Cargando…
1804. Impact of Susceptibility Testing Method on Antibiotic Selection for Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus Aureus (MRSA) Bacteremia
BACKGROUND: The selection of intravenous (IV) antibiotics for methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) bacteremia can be influenced by the vancomycin minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC). This study explores the changes in antibiotic use and inpatient mortality for patients with MRSA bac...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Oxford University Press
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6254558/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofy210.1460 |
_version_ | 1783373742169128960 |
---|---|
author | Bhatt, Mahesh Burgess, Donna R Wallace, Katie L Gregory, Eric Myint, Thein |
author_facet | Bhatt, Mahesh Burgess, Donna R Wallace, Katie L Gregory, Eric Myint, Thein |
author_sort | Bhatt, Mahesh |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: The selection of intravenous (IV) antibiotics for methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) bacteremia can be influenced by the vancomycin minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC). This study explores the changes in antibiotic use and inpatient mortality for patients with MRSA bacteremia after switching the MIC testing methods. METHODS: At University of Kentucky Medical Center, Etest™ was implemented in November 2013 for all Staphylococcus aureus blood isolates. In April 2016, this was changed to Phoenix™ automated system. Data regarding antibiotic usage for patients with MRSA bacteremia were collected from July 2014 to December 2015 (Etest™) and September 2016 to March 2017 (Phoenix™). Only patients started on IV vancomycin were included. Daptomycin and ceftaroline use was monitored by the antimicrobial stewardship team with focus on guideline adherence. RESULTS: A total of 119 and 62 patients were identified before and after switching to Phoenix™. MICs of 2 μg/mL were significantly decreased (P < 0.001) after changing to Phoenix™ (Table 1). Daptomycin use (alone or in combination) decreased from 37% (44/119) to 21% (13/62) (P = 0.013). Ceftaroline use (alone or in combination) decreased from 32% (38/119) to 19% (12/62) (P = 0.036). The reason for escalation in 13 of 44 (30%) patients with daptomycin and 6 of 38 (16%) patients with ceftaroline was an MIC of 2 μg/mL. Overall, IV vancomycin use (alone or in combination) increased from 50% (60/119) to 69% (43/62) (P = 0.007). All-cause inpatient mortality was 16% (19/119) before and 10% (6/62) (P = 0.24) after switching to Phoenix. CONCLUSION: A switch in vancomycin susceptibility testing from Etest™ to Phoenix™ automated system was associated with a significant decrease in daptomycin and ceftaroline use and an increase in IV vancomycin use without any change in all-cause inpatient mortality. DISCLOSURES: All authors: No reported disclosures. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6254558 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | Oxford University Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-62545582018-11-28 1804. Impact of Susceptibility Testing Method on Antibiotic Selection for Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus Aureus (MRSA) Bacteremia Bhatt, Mahesh Burgess, Donna R Wallace, Katie L Gregory, Eric Myint, Thein Open Forum Infect Dis Abstracts BACKGROUND: The selection of intravenous (IV) antibiotics for methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) bacteremia can be influenced by the vancomycin minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC). This study explores the changes in antibiotic use and inpatient mortality for patients with MRSA bacteremia after switching the MIC testing methods. METHODS: At University of Kentucky Medical Center, Etest™ was implemented in November 2013 for all Staphylococcus aureus blood isolates. In April 2016, this was changed to Phoenix™ automated system. Data regarding antibiotic usage for patients with MRSA bacteremia were collected from July 2014 to December 2015 (Etest™) and September 2016 to March 2017 (Phoenix™). Only patients started on IV vancomycin were included. Daptomycin and ceftaroline use was monitored by the antimicrobial stewardship team with focus on guideline adherence. RESULTS: A total of 119 and 62 patients were identified before and after switching to Phoenix™. MICs of 2 μg/mL were significantly decreased (P < 0.001) after changing to Phoenix™ (Table 1). Daptomycin use (alone or in combination) decreased from 37% (44/119) to 21% (13/62) (P = 0.013). Ceftaroline use (alone or in combination) decreased from 32% (38/119) to 19% (12/62) (P = 0.036). The reason for escalation in 13 of 44 (30%) patients with daptomycin and 6 of 38 (16%) patients with ceftaroline was an MIC of 2 μg/mL. Overall, IV vancomycin use (alone or in combination) increased from 50% (60/119) to 69% (43/62) (P = 0.007). All-cause inpatient mortality was 16% (19/119) before and 10% (6/62) (P = 0.24) after switching to Phoenix. CONCLUSION: A switch in vancomycin susceptibility testing from Etest™ to Phoenix™ automated system was associated with a significant decrease in daptomycin and ceftaroline use and an increase in IV vancomycin use without any change in all-cause inpatient mortality. DISCLOSURES: All authors: No reported disclosures. Oxford University Press 2018-11-26 /pmc/articles/PMC6254558/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofy210.1460 Text en © The Author(s) 2018. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Infectious Diseases Society of America. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial reproduction and distribution of the work, in any medium, provided the original work is not altered or transformed in any way, and that the work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com |
spellingShingle | Abstracts Bhatt, Mahesh Burgess, Donna R Wallace, Katie L Gregory, Eric Myint, Thein 1804. Impact of Susceptibility Testing Method on Antibiotic Selection for Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus Aureus (MRSA) Bacteremia |
title | 1804. Impact of Susceptibility Testing Method on Antibiotic Selection for Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus Aureus (MRSA) Bacteremia |
title_full | 1804. Impact of Susceptibility Testing Method on Antibiotic Selection for Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus Aureus (MRSA) Bacteremia |
title_fullStr | 1804. Impact of Susceptibility Testing Method on Antibiotic Selection for Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus Aureus (MRSA) Bacteremia |
title_full_unstemmed | 1804. Impact of Susceptibility Testing Method on Antibiotic Selection for Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus Aureus (MRSA) Bacteremia |
title_short | 1804. Impact of Susceptibility Testing Method on Antibiotic Selection for Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus Aureus (MRSA) Bacteremia |
title_sort | 1804. impact of susceptibility testing method on antibiotic selection for methicillin-resistant staphylococcus aureus (mrsa) bacteremia |
topic | Abstracts |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6254558/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofy210.1460 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT bhattmahesh 1804impactofsusceptibilitytestingmethodonantibioticselectionformethicillinresistantstaphylococcusaureusmrsabacteremia AT burgessdonnar 1804impactofsusceptibilitytestingmethodonantibioticselectionformethicillinresistantstaphylococcusaureusmrsabacteremia AT wallacekatiel 1804impactofsusceptibilitytestingmethodonantibioticselectionformethicillinresistantstaphylococcusaureusmrsabacteremia AT gregoryeric 1804impactofsusceptibilitytestingmethodonantibioticselectionformethicillinresistantstaphylococcusaureusmrsabacteremia AT myintthein 1804impactofsusceptibilitytestingmethodonantibioticselectionformethicillinresistantstaphylococcusaureusmrsabacteremia |