Cargando…

2415. Comparison of Minocycline MIC’s Obtained by Etest to Those Obtained by Broth Microdilution in a Bank of Isolates of Acinetobacter baumannii Collected in Southeastern Michigan

BACKGROUND: Minocycline is an important antibacterial for the management of AB infections. Discordance in tigecycline susceptibilities between BMD and ET has been as high as 43% (a ≥log 2 dilution higher MIC by ET). As many automated susceptibility panels do not include minocycline clinicians must r...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Parsons, Leo, Pogue, Jason M, Lephart, Paul, Boikov, Dina, Kaye, Keith, Dhar, Sorabh
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6254079/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofy210.2068
_version_ 1783373641263611904
author Parsons, Leo
Pogue, Jason M
Lephart, Paul
Boikov, Dina
Kaye, Keith
Dhar, Sorabh
author_facet Parsons, Leo
Pogue, Jason M
Lephart, Paul
Boikov, Dina
Kaye, Keith
Dhar, Sorabh
author_sort Parsons, Leo
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Minocycline is an important antibacterial for the management of AB infections. Discordance in tigecycline susceptibilities between BMD and ET has been as high as 43% (a ≥log 2 dilution higher MIC by ET). As many automated susceptibility panels do not include minocycline clinicians must rely on ET results. This analysis assesses the discordance between methodologies for minocycline and compares activity of minocycline and tigecycline against a clinical set of AB isolates from Southeast Michigan. METHODS: Testing using BMD and ET were done on 386 isolates of AB from 5 hospitals. Results were compared using FDA breakpoints with BMD considered the gold-standard. Correlations were defined as: (i) essential agreement (EA) if the ET MIC was identical to or 1 doubling dilution from the BMD MIC, (ii) categorical agreement (CA) if results via BMD and ET were the same susceptibility category, (iii) minor error if the isolate was intermediate by either test, but either susceptible or resistant by the other test, (iv) a major error if the isolate was false resistant by ET, and (v) a very major error if ET was false susceptible. Comparative BMD susceptibility between tigecycline and minocycline was also assessed. RESULTS: Of the 386 isolates of AB, 87% were susceptible to minocycline by BMD and 77% by ET (9.6% difference, P < 0.001). MIC comparisons are shown in Table 1. EA occurred in 80% of isolates and CA in 87%. Discordant results included 47 minor errors, 11 major errors, and 0 very major errors. 14% of isolates had >1 double dilution difference between the methodologies and 4% had >2 double dilution differences. Susceptibility rates to tigecycline and minocycline were both 87%, with 11% of tigecycline nonsusceptible isolates susceptible to minocycline and 4% of minocycline nonsusceptible isolates susceptible to tigecycline. CONCLUSION: Minocycline provides excellent activity against AB. ET provides reliable susceptibility results in comparison to BMD. DISCLOSURES: K. Kaye, Zavante Therapeutics, Inc.: Scientific Advisor, Consulting fee.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6254079
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-62540792018-11-28 2415. Comparison of Minocycline MIC’s Obtained by Etest to Those Obtained by Broth Microdilution in a Bank of Isolates of Acinetobacter baumannii Collected in Southeastern Michigan Parsons, Leo Pogue, Jason M Lephart, Paul Boikov, Dina Kaye, Keith Dhar, Sorabh Open Forum Infect Dis Abstracts BACKGROUND: Minocycline is an important antibacterial for the management of AB infections. Discordance in tigecycline susceptibilities between BMD and ET has been as high as 43% (a ≥log 2 dilution higher MIC by ET). As many automated susceptibility panels do not include minocycline clinicians must rely on ET results. This analysis assesses the discordance between methodologies for minocycline and compares activity of minocycline and tigecycline against a clinical set of AB isolates from Southeast Michigan. METHODS: Testing using BMD and ET were done on 386 isolates of AB from 5 hospitals. Results were compared using FDA breakpoints with BMD considered the gold-standard. Correlations were defined as: (i) essential agreement (EA) if the ET MIC was identical to or 1 doubling dilution from the BMD MIC, (ii) categorical