Cargando…

1134. Novel T2Candida Panel Assay Compared With Blood Cultures for Detection of Candidemia in Transplant and Non-Transplant Patients

BACKGROUND: Blood culture (BC) the current “gold” standard for detection of candidemia has a sensitivity of ~50% and turnaround time (TAT) of 2–5 days. T2Candida Panel (T2) a magnetic resonance nano-diagnostic test done directly on blood samples detects C. albicans/C. tropicalis, C. krusei/C. glabra...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hussain, Noman, Chaudhry, Zohra, Rizvi, Hira, Abreu-Lanfranco, Odaliz, Ramesh, Mayur, Busto, Ramon Del, Osborn, Zachary, Alangaden, George
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6255004/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofy210.967
_version_ 1783373856949403648
author Hussain, Noman
Chaudhry, Zohra
Rizvi, Hira
Abreu-Lanfranco, Odaliz
Ramesh, Mayur
Busto, Ramon Del
Osborn, Zachary
Alangaden, George
author_facet Hussain, Noman
Chaudhry, Zohra
Rizvi, Hira
Abreu-Lanfranco, Odaliz
Ramesh, Mayur
Busto, Ramon Del
Osborn, Zachary
Alangaden, George
author_sort Hussain, Noman
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Blood culture (BC) the current “gold” standard for detection of candidemia has a sensitivity of ~50% and turnaround time (TAT) of 2–5 days. T2Candida Panel (T2) a magnetic resonance nano-diagnostic test done directly on blood samples detects C. albicans/C. tropicalis, C. krusei/C. glabrata, and C. parapsilosis. Clinical trials of T2 showed good sensitivity, specificity, NPV 99% and TAT of 3–5 hours. The performance of T2 in high-risk transplant (Tx) population is unknown. T2 was implemented at our institution in October 2015. We evaluated the performance characteristics of T2 and BC in our Tx and non-transplant (non-Tx) patient populations. METHODS: This was an observational, retrospective, cross-sectional evaluation of patients with suspected candidemia that had T2 done from October 2015 to October 2017 at a multihospital healthcare system in Detroit, MI. Performance characteristics of the T2 and BC in Tx and non-Tx patients were compared. BC obtained within 7 days before or after the T2 test were included in the analysis. TAT, sensitivity, specificity, PPV and NPV were calculated using positive BC as the standard. Differences between groups were assessed using two sample proportions testing at α = 0.05. RESULTS: A total of 1,272 patients with suspected candidemia had T2 done: 1,162 (91%) non-Tx and 110 (9%) Tx patients. Average TAT for T2 was 13 hours (5–41) vs. 34 hours (21–109) to initial positive BC result and 4 days (3–13) to species-specific BC result. In four non-Tx patients with negative T2, C. lusitaniae, C. dubliniensis, and C. kefyr were isolated in BC. Performance characteristics of T2 and BC in the two groups is shown (Table 1). Of the T2+/BC− cases (n = 102), 9% had retinitis and 9% had invasive candidiasis. CONCLUSION: The rapid TAT, good sensitivity, and high NPV of T2 in Tx patients has clinical implications and can help support antifungal stewardship efforts in this population. The clinical significance of T2 positivity in the presence of negative BC needs further investigation. DISCLOSURES: G. Alangaden, T2 Biosystems: Speaker’s Bureau, Educational grant and Speaker honorarium.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6255004
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-62550042018-11-28 1134. Novel T2Candida Panel Assay Compared With Blood Cultures for Detection of Candidemia in Transplant and Non-Transplant Patients Hussain, Noman Chaudhry, Zohra Rizvi, Hira Abreu-Lanfranco, Odaliz Ramesh, Mayur Busto, Ramon Del Osborn, Zachary Alangaden, George Open Forum Infect Dis Abstracts BACKGROUND: Blood culture (BC) the current “gold” standard for detection of candidemia has a sensitivity of ~50% and turnaround time (TAT) of 2–5 days. T2Candida Panel (T2) a magnetic resonance nano-diagnostic test done directly on blood samples detects C. albicans/C. tropicalis, C. krusei/C. glabrata, and C. parapsilosis. Clinical trials of T2 showed good sensitivity, specificity, NPV 99% and TAT of 3–5 hours. The performance of T2 in high-risk transplant (Tx) population is unknown. T2 was implemented at our institution in October 2015. We evaluated the performance characteristics of T2 and BC in our Tx and non-transplant (non-Tx) patient