Cargando…

565. Implementing HIV Rapid Entry in a Community Infectious Disease Practice

BACKGROUND: Successful achievement of “90-90-90” HIV care continuum goals depends on increasing diagnosis, linkage to care, and treatment initiation. Recent improvement efforts include immediate linkage and antiretroviral (ARV) therapy access. Outcome data has been reported from projects implemented...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Cafardi, John, Lamarre, Thomas, Haas, Douglas, Young, Patricia, Stockton, Janice, Kallmeyer, Robert
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6254609/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofy210.573
_version_ 1783373760507674624
author Cafardi, John
Lamarre, Thomas
Haas, Douglas
Young, Patricia
Stockton, Janice
Kallmeyer, Robert
author_facet Cafardi, John
Lamarre, Thomas
Haas, Douglas
Young, Patricia
Stockton, Janice
Kallmeyer, Robert
author_sort Cafardi, John
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Successful achievement of “90-90-90” HIV care continuum goals depends on increasing diagnosis, linkage to care, and treatment initiation. Recent improvement efforts include immediate linkage and antiretroviral (ARV) therapy access. Outcome data has been reported from projects implemented in academic settings where multiple Ryan White Care Act (RWCA) services are available. The purpose of this project was to assess feasibility of Rapid Entry in a four-physician community ID practice. METHODS: Goals of the Rapid Entry project are: first visit within three business days of diagnosis and ARV start at entry. Outcomes assessed include time to first visit, ARV start, and virologic suppression. Retention in care is assessed at 6 and 12 months. Comparison is made to “standard of care” (SOC; n = 35) patients seen during 24 months prior to project implementation. Patients with new HIV diagnosis made while hospitalized were excluded. RESULTS: Thirty-four patients with new HIV diagnosis started care during project period. Demographics and baseline labs were similar between groups. Four rapid patients were injection drug users (IDU) vs. none in SOC. Time to First visit averaged 13 days (range 1–48) with 12 patients (37%) seen within three business days (SOC 7–189 days, mean 36). 19 patients (56%) started ARVs at the First visit (SOC 1/3%); 23 (68%) by Day 7 (SOC 5/15%). Time to virologic suppression was significantly less in the Rapid group. CONCLUSION: Preliminary results are comparable to reports from larger studies, suggesting that reduced time to first visit and ARV initiation shortens interval to virologic suppression. Implementing Rapid Entry in a community setting is challenging but feasible, requiring high levels of staff commitment, flexibility, and communication. Efforts in process to further improve Rapid Entry include strategies to engage/retain those infected via injection drug use and shortening time to referral from outside test sites. DISCLOSURES: J. Cafardi, Gilead: Grant Investigator, Salary.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6254609
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-62546092018-11-28 565. Implementing HIV Rapid Entry in a Community Infectious Disease Practice Cafardi, John Lamarre, Thomas Haas, Douglas Young, Patricia Stockton, Janice Kallmeyer, Robert Open Forum Infect Dis Abstracts BACKGROUND: Successful achievement of “90-90-90” HIV care continuum goals depends on increasing diagnosis, linkage to care, and treatment initiation. Recent improvement efforts include immediate linkage and antiretroviral (ARV) therapy access. Outcome data has been reported from projects implemented in academic settings where multiple Ryan White Care Act (RWCA) services are available. The purpose of this project was to assess feasibility of Rapid Entry in a four-physician community ID practice. METHODS: Goals of the Rapid Entry project are: first visit within three business days of diagnosis and ARV start at entry. Outcomes assessed include time to first visit, ARV start, and virologic suppression. Retention in care is assessed at 6 and 12 months. Comparison is made to “standard of care” (SOC; n = 35) patients seen during 24 months prior to project implementation. Patients with new HIV diagnosis made while hospitalized were excluded. RESULTS: Thirty-four patients with new HIV diagnosis started care during project period. Demographics and baseline labs were similar between groups. Four rapid patients were injection drug users (IDU) vs. none in SOC. Time to First visit averaged 13 days (range 1–48) with 12 patients (37%) seen within three business days (SOC 7–189 days, mean 36). 19 patients (56%) started ARVs at the First visit (SOC 1/3%); 23 (68%) by Day 7 (SOC 5/15%). Time to virologic suppression was significantly less in the Rapid group. CONCLUSION: Preliminary results are comparable to reports from larger studies, suggesting that reduced time to first visit and ARV initiation shortens interval to virologic suppression. Implementing Rapid Entry in a community setting is challenging but feasible, requiring high levels of staff commitment, flexibility, and communication. Efforts in process to further improve Rapid Entry include strategies to engage/retain those infected via injection drug use and shortening time to referral from outside test sites. DISCLOSURES: J. Cafardi, Gilead: Grant Investigator, Salary. Oxford University Press 2018-11-26 /pmc/articles/PMC6254609/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofy210.573 Text en © The Author(s) 2018. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Infectious Diseases Society of America. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial reproduction and distribution of the work, in any medium, provided the original work is not altered or transformed in any way, and that the work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com
spellingShingle Abstracts
Cafardi, John
Lamarre, Thomas
Haas, Douglas
Young, Patricia
Stockton, Janice
Kallmeyer, Robert
565. Implementing HIV Rapid Entry in a Community Infectious Disease Practice
title 565. Implementing HIV Rapid Entry in a Community Infectious Disease Practice
title_full 565. Implementing HIV Rapid Entry in a Community Infectious Disease Practice
title_fullStr 565. Implementing HIV Rapid Entry in a Community Infectious Disease Practice
title_full_unstemmed 565. Implementing HIV Rapid Entry in a Community Infectious Disease Practice
title_short 565. Implementing HIV Rapid Entry in a Community Infectious Disease Practice
title_sort 565. implementing hiv rapid entry in a community infectious disease practice
topic Abstracts
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6254609/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofy210.573
work_keys_str_mv AT cafardijohn 565implementinghivrapidentryinacommunityinfectiousdiseasepractice
AT lamarrethomas 565implementinghivrapidentryinacommunityinfectiousdiseasepractice
AT haasdouglas 565implementinghivrapidentryinacommunityinfectiousdiseasepractice
AT youngpatricia 565implementinghivrapidentryinacommunityinfectiousdiseasepractice
AT stocktonjanice 565implementinghivrapidentryinacommunityinfectiousdiseasepractice
AT kallmeyerrobert 565implementinghivrapidentryinacommunityinfectiousdiseasepractice