Cargando…
2087. Comparison of Alere™ i Influenza Flu A and B 2 and Cobas(®) Influenza A/B Nucleic Acid Amplification Tests for Detection of Influenza A/B in Nasopharyngeal Swabs Collected from Children
BACKGROUND: Early diagnosis of influenza virus is critical for patient management and infection control. Both, Alere™ i Influenza A and B two assay (Alere i; Abbott Laboratories) and Cobas(®) Influenza A/B nucleic acid test (LIAT; Roche Molecular Systems Inc.) are rapid sample-to-answer CLIA waived...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Oxford University Press
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6254711/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofy210.1743 |
_version_ | 1783373786858389504 |
---|---|
author | Kanwar, Neena Michael, Jeffrey Doran, Kathryn Montgomery, Emily Selvarangan, Rangaraj |
author_facet | Kanwar, Neena Michael, Jeffrey Doran, Kathryn Montgomery, Emily Selvarangan, Rangaraj |
author_sort | Kanwar, Neena |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Early diagnosis of influenza virus is critical for patient management and infection control. Both, Alere™ i Influenza A and B two assay (Alere i; Abbott Laboratories) and Cobas(®) Influenza A/B nucleic acid test (LIAT; Roche Molecular Systems Inc.) are rapid sample-to-answer CLIA waived molecular assays for flu detection. The aim of this study was to compare the performance of these two commercially available flu assays. METHODS: A total of 201 children <18 years were prospectively enrolled from January to April 2018. Subjects with a physician’s test order of Flu test were considered eligible for study participation. Nasopharyngeal swab specimens were obtained after consenting the subjects. Aliquots made were frozen for testing on different diagnostic platforms per manufacturer’s instructions. CDC Flu A/B PCR was used as a reference method to evaluate the performance of the two platforms. RESULTS: Among the 201 specimens tested, CDC PCR detected Flu A/B in 107 samples (Flu A: 73, Flu B: 36; Dual flu A/B positive: 2), while Alere i assay detected 102 samples (Flu A: 69, Flu B: 37; dual flu A/B positive: 4; invalid rate: 1/201–0.5%) and LIAT assay detected 112 samples (Flu A: 74, Flu B: 38; invalid rate: 11/201–5.5%). The overall sensitivities for Alere i vs. LIAT (95.3% vs. 100%) and specificities (100% vs. 94.7%) were comparable. Alere i assay missed five samples detected by CDC PCR at high Ct values of 33.81 (range 31.75–36.04). Standard of care BD Veritor™ Flu A/B antigen test (BD) had a sensitivity and specificity of 77.6% (68.3–84.8) and 98.9% (93.3–99.9). CONCLUSION: The diagnostic performance for Alere™ i and LIAT flu assays were found comparable. Both molecular assays had >17% higher sensitivity than BD veritor antigen test. LIAT assay was found to be more sensitive than Alere i whereas Alere i had greater specificity than LIAT. DISCLOSURES: N. Kanwar, Alere Inc.: Collaborator, Research grant. R. Selvarangan, Abbott Diagnostics: Investigator, Research grant. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6254711 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | Oxford University Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-62547112018-11-28 2087. Comparison of Alere™ i Influenza Flu A and B 2 and Cobas(®) Influenza A/B Nucleic Acid Amplification Tests for Detection of Influenza A/B in Nasopharyngeal Swabs Collected from Children Kanwar, Neena Michael, Jeffrey Doran, Kathryn Montgomery, Emily Selvarangan, Rangaraj Open Forum Infect Dis Abstracts BACKGROUND: Early diagnosis of influenza virus is critical for patient management and infection control. Both, Alere™ i Influenza A and B two assay (Alere i; Abbott Laboratories) and Cobas(®) Influenza A/B nucleic acid test (LIAT; Roche Molecular Systems Inc.) are rapid sample-to-answer CLIA waived molecular assays for flu detection. The aim of this study was to compare the performance of these two commercially available flu assays. METHODS: A total of 201 children <18 years were prospectively enrolled from January to April 2018. Subjects with a physician’s test order of Flu test were considered eligible for study participation. Nasopharyngeal swab specimens were obtained after consenting the subjects. Aliquots made were frozen for testing on different diagnostic platforms per manufacturer’s