Cargando…

2013. Procalcitonin Current State Evaluation Within a Large Health System

BACKGROUND: Procalcitonin is a hormone precursor that has been identified as a marker for bacterial infections. Procalcitonin increases as the body mounts an inflammatory response against infection, then returns to its normal range once the response subsides. Studies have shown that reduced procalci...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Pena, Kelsey, Cooper, Mandelin, Greer, Nickie, Elders, Ty, Septimus, Edward
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6254253/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofy210.1669
_version_ 1783373682378276864
author Pena, Kelsey
Cooper, Mandelin
Greer, Nickie
Elders, Ty
Septimus, Edward
author_facet Pena, Kelsey
Cooper, Mandelin
Greer, Nickie
Elders, Ty
Septimus, Edward
author_sort Pena, Kelsey
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Procalcitonin is a hormone precursor that has been identified as a marker for bacterial infections. Procalcitonin increases as the body mounts an inflammatory response against infection, then returns to its normal range once the response subsides. Studies have shown that reduced procalcitonin levels may support antibiotic discontinuation. The purpose of this study was to determine how procalcitonin is being utilized at facilities within a large health system. METHODS: From August 1, 2016 through July 31, 2017 facilities with a minimum of 30 procalcitonin levels were assessed. Patients who received antibiotics, with and without procalcitonin levels, were evaluated. The primary outcome was the frequency of multiple procalcitonin levels drawn 24–72 hours apart. Secondary analysis included baseline procalcitonin timing, antibiotic discontinuation based on procalcitonin thresholds (<0.5 or 80% reduction from a peak level), and monitoring patterns related to outcomes such as hospital length of stay (LOS), intensive care unit LOS, antibiotic duration of therapy, and hospital-onset Clostridium difficile infections. Data were obtained from a centralized, enterprise data warehouse. The study was approved by the University of Tennessee Health Science Center Institutional Review Board. RESULTS: A total of 1,005,377 patients on antibiotics from 136 facilities were included. Procalcitonin levels were evaluated for 103,913 of these patients. Within the procalcitonin group, 96% had their first procalcitonin drawn within 36 hours of the first antibiotic dose and 70% of patients had a single procalcitonin level drawn. Of those with multiple levels, 23% had levels drawn 24–72 hours apart. Only 32% had antibiotic therapy discontinued within 36 hours of meeting threshold. CONCLUSION: There is wide variability among facilities regarding procalcitonin use and monitoring. Baseline procalcitonin levels were drawn appropriately for most patients. Opportunities exist to standardize monitoring and encourage discontinuation of antibiotics when thresholds are reached. The findings of this analysis will be used to aid efforts to establish a health-system wide procalcitonin monitoring protocol to support antibiotic and laboratory stewardship. DISCLOSURES: All authors: No reported disclosures.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6254253
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-62542532018-11-28 2013. Procalcitonin Current State Evaluation Within a Large Health System Pena, Kelsey Cooper, Mandelin Greer, Nickie Elders, Ty Septimus, Edward Open Forum Infect Dis Abstracts BACKGROUND: Procalcitonin is a hormone precursor that has been identified as a marker for bacterial infections. Procalcitonin increases as the body mounts an inflammatory response against infection, then returns to its normal range once the response subsides. Studies have shown that reduced procalcitonin levels may support antibiotic discontinuation. The purpose of this study was to determine how procalcitonin is being utilized at facilities within a large health system. METHODS: From August 1, 2016 through July 31, 2017 facilities with a minimum of 30 procalcitonin levels were assessed. Patients who received antibiotics, with and without procalcitonin levels, were evaluated. The primary outcome was the frequency of multiple procalcitonin levels drawn 24–72 hours apart. Secondary analysis included baseline procalcitonin timing, antibiotic discontinuation based on procalcitonin thresholds (<0.5 or 80% reduction from a peak level), and monitoring patterns related to outcomes such as hospital length of stay (LOS), intensive care unit LOS, antibiotic duration of therapy, and hospital-onset Clostridium difficile infections. Data were obtained from a centralized, enterprise data warehouse. The study was approved by the University of Tennessee Health Science Center Institutional Review Board. RESULTS: A total of 1,005,377 patients on antibiotics from 136 facilities were included. Procalcitonin levels were evaluated for 103,913 of these patients. Within the procalcitonin group, 96% had their first procalcitonin drawn within 36 hours of the first antibiotic dose and 70% of patients had a single procalcitonin level drawn. Of those with multiple levels, 23% had levels drawn 24–72 hours apart. Only 32% had antibiotic therapy discontinued within 36 hours of meeting threshold. CONCLUSION: There is wide variability among facilities regarding procalcitonin use and monitoring. Baseline procalcitonin levels were drawn appropriately for most patients. Opportunities exist to standardize monitoring and encourage discontinuation of antibiotics when thresholds are reached. The findings of this analysis will be used to aid efforts to establish a health-system wide procalcitonin monitoring protocol to support antibiotic and laboratory stewardship. DISCLOSURES: All authors: No reported disclosures. Oxford University Press 2018-11-26 /pmc/articles/PMC6254253/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofy210.1669 Text en © The Author(s) 2018. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Infectious Diseases Society of America. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial reproduction and distribution of the work, in any medium, provided the original work is not altered or transformed in any way, and that the work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com
spellingShingle Abstracts
Pena, Kelsey
Cooper, Mandelin
Greer, Nickie
Elders, Ty
Septimus, Edward
2013. Procalcitonin Current State Evaluation Within a Large Health System
title 2013. Procalcitonin Current State Evaluation Within a Large Health System
title_full 2013. Procalcitonin Current State Evaluation Within a Large Health System
title_fullStr 2013. Procalcitonin Current State Evaluation Within a Large Health System
title_full_unstemmed 2013. Procalcitonin Current State Evaluation Within a Large Health System
title_short 2013. Procalcitonin Current State Evaluation Within a Large Health System
title_sort 2013. procalcitonin current state evaluation within a large health system
topic Abstracts
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6254253/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofy210.1669
work_keys_str_mv AT penakelsey 2013procalcitonincurrentstateevaluationwithinalargehealthsystem
AT coopermandelin 2013procalcitonincurrentstateevaluationwithinalargehealthsystem
AT greernickie 2013procalcitonincurrentstateevaluationwithinalargehealthsystem
AT eldersty 2013procalcitonincurrentstateevaluationwithinalargehealthsystem
AT septimusedward 2013procalcitonincurrentstateevaluationwithinalargehealthsystem