Cargando…

1507. Evaluating the Effects of a “Urinalysis to Reflex Culture” Process Change in the Emergency Department (ED) at a Veterans Affairs (VA) Hospital

BACKGROUND: The ED environment makes proactive collection of urine cultures (UCs) favorable. However, unnecessary UCs can result in over-detection and over-treatment of asymptomatic bacteriuria (ASB). A previous analysis at the study facility found that UCs were collected frequently despite negative...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ismail, Georgiana, Patel, Ursula C, Suda, Katie J
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6254084/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofy210.1336
_version_ 1783373642496737280
author Ismail, Georgiana
Patel, Ursula C
Suda, Katie J
author_facet Ismail, Georgiana
Patel, Ursula C
Suda, Katie J
author_sort Ismail, Georgiana
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The ED environment makes proactive collection of urine cultures (UCs) favorable. However, unnecessary UCs can result in over-detection and over-treatment of asymptomatic bacteriuria (ASB). A previous analysis at the study facility found that UCs were collected frequently despite negative urinalyses (UA), which commonly resulted in unnecessary antibiotics. Our objective was to compare the frequency of inappropriate UC utilization and inappropriate antibiotic prescribing post implementation of a “Urinalysis to Reflex Culture” process change intervention. A secondary objective was to assess the frequency of health encounters for UTIs post implementation. METHODS: After education, an ED process change was implemented in October 2017. This included automatic UC cancellation if UAs had <5 WBC/HPF. An option for “do not cancel (DNC)” UC was available for specific conditions (eg. pregnancy) per guidelines. Data were prospectively collected for 3 months post-implementation and included UA/UC results, presence of UTI symptoms, antibiotics prescribed and healthcare utilization. Inappropriate UC was defined as a UC ordered despite negative UA in asymptomatic patients. Inappropriate antibiotic prescribing was defined as treatment in patients with ASB. A Student’s t-test and contingency tables were applied in SAS; significance was set at P ≤ 0.05. RESULTS: There were 684 UAs (37.2% post-intervention) evaluated from ED visits. Post-intervention (n = 255 UAs), 37.3% of UAs were negative with UCs cancelled. Of the remaining UAs, 37.3% were positive with a processed UC, 16.9% were ordered as DNC and 8.6% were ordered without a UC. UC processing despite a negative UA significantly decreased from 100% pre-intervention to 38.6% post-intervention (P < 0.001). Inappropriate antibiotics for ASB also decreased from 10.2% pre-intervention to 1.9% post-intervention (OR = 0.17; P < 0.0110). In patients with negative UAs, antibiotic prescribing decreased by 25.3% post-intervention (P = NS). No reports of outpatient, ED, or hospital visits for UTI symptoms were found within 7 days of initial UA post-intervention. CONCLUSION: A “UA to Reflex Culture” process change demonstrated a significant decrease in processing of inappropriate UCs and unnecessary antibiotics for ASB. There were no missed UTIs or other adverse patient outcomes. DISCLOSURES: All authors: No reported disclosures.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6254084
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-62540842018-11-28 1507. Evaluating the Effects of a “Urinalysis to Reflex Culture” Process Change in the Emergency Department (ED) at a Veterans Affairs (VA) Hospital Ismail, Georgiana Patel, Ursula C Suda, Katie J Open Forum Infect Dis Abstracts BACKGROUND: The ED environment makes proactive collection of urine cultures (UCs) favorable. However, unnecessary UCs can result in over-detection and over-treatment of asymptomatic bacteriuria (ASB). A previous analysis at the study facility found that UCs were collected frequently despite negative urinalyses (UA), which commonly resulted in unnecessary antibiotics. Our objective was to compare the frequency of inappropriate UC utilization and inappropriate antibiotic prescribing post implementation of a “Urinalysis to Reflex Culture” process change intervention. A secondary objective was to assess the frequency of health encounters for UTIs post implementation. METHODS: After education, an ED process change was implemented in October 2017. This included automatic UC cancellation if UAs had <5 WBC/HPF. An option for “do not cancel (DNC)” UC was available for specific conditions (eg. pregnancy) per guidelines. Data were prospectively collected for 3 months post-implementation and included UA/UC results, presence of UTI symptoms, antibiotics prescribed and healthcare utilization. Inappropriate UC was defined as a UC ordered despite negative UA in asymptomatic patients. Inappropriate antibiotic prescribing was defined as treatment in patients with ASB. A Student’s t-test and contingency tables were applied in SAS; significance was set at P ≤ 0.05. RESULTS: There were 684 UAs (37.2% post-intervention) evaluated from ED visits. Post-intervention (n = 255 UAs), 37.3% of UAs were negative with UCs cancelled. Of the remaining UAs, 37.3% were positive with a processed UC, 16.9% were ordered as DNC and 8.6% were ordered without a UC. UC processing despite a negative UA significantly decreased from 100% pre-intervention to 38.6% post-intervention (P < 0.001). Inappropriate antibiotics for ASB also decreased from 10.2% pre-intervention to 1.9% post-intervention (OR = 0.17; P < 0.0110). In patients with negative UAs, antibiotic prescribing decreased by 25.3% post-intervention (P = NS). No reports of outpatient, ED, or hospital visits for UTI symptoms were found within 7 days of initial UA post-intervention. CONCLUSION: A “UA to Reflex Culture” process change demonstrated a significant decrease in processing of inappropriate UCs and unnecessary antibiotics for ASB. There were no missed UTIs or other adverse patient outcomes. DISCLOSURES: All authors: No reported disclosures. Oxford University Press 2018-11-26 /pmc/articles/PMC6254084/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofy210.1336 Text en © The Author(s) 2018. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Infectious Diseases Society of America. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial reproduction and distribution of the work, in any medium, provided the original work is not altered or transformed in any way, and that the work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com
spellingShingle Abstracts
Ismail, Georgiana
Patel, Ursula C
Suda, Katie J
1507. Evaluating the Effects of a “Urinalysis to Reflex Culture” Process Change in the Emergency Department (ED) at a Veterans Affairs (VA) Hospital
title 1507. Evaluating the Effects of a “Urinalysis to Reflex Culture” Process Change in the Emergency Department (ED) at a Veterans Affairs (VA) Hospital
title_full 1507. Evaluating the Effects of a “Urinalysis to Reflex Culture” Process Change in the Emergency Department (ED) at a Veterans Affairs (VA) Hospital
title_fullStr 1507. Evaluating the Effects of a “Urinalysis to Reflex Culture” Process Change in the Emergency Department (ED) at a Veterans Affairs (VA) Hospital
title_full_unstemmed 1507. Evaluating the Effects of a “Urinalysis to Reflex Culture” Process Change in the Emergency Department (ED) at a Veterans Affairs (VA) Hospital
title_short 1507. Evaluating the Effects of a “Urinalysis to Reflex Culture” Process Change in the Emergency Department (ED) at a Veterans Affairs (VA) Hospital
title_sort 1507. evaluating the effects of a “urinalysis to reflex culture” process change in the emergency department (ed) at a veterans affairs (va) hospital
topic Abstracts
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6254084/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofy210.1336
work_keys_str_mv AT ismailgeorgiana 1507evaluatingtheeffectsofaurinalysistoreflexcultureprocesschangeintheemergencydepartmentedataveteransaffairsvahospital
AT patelursulac 1507evaluatingtheeffectsofaurinalysistoreflexcultureprocesschangeintheemergencydepartmentedataveteransaffairsvahospital
AT sudakatiej 1507evaluatingtheeffectsofaurinalysistoreflexcultureprocesschangeintheemergencydepartmentedataveteransaffairsvahospital