Cargando…

312. Comparison of Short Course and Long Course of Antibiotics in Patients With Osteomyelitis: A Systemic Review and Meta-analysis

BACKGROUND: Current guidelines for treatment of osteomyelitis (OM) suggest antibiotics for 3–6 weeks. However, recent studies provided conflicting evidence about the benefits of the prolonged use of antibiotics. We conducted a systemic review and meta-analysis to assess the outcomes of short- and lo...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hsieh, Ronan, Huang, Chung-Yen, Yen, Hung-Teng, Lee, Chien-Chang
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6254561/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofy210.323
_version_ 1783373742889500672
author Hsieh, Ronan
Huang, Chung-Yen
Yen, Hung-Teng
Lee, Chien-Chang
author_facet Hsieh, Ronan
Huang, Chung-Yen
Yen, Hung-Teng
Lee, Chien-Chang
author_sort Hsieh, Ronan
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Current guidelines for treatment of osteomyelitis (OM) suggest antibiotics for 3–6 weeks. However, recent studies provided conflicting evidence about the benefits of the prolonged use of antibiotics. We conducted a systemic review and meta-analysis to assess the outcomes of short- and long-term antibiotics in patients with OM. METHODS: We used three queries to retrieve literature of vertebral OM, chronic OM, and diabetic foot OM from PubMed and Embase databases until December 2017. Each query comprised medical subject headings, title/abstract keywords, and exclusion terms. Two reviewers independently screened literature for three rounds and disagreements were resolved by a third reviewer. Quality of a cohort study and that of a randomized control trial (RCT) were assessed by Newcastle-Ottawa Quality Assessment Form and a modified Jadad scale, respectively. RESULTS: A total of 7,192 studies were retrieved (Figure 1). Eleven observation studies and five RCTs were included for analysis, including seven articles about vertebral OM, two chronic OM, five pediatric OM, and two diabetic foot OM. Of the 11 observational studies, only five were graded as good or fair quality. Thirteen studies demonstrated no significant difference in outcomes between short- and long-term of antibiotics, while three studies showed favorable outcomes in patients taking long-term antibiotics. The aggregate odds ratio (OR) of mortality was 0.46 (95% CI, 0.21, 1.02) for observational studies and 0.90 (95% CI, 0.58, 1.41) for RCTs, showing no significant benefits of long-term antibiotics in patients with OM (Figure 2). In patients with vertebral OM, outcomes were comparable between short- and long-term of antibiotics (OR 0.51, 95% CI, 0.26, 1.01). In seven studies where only intravenous (IV) antibiotics were used, there was no significant benefit of long-term antibiotics (OR 1.12, 95% CI, 0.68, 1.83). However, in the remaining nine studies where antibiotics were transitioned from IV to oral form, there was marginal benefit of long-term oral antibiotics (OR 0.44, 95% CI, 0.22, 0.91). CONCLUSION: Both RCTs and observational studies demonstrated that long-term antibiotics use did not generate significantly better outcome as compared with short-term antibiotics in patients with all-cause or a specific type of OM. [Image: see text] [Image: see text] DISCLOSURES: All authors: No reported disclosures.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6254561
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-62545612018-11-28 312. Comparison of Short Course and Long Course of Antibiotics in Patients With Osteomyelitis: A Systemic Review and Meta-analysis Hsieh, Ronan Huang, Chung-Yen Yen, Hung-Teng Lee, Chien-Chang Open Forum Infect Dis Abstracts BACKGROUND: Current guidelines for treatment of osteomyelitis (OM) suggest antibiotics for 3–6 weeks. However, recent studies provided conflicting evidence about the benefits of the prolonged use of antibiotics. We conducted a systemic review and meta-analysis to assess the outcomes of short- and long-term antibiotics in patients with OM. METHODS: We used three queries to retrieve literature of vertebral OM, chronic OM, and diabetic foot OM from PubMed and Embase databases until December 2017. Each query comprised medical subject headings, title/abstract keywords, and exclusion terms. Two reviewers independently screened literature for three rounds and disagreements were resolved by a third reviewer. Quality of a cohort study and that of a randomized control trial (RCT) were assessed by Newcastle-Ottawa Quality Assessment Form and a modified Jadad scale, respectively. RESULTS: A total of 7,192 studies were retrieved (Figure 1). Eleven observation studies and five RCTs were included for analysis, including seven articles about vertebral OM, two chronic OM, five pediatric OM, and two diabetic foot OM. Of the 11 observational studies, only five were graded as good or fair quality. Thirteen studies demonstrated no significant difference in outcomes between short- and long-term of antibiotics, while three studies showed favorable outcomes in patients taking long-term antibiotics. The aggregate odds ratio (OR) of mortality was 0.46 (95% CI, 0.21, 1.02) for observational studies and 0.90 (95% CI, 0.58, 1.41) for RCTs, showing no significant benefits of long-term antibiotics in patients with OM (Figure 2). In patients with vertebral OM, outcomes were comparable between short- and long-term of antibiotics (OR 0.51, 95% CI, 0.26, 1.01). In seven studies where only intravenous (IV) antibiotics were used, there was no significant benefit of long-term antibiotics (OR 1.12, 95% CI, 0.68, 1.83). However, in the remaining nine studies where antibiotics were transitioned from IV to oral form, there was marginal benefit of long-term oral antibiotics (OR 0.44, 95% CI, 0.22, 0.91). CONCLUSION: Both RCTs and observational studies demonstrated that long-term antibiotics use did not generate significantly better outcome as compared with short-term antibiotics in patients with all-cause or a specific type of OM. [Image: see text] [Image: see text] DISCLOSURES: All authors: No reported disclosures. Oxford University Press 2018-11-26 /pmc/articles/PMC6254561/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofy210.323 Text en © The Author(s) 2018. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Infectious Diseases Society of America. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial reproduction and distribution of the work, in any medium, provided the original work is not altered or transformed in any way, and that the work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com
spellingShingle Abstracts
Hsieh, Ronan
Huang, Chung-Yen
Yen, Hung-Teng
Lee, Chien-Chang
312. Comparison of Short Course and Long Course of Antibiotics in Patients With Osteomyelitis: A Systemic Review and Meta-analysis
title 312. Comparison of Short Course and Long Course of Antibiotics in Patients With Osteomyelitis: A Systemic Review and Meta-analysis
title_full 312. Comparison of Short Course and Long Course of Antibiotics in Patients With Osteomyelitis: A Systemic Review and Meta-analysis
title_fullStr 312. Comparison of Short Course and Long Course of Antibiotics in Patients With Osteomyelitis: A Systemic Review and Meta-analysis
title_full_unstemmed 312. Comparison of Short Course and Long Course of Antibiotics in Patients With Osteomyelitis: A Systemic Review and Meta-analysis
title_short 312. Comparison of Short Course and Long Course of Antibiotics in Patients With Osteomyelitis: A Systemic Review and Meta-analysis
title_sort 312. comparison of short course and long course of antibiotics in patients with osteomyelitis: a systemic review and meta-analysis
topic Abstracts
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6254561/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofy210.323
work_keys_str_mv AT hsiehronan 312comparisonofshortcourseandlongcourseofantibioticsinpatientswithosteomyelitisasystemicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT huangchungyen 312comparisonofshortcourseandlongcourseofantibioticsinpatientswithosteomyelitisasystemicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT yenhungteng 312comparisonofshortcourseandlongcourseofantibioticsinpatientswithosteomyelitisasystemicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT leechienchang 312comparisonofshortcourseandlongcourseofantibioticsinpatientswithosteomyelitisasystemicreviewandmetaanalysis