Cargando…
1134. Novel T2Candida Panel Assay Compared With Blood Cultures for Detection of Candidemia in Transplant and Non-Transplant Patients
BACKGROUND: Blood culture (BC) the current “gold” standard for detection of candidemia has a sensitivity of ~50% and turnaround time (TAT) of 2–5 days. T2Candida Panel (T2) a magnetic resonance nano-diagnostic test done directly on blood samples detects C. albicans/C. tropicalis, C. krusei/C. glabra...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Oxford University Press
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6255004/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofy210.967 |
_version_ | 1783373856949403648 |
---|---|
author | Hussain, Noman Chaudhry, Zohra Rizvi, Hira Abreu-Lanfranco, Odaliz Ramesh, Mayur Busto, Ramon Del Osborn, Zachary Alangaden, George |
author_facet | Hussain, Noman Chaudhry, Zohra Rizvi, Hira Abreu-Lanfranco, Odaliz Ramesh, Mayur Busto, Ramon Del Osborn, Zachary Alangaden, George |
author_sort | Hussain, Noman |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Blood culture (BC) the current “gold” standard for detection of candidemia has a sensitivity of ~50% and turnaround time (TAT) of 2–5 days. T2Candida Panel (T2) a magnetic resonance nano-diagnostic test done directly on blood samples detects C. albicans/C. tropicalis, C. krusei/C. glabrata, and C. parapsilosis. Clinical trials of T2 showed good sensitivity, specificity, NPV 99% and TAT of 3–5 hours. The performance of T2 in high-risk transplant (Tx) population is unknown. T2 was implemented at our institution in October 2015. We evaluated the performance characteristics of T2 and BC in our Tx and non-transplant (non-Tx) patient populations. METHODS: This was an observational, retrospective, cross-sectional evaluation of patients with suspected candidemia that had T2 done from October 2015 to October 2017 at a multihospital healthcare system in Detroit, MI. Performance characteristics of the T2 and BC in Tx and non-Tx patients were compared. BC obtained within 7 days before or after the T2 test were included in the analysis. TAT, sensitivity, specificity, PPV and NPV were calculated using positive BC as the standard. Differences between groups were assessed using two sample proportions testing at α = 0.05. RESULTS: A total of 1,272 patients with suspected candidemia had T2 done: 1,162 (91%) non-Tx and 110 (9%) Tx patients. Average TAT for T2 was 13 hours (5–41) vs. 34 hours (21–109) to initial positive BC result and 4 days (3–13) to species-specific BC result. In four non-Tx patients with negative T2, C. lusitaniae, C. dubliniensis, and C. kefyr were isolated in BC. Performance characteristics of T2 and BC in the two groups is shown (Table 1). Of the T2+/BC− cases (n = 102), 9% had retinitis and 9% had invasive candidiasis. CONCLUSION: The rapid TAT, good sensitivity, and high NPV of T2 in Tx patients has clinical implications and can help support antifungal stewardship efforts in this population. The clinical significance of T2 positivity in the presence of negative BC needs further investigation. DISCLOSURES: G. Alangaden, T2 Biosystems: Speaker’s Bureau, Educational grant and Speaker honorarium. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6255004 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | Oxford University Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-62550042018-11-28 1134. Novel T2Candida Panel Assay Compared With Blood Cultures for Detection of Candidemia in Transplant and Non-Transplant Patients Hussain, Noman Chaudhry, Zohra Rizvi, Hira Abreu-Lanfranco, Odaliz Ramesh, Mayur Busto, Ramon Del Osborn, Zachary Alangaden, George Open Forum Infect Dis Abstracts BACKGROUND: Blood culture (BC) the current “gold” standard for detection of candidemia has a sensitivity of ~50% and turnaround time (TAT) of 2–5 days. T2Candida Panel (T2) a magnetic resonance nano-diagnostic test done directly on blood samples detects C. albicans/C. tropicalis, C. krusei/C. glabrata, and C. parapsilosis. Clinical trials of T2 showed good sensitivity, specificity, NPV 99% and TAT of 3–5 hours. The performance of T2 in high-risk transplant (Tx) population is unknown. T2 was implemented at our institution in October 2015. We evaluated the performance characteristics of T2 and BC in our Tx and non-transplant (non-Tx) patient populations. METHODS: This was an