Cargando…

412. Clinical and Pharmacoeconomic Evaluation of Antifungal Prophylaxis With Continuous Micafungin Compared to Posaconazole With Micafungin Bridging in Patients Undergoing Allogeneic Stem Cell Transplantation: A 6-Year Cohort Analysis

BACKGROUND: Patients undergoing allogeneic stem-cell transplantation (aSCT) are at high risk of invasive fungal disease (IFD). Optimization of antifungal prophylaxis strategies may further improve patient outcomes and reduce treatment costs. METHODS: We performed a retrospective single-center pharma...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Heimann, Sebastian M, Vehreschild, Maria J G T, Franke, Bernd, Cornely, Oliver, Hamprecht, Axel, Piepenbrock, Ellen, Scheid, Christoph, Vehreschild, Janne
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6254699/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofy210.423
_version_ 1783373783918182400
author Heimann, Sebastian M
Vehreschild, Maria J G T
Franke, Bernd
Cornely, Oliver
Hamprecht, Axel
Piepenbrock, Ellen
Scheid, Christoph
Vehreschild, Janne
author_facet Heimann, Sebastian M
Vehreschild, Maria J G T
Franke, Bernd
Cornely, Oliver
Hamprecht, Axel
Piepenbrock, Ellen
Scheid, Christoph
Vehreschild, Janne
author_sort Heimann, Sebastian M
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Patients undergoing allogeneic stem-cell transplantation (aSCT) are at high risk of invasive fungal disease (IFD). Optimization of antifungal prophylaxis strategies may further improve patient outcomes and reduce treatment costs. METHODS: We performed a retrospective single-center pharmacoeconomic evaluation comparing patients who received either posaconazole oral solution plus micafungin as intravenous bridging as required (POS-MIC) to patients who received only micafungin (MIC) as antifungal prophylaxis after aSCT at the University Hospital of Cologne. Epidemiological, clinical, and direct treatment cost data extracted from the Cologne Cohort of Neutropenic Patients (CoCoNut) were analyzed. Revised 2008 EORTC/MSG criteria were used for classification of IFD. RESULTS: During the observation period from January 2010 to December 2015, 313 patients (97 patients in the POS-MIC and 216 patients in the MIC group) fulfilled inclusion criteria. Most patients were male (n = 174; 56%) and median age was 52 years (range: 18–75 years). Acute myeloid leukemia was the most common underlying disease (n = 146; 47%). In the POS-MIC and MIC group, median overall length of stay (LOS) was 42 days (IQR: 35–52 days) vs. 40 days (IQR: 35–49 days; P = 0.296), resulting in median overall direct treatment costs of €42,964 (IQR: 35,040 - €56,348) vs. €43,291 (IQR: €37,281 vs. €51,848; P = 0.993), respectively. In both groups, possible IFD occurred in six patients (6%) vs. 16 patients (7%; P = 0.696) and probable/proven IFD occurred in five patients (5%) vs. threepatients (1%; P = 0.051). Overall in-hospital mortality rates in the POS-MIC and MIC group were 10% (n = 10) and 4% (n = 9; P = 0.035). Kaplan–Meier analysis showed improved outcome of patients who received MIC at day 100 (P = 0.037) and at day 365 (P < 0.001) following aSCT. Multivariable cox-regression model demonstrated treatment on ICU as the most important independent covariate for mortality at day 100 (HR: 8.08; P < 0.001) and at day 365 (HR: 4.70; P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: We observed a higher mortality in patients receiving POS-MIC instead of MIC, which was not explained by breakthrough IFDs. The higher drug acquisition costs of micafungin compared with posaconazole oral solution did not translate into higher overall direct treatment costs. DISCLOSURES: S. M. Heimann, Astellas: Grant Investigator and Lecture honoraria, Research grant and Speaker honorarium. M. J. G. T. Vehreschild, Astellas: Grant Investigator and Speaker’s Bureau, Research grant. O. Cornely, Astellas: Consultant, Grant Investigator and Lecture honoraria, Consulting fee, Research grant and Speaker honorarium. J. Vehreschild, Astellas: Grant Investigator and Speaker’s Bureau, Research grant and Speaker honorarium.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6254699
