Cargando…

1977. Comparative Effectiveness of Linezolid vs. Trimethoprim–Sulfamethoxazole for Acute Bacterial Skin and Skin Structure Infections (ABSSSIs) at a Veterans Affairs Hospital

BACKGROUND: Linezolid (LZD) and trimethoprim–sulfamethoxazole (TMP-SMX) are both used in the treatment of acute bacterial skin and skin structure infection (ABSSSI) with differing adverse event profiles to guide usage, but their comparative efficacies in severe ABSSSI remain unclear. METHODS: This r...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Tan, Xing, Linneman, Travis W, Moenster, Ryan P
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6254073/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofy210.1633
_version_ 1783373639841742848
author Tan, Xing
Linneman, Travis W
Moenster, Ryan P
author_facet Tan, Xing
Linneman, Travis W
Moenster, Ryan P
author_sort Tan, Xing
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Linezolid (LZD) and trimethoprim–sulfamethoxazole (TMP-SMX) are both used in the treatment of acute bacterial skin and skin structure infection (ABSSSI) with differing adverse event profiles to guide usage, but their comparative efficacies in severe ABSSSI remain unclear. METHODS: This retrospective cohort study evaluated patients admitted to the VA St. Louis Health Care System for treatment of an ABSSSI between April 18, 2000 and October 16, 2017 and discharged with a prescription for ≥5 days of LZD or TMP-SMX. The primary outcome was clinical failure, defined as a composite of an Emergency Department visit, clinic visit, inpatient admission, extension of antibiotics, change of antibiotic regimen for any reason, or the presence of an adverse reaction occurring in the 14 days after completion of the outpatient regimen. Adverse reactions evaluated were acute kidney injury, hyperkalemia, neutropenia, thrombocytopenia, and anemia. The secondary outcome evaluated risk factors for clinical failure with multivariate logistic regression analysis. Potential factors to be included in the analysis were drug choice, duration of intravenous antibiotic use while inpatient (<24 hours, ≥24 hours to ≤48 hours, >48 hours), identification of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) in culture, MRSA nasal colonization, and incision and drainage. RESULTS: A total of 139 patients were included in the analysis; 51 treated with LZD and 88 treated with TMP-SMX. Length of hospital stay was greater in the LZD group (6.05 days vs. 3.69 days [P = 0.023]), as was antibiotic use during hospitalization (98% [49/50] vs. 86% [77/90]; P = 0.019). The mean day supply of antibiotic dispensed at discharge was 10.18 in the LZD group and 9.64 in the TMP-SMX group (P = 0.48). Twenty-two percent (11/51) of patients treated with LZD and 18% (16/88) of those treated with TMP-SMX (P = 0.878) experienced clinical failure. Only receipt of antibiotics for 24–48 hours during hospitalization met criteria for inclusion in the multivariate analysis, but was not significantly associated with clinical failure (0.367 [95% CI 0.083–1.63]; P = 0.187). CONCLUSION: There was no difference in the rate of clinical failure between patients treated with LZD or TMP-SMX for severe ABSSSI. DISCLOSURES: All authors: No reported disclosures.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6254073
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-62540732018-11-28 1977. Comparative Effectiveness of Linezolid vs. Trimethoprim–Sulfamethoxazole for Acute Bacterial Skin and Skin Structure Infections (ABSSSIs) at a Veterans Affairs Hospital Tan, Xing Linneman, Travis W Moenster, Ryan P Open Forum Infect Dis Abstracts BACKGROUND: Linezolid (LZD) and trimethoprim–sulfamethoxazole (TMP-SMX) are both used in the treatment of acute bacterial skin and skin structure infection (ABSSSI) with differing adverse event profiles to guide usage, but their comparative efficacies in severe ABSSSI remain unclear. METHODS: This retrospective cohort study evaluated patients admitted to the VA St. Louis Health Care System for treatment of an ABSSSI between April 18, 2000 and October 16, 2017 and discharged with a prescription for ≥5 days of LZD or TMP-SMX. The primary outcome was clinical failure, defined as a composite of an Emergency