Cargando…

1973. A Meta-Analysis of the Effectiveness of LAIV4 and IIV against Influenza A/H3N2 Strains in Children 2–18 Years of Age During the 2016–2017 Season

BACKGROUND: The effectiveness of the quadrivalent live attenuated influenza vaccine (LAIV4) and inactivated influenza vaccines (IIV) has been evaluated in recent seasons using a number of different study designs (e.g., randomized controlled studies [RCT], cohort studies and test-negative case–contro...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Mallory, Raburn, Bandell, Allyn, Ambrose, Christopher S, Yu, Jing
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6254534/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofy210.1629
_version_ 1783373736537227264
author Mallory, Raburn
Bandell, Allyn
Ambrose, Christopher S
Yu, Jing
author_facet Mallory, Raburn
Bandell, Allyn
Ambrose, Christopher S
Yu, Jing
author_sort Mallory, Raburn
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The effectiveness of the quadrivalent live attenuated influenza vaccine (LAIV4) and inactivated influenza vaccines (IIV) has been evaluated in recent seasons using a number of different study designs (e.g., randomized controlled studies [RCT], cohort studies and test-negative case–control [TNCC] studies). Effectiveness estimates from these studies have, in general, had very broad confidence intervals reflecting the small numbers of cases reported. We conducted a meta-analysis to more precisely estimate the effectiveness of both vaccine types for the 2016–2017 season. METHODS: LAIV4 and IIV efficacy and effectiveness studies conducted over the 2016–2017 influenza season were identified from the published literature and through personal communication with the study investigators. Effectiveness estimates from all available study designs were included in the meta-analysis to maximize use of all available data and because all studies included methods to minimize bias. The analysis provided average estimates of the LAIV4 and IIV efficacy across countries. A sensitivity analysis limited to TNCC studies was also conducted. Only effectiveness results for A/H3N2 strains were combined as circulation of other strains was minimal. The meta-analyses used a random effects model. Heterogeneity testing was performed. RESULTS: Seven studies conducted in children in the United States, Japan, Finland, Germany, thr UK, and Canada were identified including four TNCC studies, one cohort study and one RCT (Figure 1). Individual effectiveness estimates ranged from 29% to 74% for LAIV4 and from 31% to 56% for IIV. Heterogeneity testing for H3N2 strains was not statistically significant. The consolidated effectiveness estimate across studies for LAIV4 was 44% (95% CI: 24, 58) and for IIV was 45% (95% CI: 29, 58). Estimates for the sensitivity analysis limited to TNCC studies were 61% (95% CI: 40, 74) and 43% (95% CI: 32, 52) for LAIV4 and IIV, respectively. [Image: see text] CONCLUSION: Despite variability in estimates across studies, both LAIV4 and IIV showed moderate and comparable effectiveness in children for circulating H3N2 strains during the 2016–2017 influenza season. DISCLOSURES: R. Mallory, MedImmune: Employee, Salary. A. Bandell, AstraZeneca: Employee, Salary. C. S. Ambrose, AstraZeneca: Employee, Salary. J. Yu, GSK: Employee, Salary and Stockholder.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6254534
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-62545342018-11-28 1973. A Meta-Analysis of the Effectiveness of LAIV4 and IIV against Influenza A/H3N2 Strains in Children 2–18 Years of Age During the 2016–2017 Season Mallory, Raburn Bandell, Allyn Ambrose, Christopher S Yu, Jing Open Forum Infect Dis Abstracts BACKGROUND: The effectiveness of the quadrivalent live attenuated influenza vaccine (LAIV4) and inactivated influenza vaccines (IIV) has been evaluated in recent seasons using a number of different study designs (e.g., randomized controlled studies [RCT], cohort studies and test-negative case–control [TNCC] studies). Effectiveness estimates from these studies have, in general, had very broad confidence intervals reflecting the small numbers of cases reported. We conducted a meta-analysis to more precisely estimate the effectiveness of both vaccine