Cargando…
504. Change in Clostridium difficile Strain-Type Distribution After Implementation of Diagnostic Stewardship
BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to evaluate the change in strain-type distribution after eliminating testing of formed and laxative induced diarrheal stool. METHODS: Beginning in July 2013, all Clostridium difficile-positive stool samples by Cepheid’s GeneXpert were routinely typed using Multi...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Oxford University Press
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6254506/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofy210.513 |
_version_ | 1783373729899741184 |
---|---|
author | McMillen, Tracy Chow, Hoi Yan Aslam, Anoshé Brite, Jennifer Babady, N Esther Kamboj, Mini |
author_facet | McMillen, Tracy Chow, Hoi Yan Aslam, Anoshé Brite, Jennifer Babady, N Esther Kamboj, Mini |
author_sort | McMillen, Tracy |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to evaluate the change in strain-type distribution after eliminating testing of formed and laxative induced diarrheal stool. METHODS: Beginning in July 2013, all Clostridium difficile-positive stool samples by Cepheid’s GeneXpert were routinely typed using Multi-Locus Sequence Typing (MLST). MLST was performed as previously described (1). After implementation of rejection policy and re-education of staff, strain type (ST) distribution among tested samples were analyzed and compared with historic data. RESULTS: After evaluation of our historical typing data the 10 most frequent ST were identified. Diagnostic stewardship led to 40.0% reduction in testing volume, the positivity rate increased from 12.0% to 12.6%. The frequency distribution of threemost prevalent strain types (MLST-2, 8, and 42) declined by 38%, 60%, and 42%, respectively. The absolute number of epidemic strains, ST-1 and ST-11, remained unchanged and the frequency distribution increased from 9.6% to 14.0%. No clonal outbreaks were detected during this time. CONCLUSION: Implementation of diagnostic stewardship led to a reduction in recovery of endemic strains without substantial impact on detection of hypervirulent or epidemic strains. DISCLOSURES: All authors: No reported disclosures. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6254506 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | Oxford University Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-62545062018-11-28 504. Change in Clostridium difficile Strain-Type Distribution After Implementation of Diagnostic Stewardship McMillen, Tracy Chow, Hoi Yan Aslam, Anoshé Brite, Jennifer Babady, N Esther Kamboj, Mini Open Forum Infect Dis Abstracts BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to evaluate the change in strain-type distribution after eliminating testing of formed and laxative induced diarrheal stool. METHODS: Beginning in July 2013, all Clostridium difficile-positive stool samples by Cepheid’s GeneXpert were routinely typed using Multi-Locus Sequence Typing (MLST). MLST was performed as previously described (1). After implementation of rejection policy and re-education of staff, strain type (ST) distribution among tested samples were analyzed and compared with historic data. RESULTS: After evaluation of our historical typing data the 10 most frequent ST were identified. Diagnostic stewardship led to 40.0% reduction in testing volume, the positivity rate increased from 12.0% to 12.6%. The frequency distribution of threemost prevalent strain types (MLST-2, 8, and 42) declined by 38%, 60%, and 42%, respectively. The absolute number of epidemic strains, ST-1 and ST-11, remained unchanged and the frequency distribution increased from 9.6% to 14.0%. No clonal outbreaks were detected during this time. CONCLUSION: Implementation of diagnostic stewardship led to a reduction in recovery of endemic strains without substantial impact on detection of hypervirulent or epidemic strains. DISCLOSURES: All authors: No reported disclosures. Oxford University Press 2018-11-26 /pmc/articles/PMC6254506/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofy210.513 Text en © The Author(s) 2018. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Infectious Diseases Society of America. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial reproduction and distribution of the work, in any medium, provided the original work is not altered or transformed in any way, and that the work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com |
spellingShingle | Abstracts McMillen, Tracy Chow, Hoi Yan Aslam, Anoshé Brite, Jennifer Babady, N Esther Kamboj, Mini 504. Change in Clostridium difficile Strain-Type Distribution After Implementation of Diagnostic Stewardship |
title | 504. Change in Clostridium difficile Strain-Type Distribution After Implementation of Diagnostic Stewardship |
title_full | 504. Change in Clostridium difficile Strain-Type Distribution After Implementation of Diagnostic Stewardship |
title_fullStr | 504. Change in Clostridium difficile Strain-Type Distribution After Implementation of Diagnostic Stewardship |
title_full_unstemmed | 504. Change in Clostridium difficile Strain-Type Distribution After Implementation of Diagnostic Stewardship |
title_short | 504. Change in Clostridium difficile Strain-Type Distribution After Implementation of Diagnostic Stewardship |
title_sort | 504. change in clostridium difficile strain-type distribution after implementation of diagnostic stewardship |
topic | Abstracts |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6254506/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofy210.513 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT mcmillentracy 504changeinclostridiumdifficilestraintypedistributionafterimplementationofdiagnosticstewardship AT chowhoiyan 504changeinclostridiumdifficilestraintypedistributionafterimplementationofdiagnosticstewardship AT aslamanoshe 504changeinclostridiumdifficilestraintypedistributionafterimplementationofdiagnosticstewardship AT britejennifer 504changeinclostridiumdifficilestraintypedistributionafterimplementationofdiagnosticstewardship AT babadynesther 504changeinclostridiumdifficilestraintypedistributionafterimplementationofdiagnosticstewardship AT kambojmini 504changeinclostridiumdifficilestraintypedistributionafterimplementationofdiagnosticstewardship |