Department visit, clinic visit, inpatient admission, extension of antibiotics, change of antibiotic regimen for any reason, or the presence of an adverse reaction occurring in the 14 days after completion of the outpatient regimen. Adverse reactions evaluated were acute kidney injury, hyperkalemia, neutropenia, thrombocytopenia, and anemia. The secondary outcome evaluated risk factors for clinical failure with multivariate logistic regression analysis. Potential factors to be included in the analysis were drug choice, duration of intravenous antibiotic use while inpatient (<24 hours, ≥24 hours to ≤48 hours, >48 hours), identification of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) in culture, MRSA nasal colonization, and incision and drainage. RESULTS: A total of 139 patients were included in the analysis; 51 treated with LZD and 88 treated with TMP-SMX. Length of hospital stay was greater in the LZD group (6.05 days vs. 3.69 days [P = 0.023]), as was antibiotic use during hospitalization (98% [49/50] vs. 86% [77/90]; P = 0.019). The mean day supply of antibiotic dispensed at discharge was 10.18 in the LZD group and 9.64 in the TMP-SMX group (P = 0.48). Twenty-two percent (11/51) of patients treated with LZD and 18% (16/88) of those treated with TMP-SMX (P = 0.878) experienced clinical failure. Only receipt of antibiotics for 24–48 hours during hospitalization met criteria for inclusion in the multivariate analysis, but was not significantly associated with clinical failure (0.367 [95% CI 0.083–1.63]; P = 0.187). CONCLUSION: There was no difference in the rate of clinical failure between patients treated with LZD or TMP-SMX for severe ABSSSI. DISCLOSURES: All authors: No reported disclosures. Oxford University Press 2018-11-26 /pmc/articles/PMC6254073/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofy210.1633 Text en © The Author(s) 2018. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Infectious Diseases Society of America. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial reproduction and distribution of the work, in any medium, provided the original work is not altered or transformed in any way, and that the work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com
spellingShingle Abstracts
Tan, Xing
Linneman, Travis W
Moenster, Ryan P
1977. Comparative Effectiveness of Linezolid vs. Trimethoprim–Sulfamethoxazole for Acute Bacterial Skin and Skin Structure Infections (ABSSSIs) at a Veterans Affairs Hospital
title 1977. Comparative Effectiveness of Linezolid vs. Trimethoprim–Sulfamethoxazole for Acute Bacterial Skin and Skin Structure Infections (ABSSSIs) at a Veterans Affairs Hospital
title_full 1977. Comparative Effectiveness of Linezolid vs. Trimethoprim–Sulfamethoxazole for Acute Bacterial Skin and Skin Structure Infections (ABSSSIs) at a Veterans Affairs Hospital
title_fullStr 1977. Comparative Effectiveness of Linezolid vs. Trimethoprim–Sulfamethoxazole for Acute Bacterial Skin and Skin Structure Infections (ABSSSIs) at a Veterans Affairs Hospital
title_full_unstemmed 1977. Comparative Effectiveness of Linezolid vs. Trimethoprim–Sulfamethoxazole for Acute Bacterial Skin and Skin Structure Infections (ABSSSIs) at a Veterans Affairs Hospital
title_short 1977. Comparative Effectiveness of Linezolid vs. Trimethoprim–Sulfamethoxazole for Acute Bacterial Skin and Skin Structure Infections (ABSSSIs) at a Veterans Affairs Hospital
title_sort 1977. comparative effectiveness of linezolid vs. trimethoprim–sulfamethoxazole for acute bacterial skin and skin structure infections (absssis) at a veterans affairs hospital
topic Abstracts
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6254073/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofy210.1633
work_keys_str_mv AT tanxing 1977comparativeeffectivenessoflinezolidvstrimethoprimsulfamethoxazoleforacutebacterialskinandskinstructureinfectionsabsssisataveteransaffairshospital
AT linnemantravisw 1977comparativeeffectivenessoflinezolidvstrimethoprimsulfamethoxazoleforacutebacterialskinandskinstructureinfectionsabsssisataveteransaffairshospital
AT moensterryanp 1977comparativeeffectivenessoflinezolidvstrimethoprimsulfamethoxazoleforacutebacterialskinandskinstructureinfectionsabsssisataveteransaffairshospital