Cargando…

1526. Oral Fosfomycin Use for Urinary Tract Infections and Its Clinical Impact on Hospital Stay

BACKGROUND: Oral fosfomycin is a treatment option for urinary tract infections (UTI) caused by multi-drug-resistant organisms (MDRO). The objective of the study was to describe the prescribing pattern of fosfomycin and determine its role in (1) preventing hospital admissions for patients seen in the...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Mai, Christina, Donaghy, Henry, Doan, Thien-Ly
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6254172/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofy210.1355
_version_ 1783373663443091456
author Mai, Christina
Donaghy, Henry
Doan, Thien-Ly
author_facet Mai, Christina
Donaghy, Henry
Doan, Thien-Ly
author_sort Mai, Christina
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Oral fosfomycin is a treatment option for urinary tract infections (UTI) caused by multi-drug-resistant organisms (MDRO). The objective of the study was to describe the prescribing pattern of fosfomycin and determine its role in (1) preventing hospital admissions for patients seen in the emergency department or (2) promoting earlier discharges for admitted patients. METHODS: This retrospective chart review evaluated adults that received at least one dose of fosfomycin during the period 2014–2017. Information was collected using electronic medical records (e.g., demographics, symptoms, dose/duration of fosfomycin, urine culture results, length of stay, and hospital readmission). Statistical analysis was performed using descriptive statistics. RESULTS: Forty-three patients were included (60.5% females). Nearly half of the population (48.8%) had a history of recurrent UTIs. Patients received fosfomycin for cystitis (58.1%), pyelonephritis (34.9%), and asymptomatic bacteriuria (7%). Only two patients received >1 dose. Empiric use of fosfomycin was seen in only 9.3%. Of those treated based on culture results, 84.6% of patients had MRDOs (29 ESBL, 2 VRE, 1 KPC, 1 resistant-Pseudomonas). No isolates had fosfomycin susceptibilities performed. In 72% of the time, patients had no other oral options. In 74.3% of the time, fosfomycin was used as step-down therapy from intravenous (IV) antibiotics (e.g., carbapenems 69%, ceftriaxone 13.8%). Infectious Diseases was consulted on 81.4% of cases. Seven percent of patients had documented allergies to the preferred agent. Treatment success was seen in 93% of patients, while three patients failed treatment requiring readmission for IV therapy. Fosfomycin use resulted in earlier discharge in 75.8% of cases (range of 1–6 days, mean 2.92 hospital days avoided per patient). For those who received fosfomycin as part of their emergency visit, 90% (9 of 10) were able to avoid hospitalization. CONCLUSION: In our study, fosfomycin was used in UTI caused by MRDOs, with treatment successfully demonstrated in a majority of patients. Fosfomycin allowed for patients to avoid hospitalization or promoted earlier discharge, on average 3 days sooner than anticipated. Use of fosfomycin should be considered in appropriate patients in an effort to decrease length-of-stay or altogether avoid hospitalization. DISCLOSURES: All authors: No reported disclosures.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6254172
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-62541722018-11-28 1526. Oral Fosfomycin Use for Urinary Tract Infections and Its Clinical Impact on Hospital Stay Mai, Christina Donaghy, Henry Doan, Thien-Ly Open Forum Infect Dis Abstracts BACKGROUND: Oral fosfomycin is a treatment option for urinary tract infections (UTI) caused by multi-drug-resistant organisms (MDRO). The objective of the study was to describe the prescribing pattern of fosfomycin and determine its role in (1) preventing hospital admissions for patients seen in the emergency department or (2) promoting earlier discharges for admitted patients. METHODS: This retrospective chart review evaluated adults that received at least one dose of fosfomycin during the period 2014–2017. Information was collected using electronic medical records (e.g., demographics, symptoms, dose/duration of fosfomycin, urine culture results, length of stay, and hospital readmission). Statistical analysis was performed using descriptive statistics. RESULTS: Forty-three patients were included (60.5% females). Nearly half of the population (48.8%) had a history of recurrent UTIs. Patients received fosfomycin for cystitis (58.1%), pyelonephritis (34.9%), and asymptomatic bacteriuria (7%). Only two patients received >1 dose. Empiric use of fosfomycin was seen in only 9.3%. Of those treated based on culture results, 84.6% of patients had MRDOs (29 ESBL, 2 VRE, 1 KPC, 1 resistant-Pseudomonas). No isolates had fosfomycin susceptibilities performed. In 72% of the time, patients had no other oral options. In 74.3% of the time, fosfomycin was used as step-down therapy from intravenous (IV) antibiotics (e.g., carbapenems 69%, ceftriaxone 13.8%). Infectious Diseases was consulted on 81.4% of cases. Seven percent of patients had documented allergies to the preferred agent. Treatment success was seen in 93% of patients, while three patients failed treatment requiring readmission for IV therapy. Fosfomycin use resulted in earlier discharge in 75.8% of cases (range of 1–6 days, mean 2.92 hospital days avoided per patient). For those who received fosfomycin as part of their emergency visit, 90% (9 of 10) were able to avoid hospitalization. CONCLUSION: In our study, fosfomycin was used in UTI caused by MRDOs, with treatment successfully demonstrated in a majority of patients. Fosfomycin allowed for patients to avoid hospitalization or promoted earlier discharge, on average 3 days sooner than anticipated. Use of fosfomycin should be considered in appropriate patients in an effort to decrease length-of-stay or altogether avoid hospitalization. DISCLOSURES: All authors: No reported disclosures. Oxford University Press 2018-11-26 /pmc/articles/PMC6254172/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofy210.1355 Text en © The Author(s) 2018. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Infectious Diseases Society of America. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial reproduction and distribution of the work, in any medium, provided the original work is not altered or transformed in any way, and that the work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com
spellingShingle Abstracts
Mai, Christina
Donaghy, Henry
Doan, Thien-Ly
1526. Oral Fosfomycin Use for Urinary Tract Infections and Its Clinical Impact on Hospital Stay
title 1526. Oral Fosfomycin Use for Urinary Tract Infections and Its Clinical Impact on Hospital Stay
title_full 1526. Oral Fosfomycin Use for Urinary Tract Infections and Its Clinical Impact on Hospital Stay
title_fullStr 1526. Oral Fosfomycin Use for Urinary Tract Infections and Its Clinical Impact on Hospital Stay
title_full_unstemmed 1526. Oral Fosfomycin Use for Urinary Tract Infections and Its Clinical Impact on Hospital Stay
title_short 1526. Oral Fosfomycin Use for Urinary Tract Infections and Its Clinical Impact on Hospital Stay
title_sort 1526. oral fosfomycin use for urinary tract infections and its clinical impact on hospital stay
topic Abstracts
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6254172/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofy210.1355
work_keys_str_mv AT maichristina 1526oralfosfomycinuseforurinarytractinfectionsanditsclinicalimpactonhospitalstay
AT donaghyhenry 1526oralfosfomycinuseforurinarytractinfectionsanditsclinicalimpactonhospitalstay
AT doanthienly 1526oralfosfomycinuseforurinarytractinfectionsanditsclinicalimpactonhospitalstay