Cargando…

1075. A Retrospective Comparison of Native Valve Endocarditis and Prosthetic Valve Endocarditis in a Large Tertiary Care Teaching Hospital From 2007 to 2015

BACKGROUND: Studies comparing native valve and prosthetic valve endocarditis (NVE and PVE) have mixed findings on the risk factors and outcomes between the two cohorts. This retrospective review of infective endocarditis (IE) at a teaching hospital in the United States aims to compare the clinical a...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Annie Lo, Hoi Yee, Mostaghim, Anahita, Khardori, Nancy
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6254068/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofy210.912
Descripción
Sumario:BACKGROUND: Studies comparing native valve and prosthetic valve endocarditis (NVE and PVE) have mixed findings on the risk factors and outcomes between the two cohorts. This retrospective review of infective endocarditis (IE) at a teaching hospital in the United States aims to compare the clinical and microbiological features between NVE and PVE. METHODS: Patients were retrospectively identified from 2007 to 2015 using appropriate IE-related ICD-9 codes. Cases that met definite Modified Duke Criteria for IE were further classified as either PVE or NVE, and were reviewed for epidemiology, causative organism(s), affected valves and associations, risk factors, dental procedures in the past 6 months, and 30-day mortality. RESULTS: A total of 363 admissions met criteria for definite endocarditis, with 261 NVE cases and 59 PVE cases. Forty-three cases that were either associated with an infection involving both native and prosthetic valves or intracardiac devices were omitted from this study. Most risk factors, such as hemodialysis and intravenous drug use, did not show any significant difference amongst the two groups. IE involving the aortic valve as well as a previous history of IE were more likely to be seen in PVE (both P < 0.0001). Dental procedures done in the preceding 6 months before IE admission were more likely to be associated with PVE than NVE (P = 0.0043). PVE showed a higher likelihood of 30-day mortality compared with NVE (P = 0.067). The causative organisms of PVE were more likely to be caused by common gut pathogens such as Klebsiella and Enterobacter species. CONCLUSION: PVE cases had a significantly higher chance of involving the aortic valve as well as having a history of IE. PVE cases were also significantly more likely to be associated with a dental procedure done in the preceding 6 months than with the NVE cases. This implies that patients with prosthetic valves, who are currently covered under the 2007 AHA guidelines to receive prophylaxis prior to dental procedures, are still at a high risk of developing PVE. It may be prudent to reconsider adding a post-procedure dose of antibiotics, instead of a single preprocedure dose, to extend the protection of this high-risk population with prosthetic valves. Furthermore, PVE cases showed higher rates of 30-day mortality compared with NVE with near significance, which is likely multifactorial. DISCLOSURES: All authors: No reported disclosures.