Cargando…
285. Challenging the Dogmas of Outpatient Parenteral Antimicrobial Therapy Through a Randomized Controlled Trial
BACKGROUND: Outpatient parenteral antimicrobial therapy (OPAT) has shifted from being a novel concept to an accepted model of care for some conditions. However, concerns remain that have limited its broader roll out: the use of daily ceftriaxone regarding its efficacy and impact on antibiotic resist...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Oxford University Press
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6254697/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofy210.296 |
_version_ | 1783373783442128896 |
---|---|
author | Ibrahim, Laila Hopper, Sandy Orsini, Francesca Daley, Andrew Babl, Franz Bryant, Penelope |
author_facet | Ibrahim, Laila Hopper, Sandy Orsini, Francesca Daley, Andrew Babl, Franz Bryant, Penelope |
author_sort | Ibrahim, Laila |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Outpatient parenteral antimicrobial therapy (OPAT) has shifted from being a novel concept to an accepted model of care for some conditions. However, concerns remain that have limited its broader roll out: the use of daily ceftriaxone regarding its efficacy and impact on antibiotic resistance, intravenous (IV) catheter complications, risk of treating an acute infection directly from the emergency room (ER), and concern that OPAT has shifted the burden of cost from hospitals to patients. We aimed to address these questions with the first randomized controlled trial (RCT) of OPAT efficacy in children: comparing OPAT directly from the ER using IV ceftriaxone with hospitalization using IV flucloxacillin for moderate/severe cellulitis. METHODS: The RCT was set at a tertiary pediatric hospital from January 2015 to June 2017. Inclusion criteria: children 6 months–18 years with uncomplicated cellulitis needing IV antibiotics. Patients were randomized to ceftriaxone via OPAT at home or flucloxacillin in hospital, using a peripheral catheter. Primary outcome: treatment failure within 48 hours due to lack of improvement or adverse events. Secondary outcomes: complications, readmission, acquisition of nasal and stool-resistant bacteria and costs. RESULTS: A total of 188 children were randomized: 93 to OPAT and 95 to hospital. In the intention-to-treat population, there was no difference in treatment failure between OPAT and hospital (2% vs. 7%, P = 0.09). Per protocol, OPAT had less failure (1% vs. 8%, P = 0.03). There was no increased acquisition of MRSA, ESBL, VRE or C. difficile with OPAT compared with in hospital at 1 week or 3 months (P > 0.05). Complication rates were similar (6% vs. 7%, P = 0.78), and repeat IV catheterization was less with OPAT (3% vs. 15%, P = 0.002). Readmission was 1% on OPAT. The cost to families was significantly less with OPAT (AUD213 vs. AUD733, P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Despite the acuity of the infection, OPAT with IV ceftriaxone for moderate/severe cellulitis in children is efficacious with complications and readmissions no different from hospital care with IV flucloxacillin. Short-term ceftriaxone use in healthy children on OPAT is not associated with increased acquisition of resistant organisms, and has reduced burden of costs to families (ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02334124). DISCLOSURES: All authors: No reported disclosures. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6254697 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | Oxford University Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-62546972018-11-28 285. Challenging the Dogmas of Outpatient Parenteral Antimicrobial Therapy Through a Randomized Controlled Trial Ibrahim, Laila Hopper, Sandy Orsini, Francesca Daley, Andrew Babl, Franz Bryant, Penelope Open Forum Infect Dis Abstracts BACKGROUND: Outpatient parenteral antimicrobial therapy (OPAT) has shifted from being a novel concept to an accepted model of care for some conditions. However, concerns remain that have limited its broader roll out: the use of daily ceftriaxone regarding its efficacy and impact on antibiotic resistance, intravenous (IV) catheter complications, risk of treating an acute infection directly from the emergency room (ER), and concern that OPAT has shifted the burden of cost from hospitals to patients. We