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-62546992018-11-28 412. Clinical and Pharmacoeconomic Evaluation of Antifungal Prophylaxis With Continuous Micafungin Compared to Posaconazole With Micafungin Bridging in Patients Undergoing Allogeneic Stem Cell Transplantation: A 6-Year Cohort Analysis Heimann, Sebastian M Vehreschild, Maria J G T Franke, Bernd Cornely, Oliver Hamprecht, Axel Piepenbrock, Ellen Scheid, Christoph Vehreschild, Janne Open Forum Infect Dis Abstracts BACKGROUND: Patients undergoing allogeneic stem-cell transplantation (aSCT) are at high risk of invasive fungal disease (IFD). Optimization of antifungal prophylaxis strategies may further improve patient outcomes and reduce treatment costs. METHODS: We performed a retrospective single-center pharmacoeconomic evaluation comparing patients who received either posaconazole oral solution plus micafungin as intravenous bridging as required (POS-MIC) to patients who received only micafungin (MIC) as antifungal prophylaxis after aSCT at the University Hospital of Cologne. Epidemiological, clinical, and direct treatment cost data extracted from the Cologne Cohort of Neutropenic Patients (CoCoNut) were analyzed. Revised 2008 EORTC/MSG criteria were used for classification of IFD. RESULTS: During the observation period from January 2010 to December 2015, 313 patients (97 patients in the POS-MIC and 216 patients in the MIC group) fulfilled inclusion criteria. Most patients were male (n = 174; 56%) and median age was 52 years (range: 18–75 years). Acute myeloid leukemia was the most common underlying disease (n = 146; 47%). In the POS-MIC and MIC group, median overall length of stay (LOS) was 42 days (IQR: 35–52 days) vs. 40 days (IQR: 35–49 days; P = 0.296), resulting in median overall direct treatment costs of €42,964 (IQR: 35,040 - €56,348) vs. €43,291 (IQR: €37,281 vs. €51,848; P = 0.993), respectively. In both groups, possible IFD occurred in six patients (6%) vs. 16 patients (7%; P = 0.696) and probable/proven IFD occurred in five patients (5%) vs. threepatients (1%; P = 0.051). Overall in-hospital mortality rates in the POS-MIC and MIC group were 10% (n = 10) and 4% (n = 9; P = 0.035). Kaplan–Meier analysis showed improved outcome of patients who received MIC at day 100 (P = 0.037) and at day 365 (P < 0.001) following aSCT. Multivariable cox-regression model demonstrated treatment on ICU as the most important independent covariate for mortality at day 100 (HR: 8.08; P < 0.001) and at day 365 (HR: 4.70; P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: We observed a higher mortality in patients receiving POS-MIC instead of MIC, which was not explained by breakthrough IFDs. The higher drug acquisition costs of micafungin compared with posaconazole oral solution did not translate into higher overall direct treatment costs. DISCLOSURES: S. M. Heimann, Astellas: Grant Investigator and Lecture honoraria, Research grant and Speaker honorarium. M. J. G. T. Vehreschild, Astellas: Grant Investigator and Speaker’s Bureau, Research grant. O. Cornely, Astellas: Consultant, Grant Investigator and Lecture honoraria, Consulting fee, Research grant and Speaker honorarium. J. Vehreschild, Astellas: Grant Investigator and Speaker’s Bureau, Research grant and Speaker honorarium. Oxford University Press 2018-11-26 /pmc/articles/PMC6254699/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofy210.423 Text en © The Author(s) 2018. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Infectious Diseases Society of America. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial reproduction and distribution of the work, in any medium, provided the original work is not altered or transformed in any way, and that the work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com
