Cargando…

504. Change in Clostridium difficile Strain-Type Distribution After Implementation of Diagnostic Stewardship

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to evaluate the change in strain-type distribution after eliminating testing of formed and laxative induced diarrheal stool. METHODS: Beginning in July 2013, all Clostridium difficile-positive stool samples by Cepheid’s GeneXpert were routinely typed using Multi...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: McMillen, Tracy, Chow, Hoi Yan, Aslam, Anoshé, Brite, Jennifer, Babady, N Esther, Kamboj, Mini
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6254506/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofy210.513
_version_ 1783373729899741184
author McMillen, Tracy
Chow, Hoi Yan
Aslam, Anoshé
Brite, Jennifer
Babady, N Esther
Kamboj, Mini
author_facet McMillen, Tracy
Chow, Hoi Yan
Aslam, Anoshé
Brite, Jennifer
Babady, N Esther
Kamboj, Mini
author_sort McMillen, Tracy
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to evaluate the change in strain-type distribution after eliminating testing of formed and laxative induced diarrheal stool. METHODS: Beginning in July 2013, all Clostridium difficile-positive stool samples by Cepheid’s GeneXpert were routinely typed using Multi-Locus Sequence Typing (MLST). MLST was performed as previously described (1). After implementation of rejection policy and re-education of staff, strain type (ST) distribution among tested samples were analyzed and compared with historic data. RESULTS: After evaluation of our historical typing data the 10 most frequent ST were identified. Diagnostic stewardship led to 40.0% reduction in testing volume, the positivity rate increased from 12.0% to 12.6%. The frequency distribution of threemost prevalent strain types (MLST-2, 8, and 42) declined by 38%, 60%, and 42%, respectively. The absolute number of epidemic strains, ST-1 and ST-11, remained unchanged and the frequency distribution increased from 9.6% to 14.0%. No clonal outbreaks were detected during this time. CONCLUSION: Implementation of diagnostic stewardship led to a reduction in recovery of endemic strains without substantial impact on detection of hypervirulent or epidemic strains. DISCLOSURES: All authors: No reported disclosures.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6254506
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-62545062018-11-28 504. Change in Clostridium difficile Strain-Type Distribution After Implementation of Diagnostic Stewardship McMillen, Tracy Chow, Hoi Yan Aslam, Anoshé Brite, Jennifer Babady, N Esther Kamboj, Mini Open Forum Infect Dis Abstracts BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to evaluate the change in strain-type distribution after eliminating testing of formed and laxative induced diarrheal stool. METHODS: Beginning in July 2013, all Clostridium difficile-positive stool samples by Cepheid’s GeneXpert were routinely typed using Multi-Locus Sequence Typing (MLST). MLST was performed as previously described (1). After implementation of rejection policy and re-education of staff, strain type (ST) distribution among tested samples were analyzed and compared with historic data. RESULTS: After evaluation of our historical typing data the 10 most frequent ST were identified. Diagnostic stewardship led to 40.0% reduction in testing volume, the positivity rate increased from 12.0% to 12.6%. The frequency distribution of threemost prevalent strain types (MLST-2, 8, and 42) declined by 38%, 60%, and 42%, respectively. The absolute number of epidemic strains, ST-1 and ST-11, remained unchanged and the frequency distribution increased from 9.6% to 14.0%. No clonal outbreaks were detected during this time. CONCLUSION: Implementation of diagnostic stewardship led to a reduction in recovery of endemic strains without substantial impact on detection of hypervirulent or epidemic strains. DISCLOSURES: All authors: No reported disclosures. Oxford University Press 2018-11-26 /pmc/articles/PMC6254506/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofy210.513 Text en © The Author(s) 2018. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Infectious Diseases Society of America. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial reproduction and distribution of the work, in any medium, provided the original work is not altered or transformed in any way, and that the work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com
spellingShingle Abstracts
McMillen, Tracy
Chow, Hoi Yan
Aslam, Anoshé
Brite, Jennifer
Babady, N Esther
Kamboj, Mini
504. Change in Clostridium difficile Strain-Type Distribution After Implementation of Diagnostic Stewardship
title 504. Change in Clostridium difficile Strain-Type Distribution After Implementation of Diagnostic Stewardship
title_full 504. Change in Clostridium difficile Strain-Type Distribution After Implementation of Diagnostic Stewardship
title_fullStr 504. Change in Clostridium difficile Strain-Type Distribution After Implementation of Diagnostic Stewardship
title_full_unstemmed 504. Change in Clostridium difficile Strain-Type Distribution After Implementation of Diagnostic Stewardship
title_short 504. Change in Clostridium difficile Strain-Type Distribution After Implementation of Diagnostic Stewardship
title_sort 504. change in clostridium difficile strain-type distribution after implementation of diagnostic stewardship
topic Abstracts
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6254506/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofy210.513
work_keys_str_mv AT mcmillentracy 504changeinclostridiumdifficilestraintypedistributionafterimplementationofdiagnosticstewardship
AT chowhoiyan 504changeinclostridiumdifficilestraintypedistributionafterimplementationofdiagnosticstewardship
AT aslamanoshe 504changeinclostridiumdifficilestraintypedistributionafterimplementationofdiagnosticstewardship
AT britejennifer 504changeinclostridiumdifficilestraintypedistributionafterimplementationofdiagnosticstewardship
AT babadynesther 504changeinclostridiumdifficilestraintypedistributionafterimplementationofdiagnosticstewardship
AT kambojmini 504changeinclostridiumdifficilestraintypedistributionafterimplementationofdiagnosticstewardship