Cargando…
2101. Catheter-related Infections Complicating Central Venous Catheter Access Device Insertion: A Retrospective Audit and Comparison of Two Cohorts
BACKGROUND: Central venous access devices (CVAD) are essential for long-term intra-venous treatment of malignancies and other conditions. Catheter-related infections (CRI) complicate long-term CVAD use at rates between 1.5 and 5%, resulting in significant morbidity and mortality. Current evidence do...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Oxford University Press
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6254061/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofy210.1757 |
_version_ | 1783373636978081792 |
---|---|
author | Hoey, Anne Edinger-Reeve, Milan Anshaw, Melissa Chan, Hubert Konecny, Pamela |
author_facet | Hoey, Anne Edinger-Reeve, Milan Anshaw, Melissa Chan, Hubert Konecny, Pamela |
author_sort | Hoey, Anne |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Central venous access devices (CVAD) are essential for long-term intra-venous treatment of malignancies and other conditions. Catheter-related infections (CRI) complicate long-term CVAD use at rates between 1.5 and 5%, resulting in significant morbidity and mortality. Current evidence does not support a role for antibiotic prophylaxis pre-insertion. We aim to determine rates of CRIs complicating CVAD insertions by vascular surgery and interventional radiology in a single institution and examine the role of antibiotic prophylaxis in prevention. METHODS: A retrospective audit was carried out on CVAD insertions (tunnelled central venous catheter (CVC) or subcutaneous port) by the Vascular Surgery and Radiology Departments at a tertiary teaching hospital in Sydney, Australia from January 2014 to December 2016. Data were collected on patient demographics, antibiotic prophylaxis, skin preparation and CRIs. Rates of CRIs were compared by chi-square test (α 0.05). RESULTS: Ninety-five (11 tunnelled CVC; 84 subcutaneous ports) and 222 (21 tunnelled CVC; 201 subcutaneous ports) CVAD insertions were performed by vascular surgery and radiology, respectively. Median age was 56 years (IQR 48–66) in the vascular cohort and 64 years (IQR 55–72) in the radiology cohort. Females were predominant in both vascular (70; 73.7%) and radiology (119, 53.6%) cohorts and the most common indication was chemotherapy (vascular 84; 88.4% and radiology 205; 92.8%, n = 1 missing). Antibiotic prophylaxis was used in 88 (92.6%) vascular insertions but only 2 (0.95%, n = 12 missing) insertions by radiology. Iodine skin preparation was preferred for vascular insertions (92; 98.9%, n = 2 missing) compared with chlorhexidine for radiology insertions (214; 97.7%, n = 3 missing). CRIs occurred in 4 (4.2%) of the vascular cohort and 8 (3.6%) of radiology cohort (P = 0.80). CONCLUSION: Rates of CRIs complicating CVAD procedures were similar in a vascular cohort where most received antibiotic prophylaxis, and in a radiology cohort where antibiotic prophylaxis was rarely used. There was no evidence to support antibiotic prophylaxis in prevention of CRIs, although choice of skin preparation and other factors may have confounded findings. DISCLOSURES: All authors: No reported disclosures. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6254061 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | Oxford University Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-62540612018-11-28 2101. Catheter-related Infections Complicating Central Venous Catheter Access Device Insertion: A Retrospective Audit and Comparison of Two Cohorts Hoey, Anne Edinger-Reeve, Milan Anshaw, Melissa Chan, Hubert Konecny, Pamela Open Forum Infect Dis Abstracts BACKGROUND: Central venous access devices (CVAD) are essential for long-term intra-venous treatment of malignancies and other conditions. Catheter-related infections (CRI) complicate long-term CVAD use at rates between 1.5 and 5%, resulting in significant morbidity and mortality. Current evidence does not support a role for antibiotic prophylaxis pre-insertion. We aim to determine rates of CRIs complicating CVAD insertions by vascular surgery and interventional radiology in a single institution and examine the role of antibiotic prophylaxis in prevention. METHODS: A retrospective audit was carried out on CVAD insertions (tunnelled central venous catheter (CVC) or subcutaneous port) by the Vascular Surgery and Radiology Departments at a tertiary teaching hospital in Sydney, Australia from January 2014 to December 2016. Data were collected on patient demographics, antibiotic prophylaxis, skin preparation and CRIs. Rates of CRIs were compared by chi-square test (α 0.05). RESULTS: Ninety-five (11 tunnelled CVC; 84 subcutaneous ports) and 222 (21 tunnelled CVC; 201 subcutaneous ports) CVAD insertions were performed by vascular surgery and radiology, respectively. Median age was 56 years (IQR 48–66) in the vascular cohort and 64 years (IQR 55–72) in the radiology cohort. Females were predominant in both vascular (70; 73.7%) and radiology (119, 53.6%) cohorts and the most common indication was chemotherapy (vascular 84; 88.4% and radiology 205; 92.8%, n = 1 missing). Antibiotic prophylaxis was used in 88 (92.6%) vascular insertions but only 2 (0.95%, n = 12 missing) insertions by radiology. Iodine skin preparation was preferred for vascular insertions (92; 98.9%, n = 2 missing) compared with chlorhexidine for radiology insertions (214; 97.7%, n = 3 missing). CRIs occurred in 4 (4.2%) of the vascular cohort and 8 (3.6%) of radiology cohort (P = 0.80). CONCLUSION: Rates of CRIs complicating CVAD procedures were similar in a vascular cohort where most received antibiotic prophylaxis, and in a radiology cohort where antibiotic prophylaxis was rarely used. There was no evidence to support antibiotic prophylaxis in prevention of CRIs, although choice of skin preparation and other factors may have confounded findings. DISCLOSURES: All authors: No reported disclosures. Oxford University Press 2018-11-26 /pmc/articles/PMC6254061/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofy210.1757 Text en © The Author(s) 2018. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Infectious Diseases Society of America. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial reproduction and distribution of the work, in any medium, provided the original work is not altered or transformed in any way, and that the work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com |
spellingShingle | Abstracts Hoey, Anne Edinger-Reeve, Milan Anshaw, Melissa Chan, Hubert Konecny, Pamela 2101. Catheter-related Infections Complicating Central Venous Catheter Access Device Insertion: A Retrospective Audit and Comparison of Two Cohorts |
title | 2101. Catheter-related Infections Complicating Central Venous Catheter Access Device Insertion: A Retrospective Audit and Comparison of Two Cohorts |
title_full | 2101. Catheter-related Infections Complicating Central Venous Catheter Access Device Insertion: A Retrospective Audit and Comparison of Two Cohorts |
title_fullStr | 2101. Catheter-related Infections Complicating Central Venous Catheter Access Device Insertion: A Retrospective Audit and Comparison of Two Cohorts |
title_full_unstemmed | 2101. Catheter-related Infections Complicating Central Venous Catheter Access Device Insertion: A Retrospective Audit and Comparison of Two Cohorts |
title_short | 2101. Catheter-related Infections Complicating Central Venous Catheter Access Device Insertion: A Retrospective Audit and Comparison of Two Cohorts |
title_sort | 2101. catheter-related infections complicating central venous catheter access device insertion: a retrospective audit and comparison of two cohorts |
topic | Abstracts |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6254061/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofy210.1757 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT hoeyanne 2101catheterrelatedinfectionscomplicatingcentralvenouscatheteraccessdeviceinsertionaretrospectiveauditandcomparisonoftwocohorts AT edingerreevemilan 2101catheterrelatedinfectionscomplicatingcentralvenouscatheteraccessdeviceinsertionaretrospectiveauditandcomparisonoftwocohorts AT anshawmelissa 2101catheterrelatedinfectionscomplicatingcentralvenouscatheteraccessdeviceinsertionaretrospectiveauditandcomparisonoftwocohorts AT chanhubert 2101catheterrelatedinfectionscomplicatingcentralvenouscatheteraccessdeviceinsertionaretrospectiveauditandcomparisonoftwocohorts AT konecnypamela 2101catheterrelatedinfectionscomplicatingcentralvenouscatheteraccessdeviceinsertionaretrospectiveauditandcomparisonoftwocohorts |