Cargando…

1161. Infection Control After Debridement of Brucella melitensis Hardware Infection

BACKGROUND: Brucellosis is the most common laboratory-acquired bacterial infection, according to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), despite the rare incidence of Brucellosis in the population at large. A 34-year-old man presented with pain and swelling of the left leg, where he ha...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Novack, Amanda
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6254182/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofy210.994
_version_ 1783373665851670528
author Novack, Amanda
author_facet Novack, Amanda
author_sort Novack, Amanda
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Brucellosis is the most common laboratory-acquired bacterial infection, according to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), despite the rare incidence of Brucellosis in the population at large. A 34-year-old man presented with pain and swelling of the left leg, where he had previously sustained an open tibia fracture 1 year prior. After the initial injury, he underwent four corrective surgeries (including bone graft and internal-fixation) and was asymptomatic for 6 months before these new symptoms developed. MRI revealed a 6.5 × 5.1 × 2.7 cm abscess and tibial osteomyelitis. Surgical staff performed an aggressive incision and drainage (I&D) with saucerization of the tibia, to treat what seemed to be a routine hardware infection. Five days later, tissue cultures grew Brucella melitensis. Upon further questioning, the patient described butchering a wild boar 10 days prior to symptom onset. METHODS: The CDC provides guidance on serological testing and post-exposure prophylaxis (PEP) for persons exposed to Brucella in the laboratory setting. Upon identification of this patient’s Brucella isolates, infection control staff identified all laboratory workers that met CDC criteria for “high risk” exposure, as well as other healthcare workers (HCW) exposed to aerosolized infectious material (including those workers in the operating room during pulse lavage of the abscess). RESULTS: Staff identified 34 HCW with presumed high-risk exposure, including 19 laboratory personnel, 13 operating room personnel, and two patient care technicians. Baseline serology was obtained on all 34 HCW, and PEP with rifampin and doxycycline was prescribed for each. Nine of the exposed employees changed PEP therapy due to intolerance, and follow-up serology was obtained on 32 of the 34 healthcare workers, with zero seroconversions found. CONCLUSION: Brucellosis is a rare disease in clinical practice, so a high index of suspicion is necessary to enact appropriate precautions before widespread exposures. When exposure is identified after the fact, efficient protocols should be in place to identify all susceptible individuals. Due to the low infectious dose of Brucella melitensis, CDC guidance should be expanded to include aerosolizing procedures outside of the laboratory. DISCLOSURES: All authors: No reported disclosures.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6254182
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-62541822018-11-28 1161. Infection Control After Debridement of Brucella melitensis Hardware Infection Novack, Amanda Open Forum Infect Dis Abstracts BACKGROUND: Brucellosis is the most common laboratory-acquired bacterial infection, according to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), despite the rare incidence of Brucellosis in the population at large. A 34-year-old man presented with pain and swelling of the left leg, where he had previously sustained an open tibia fracture 1 year prior. After the initial injury, he underwent four corrective surgeries (including bone graft and internal-fixation) and was asymptomatic for 6 months before these new symptoms developed. MRI revealed a 6.5 × 5.1 × 2.7 cm abscess and tibial osteomyelitis. Surgical staff performed an aggressive incision and drainage (I&D) with saucerization of the tibia, to treat what seemed to be a routine hardware infection. Five days later, tissue cultures grew Brucella melitensis. Upon further questioning, the patient described butchering a wild boar 10 days prior to symptom onset. METHODS: The CDC provides guidance on serological testing and post-exposure prophylaxis (PEP) for persons exposed to Brucella in the laboratory setting. Upon identification of this patient’s Brucella isolates, infection control staff identified all laboratory workers that met CDC criteria for “high risk” exposure, as well as other healthcare workers (HCW) exposed to aerosolized infectious material (including those workers in the operating room during pulse lavage of the abscess). RESULTS: Staff identified 34 HCW with presumed high-risk exposure, including 19 laboratory personnel, 13 operating room personnel, and two patient care technicians. Baseline serology was obtained on all 34 HCW, and PEP with rifampin and doxycycline was prescribed for each. Nine of the exposed employees changed PEP therapy due to intolerance, and follow-up serology was obtained on 32 of the 34 healthcare workers, with zero seroconversions found. CONCLUSION: Brucellosis is a rare disease in clinical practice, so a high index of suspicion is necessary to enact appropriate precautions before widespread exposures. When exposure is identified after the fact, efficient protocols should be in place to identify all susceptible individuals. Due to the low infectious dose of Brucella melitensis, CDC guidance should be expanded to include aerosolizing procedures outside of the laboratory. DISCLOSURES: All authors: No reported disclosures. Oxford University Press 2018-11-26 /pmc/articles/PMC6254182/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofy210.994 Text en © The Author(s) 2018. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Infectious Diseases Society of America. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial reproduction and distribution of the work, in any medium, provided the original work is not altered or transformed in any way, and that the work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com
spellingShingle Abstracts
Novack, Amanda
1161. Infection Control After Debridement of Brucella melitensis Hardware Infection
title 1161. Infection Control After Debridement of Brucella melitensis Hardware Infection
title_full 1161. Infection Control After Debridement of Brucella melitensis Hardware Infection
title_fullStr 1161. Infection Control After Debridement of Brucella melitensis Hardware Infection
title_full_unstemmed 1161. Infection Control After Debridement of Brucella melitensis Hardware Infection
title_short 1161. Infection Control After Debridement of Brucella melitensis Hardware Infection
title_sort 1161. infection control after debridement of brucella melitensis hardware infection
topic Abstracts
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6254182/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofy210.994
work_keys_str_mv AT novackamanda 1161infectioncontrolafterdebridementofbrucellamelitensishardwareinfection