Cargando…

2297. The Diagnostic Yield of 16/18S rRNA PCR of Sterile Site Samples in Pediatric Patients

BACKGROUND: 16S ribosomal RNA (rRNA) and 18S rRNA gene polymerase chain reaction (16/18S PCR) with sequencing can provide expeditious bacterial or fungal pathogen identification from sterile site samples (cost $474/PCR). Our objective was to assess the utilization and diagnostic yield of 16/18S PCR...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Mithal, Leena B, Qi, Chao, Malczynski, Michael, Seed, Patrick C
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6255003/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofy210.1950
_version_ 1783373856727105536
author Mithal, Leena B
Qi, Chao
Malczynski, Michael
Seed, Patrick C
author_facet Mithal, Leena B
Qi, Chao
Malczynski, Michael
Seed, Patrick C
author_sort Mithal, Leena B
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: 16S ribosomal RNA (rRNA) and 18S rRNA gene polymerase chain reaction (16/18S PCR) with sequencing can provide expeditious bacterial or fungal pathogen identification from sterile site samples (cost $474/PCR). Our objective was to assess the utilization and diagnostic yield of 16/18S PCR of sterile site samples in pediatric patients. METHODS: Patients’ sterile site fluid or direct tissue specimens were collected and cultured at Lurie Children’s Hospital of Chicago and sent to Northwestern Memorial Hospital for 16/18S PCR as clinically indicated. Clinical data were reviewed including PCRs, cultures, and medical conditions. RESULTS: 16/18S PCR testing increased over the study period. In total, 177 samples were sent for 16S and/or 18S PCR from 146 patients (January 2016–April 2018). Osteoarticular, CSF, pleural fluid and organ tissue (n = 28; lung=19, chest mass=2, liver=2, spleen=2, etc.) sites were most frequent. The yield of 16/18S PCR by source is listed in Table 1. Twenty-eight of 156 samples for 16S PCR were positive (17.9%); 21 with a single organism ID, one with two organisms, and 6 indeterminate. (Table 2). Of negative 16S PCR samples, one grew Mycobacterium avium complex in culture. 18S PCR was performed on 108 unique samples; 7 were positive (6.5%, Table 3). For 4 positive 18S PCRs, a fungus also grew in culture with 3 concordant results and one discordant. Two negative 18S PCR samples grew molds (Phellinus spp.; Blastomyces dermatitidis). All patients (100%) with positive 18S PCR were immunocompromised compared with 21% (6/28) with positive 16S PCR. Both 16S and 18S PCRs were sent on 87 samples of which 16S PCR was positive in 5, 18S PCR was positive in 3, and none had both 16/18S PCRs positive. CONCLUSION: 16/18S PCR can provide important infectious pathogen diagnostics. 16S PCR should be sent only if bacterial culture is negative with higher yield sites being brain, abscess, pleural effusion, bone/joint and CSF. 16S PCR appears useful if an anaerobic pathogen is likely but conditions are not optimal for recovery. 18S PCR is highest yield in patients at risk of fungal disease. 16 and 18S PCRs were often sent together, likely reflexively. Selective or sequential testing may be advisable for most cases, guided by the clinical index of suspicion. Best practices to optimize resource utilization and clinical impact are evolving. [Image: see text] [Image: see text] [Image: see text] DISCLOSURES: All authors: No reported disclosures.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6255003