populations. METHODS: This was an observational, retrospective, cross-sectional evaluation of patients with suspected candidemia that had T2 done from October 2015 to October 2017 at a multihospital healthcare system in Detroit, MI. Performance characteristics of the T2 and BC in Tx and non-Tx patients were compared. BC obtained within 7 days before or after the T2 test were included in the analysis. TAT, sensitivity, specificity, PPV and NPV were calculated using positive BC as the standard. Differences between groups were assessed using two sample proportions testing at α = 0.05. RESULTS: A total of 1,272 patients with suspected candidemia had T2 done: 1,162 (91%) non-Tx and 110 (9%) Tx patients. Average TAT for T2 was 13 hours (5–41) vs. 34 hours (21–109) to initial positive BC result and 4 days (3–13) to species-specific BC result. In four non-Tx patients with negative T2, C. lusitaniae, C. dubliniensis, and C. kefyr were isolated in BC. Performance characteristics of T2 and BC in the two groups is shown (Table 1). Of the T2+/BC− cases (n = 102), 9% had retinitis and 9% had invasive candidiasis. CONCLUSION: The rapid TAT, good sensitivity, and high NPV of T2 in Tx patients has clinical implications and can help support antifungal stewardship efforts in this population. The clinical significance of T2 positivity in the presence of negative BC needs further investigation. DISCLOSURES: G. Alangaden, T2 Biosystems: Speaker’s Bureau, Educational grant and Speaker honorarium. Oxford University Press 2018-11-26 /pmc/articles/PMC6255004/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofy210.967 Text en © The Author(s) 2018. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Infectious Diseases Society of America. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial reproduction and distribution of the work, in any medium, provided the original work is not altered or transformed in any way, and that the work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com
spellingShingle Abstracts
Hussain, Noman
Chaudhry, Zohra
Rizvi, Hira
Abreu-Lanfranco, Odaliz
Ramesh, Mayur
Busto, Ramon Del
Osborn, Zachary
Alangaden, George
1134. Novel T2Candida Panel Assay Compared With Blood Cultures for Detection of Candidemia in Transplant and Non-Transplant Patients
title 1134. Novel T2Candida Panel Assay Compared With Blood Cultures for Detection of Candidemia in Transplant and Non-Transplant Patients
title_full 1134. Novel T2Candida Panel Assay Compared With Blood Cultures for Detection of Candidemia in Transplant and Non-Transplant Patients
title_fullStr 1134. Novel T2Candida Panel Assay Compared With Blood Cultures for Detection of Candidemia in Transplant and Non-Transplant Patients
title_full_unstemmed 1134. Novel T2Candida Panel Assay Compared With Blood Cultures for Detection of Candidemia in Transplant and Non-Transplant Patients
title_short 1134. Novel T2Candida Panel Assay Compared With Blood Cultures for Detection of Candidemia in Transplant and Non-Transplant Patients
title_sort 1134. novel t2candida panel assay compared with blood cultures for detection of candidemia in transplant and non-transplant patients
topic Abstracts
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6255004/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofy210.967
work_keys_str_mv AT hussainnoman 1134novelt2candidapanelassaycomparedwithbloodculturesfordetectionofcandidemiaintransplantandnontransplantpatients
AT chaudhryzohra 1134novelt2candidapanelassaycomparedwithbloodculturesfordetectionofcandidemiaintransplantandnontransplantpatients
AT rizvihira 1134novelt2candidapanelassaycomparedwithbloodculturesfordetectionofcandidemiaintransplantandnontransplantpatients
AT abreulanfrancoodaliz 1134novelt2candidapanelassaycomparedwithbloodculturesfordetectionofcandidemiaintransplantandnontransplantpatients
AT rameshmayur 1134novelt2candidapanelassaycomparedwithbloodculturesfordetectionofcandidemiaintransplantandnontransplantpatients
AT bustoramondel 1134novelt2candidapanelassaycomparedwithbloodculturesfordetectionofcandidemiaintransplantandnontransplantpatients
AT osbornzachary 1134novelt2candidapanelassaycomparedwithbloodculturesfordetectionofcandidemiaintransplantandnontransplantpatients
AT alangadengeorge 1134novelt2candidapanelassaycomparedwithbloodculturesfordetectionofcandidemiaintransplantandnontransplantpatients