instructions. CDC Flu A/B PCR was used as a reference method to evaluate the performance of the two platforms. RESULTS: Among the 201 specimens tested, CDC PCR detected Flu A/B in 107 samples (Flu A: 73, Flu B: 36; Dual flu A/B positive: 2), while Alere i assay detected 102 samples (Flu A: 69, Flu B: 37; dual flu A/B positive: 4; invalid rate: 1/201–0.5%) and LIAT assay detected 112 samples (Flu A: 74, Flu B: 38; invalid rate: 11/201–5.5%). The overall sensitivities for Alere i vs. LIAT (95.3% vs. 100%) and specificities (100% vs. 94.7%) were comparable. Alere i assay missed five samples detected by CDC PCR at high Ct values of 33.81 (range 31.75–36.04). Standard of care BD Veritor™ Flu A/B antigen test (BD) had a sensitivity and specificity of 77.6% (68.3–84.8) and 98.9% (93.3–99.9). CONCLUSION: The diagnostic performance for Alere™ i and LIAT flu assays were found comparable. Both molecular assays had >17% higher sensitivity than BD veritor antigen test. LIAT assay was found to be more sensitive than Alere i whereas Alere i had greater specificity than LIAT. DISCLOSURES: N. Kanwar, Alere Inc.: Collaborator, Research grant. R. Selvarangan, Abbott Diagnostics: Investigator, Research grant. Oxford University Press 2018-11-26 /pmc/articles/PMC6254711/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofy210.1743 Text en © The Author(s) 2018. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Infectious Diseases Society of America. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial reproduction and distribution of the work, in any medium, provided the original work is not altered or transformed in any way, and that the work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com |
spellingShingle | Abstracts Kanwar, Neena Michael, Jeffrey Doran, Kathryn Montgomery, Emily Selvarangan, Rangaraj 2087. Comparison of Alere™ i Influenza Flu A and B 2 and Cobas(®) Influenza A/B Nucleic Acid Amplification Tests for Detection of Influenza A/B in Nasopharyngeal Swabs Collected from Children |
title | 2087. Comparison of Alere™ i Influenza Flu A and B 2 and Cobas(®) Influenza A/B Nucleic Acid Amplification Tests for Detection of Influenza A/B in Nasopharyngeal Swabs Collected from Children |
title_full | 2087. Comparison of Alere™ i Influenza Flu A and B 2 and Cobas(®) Influenza A/B Nucleic Acid Amplification Tests for Detection of Influenza A/B in Nasopharyngeal Swabs Collected from Children |
title_fullStr | 2087. Comparison of Alere™ i Influenza Flu A and B 2 and Cobas(®) Influenza A/B Nucleic Acid Amplification Tests for Detection of Influenza A/B in Nasopharyngeal Swabs Collected from Children |
title_full_unstemmed | 2087. Comparison of Alere™ i Influenza Flu A and B 2 and Cobas(®) Influenza A/B Nucleic Acid Amplification Tests for Detection of Influenza A/B in Nasopharyngeal Swabs Collected from Children |
title_short | 2087. Comparison of Alere™ i Influenza Flu A and B 2 and Cobas(®) Influenza A/B Nucleic Acid Amplification Tests for Detection of Influenza A/B in Nasopharyngeal Swabs Collected from Children |
title_sort | 2087. comparison of alere™ i influenza flu a and b 2 and cobas(®) influenza a/b nucleic acid amplification tests for detection of influenza a/b in nasopharyngeal swabs collected from children |
topic | Abstracts |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6254711/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofy210.1743 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT kanwarneena 2087comparisonofalereiinfluenzafluaandb2andcobasinfluenzaabnucleicacidamplificationtestsfordetectionofinfluenzaabinnasopharyngealswabscollectedfromchildren AT michaeljeffrey 2087comparisonofalereiinfluenzafluaandb2andcobasinfluenzaabnucleicacidamplificationtestsfordetectionofinfluenzaabinnasopharyngealswabscollectedfromchildren AT dorankathryn 2087comparisonofalereiinfluenzafluaandb2andcobasinfluenzaabnucleicacidamplificationtestsfordetectionofinfluenzaabinnasopharyngealswabscollectedfromchildren AT montgomeryemily 2087comparisonofalereiinfluenzafluaandb2andcobasinfluenzaabnucleicacidamplificationtestsfordetectionofinfluenzaabinnasopharyngealswabscollectedfromchildren AT selvaranganrangaraj 2087comparisonofalereiinfluenzafluaandb2andcobasinfluenzaabnucleicacidamplificationtestsfordetectionofinfluenzaabinnasopharyngealswabscollectedfromchildren |