types for the 2016–2017 season. METHODS: LAIV4 and IIV efficacy and effectiveness studies conducted over the 2016–2017 influenza season were identified from the published literature and through personal communication with the study investigators. Effectiveness estimates from all available study designs were included in the meta-analysis to maximize use of all available data and because all studies included methods to minimize bias. The analysis provided average estimates of the LAIV4 and IIV efficacy across countries. A sensitivity analysis limited to TNCC studies was also conducted. Only effectiveness results for A/H3N2 strains were combined as circulation of other strains was minimal. The meta-analyses used a random effects model. Heterogeneity testing was performed. RESULTS: Seven studies conducted in children in the United States, Japan, Finland, Germany, thr UK, and Canada were identified including four TNCC studies, one cohort study and one RCT (Figure 1). Individual effectiveness estimates ranged from 29% to 74% for LAIV4 and from 31% to 56% for IIV. Heterogeneity testing for H3N2 strains was not statistically significant. The consolidated effectiveness estimate across studies for LAIV4 was 44% (95% CI: 24, 58) and for IIV was 45% (95% CI: 29, 58). Estimates for the sensitivity analysis limited to TNCC studies were 61% (95% CI: 40, 74) and 43% (95% CI: 32, 52) for LAIV4 and IIV, respectively. [Image: see text] CONCLUSION: Despite variability in estimates across studies, both LAIV4 and IIV showed moderate and comparable effectiveness in children for circulating H3N2 strains during the 2016–2017 influenza season. DISCLOSURES: R. Mallory, MedImmune: Employee, Salary. A. Bandell, AstraZeneca: Employee, Salary. C. S. Ambrose, AstraZeneca: Employee, Salary. J. Yu, GSK: Employee, Salary and Stockholder. Oxford University Press 2018-11-26 /pmc/articles/PMC6254534/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofy210.1629 Text en © The Author(s) 2018. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Infectious Diseases Society of America. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial reproduction and distribution of the work, in any medium, provided the original work is not altered or transformed in any way, and that the work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com
spellingShingle Abstracts
Mallory, Raburn
Bandell, Allyn
Ambrose, Christopher S
Yu, Jing
1973. A Meta-Analysis of the Effectiveness of LAIV4 and IIV against Influenza A/H3N2 Strains in Children 2–18 Years of Age During the 2016–2017 Season
title 1973. A Meta-Analysis of the Effectiveness of LAIV4 and IIV against Influenza A/H3N2 Strains in Children 2–18 Years of Age During the 2016–2017 Season
title_full 1973. A Meta-Analysis of the Effectiveness of LAIV4 and IIV against Influenza A/H3N2 Strains in Children 2–18 Years of Age During the 2016–2017 Season
title_fullStr 1973. A Meta-Analysis of the Effectiveness of LAIV4 and IIV against Influenza A/H3N2 Strains in Children 2–18 Years of Age During the 2016–2017 Season
title_full_unstemmed 1973. A Meta-Analysis of the Effectiveness of LAIV4 and IIV against Influenza A/H3N2 Strains in Children 2–18 Years of Age During the 2016–2017 Season
title_short 1973. A Meta-Analysis of the Effectiveness of LAIV4 and IIV against Influenza A/H3N2 Strains in Children 2–18 Years of Age During the 2016–2017 Season
title_sort 1973. a meta-analysis of the effectiveness of laiv4 and iiv against influenza a/h3n2 strains in children 2–18 years of age during the 2016–2017 season
topic Abstracts
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6254534/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofy210.1629
work_keys_str_mv AT malloryraburn 1973ametaanalysisoftheeffectivenessoflaiv4andiivagainstinfluenzaah3n2strainsinchildren218yearsofageduringthe20162017season
AT bandellallyn 1973ametaanalysisoftheeffectivenessoflaiv4andiivagainstinfluenzaah3n2strainsinchildren218yearsofageduringthe20162017season
AT ambrosechristophers 1973ametaanalysisoftheeffectivenessoflaiv4andiivagainstinfluenzaah3n2strainsinchildren218yearsofageduringthe20162017season
AT yujing 1973ametaanalysisoftheeffectivenessoflaiv4andiivagainstinfluenzaah3n2strainsinchildren218yearsofageduringthe20162017season