Cargando…

728. Regional Validation of Distinct RSV Seasonality Thresholds for Antigen and PCR Testing

BACKGROUND: Respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) produces annual epidemics that vary in the timing of season onset, peak, and duration by season and by geographic region. Recent analyses by the US Centers for Disease Control at the national level have demonstrated that polymerase chain reaction (PCR) t...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ambrose, Christopher S, Steed, Lisa L, Brandon, Michael, Frye, Kara, Thomson, Gina
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6254939/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofy210.735
_version_ 1783373841917018112
author Ambrose, Christopher S
Steed, Lisa L
Brandon, Michael
Frye, Kara
Thomson, Gina
author_facet Ambrose, Christopher S
Steed, Lisa L
Brandon, Michael
Frye, Kara
Thomson, Gina
author_sort Ambrose, Christopher S
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) produces annual epidemics that vary in the timing of season onset, peak, and duration by season and by geographic region. Recent analyses by the US Centers for Disease Control at the national level have demonstrated that polymerase chain reaction (PCR) testing has largely replaced rapid antigen testing as the predominant test type and that the traditional 10% positivity threshold for defining an RSV season based on antigen testing should not be applied to PCR testing, for which the comparable threshold for real-time surveillance was 3%. The aim of this study was to validate and model implementation of the antigen (10%) and PCR (3%) positivity thresholds at regional, state, and local levels in a large national dataset of RSV testing results from US hospitals. METHODS: RSV test results were obtained from 599 laboratories that participated from 2011 to 2016 in RSVAlert(®), a national RSV surveillance program. For laboratories that provided consistent weekly data (≥10 tests for ≥30 weeks of a season), regional test numbers and positivity were summarized weekly by test type within each season. Season onset and offset were calculated for the 10 US Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) regions and 10 large states plus Hawaii based on (1) antigen only for all seasons, (2) PCR only for all seasons, and (3) the predominant test type used in a specific geography in a season (either antigen or PCR). RESULTS: An average of 543,340 RSV tests was reported each season. At the regional and state levels, there were fewer outlier estimates of RSV season length when the predominant regional test type was used to define the season (Figures 1 and 2). Exceptions were few and occurred with antigen testing data. CONCLUSION: Overall, PCR positivity of 3% was comparable to antigen positivity of 10% at the regional and state levels. Local RSV season determination was most reliable when based on the predominant test type utilized. Funded by AstraZeneca [Image: see text] [Image: see text] DISCLOSURES: C. S. Ambrose, AstraZeneca: Employee, Salary and Stocks.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6254939
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-62549392018-11-28 728. Regional Validation of Distinct RSV Seasonality Thresholds for Antigen and PCR Testing Ambrose, Christopher S Steed, Lisa L Brandon, Michael Frye, Kara Thomson, Gina Open Forum Infect Dis Abstracts BACKGROUND: Respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) produces annual epidemics that vary in the timing of season onset, peak, and duration by season and by geographic region. Recent analyses by the US Centers for Disease Control at the national level have demonstrated that polymerase chain reaction (PCR) testing has largely replaced rapid antigen testing as the predominant test type and that the traditional 10% positivity threshold for defining an RSV season based on antigen testing should not be applied to PCR testing, for which the comparable threshold for real-time surveillance was 3%. The aim of this study was to validate and model implementation of the antigen (10%) and PCR (3%) positivity thresholds at regional, state, and local levels in a large national dataset of RSV testing results from US hospitals. METHODS: RSV test results were obtained from 599 laboratories that participated from 2011 to 2016 in RSVAlert(®), a national RSV surveillance program. For laboratories that provided consistent weekly data (≥10 tests for ≥30 weeks of a season), regional test numbers and positivity were summarized weekly by test type within each season. Season onset and offset were calculated for the 10 US Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) regions and 10 large states plus Hawaii based on (1) antigen only for all seasons, (2) PCR only for all seasons, and (3) the predominant test type used in a specific geography in a season (either antigen or PCR). RESULTS: An average of 543,340 RSV tests was reported each season. At the regional and state levels, there were fewer outlier estimates of RSV season length when the predominant regional test type was used to define the season (Figures 1 and 2). Exceptions were few and occurred with antigen testing data. CONCLUSION: Overall, PCR positivity of 3% was comparable to antigen positivity of 10% at the regional and state levels. Local RSV season determination was most reliable when based on the predominant test type utilized. Funded by AstraZeneca [Image: see text] [Image: see text] DISCLOSURES: C. S. Ambrose, AstraZeneca: Employee, Salary and Stocks. Oxford University Press 2018-11-26 /pmc/articles/PMC6254939/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofy210.735 Text en © The Author(s) 2018. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Infectious Diseases Society of America. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial reproduction and distribution of the work, in any medium, provided the original work is not altered or transformed in any way, and that the work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com
spellingShingle Abstracts
Ambrose, Christopher S
Steed, Lisa L
Brandon, Michael
Frye, Kara
Thomson, Gina
728. Regional Validation of Distinct RSV Seasonality Thresholds for Antigen and PCR Testing
title 728. Regional Validation of Distinct RSV Seasonality Thresholds for Antigen and PCR Testing
title_full 728. Regional Validation of Distinct RSV Seasonality Thresholds for Antigen and PCR Testing
title_fullStr 728. Regional Validation of Distinct RSV Seasonality Thresholds for Antigen and PCR Testing
title_full_unstemmed 728. Regional Validation of Distinct RSV Seasonality Thresholds for Antigen and PCR Testing
title_short 728. Regional Validation of Distinct RSV Seasonality Thresholds for Antigen and PCR Testing
title_sort 728. regional validation of distinct rsv seasonality thresholds for antigen and pcr testing
topic Abstracts
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6254939/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofy210.735
work_keys_str_mv AT ambrosechristophers 728regionalvalidationofdistinctrsvseasonalitythresholdsforantigenandpcrtesting
AT steedlisal 728regionalvalidationofdistinctrsvseasonalitythresholdsforantigenandpcrtesting
AT brandonmichael 728regionalvalidationofdistinctrsvseasonalitythresholdsforantigenandpcrtesting
AT fryekara 728regionalvalidationofdistinctrsvseasonalitythresholdsforantigenandpcrtesting
AT thomsongina 728regionalvalidationofdistinctrsvseasonalitythresholdsforantigenandpcrtesting