Cargando…

438. Finding Toxocara Eggs in Park Soil From Montgomery County, Pennsylvania

BACKGROUND: Toxocara canis (dogs) and Toxocara cati (cats) is a parasitic worm commonly called roundworm. Toxocara eggs are spherical to oblong in shape, have a rough/pitted edge, appear brownish in color, and measures 75–90 µm (T. canis) and 65–70 µm (T. cati). This environmental surveillance study...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Stek, Devyn
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6255000/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofy210.448
_version_ 1783373856032948224
author Stek, Devyn
author_facet Stek, Devyn
author_sort Stek, Devyn
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Toxocara canis (dogs) and Toxocara cati (cats) is a parasitic worm commonly called roundworm. Toxocara eggs are spherical to oblong in shape, have a rough/pitted edge, appear brownish in color, and measures 75–90 µm (T. canis) and 65–70 µm (T. cati). This environmental surveillance study was designed to examine Toxocara contamination levels of selected parks in Montgomery County, Pennsylvania for the first time. METHODS: Six soil samples (2 cups each) were obtained from six different parks, for a total of 36 samples. Two table spoons of dried/sifted soil were added to a glass, covered with 1/4 cup of a sugar floatation solution, stirred for 30 seconds, and let sit for 1 hour. The supernatant was transferred to a 20 mL plastic tube, capped, and let sit overnight. Three drops of surface fluid were placed on a glass slide and examined at ×400 total magnification. The number of Toxocara eggs from a full grid search of the cover slip area was recorded. RESULTS: Overall, 35 of 36 samples tested positive for Toxocara eggs. The parks and samples varied in their levels of contamination of Toxocara eggs; smallest samples (0 and 2 eggs) from Sanatoga Park and largest samples from Pottstown Memorial Park [52 eggs – picnic pavilion] and Heather Place Park [56 eggs – tree grove]. The average number of eggs from Sanatoga Park (2.5 eggs [95% CI: 1.0, 4.0]), Gerald Richards Park (4.0 eggs [95% CI: 3.8, 6.2]), and Althouse Arboretum (4.7 eggs [95% CI: 3.3, 6.1]) were significantly lower than Manderach Park (11.7 eggs [95% CI: 9.6, 13.8]). Sanatoga, Gerald Richards, and Heather Place had similar average number of eggs (χ(2) = 3.97 < 5.99). Pottstown Memorial Park (18.2 eggs [95% CI: 4.1, 32.1]) and Heather Place Park (18.5 eggs [95% CI: 3.5, 23.5]) had the highest averages; both parks had very similar average number of eggs (χ(2) = 0.02 < 3.84). CONCLUSION: This study demonstrated that Toxocara eggs could be found in every park that was tested. The number of eggs per sampled varied greatly; highest amounts in areas that could contain food droppings (e.g., picnic area) or potential bathrooms for dogs (e.g., tree grove). Some parks were significantly less infected with an average number of Toxocara eggs than other parks. DISCLOSURES: All authors: No reported disclosures.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6255000
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-62550002018-11-28 438. Finding Toxocara Eggs in Park Soil From Montgomery County, Pennsylvania Stek, Devyn Open Forum Infect Dis Abstracts BACKGROUND: Toxocara canis (dogs) and Toxocara cati (cats) is a parasitic worm commonly called roundworm. Toxocara eggs are spherical to oblong in shape, have a rough/pitted edge, appear brownish in color, and measures 75–90 µm (T. canis) and 65–70 µm (T. cati). This environmental surveillance study was designed to examine Toxocara contamination levels of selected parks in Montgomery County, Pennsylvania for the first time. METHODS: Six soil samples (2 cups each) were obtained from six different parks, for a total of 36 samples. Two table spoons of dried/sifted soil were added to a glass, covered with 1/4 cup of a sugar floatation solution, stirred for 30 seconds, and let sit for 1 hour. The supernatant was transferred to a 20 mL plastic tube, capped, and let sit overnight. Three drops of surface fluid were placed on a glass slide and examined at ×400 total magnification. The number of Toxocara eggs from a full grid search of the cover slip area was recorded. RESULTS: Overall, 35 of 36 samples tested positive for Toxocara eggs. The parks and samples varied in their levels of contamination of Toxocara eggs; smallest samples (0 and 2 eggs) from Sanatoga Park and largest samples from Pottstown Memorial Park [52 eggs – picnic pavilion] and Heather Place Park [56 eggs – tree grove]. The average number of eggs from Sanatoga Park (2.5 eggs [95% CI: 1.0, 4.0]), Gerald Richards Park (4.0 eggs [95% CI: 3.8, 6.2]), and Althouse Arboretum (4.7 eggs [95% CI: 3.3, 6.1]) were significantly lower than Manderach Park (11.7 eggs [95% CI: 9.6, 13.8]). Sanatoga, Gerald Richards, and Heather Place had similar average number of eggs (χ(2) = 3.97 < 5.99). Pottstown Memorial Park (18.2 eggs [95% CI: 4.1, 32.1]) and Heather Place Park (18.5 eggs [95% CI: 3.5, 23.5]) had the highest averages; both parks had very similar average number of eggs (χ(2) = 0.02 < 3.84). CONCLUSION: This study demonstrated that Toxocara eggs could be found in every park that was tested. The number of eggs per sampled varied greatly; highest amounts in areas that could contain food droppings (e.g., picnic area) or potential bathrooms for dogs (e.g., tree grove). Some parks were significantly less infected with an average number of Toxocara eggs than other parks. DISCLOSURES: All authors: No reported disclosures. Oxford University Press 2018-11-26 /pmc/articles/PMC6255000/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofy210.448 Text en © The Author(s) 2018. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Infectious Diseases Society of America. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial reproduction and distribution of the work, in any medium, provided the original work is not altered or transformed in any way, and that the work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com
spellingShingle Abstracts
Stek, Devyn
438. Finding Toxocara Eggs in Park Soil From Montgomery County, Pennsylvania
title 438. Finding Toxocara Eggs in Park Soil From Montgomery County, Pennsylvania
title_full 438. Finding Toxocara Eggs in Park Soil From Montgomery County, Pennsylvania
title_fullStr 438. Finding Toxocara Eggs in Park Soil From Montgomery County, Pennsylvania
title_full_unstemmed 438. Finding Toxocara Eggs in Park Soil From Montgomery County, Pennsylvania
title_short 438. Finding Toxocara Eggs in Park Soil From Montgomery County, Pennsylvania
title_sort 438. finding toxocara eggs in park soil from montgomery county, pennsylvania
topic Abstracts
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6255000/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofy210.448
work_keys_str_mv AT stekdevyn 438findingtoxocaraeggsinparksoilfrommontgomerycountypennsylvania