observational, retrospective, cross-sectional evaluation of patients with suspected candidemia that had T2 done from October 2015 to October 2017 at a multihospital healthcare system in Detroit, MI. Performance characteristics of the T2 and BC in Tx and non-Tx patients were compared. BC obtained within 7 days before or after the T2 test were included in the analysis. TAT, sensitivity, specificity, PPV and NPV were calculated using positive BC as the standard. Differences between groups were assessed using two sample proportions testing at α = 0.05. RESULTS: A total of 1,272 patients with suspected candidemia had T2 done: 1,162 (91%) non-Tx and 110 (9%) Tx patients. Average TAT for T2 was 13 hours (5–41) vs. 34 hours (21–109) to initial positive BC result and 4 days (3–13) to species-specific BC result. In four non-Tx patients with negative T2, C. lusitaniae, C. dubliniensis, and C. kefyr were isolated in BC. Performance characteristics of T2 and BC in the two groups is shown (Table 1). Of the T2+/BC− cases (n = 102), 9% had retinitis and 9% had invasive candidiasis. CONCLUSION: The rapid TAT, good sensitivity, and high NPV of T2 in Tx patients has clinical implications and can help support antifungal stewardship efforts in this population. The clinical significance of T2 positivity in the presence of negative BC needs further investigation. DISCLOSURES: G. Alangaden, T2 Biosystems: Speaker’s Bureau, Educational grant and Speaker honorarium. Oxford University Press 2018-11-26 /pmc/articles/PMC6255004/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofy210.967 Text en © The Author(s) 2018. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Infectious Diseases Society of America. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial reproduction and distribution of the work, in any medium, provided the original work is not altered or transformed in any way, and that the work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com |
spellingShingle | Abstracts Hussain, Noman Chaudhry, Zohra Rizvi, Hira Abreu-Lanfranco, Odaliz Ramesh, Mayur Busto, Ramon Del Osborn, Zachary Alangaden, George 1134. Novel T2Candida Panel Assay Compared With Blood Cultures for Detection of Candidemia in Transplant and Non-Transplant Patients |
title | 1134. Novel T2Candida Panel Assay Compared With Blood Cultures for Detection of Candidemia in Transplant and Non-Transplant Patients |
title_full | 1134. Novel T2Candida Panel Assay Compared With Blood Cultures for Detection of Candidemia in Transplant and Non-Transplant Patients |
title_fullStr | 1134. Novel T2Candida Panel Assay Compared With Blood Cultures for Detection of Candidemia in Transplant and Non-Transplant Patients |
title_full_unstemmed | 1134. Novel T2Candida Panel Assay Compared With Blood Cultures for Detection of Candidemia in Transplant and Non-Transplant Patients |
title_short | 1134. Novel T2Candida Panel Assay Compared With Blood Cultures for Detection of Candidemia in Transplant and Non-Transplant Patients |
title_sort | 1134. novel t2candida panel assay compared with blood cultures for detection of candidemia in transplant and non-transplant patients |
topic | Abstracts |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6255004/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofy210.967 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT hussainnoman 1134novelt2candidapanelassaycomparedwithbloodculturesfordetectionofcandidemiaintransplantandnontransplantpatients AT chaudhryzohra 1134novelt2candidapanelassaycomparedwithbloodculturesfordetectionofcandidemiaintransplantandnontransplantpatients AT rizvihira 1134novelt2candidapanelassaycomparedwithbloodculturesfordetectionofcandidemiaintransplantandnontransplantpatients AT abreulanfrancoodaliz 1134novelt2candidapanelassaycomparedwithbloodculturesfordetectionofcandidemiaintransplantandnontransplantpatients AT rameshmayur 1134novelt2candidapanelassaycomparedwithbloodculturesfordetectionofcandidemiaintransplantandnontransplantpatients AT bustoramondel 1134novelt2candidapanelassaycomparedwithbloodculturesfordetectionofcandidemiaintransplantandnontransplantpatients AT osbornzachary 1134novelt2candidapanelassaycomparedwithbloodculturesfordetectionofcandidemiaintransplantandnontransplantpatients AT alangadengeorge 1134novelt2candidapanelassaycomparedwithbloodculturesfordetectionofcandidemiaintransplantandnontransplantpatients |