Cargando…

1242. Quantitative Analysis of Microbial Burden on LTCF Environmental Surfaces

BACKGROUND: There is a lack of data on environmental surface contamination in long-term care facilities (LTCF), despite multiple reports of outbreaks of multi-drug-resistant organisms in these settings. Therefore, we conducted a quantitative analysis of the microbial burden and prevalence of epidemi...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: DiBiase, Lauren, Powell, Amy, Gergen, Maria, Weber, David J, Sickbert-Bennett, Emily E, Rutala, William A
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6254269/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofy210.1075
_version_ 1783373684231110656
author DiBiase, Lauren
Powell, Amy
Gergen, Maria
Weber, David J
Sickbert-Bennett, Emily E
Rutala, William A
author_facet DiBiase, Lauren
Powell, Amy
Gergen, Maria
Weber, David J
Sickbert-Bennett, Emily E
Rutala, William A
author_sort DiBiase, Lauren
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: There is a lack of data on environmental surface contamination in long-term care facilities (LTCF), despite multiple reports of outbreaks of multi-drug-resistant organisms in these settings. Therefore, we conducted a quantitative analysis of the microbial burden and prevalence of epidemiologically important pathogens (EIP) found on LTCF environmental surfaces. METHODS: Microbiological samples were collected using Rodac plates from resident rooms and common areas in five LTCFs. At each facility, five samples from up to 10 different available environmental surfaces were collected from a room of a resident reported to be colonized with EIP, as well as from a room of a resident reported to be non-colonized. In addition, five samples from up to 10 different environmental surfaces were collected from two common areas in the facility. EIPs were defined as MRSA, VRE, C. difficile and multi-drug-resistant Gram negative bacilli. Data were analyzed for each environmental site sampled in a resident room or common area based on total bacterial colony forming units (CFU), mean CFU per Rodac, total EIP by site, and mean EIP counts per Rodac. RESULTS: The below table summarizes total EIP recovered from environmental sites by reported EIP colonization status of the resident. Rooms of residents with reported colonization had much greater EIP counts per Rodac (8.32, 95% CI 8.05, 8.60) than rooms of non-colonized residents (0.78, 95% CI 0.70, 0.86). MRSA was the most common EIP recovered from Rodacs, followed by C. difficile. Very few EIPs were recovered from the common areas sampled at these LTCFs. CONCLUSION: We found varying levels of CFU and EIP on environmental sites at LTCFs. Colonization status of a resident was a strong predictor of higher levels of EIP being recovered from his/her room. DISCLOSURES: All authors: No reported disclosures.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6254269
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-62542692018-11-28 1242. Quantitative Analysis of Microbial Burden on LTCF Environmental Surfaces DiBiase, Lauren Powell, Amy Gergen, Maria Weber, David J Sickbert-Bennett, Emily E Rutala, William A Open Forum Infect Dis Abstracts BACKGROUND: There is a lack of data on environmental surface contamination in long-term care facilities (LTCF), despite multiple reports of outbreaks of multi-drug-resistant organisms in these settings. Therefore, we conducted a quantitative analysis of the microbial burden and prevalence of epidemiologically important pathogens (EIP) found on LTCF environmental surfaces. METHODS: Microbiological samples were collected using Rodac plates from resident rooms and common areas in five LTCFs. At each facility, five samples from up to 10 different available environmental surfaces were collected from a room of a resident reported to be colonized with EIP, as well as from a room of a resident reported to be non-colonized. In addition, five samples from up to 10 different environmental surfaces were collected from two common areas in the facility. EIPs were defined as MRSA, VRE, C. difficile and multi-drug-resistant Gram negative bacilli. Data were analyzed for each environmental site sampled in a resident room or common area based on total bacterial colony forming units (CFU), mean CFU per Rodac, total EIP by site, and mean EIP counts per Rodac. RESULTS: The below table summarizes total EIP recovered from environmental sites by reported EIP colonization status of the resident. Rooms of residents with reported colonization had much greater EIP counts per Rodac (8.32, 95% CI 8.05, 8.60) than rooms of non-colonized residents (0.78, 95% CI 0.70, 0.86). MRSA was the most common EIP recovered from Rodacs, followed by C. difficile. Very few EIPs were recovered from the common areas sampled at these LTCFs. CONCLUSION: We found varying levels of CFU and EIP on environmental sites at LTCFs. Colonization status of a resident was a strong predictor of higher levels of EIP being recovered from his/her room. DISCLOSURES: All authors: No reported disclosures. Oxford University Press 2018-11-26 /pmc/articles/PMC6254269/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofy210.1075 Text en © The Author(s) 2018. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Infectious Diseases Society of America. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial reproduction and distribution of the work, in any medium, provided the original work is not altered or transformed in any way, and that the work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com
spellingShingle Abstracts
DiBiase, Lauren
Powell, Amy
Gergen, Maria
Weber, David J
Sickbert-Bennett, Emily E
Rutala, William A
1242. Quantitative Analysis of Microbial Burden on LTCF Environmental Surfaces
title 1242. Quantitative Analysis of Microbial Burden on LTCF Environmental Surfaces
title_full 1242. Quantitative Analysis of Microbial Burden on LTCF Environmental Surfaces
title_fullStr 1242. Quantitative Analysis of Microbial Burden on LTCF Environmental Surfaces
title_full_unstemmed 1242. Quantitative Analysis of Microbial Burden on LTCF Environmental Surfaces
title_short 1242. Quantitative Analysis of Microbial Burden on LTCF Environmental Surfaces
title_sort 1242. quantitative analysis of microbial burden on ltcf environmental surfaces
topic Abstracts
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6254269/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofy210.1075
work_keys_str_mv AT dibiaselauren 1242quantitativeanalysisofmicrobialburdenonltcfenvironmentalsurfaces
AT powellamy 1242quantitativeanalysisofmicrobialburdenonltcfenvironmentalsurfaces
AT gergenmaria 1242quantitativeanalysisofmicrobialburdenonltcfenvironmentalsurfaces
AT weberdavidj 1242quantitativeanalysisofmicrobialburdenonltcfenvironmentalsurfaces
AT sickbertbennettemilye 1242quantitativeanalysisofmicrobialburdenonltcfenvironmentalsurfaces
AT rutalawilliama 1242quantitativeanalysisofmicrobialburdenonltcfenvironmentalsurfaces