aimed to address these questions with the first randomized controlled trial (RCT) of OPAT efficacy in children: comparing OPAT directly from the ER using IV ceftriaxone with hospitalization using IV flucloxacillin for moderate/severe cellulitis. METHODS: The RCT was set at a tertiary pediatric hospital from January 2015 to June 2017. Inclusion criteria: children 6 months–18 years with uncomplicated cellulitis needing IV antibiotics. Patients were randomized to ceftriaxone via OPAT at home or flucloxacillin in hospital, using a peripheral catheter. Primary outcome: treatment failure within 48 hours due to lack of improvement or adverse events. Secondary outcomes: complications, readmission, acquisition of nasal and stool-resistant bacteria and costs. RESULTS: A total of 188 children were randomized: 93 to OPAT and 95 to hospital. In the intention-to-treat population, there was no difference in treatment failure between OPAT and hospital (2% vs. 7%, P = 0.09). Per protocol, OPAT had less failure (1% vs. 8%, P = 0.03). There was no increased acquisition of MRSA, ESBL, VRE or C. difficile with OPAT compared with in hospital at 1 week or 3 months (P > 0.05). Complication rates were similar (6% vs. 7%, P = 0.78), and repeat IV catheterization was less with OPAT (3% vs. 15%, P = 0.002). Readmission was 1% on OPAT. The cost to families was significantly less with OPAT (AUD213 vs. AUD733, P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Despite the acuity of the infection, OPAT with IV ceftriaxone for moderate/severe cellulitis in children is efficacious with complications and readmissions no different from hospital care with IV flucloxacillin. Short-term ceftriaxone use in healthy children on OPAT is not associated with increased acquisition of resistant organisms, and has reduced burden of costs to families (ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02334124). DISCLOSURES: All authors: No reported disclosures. Oxford University Press 2018-11-26 /pmc/articles/PMC6254697/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofy210.296 Text en © The Author(s) 2018. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Infectious Diseases Society of America. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial reproduction and distribution of the work, in any medium, provided the original work is not altered or transformed in any way, and that the work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com |
spellingShingle | Abstracts Ibrahim, Laila Hopper, Sandy Orsini, Francesca Daley, Andrew Babl, Franz Bryant, Penelope 285. Challenging the Dogmas of Outpatient Parenteral Antimicrobial Therapy Through a Randomized Controlled Trial |
title | 285. Challenging the Dogmas of Outpatient Parenteral Antimicrobial Therapy Through a Randomized Controlled Trial |
title_full | 285. Challenging the Dogmas of Outpatient Parenteral Antimicrobial Therapy Through a Randomized Controlled Trial |
title_fullStr | 285. Challenging the Dogmas of Outpatient Parenteral Antimicrobial Therapy Through a Randomized Controlled Trial |
title_full_unstemmed | 285. Challenging the Dogmas of Outpatient Parenteral Antimicrobial Therapy Through a Randomized Controlled Trial |
title_short | 285. Challenging the Dogmas of Outpatient Parenteral Antimicrobial Therapy Through a Randomized Controlled Trial |
title_sort | 285. challenging the dogmas of outpatient parenteral antimicrobial therapy through a randomized controlled trial |
topic | Abstracts |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6254697/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofy210.296 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT ibrahimlaila 285challengingthedogmasofoutpatientparenteralantimicrobialtherapythrougharandomizedcontrolledtrial AT hoppersandy 285challengingthedogmasofoutpatientparenteralantimicrobialtherapythrougharandomizedcontrolledtrial AT orsinifrancesca 285challengingthedogmasofoutpatientparenteralantimicrobialtherapythrougharandomizedcontrolledtrial AT daleyandrew 285challengingthedogmasofoutpatientparenteralantimicrobialtherapythrougharandomizedcontrolledtrial AT bablfranz 285challengingthedogmasofoutpatientparenteralantimicrobialtherapythrougharandomizedcontrolledtrial AT bryantpenelope 285challengingthedogmasofoutpatientparenteralantimicrobialtherapythrougharandomizedcontrolledtrial |