spellingShingle Abstracts
Heimann, Sebastian M
Vehreschild, Maria J G T
Franke, Bernd
Cornely, Oliver
Hamprecht, Axel
Piepenbrock, Ellen
Scheid, Christoph
Vehreschild, Janne
412. Clinical and Pharmacoeconomic Evaluation of Antifungal Prophylaxis With Continuous Micafungin Compared to Posaconazole With Micafungin Bridging in Patients Undergoing Allogeneic Stem Cell Transplantation: A 6-Year Cohort Analysis
title 412. Clinical and Pharmacoeconomic Evaluation of Antifungal Prophylaxis With Continuous Micafungin Compared to Posaconazole With Micafungin Bridging in Patients Undergoing Allogeneic Stem Cell Transplantation: A 6-Year Cohort Analysis
title_full 412. Clinical and Pharmacoeconomic Evaluation of Antifungal Prophylaxis With Continuous Micafungin Compared to Posaconazole With Micafungin Bridging in Patients Undergoing Allogeneic Stem Cell Transplantation: A 6-Year Cohort Analysis
title_fullStr 412. Clinical and Pharmacoeconomic Evaluation of Antifungal Prophylaxis With Continuous Micafungin Compared to Posaconazole With Micafungin Bridging in Patients Undergoing Allogeneic Stem Cell Transplantation: A 6-Year Cohort Analysis
title_full_unstemmed 412. Clinical and Pharmacoeconomic Evaluation of Antifungal Prophylaxis With Continuous Micafungin Compared to Posaconazole With Micafungin Bridging in Patients Undergoing Allogeneic Stem Cell Transplantation: A 6-Year Cohort Analysis
title_short 412. Clinical and Pharmacoeconomic Evaluation of Antifungal Prophylaxis With Continuous Micafungin Compared to Posaconazole With Micafungin Bridging in Patients Undergoing Allogeneic Stem Cell Transplantation: A 6-Year Cohort Analysis
title_sort 412. clinical and pharmacoeconomic evaluation of antifungal prophylaxis with continuous micafungin compared to posaconazole with micafungin bridging in patients undergoing allogeneic stem cell transplantation: a 6-year cohort analysis
topic Abstracts
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6254699/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofy210.423
work_keys_str_mv AT heimannsebastianm 412clinicalandpharmacoeconomicevaluationofantifungalprophylaxiswithcontinuousmicafungincomparedtoposaconazolewithmicafunginbridginginpatientsundergoingallogeneicstemcelltransplantationa6yearcohortanalysis
AT vehreschildmariajgt 412clinicalandpharmacoeconomicevaluationofantifungalprophylaxiswithcontinuousmicafungincomparedtoposaconazolewithmicafunginbridginginpatientsundergoingallogeneicstemcelltransplantationa6yearcohortanalysis
AT frankebernd 412clinicalandpharmacoeconomicevaluationofantifungalprophylaxiswithcontinuousmicafungincomparedtoposaconazolewithmicafunginbridginginpatientsundergoingallogeneicstemcelltransplantationa6yearcohortanalysis
AT cornelyoliver 412clinicalandpharmacoeconomicevaluationofantifungalprophylaxiswithcontinuousmicafungincomparedtoposaconazolewithmicafunginbridginginpatientsundergoingallogeneicstemcelltransplantationa6yearcohortanalysis
AT hamprechtaxel 412clinicalandpharmacoeconomicevaluationofantifungalprophylaxiswithcontinuousmicafungincomparedtoposaconazolewithmicafunginbridginginpatientsundergoingallogeneicstemcelltransplantationa6yearcohortanalysis
AT piepenbrockellen 412clinicalandpharmacoeconomicevaluationofantifungalprophylaxiswithcontinuousmicafungincomparedtoposaconazolewithmicafunginbridginginpatientsundergoingallogeneicstemcelltransplantationa6yearcohortanalysis
AT scheidchristoph 412clinicalandpharmacoeconomicevaluationofantifungalprophylaxiswithcontinuousmicafungincomparedtoposaconazolewithmicafunginbridginginpatientsundergoingallogeneicstemcelltransplantationa6yearcohortanalysis
AT vehreschildjanne 412clinicalandpharmacoeconomicevaluationofantifungalprophylaxiswithcontinuousmicafungincomparedtoposaconazolewithmicafunginbridginginpatientsundergoingallogeneicstemcelltransplantationa6yearcohortanalysis