Cargando…

2116. Impact of an Evidence-Based Intervention on Urinary Catheter Utilization in Switzerland

BACKGROUND: In acute care hospitals, urinary catheters are often inserted and kept without proper indication, and may lead to catheter-associated urinary tract infection (CAUTI) and various non-infectious complications. In this pilot study, we attempted to decrease urinary catheterization via an awa...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Schweiger, Alexander, Kuster, Stefan, Maag, Judith, Züllig, Stephanie, Atkinson, Andrew, Bertschy, Sonja, Bortolin, Emmanuelle, John, Gregor, Sax, Hugo, Schwappach, David, Marschall, Jonas
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6254529/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofy210.1772
_version_ 1783373735357579264
author Schweiger, Alexander
Kuster, Stefan
Maag, Judith
Züllig, Stephanie
Atkinson, Andrew
Bertschy, Sonja
Bortolin, Emmanuelle
John, Gregor
Sax, Hugo
Schwappach, David
Marschall, Jonas
author_facet Schweiger, Alexander
Kuster, Stefan
Maag, Judith
Züllig, Stephanie
Atkinson, Andrew
Bertschy, Sonja
Bortolin, Emmanuelle
John, Gregor
Sax, Hugo
Schwappach, David
Marschall, Jonas
author_sort Schweiger, Alexander
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: In acute care hospitals, urinary catheters are often inserted and kept without proper indication, and may lead to catheter-associated urinary tract infection (CAUTI) and various non-infectious complications. In this pilot study, we attempted to decrease urinary catheterization via an awareness campaign and an intervention bundle, consisting of (1) an indication list for urinary catheterization, (2) daily evaluation of the need for ongoing catheterization, and (3) education on proper catheter insertion and maintenance. METHODS: We conducted a before/after intervention study in seven small, mid-size and academic hospitals distributed across Switzerland. After a 3-month pre-intervention surveillance, the intervention period started with a workshop for local project leaders who then implemented the intervention bundle. During the 3-month post-intervention surveillance, the primary outcome was catheter utilization; secondary outcomes were CAUTI, non-infectious outcomes, and process indicators (proportion of indicated catheters, frequency of catheter evaluation). RESULTS: We analyzed data on 25,880 mostly general medical or surgical patients, 13,171 of which pre-intervention (August–October 2016) and 12,709 post-intervention (August–October 2017). Catheter utilization dropped from 23.7% to 21.0% [adjusted odds ratio 0.9 (95% confidence interval, CI, 0.84–0.96); P = 0.001]. There were 1.02 CAUTI per 1,000 catheter-days (before) and 1.33 (after) [aOR 1.2 (0.6–2.4); P = 0.6]. Non-infectious complications decreased slightly from 39.4 to 35.4 events per 1,000 catheter-days [aOR 0.9 (0.77–1.07); P = 0.2]. The proportion of catheters with a documented proper indication went from 74.5% to 90.0% [aOR 4.1 (3.35–4.95); P < 0.001]. Reevaluations increased from 167 to 623 per 1,000 catheter-days [aOR 3.12 (2.92–3.36); P < 0.001]. CONCLUSION: In this before/after intervention study, a simple bundle of 3 evidence-based measures reduced catheter utilization and led to increases in indicated urinary catheters and daily evaluations. The intervention had a small impact on non-infectious complications, whereas the CAUTI rate remained on a low level. The next step is planning the national rollout of both the surveillance module and the intervention bundle. DISCLOSURES: All authors: No reported disclosures.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6254529
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-62545292018-11-28 2116. Impact of an Evidence-Based Intervention on Urinary Catheter Utilization in Switzerland Schweiger, Alexander Kuster, Stefan Maag, Judith Züllig, Stephanie Atkinson, Andrew Bertschy, Sonja Bortolin, Emmanuelle John, Gregor Sax, Hugo Schwappach, David Marschall, Jonas Open Forum Infect Dis Abstracts BACKGROUND: In acute care hospitals, urinary catheters are often inserted and kept without proper indication, and may lead to catheter-associated urinary tract infection (CAUTI) and various non-infectious complications. In this pilot study, we attempted to decrease urinary catheterization via an awareness campaign and an intervention bundle, consisting of (1) an indication list for urinary catheterization, (2) daily evaluation of the need for ongoing catheterization, and (3) education