinical cure rates (70.7% vs. 90.9%, P = 0.003), post-infection length of stay (7 days [5–10] vs. 5 [4–8], P = 0.007), and time to clinical cure (2.8 days (1.6–5.8) vs. 2.0 (1.2–2.9), P = 0.018) in the AZT and CEP groups respectively. In a multivariate logistic regression model, patients who received AZT were significantly less likely to achieve clinical cure (OR=0.187, 95% CI (0.058–0.597). In a pre-determined subgroup analysis, clinical cure rates varied in E. coli (72% vs. 94.4%, P = 0.009), K. pneumoniae (70% vs. 90.5%, P = 0.296) and P. aeruginosa (66.7% vs. 76.9%, P = 1.000) in the AZT and CEP group respectively. CONCLUSION: Patients who receive aztreonam for Gram-negative bacteremia may be more likely to experience clinical failure. Larger, prospective studies are warranted to confirm these findings. DISCLOSURES: All authors: No reported disclosures.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6254044
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-62540442018-11-28 1044. Aztreonam (AZT) vs. Cephalosporin (CEP) Therapy for the Treatment of Gram-Negative Bacteremia Shah, Sunish Krevolin, Kyle Bias, Tiffany Open Forum Infect Dis Abstracts BACKGROUND: The IDSA recommends use of AZT in patients with a confirmed beta-lactam allergy for nosocomial Gram-negative infections. Despite this recommendation, there is limited data to suggest AZT is inferior to cephalosporins (CEP) for the treatment of Gram-negative infections. This study aims to evaluate clinical outcomes in bacteremic patients treated with either AZT or CEP therapy. METHODS: A single-center, retrospective chart review of adult patients with positive blood cultures for Escherichia coli, Klebsiella pneumoniae or Pseudomonas aeruginosa was conducted to compare clinical outcomes between those who received ≥ 48 hours of AZT or CEP therapy (cefepime or ceftriaxone). The following clinical outcomes were assessed: clinical cure, in-hospital mortality, post-infection length of stay (LOS), post-infection intensive care unit LOS, microbiologic cure and leukocytosis resolution. RESULTS: One-hundred and twenty-nine patients met criteria for evaluation: 41 received AZT and 88 received CEP therapy. At baseline, patients who received AZT were more likely to have renal dysfunction (34.1% vs. 18.2%, P = 0.046), receive synergistic antimicrobials (61% vs. 28.4%, P < 0.001) and had a longer pre-infection LOS (1 day [0–2] vs. 0 [0–1], P = 0.032) compared with those who received CEP. Although in-hospital mortality rates were similar between both groups (2.4% vs. 3.4%, P = 1.000), there was a statistically significant difference in clinical cure rates (70.7% vs. 90.9%, P = 0.003), post-infection length of stay (7 days [5–10] vs. 5 [4–8], P = 0.007), and time to clinical cure (2.8 days (1.6–5.8) vs. 2.0 (1.2–2.9), P = 0.018) in the AZT and CEP groups respectively. In a multivariate logistic regression model, patients who received AZT were significantly less likely to achieve clinical cure (OR=0.187, 95% CI (0.058–0.597). In a pre-determined subgroup analysis, clinical cure rates varied in E. coli (72% vs. 94.4%, P = 0.009), K. pneumoniae (70% vs. 90.5%, P = 0.296) and P. aeruginosa (66.7% vs. 76.9%, P = 1.000) in the AZT and CEP group respectively. CONCLUSION: Patients who receive aztreonam for Gram-negative bacteremia may be more likely to experience clinical failure. Larger, prospective studies are warranted to confirm these findings. DISCLOSURES: All authors: No reported disclosures. Oxford University Press 2018-11-26 /pmc/articles/PMC6254044/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofy210.881 Text en © The Author(s) 2018. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Infectious Diseases Society of America. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial reproduction and distribution of the work, in any medium, provided the original work is not altered or transformed in any way, and that the work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com
spellingShingle Abstracts
Shah, Sunish
Krevolin, Kyle
Bias, Tiffany
1044. Aztreonam (AZT) vs. Cephalosporin (CEP) Therapy for the Treatment of Gram-Negative Bacteremia
title 1044. Aztreonam (AZT) vs. Cephalosporin (CEP) Therapy for the Treatment of Gram-Negative Bacteremia
title_full 1044. Aztreonam (AZT) vs. Cephalosporin (CEP) Therapy for the Treatment of Gram-Negative Bacteremia
title_fullStr 1044. Aztreonam (AZT) vs. Cephalosporin (CEP) Therapy for the Treatment of Gram-Negative Bacteremia
title_full_unstemmed 1044. Aztreonam (AZT) vs. Cephalosporin (CEP) Therapy for the Treatment of Gram-Negative Bacteremia
title_short 1044. Aztreonam (AZT) vs. Cephalosporin (CEP) Therapy for the Treatment of Gram-Negative Bacteremia
title_sort 1044. aztreonam (azt) vs. cephalosporin (cep) therapy for the treatment of gram-negative bacteremia
topic Abstracts
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6254044/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofy210.881
work_keys_str_mv AT shahsunish 1044aztreonamaztvscephalosporinceptherapyforthetreatmentofgramnegativebacteremia
AT krevolinkyle 1044aztreonamaztvscephalosporinceptherapyforthetreatmentofgramnegativebacteremia
AT biastiffany 1044aztreonamaztvscephalosporinceptherapyforthetreatmentofgramnegativebacteremia