Cargando…

2101. Catheter-related Infections Complicating Central Venous Catheter Access Device Insertion: A Retrospective Audit and Comparison of Two Cohorts

BACKGROUND: Central venous access devices (CVAD) are essential for long-term intra-venous treatment of malignancies and other conditions. Catheter-related infections (CRI) complicate long-term CVAD use at rates between 1.5 and 5%, resulting in significant morbidity and mortality. Current evidence do...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hoey, Anne, Edinger-Reeve, Milan, Anshaw, Melissa, Chan, Hubert, Konecny, Pamela
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6254061/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofy210.1757
_version_ 1783373636978081792
author Hoey, Anne
Edinger-Reeve, Milan
Anshaw, Melissa
Chan, Hubert
Konecny, Pamela
author_facet Hoey, Anne
Edinger-Reeve, Milan
Anshaw, Melissa
Chan, Hubert
Konecny, Pamela
author_sort Hoey, Anne
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Central venous access devices (CVAD) are essential for long-term intra-venous treatment of malignancies and other conditions. Catheter-related infections (CRI) complicate long-term CVAD use at rates between 1.5 and 5%, resulting in significant morbidity and mortality. Current evidence does not support a role for antibiotic prophylaxis pre-insertion. We aim to determine rates of CRIs complicating CVAD insertions by vascular surgery and interventional radiology in a single institution and examine the role of antibiotic prophylaxis in prevention. METHODS: A retrospective audit was carried out on CVAD insertions (tunnelled central venous catheter (CVC) or subcutaneous port) by the Vascular Surgery and Radiology Departments at a tertiary teaching hospital in Sydney, Australia from January 2014 to December 2016. Data were collected on patient demographics, antibiotic prophylaxis, skin preparation and CRIs. Rates of CRIs were compared by chi-square test (α 0.05). RESULTS: Ninety-five (11 tunnelled CVC; 84 subcutaneous ports) and 222 (21 tunnelled CVC; 201 subcutaneous ports) CVAD insertions were performed by vascular surgery and radiology, respectively. Median age was 56 years (IQR 48–66) in the vascular cohort and 64 years (IQR 55–72) in the radiology cohort. Females were predominant in both vascular (70; 73.7%) and radiology (119, 53.6%) cohorts and the most common indication was chemotherapy (vascular 84; 88.4% and radiology 205; 92.8%, n = 1 missing). Antibiotic prophylaxis was used in 88 (92.6%) vascular insertions but only 2 (0.95%, n = 12 missing) insertions by radiology. Iodine skin preparation was preferred for vascular insertions (92; 98.9%, n = 2 missing) compared with chlorhexidine for radiology insertions (214; 97.7%, n = 3 missing). CRIs occurred in 4 (4.2%) of the vascular cohort and 8 (3.6%) of radiology cohort (P = 0.80). CONCLUSION: Rates of CRIs complicating CVAD procedures were similar in a vascular cohort where most received antibiotic prophylaxis, and in a radiology cohort where antibiotic prophylaxis was rarely used. There was no evidence to support antibiotic prophylaxis in prevention of CRIs, although choice of skin preparation and other factors may have confounded findings. DISCLOSURES: All authors: No reported disclosures.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6254061
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-62540612018-11-28 2101. Catheter-related Infections Complicating Central Venous Catheter Access Device Insertion: A Retrospective Audit and Comparison of Two Cohorts Hoey, Anne Edinger-Reeve, Milan Anshaw, Melissa Chan, Hubert Konecny, Pamela Open Forum Infect Dis Abstracts BACKGROUND: Central venous access devices (CVAD) are essential for long-term intra-venous treatment of malignancies and other conditions. Catheter-related infections (CRI) complicate long-term CVAD use at rates between 1.5 and 5%, resulting in significant morbidity and mortality. Current evidence does not support a role for antibiotic prophylaxis pre-insertion. We aim to determine rates of CRIs complicating CVAD insertions by vascular surgery and interventional radiology in a single institution and examine the role of antibiotic prophylaxis in prevention. METHODS: A retrospective audit was carried out