agreement (CA) if results via BMD and ET were the same susceptibility category, (iii) minor error if the isolate was intermediate by either test, but either susceptible or resistant by the other test, (iv) a major error if the isolate was false resistant by ET, and (v) a very major error if ET was false susceptible. Comparative BMD susceptibility between tigecycline and minocycline was also assessed. RESULTS: Of the 386 isolates of AB, 87% were susceptible to minocycline by BMD and 77% by ET (9.6% difference, P < 0.001). MIC comparisons are shown in Table 1. EA occurred in 80% of isolates and CA in 87%. Discordant results included 47 minor errors, 11 major errors, and 0 very major errors. 14% of isolates had >1 double dilution difference between the methodologies and 4% had >2 double dilution differences. Susceptibility rates to tigecycline and minocycline were both 87%, with 11% of tigecycline nonsusceptible isolates susceptible to minocycline and 4% of minocycline nonsusceptible isolates susceptible to tigecycline. CONCLUSION: Minocycline provides excellent activity against AB. ET provides reliable susceptibility results in comparison to BMD. DISCLOSURES: K. Kaye, Zavante Therapeutics, Inc.: Scientific Advisor, Consulting fee. Oxford University Press 2018-11-26 /pmc/articles/PMC6254079/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofy210.2068 Text en © The Author(s) 2018. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Infectious Diseases Society of America. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial reproduction and distribution of the work, in any medium, provided the original work is not altered or transformed in any way, and that the work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com
spellingShingle Abstracts
Parsons, Leo
Pogue, Jason M
Lephart, Paul
Boikov, Dina
Kaye, Keith
Dhar, Sorabh
2415. Comparison of Minocycline MIC’s Obtained by Etest to Those Obtained by Broth Microdilution in a Bank of Isolates of Acinetobacter baumannii Collected in Southeastern Michigan
title 2415. Comparison of Minocycline MIC’s Obtained by Etest to Those Obtained by Broth Microdilution in a Bank of Isolates of Acinetobacter baumannii Collected in Southeastern Michigan
title_full 2415. Comparison of Minocycline MIC’s Obtained by Etest to Those Obtained by Broth Microdilution in a Bank of Isolates of Acinetobacter baumannii Collected in Southeastern Michigan
title_fullStr 2415. Comparison of Minocycline MIC’s Obtained by Etest to Those Obtained by Broth Microdilution in a Bank of Isolates of Acinetobacter baumannii Collected in Southeastern Michigan
title_full_unstemmed 2415. Comparison of Minocycline MIC’s Obtained by Etest to Those Obtained by Broth Microdilution in a Bank of Isolates of Acinetobacter baumannii Collected in Southeastern Michigan
title_short 2415. Comparison of Minocycline MIC’s Obtained by Etest to Those Obtained by Broth Microdilution in a Bank of Isolates of Acinetobacter baumannii Collected in Southeastern Michigan
title_sort 2415. comparison of minocycline mic’s obtained by etest to those obtained by broth microdilution in a bank of isolates of acinetobacter baumannii collected in southeastern michigan
topic Abstracts
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6254079/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofy210.2068
work_keys_str_mv AT parsonsleo 2415comparisonofminocyclinemicsobtainedbyetesttothoseobtainedbybrothmicrodilutioninabankofisolatesofacinetobacterbaumanniicollectedinsoutheasternmichigan
AT poguejasonm 2415comparisonofminocyclinemicsobtainedbyetesttothoseobtainedbybrothmicrodilutioninabankofisolatesofacinetobacterbaumanniicollectedinsoutheasternmichigan
AT lephartpaul 2415comparisonofminocyclinemicsobtainedbyetesttothoseobtainedbybrothmicrodilutioninabankofisolatesofacinetobacterbaumanniicollectedinsoutheasternmichigan
AT boikovdina 2415comparisonofminocyclinemicsobtainedbyetesttothoseobtainedbybrothmicrodilutioninabankofisolatesofacinetobacterbaumanniicollectedinsoutheasternmichigan
AT kayekeith 2415comparisonofminocyclinemicsobtainedbyetesttothoseobtainedbybrothmicrodilutioninabankofisolatesofacinetobacterbaumanniicollectedinsoutheasternmichigan
AT dharsorabh 2415comparisonofminocyclinemicsobtainedbyetesttothoseobtainedbybrothmicrodilutioninabankofisolatesofacinetobacterbaumanniicollectedinsoutheasternmichigan