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-62550032018-11-28 2297. The Diagnostic Yield of 16/18S rRNA PCR of Sterile Site Samples in Pediatric Patients Mithal, Leena B Qi, Chao Malczynski, Michael Seed, Patrick C Open Forum Infect Dis Abstracts BACKGROUND: 16S ribosomal RNA (rRNA) and 18S rRNA gene polymerase chain reaction (16/18S PCR) with sequencing can provide expeditious bacterial or fungal pathogen identification from sterile site samples (cost $474/PCR). Our objective was to assess the utilization and diagnostic yield of 16/18S PCR of sterile site samples in pediatric patients. METHODS: Patients’ sterile site fluid or direct tissue specimens were collected and cultured at Lurie Children’s Hospital of Chicago and sent to Northwestern Memorial Hospital for 16/18S PCR as clinically indicated. Clinical data were reviewed including PCRs, cultures, and medical conditions. RESULTS: 16/18S PCR testing increased over the study period. In total, 177 samples were sent for 16S and/or 18S PCR from 146 patients (January 2016–April 2018). Osteoarticular, CSF, pleural fluid and organ tissue (n = 28; lung=19, chest mass=2, liver=2, spleen=2, etc.) sites were most frequent. The yield of 16/18S PCR by source is listed in Table 1. Twenty-eight of 156 samples for 16S PCR were positive (17.9%); 21 with a single organism ID, one with two organisms, and 6 indeterminate. (Table 2). Of negative 16S PCR samples, one grew Mycobacterium avium complex in culture. 18S PCR was performed on 108 unique samples; 7 were positive (6.5%, Table 3). For 4 positive 18S PCRs, a fungus also grew in culture with 3 concordant results and one discordant. Two negative 18S PCR samples grew molds (Phellinus spp.; Blastomyces dermatitidis). All patients (100%) with positive 18S PCR were immunocompromised compared with 21% (6/28) with positive 16S PCR. Both 16S and 18S PCRs were sent on 87 samples of which 16S PCR was positive in 5, 18S PCR was positive in 3, and none had both 16/18S PCRs positive. CONCLUSION: 16/18S PCR can provide important infectious pathogen diagnostics. 16S PCR should be sent only if bacterial culture is negative with higher yield sites being brain, abscess, pleural effusion, bone/joint and CSF. 16S PCR appears useful if an anaerobic pathogen is likely but conditions are not optimal for recovery. 18S PCR is highest yield in patients at risk of fungal disease. 16 and 18S PCRs were often sent together, likely reflexively. Selective or sequential testing may be advisable for most cases, guided by the clinical index of suspicion. Best practices to optimize resource utilization and clinical impact are evolving. [Image: see text] [Image: see text] [Image: see text] DISCLOSURES: All authors: No reported disclosures. Oxford University Press 2018-11-26 /pmc/articles/PMC6255003/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofy210.1950 Text en © The Author(s) 2018. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Infectious Diseases Society of America. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial reproduction and distribution of the work, in any medium, provided the original work is not altered or transformed in any way, and that the work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com
spellingShingle Abstracts
Mithal, Leena B
Qi, Chao
Malczynski, Michael
Seed, Patrick C
2297. The Diagnostic Yield of 16/18S rRNA PCR of Sterile Site Samples in Pediatric Patients
title 2297. The Diagnostic Yield of 16/18S rRNA PCR of Sterile Site Samples in Pediatric Patients
title_full 2297. The Diagnostic Yield of 16/18S rRNA PCR of Sterile Site Samples in Pediatric Patients
title_fullStr 2297. The Diagnostic Yield of 16/18S rRNA PCR of Sterile Site Samples in Pediatric Patients
title_full_unstemmed 2297. The Diagnostic Yield of 16/18S rRNA PCR of Sterile Site Samples in Pediatric Patients
title_short 2297. The Diagnostic Yield of 16/18S rRNA PCR of Sterile Site Samples in Pediatric Patients
title_sort 2297. the diagnostic yield of 16/18s rrna pcr of sterile site samples in pediatric patients
topic Abstracts
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6255003/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofy210.1950
work_keys_str_mv AT mithalleenab 2297thediagnosticyieldof1618srrnapcrofsterilesitesamplesinpediatricpatients
AT qichao 2297thediagnosticyieldof1618srrnapcrofsterilesitesamplesinpediatricpatients
AT malczynskimichael 2297thediagnosticyieldof1618srrnapcrofsterilesitesamplesinpediatricpatients
AT seedpatrickc 2297thediagnosticyieldof1618srrnapcrofsterilesitesamplesinpediatricpatients