on CVAD insertions (tunnelled central venous catheter (CVC) or subcutaneous port) by the Vascular Surgery and Radiology Departments at a tertiary teaching hospital in Sydney, Australia from January 2014 to December 2016. Data were collected on patient demographics, antibiotic prophylaxis, skin preparation and CRIs. Rates of CRIs were compared by chi-square test (α 0.05). RESULTS: Ninety-five (11 tunnelled CVC; 84 subcutaneous ports) and 222 (21 tunnelled CVC; 201 subcutaneous ports) CVAD insertions were performed by vascular surgery and radiology, respectively. Median age was 56 years (IQR 48–66) in the vascular cohort and 64 years (IQR 55–72) in the radiology cohort. Females were predominant in both vascular (70; 73.7%) and radiology (119, 53.6%) cohorts and the most common indication was chemotherapy (vascular 84; 88.4% and radiology 205; 92.8%, n = 1 missing). Antibiotic prophylaxis was used in 88 (92.6%) vascular insertions but only 2 (0.95%, n = 12 missing) insertions by radiology. Iodine skin preparation was preferred for vascular insertions (92; 98.9%, n = 2 missing) compared with chlorhexidine for radiology insertions (214; 97.7%, n = 3 missing). CRIs occurred in 4 (4.2%) of the vascular cohort and 8 (3.6%) of radiology cohort (P = 0.80). CONCLUSION: Rates of CRIs complicating CVAD procedures were similar in a vascular cohort where most received antibiotic prophylaxis, and in a radiology cohort where antibiotic prophylaxis was rarely used. There was no evidence to support antibiotic prophylaxis in prevention of CRIs, although choice of skin preparation and other factors may have confounded findings. DISCLOSURES: All authors: No reported disclosures. Oxford University Press 2018-11-26 /pmc/articles/PMC6254061/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofy210.1757 Text en © The Author(s) 2018. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Infectious Diseases Society of America. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial reproduction and distribution of the work, in any medium, provided the original work is not altered or transformed in any way, and that the work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com
spellingShingle Abstracts
Hoey, Anne
Edinger-Reeve, Milan
Anshaw, Melissa
Chan, Hubert
Konecny, Pamela
2101. Catheter-related Infections Complicating Central Venous Catheter Access Device Insertion: A Retrospective Audit and Comparison of Two Cohorts
title 2101. Catheter-related Infections Complicating Central Venous Catheter Access Device Insertion: A Retrospective Audit and Comparison of Two Cohorts
title_full 2101. Catheter-related Infections Complicating Central Venous Catheter Access Device Insertion: A Retrospective Audit and Comparison of Two Cohorts
title_fullStr 2101. Catheter-related Infections Complicating Central Venous Catheter Access Device Insertion: A Retrospective Audit and Comparison of Two Cohorts
title_full_unstemmed 2101. Catheter-related Infections Complicating Central Venous Catheter Access Device Insertion: A Retrospective Audit and Comparison of Two Cohorts
title_short 2101. Catheter-related Infections Complicating Central Venous Catheter Access Device Insertion: A Retrospective Audit and Comparison of Two Cohorts
title_sort 2101. catheter-related infections complicating central venous catheter access device insertion: a retrospective audit and comparison of two cohorts
topic Abstracts
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6254061/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofy210.1757
work_keys_str_mv AT hoeyanne 2101catheterrelatedinfectionscomplicatingcentralvenouscatheteraccessdeviceinsertionaretrospectiveauditandcomparisonoftwocohorts
AT edingerreevemilan 2101catheterrelatedinfectionscomplicatingcentralvenouscatheteraccessdeviceinsertionaretrospectiveauditandcomparisonoftwocohorts
AT anshawmelissa 2101catheterrelatedinfectionscomplicatingcentralvenouscatheteraccessdeviceinsertionaretrospectiveauditandcomparisonoftwocohorts
AT chanhubert 2101catheterrelatedinfectionscomplicatingcentralvenouscatheteraccessdeviceinsertionaretrospectiveauditandcomparisonoftwocohorts
AT konecnypamela 2101catheterrelatedinfectionscomplicatingcentralvenouscatheteraccessdeviceinsertionaretrospectiveauditandcomparisonoftwocohorts