Cargando…

2106. What Metrics Should We Use to Evaluate CAUTI Performance for Inpatient Rehabilitation Units? An Evaluation of a Large, National Healthcare System

BACKGROUND: The National Healthcare Safety Network (NHSN)’s Targeted Assessment for Prevention (TAP) Strategy is a framework for quality improvement that offers a focused approach to infection prevention. The cumulative attributable difference (CAD) is used as a prioritization metric to identify are...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Sharma, Mamta, Battjes, Rebecca, Sturm, Lisa, Fakih, Mohamad
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6254104/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofy210.1762
_version_ 1783373647249932288
author Sharma, Mamta
Battjes, Rebecca
Sturm, Lisa
Fakih, Mohamad
author_facet Sharma, Mamta
Battjes, Rebecca
Sturm, Lisa
Fakih, Mohamad
author_sort Sharma, Mamta
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The National Healthcare Safety Network (NHSN)’s Targeted Assessment for Prevention (TAP) Strategy is a framework for quality improvement that offers a focused approach to infection prevention. The cumulative attributable difference (CAD) is used as a prioritization metric to identify areas with the highest burden of excess infections. The standardized utilization ratio (SUR) provides risk-adjusted urinary catheter metric beyond traditional device utilization ratios (DUR). We reviewed a TAP Report and SURs for all Inpatient Rehabilitation Facilities (IRF) within a large, national healthcare system. METHODS: Using the NHSN database, we generated a catheter-associated urinary tract infection (CAUTI) TAP Report for all IRFs across the system for calendar year 2017. The standardized infection ratio (SIR) goal was set at 0.75. CAD [observed events − (predicted events multiplied by SIR goal)] was calculated. A 12-month cumulative urinary catheter SUR was also computed in NHSN. RESULTS: Data from 26 IRFs were reviewed. Total CAUTIs ranged from 0 to 5 (median = 0, mean = 0.88). DURs ranged from 3 to 17%; CAD, −0.70 to 4.10; 12-month cumulative SURs, 0.35–2.14. Statistically significant SIRs were only calculated for two IRFs. Several IRFs with 0 infections had SURs > 1, and two IRFs with multiple CAUTIs had an SUR of ≤1 (table). CONCLUSION: CAD is an actionable prioritization metric for infection prevention in health systems and individual facilities. In populations where events are rare, however, the SUR can be an additional metric to reduce device-associated risks. Areas with high CAD/low SUR could be evaluated for other potential causal factors, including device insertion, care/maintenance techniques and accuracy of NHSN definition application. DISCLOSURES: All authors: No reported disclosures.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6254104
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-62541042018-11-28 2106. What Metrics Should We Use to Evaluate CAUTI Performance for Inpatient Rehabilitation Units? An Evaluation of a Large, National Healthcare System Sharma, Mamta Battjes, Rebecca Sturm, Lisa Fakih, Mohamad Open Forum Infect Dis Abstracts BACKGROUND: The National Healthcare Safety Network (NHSN)’s Targeted Assessment for Prevention (TAP) Strategy is a framework for quality improvement that offers a focused approach to infection prevention. The cumulative attributable difference (CAD) is used as a prioritization metric to identify areas with the highest burden of excess infections. The standardized utilization ratio (SUR) provides risk-adjusted urinary catheter metric beyond traditional device utilization ratios (DUR). We reviewed a TAP Report and SURs for all Inpatient Rehabilitation Facilities (IRF) within a large, national healthcare system. METHODS: Using the NHSN database, we generated a catheter-associated urinary tract infection (CAUTI) TAP Report for all IRFs across the system for calendar year 2017. The standardized infection ratio (SIR) goal was set at 0.75. CAD [observed events − (predicted events multiplied by SIR goal)] was calculated. A 12-month cumulative urinary catheter SUR was also computed in NHSN. RESULTS: Data from 26 IRFs were reviewed. Total CAUTIs ranged from 0 to 5 (median = 0, mean = 0.88). DURs ranged from 3 to 17%; CAD, −0.70 to 4.10; 12-month cumulative SURs, 0.35–2.14. Statistically significant SIRs were only calculated for two IRFs. Several IRFs with 0 infections had SURs > 1, and two IRFs with multiple CAUTIs had an SUR of ≤1 (table). CONCLUSION: CAD is an actionable prioritization metric for infection prevention in health systems and individual facilities. In populations where events are rare, however, the SUR can be an additional metric to reduce device-associated risks. Areas with high CAD/low SUR could be evaluated for other potential causal factors, including device insertion, care/maintenance techniques and accuracy of NHSN definition application. DISCLOSURES: All authors: No reported disclosures. Oxford University Press 2018-11-26 /pmc/articles/PMC6254104/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofy210.1762 Text en © The Author(s) 2018. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Infectious Diseases Society of America. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial reproduction and distribution of the work, in any medium, provided the original work is not altered or transformed in any way, and that the work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com
spellingShingle Abstracts
Sharma, Mamta
Battjes, Rebecca
Sturm, Lisa
Fakih, Mohamad
2106. What Metrics Should We Use to Evaluate CAUTI Performance for Inpatient Rehabilitation Units? An Evaluation of a Large, National Healthcare System
title 2106. What Metrics Should We Use to Evaluate CAUTI Performance for Inpatient Rehabilitation Units? An Evaluation of a Large, National Healthcare System
title_full 2106. What Metrics Should We Use to Evaluate CAUTI Performance for Inpatient Rehabilitation Units? An Evaluation of a Large, National Healthcare System
title_fullStr 2106. What Metrics Should We Use to Evaluate CAUTI Performance for Inpatient Rehabilitation Units? An Evaluation of a Large, National Healthcare System
title_full_unstemmed 2106. What Metrics Should We Use to Evaluate CAUTI Performance for Inpatient Rehabilitation Units? An Evaluation of a Large, National Healthcare System
title_short 2106. What Metrics Should We Use to Evaluate CAUTI Performance for Inpatient Rehabilitation Units? An Evaluation of a Large, National Healthcare System
title_sort 2106. what metrics should we use to evaluate cauti performance for inpatient rehabilitation units? an evaluation of a large, national healthcare system
topic Abstracts
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6254104/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofy210.1762
work_keys_str_mv AT sharmamamta 2106whatmetricsshouldweusetoevaluatecautiperformanceforinpatientrehabilitationunitsanevaluationofalargenationalhealthcaresystem
AT battjesrebecca 2106whatmetricsshouldweusetoevaluatecautiperformanceforinpatientrehabilitationunitsanevaluationofalargenationalhealthcaresystem
AT sturmlisa 2106whatmetricsshouldweusetoevaluatecautiperformanceforinpatientrehabilitationunitsanevaluationofalargenationalhealthcaresystem
AT fakihmohamad 2106whatmetricsshouldweusetoevaluatecautiperformanceforinpatientrehabilitationunitsanevaluationofalargenationalhealthcaresystem