on proper catheter insertion and maintenance. METHODS: We conducted a before/after intervention study in seven small, mid-size and academic hospitals distributed across Switzerland. After a 3-month pre-intervention surveillance, the intervention period started with a workshop for local project leaders who then implemented the intervention bundle. During the 3-month post-intervention surveillance, the primary outcome was catheter utilization; secondary outcomes were CAUTI, non-infectious outcomes, and process indicators (proportion of indicated catheters, frequency of catheter evaluation). RESULTS: We analyzed data on 25,880 mostly general medical or surgical patients, 13,171 of which pre-intervention (August–October 2016) and 12,709 post-intervention (August–October 2017). Catheter utilization dropped from 23.7% to 21.0% [adjusted odds ratio 0.9 (95% confidence interval, CI, 0.84–0.96); P = 0.001]. There were 1.02 CAUTI per 1,000 catheter-days (before) and 1.33 (after) [aOR 1.2 (0.6–2.4); P = 0.6]. Non-infectious complications decreased slightly from 39.4 to 35.4 events per 1,000 catheter-days [aOR 0.9 (0.77–1.07); P = 0.2]. The proportion of catheters with a documented proper indication went from 74.5% to 90.0% [aOR 4.1 (3.35–4.95); P < 0.001]. Reevaluations increased from 167 to 623 per 1,000 catheter-days [aOR 3.12 (2.92–3.36); P < 0.001]. CONCLUSION: In this before/after intervention study, a simple bundle of 3 evidence-based measures reduced catheter utilization and led to increases in indicated urinary catheters and daily evaluations. The intervention had a small impact on non-infectious complications, whereas the CAUTI rate remained on a low level. The next step is planning the national rollout of both the surveillance module and the intervention bundle. DISCLOSURES: All authors: No reported disclosures. Oxford University Press 2018-11-26 /pmc/articles/PMC6254529/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofy210.1772 Text en © The Author(s) 2018. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Infectious Diseases Society of America. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial reproduction and distribution of the work, in any medium, provided the original work is not altered or transformed in any way, and that the work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com
spellingShingle Abstracts
Schweiger, Alexander
Kuster, Stefan
Maag, Judith
Züllig, Stephanie
Atkinson, Andrew
Bertschy, Sonja
Bortolin, Emmanuelle
John, Gregor
Sax, Hugo
Schwappach, David
Marschall, Jonas
2116. Impact of an Evidence-Based Intervention on Urinary Catheter Utilization in Switzerland
title 2116. Impact of an Evidence-Based Intervention on Urinary Catheter Utilization in Switzerland
title_full 2116. Impact of an Evidence-Based Intervention on Urinary Catheter Utilization in Switzerland
title_fullStr 2116. Impact of an Evidence-Based Intervention on Urinary Catheter Utilization in Switzerland
title_full_unstemmed 2116. Impact of an Evidence-Based Intervention on Urinary Catheter Utilization in Switzerland
title_short 2116. Impact of an Evidence-Based Intervention on Urinary Catheter Utilization in Switzerland
title_sort 2116. impact of an evidence-based intervention on urinary catheter utilization in switzerland
topic Abstracts
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6254529/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofy210.1772
work_keys_str_mv AT schweigeralexander 2116impactofanevidencebasedinterventiononurinarycatheterutilizationinswitzerland
AT kusterstefan 2116impactofanevidencebasedinterventiononurinarycatheterutilizationinswitzerland
AT maagjudith 2116impactofanevidencebasedinterventiononurinarycatheterutilizationinswitzerland
AT zulligstephanie 2116impactofanevidencebasedinterventiononurinarycatheterutilizationinswitzerland
AT atkinsonandrew 2116impactofanevidencebasedinterventiononurinarycatheterutilizationinswitzerland
AT bertschysonja 2116impactofanevidencebasedinterventiononurinarycatheterutilizationinswitzerland
AT bortolinemmanuelle 2116impactofanevidencebasedinterventiononurinarycatheterutilizationinswitzerland
AT johngregor 2116impactofanevidencebasedinterventiononurinarycatheterutilizationinswitzerland
AT saxhugo 2116impactofanevidencebasedinterventiononurinarycatheterutilizationinswitzerland
AT schwappachdavid 2116impactofanevidencebasedinterventiononurinarycatheterutilizationinswitzerland
AT marschalljonas 2116impactofanevidencebasedinterventiononurinarycatheterutilizationinswitzerland