Cargando…

516. Implementation of a Probiotic for the Primary Prevention of Hospital-Onset Clostridium difficile Infection

BACKGROUND: Hospital-onset Clostridium difficile infection (HO-CDI) affects over 100,000 patients in the United States each year. Due to a rising rate of HO-CDI at Denver Health, a multifaceted CDI prevention plan was implemented which included a probiotic intervention. The purpose of this study was...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Shihadeh, Kati, Young, Heather, Knepper, Bryan, Tapia, Robert, Jenkins, Timothy C
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6255073/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofy210.525
_version_ 1783373872902438912
author Shihadeh, Kati
Young, Heather
Knepper, Bryan
Tapia, Robert
Jenkins, Timothy C
author_facet Shihadeh, Kati
Young, Heather
Knepper, Bryan
Tapia, Robert
Jenkins, Timothy C
author_sort Shihadeh, Kati
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Hospital-onset Clostridium difficile infection (HO-CDI) affects over 100,000 patients in the United States each year. Due to a rising rate of HO-CDI at Denver Health, a multifaceted CDI prevention plan was implemented which included a probiotic intervention. The purpose of this study was to describe the implementation and uptake of the probiotic intervention. METHODS: This is a retrospective study of adult inpatients who received antibiotics considered high-risk for the development of CDI from March 2017 to March 2018. In March 2017, a Best Practice Advisory (BPA) was implemented to advise providers to order Bio-K+ (L. acidophilus, L. casei, and L. rhamnosus) when they signed an order for a high-risk antibiotic. The BPA allowed providers to order or decline the probiotic directly from the BPA. The BPA was suppressed in patients who were pregnant, immunocompromised, unable to take oral medications, or had active CDI. The primary outcome was the proportion of patients for whom Bio-K+ was prescribed in the first year. Secondary outcomes include CDI rates before and after the intervention and adverse events defined as a positive Lactobacillus culture. RESULTS: The BPA fired in 3,840 cases, and Bio-K+ was ordered in 94.8% of these. For patients who received a high-risk antibiotic for at least 24 hours, there were 2,636 courses of Bio-K+ prescribed for 2,324 unique patients for a median duration of 3 days. The HO-CDI rates for 1 year pre- and postintervention were 0.75 and 0.60 cases per 1,000 patient days, respectively (P = 0.16). Lactobacillus was cultured in 11 patients; five patients received Bio-K+ prior to culture. The positive cultures were from abdominal fluid (4) and sputum (1). There were no positive blood cultures in patients who received the probiotic. CONCLUSION: A probiotic intervention for the prevention of CDI implemented via BPA had excellent provider uptake. As part of a multifaceted CDI action plan, a probiotic intervention was well received and had a low risk of serious adverse events. DISCLOSURES: All authors: No reported disclosures.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6255073
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-62550732018-11-28 516. Implementation of a Probiotic for the Primary Prevention of Hospital-Onset Clostridium difficile Infection Shihadeh, Kati Young, Heather Knepper, Bryan Tapia, Robert Jenkins, Timothy C Open Forum Infect Dis Abstracts BACKGROUND: Hospital-onset Clostridium difficile infection (HO-CDI) affects over 100,000 patients in the United States each year. Due to a rising rate of HO-CDI at Denver Health, a multifaceted CDI prevention plan was implemented which included a probiotic intervention. The purpose of this study was to describe the implementation and uptake of the probiotic intervention. METHODS: This is a retrospective study of adult inpatients who received antibiotics considered high-risk for the development of CDI from March 2017 to March 2018. In March 2017, a Best Practice Advisory (BPA) was implemented to advise providers to order Bio-K+ (L. acidophilus, L. casei, and L. rhamnosus) when they signed an order for a high-risk antibiotic. The BPA allowed providers to order or decline the probiotic directly from the BPA. The BPA was suppressed in patients who were pregnant, immunocompromised, unable to take oral medications, or had active CDI. The primary outcome was the proportion of patients for whom Bio-K+ was prescribed in the first year. Secondary outcomes include CDI rates before and after the intervention and adverse events defined as a positive Lactobacillus culture. RESULTS: The BPA fired in 3,840 cases, and Bio-K+ was ordered in 94.8% of these. For patients who received a high-risk antibiotic for at least 24 hours, there were 2,636 courses of Bio-K+ prescribed for 2,324 unique patients for a median duration of 3 days. The HO-CDI rates for 1 year pre- and postintervention were 0.75 and 0.60 cases per 1,000 patient days, respectively (P = 0.16). Lactobacillus was cultured in 11 patients; five patients received Bio-K+ prior to culture. The positive cultures were from abdominal fluid (4) and sputum (1). There were no positive blood cultures in patients who received the probiotic. CONCLUSION: A probiotic intervention for the prevention of CDI implemented via BPA had excellent provider uptake. As part of a multifaceted CDI action plan, a probiotic intervention was well received and had a low risk of serious adverse events. DISCLOSURES: All authors: No reported disclosures. Oxford University Press 2018-11-26 /pmc/articles/PMC6255073/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofy210.525 Text en © The Author(s) 2018. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Infectious Diseases Society of America. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial reproduction and distribution of the work, in any medium, provided the original work is not altered or transformed in any way, and that the work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com
spellingShingle Abstracts
Shihadeh, Kati
Young, Heather
Knepper, Bryan
Tapia, Robert
Jenkins, Timothy C
516. Implementation of a Probiotic for the Primary Prevention of Hospital-Onset Clostridium difficile Infection
title 516. Implementation of a Probiotic for the Primary Prevention of Hospital-Onset Clostridium difficile Infection
title_full 516. Implementation of a Probiotic for the Primary Prevention of Hospital-Onset Clostridium difficile Infection
title_fullStr 516. Implementation of a Probiotic for the Primary Prevention of Hospital-Onset Clostridium difficile Infection
title_full_unstemmed 516. Implementation of a Probiotic for the Primary Prevention of Hospital-Onset Clostridium difficile Infection
title_short 516. Implementation of a Probiotic for the Primary Prevention of Hospital-Onset Clostridium difficile Infection
title_sort 516. implementation of a probiotic for the primary prevention of hospital-onset clostridium difficile infection
topic Abstracts
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6255073/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofy210.525
work_keys_str_mv AT shihadehkati 516implementationofaprobioticfortheprimarypreventionofhospitalonsetclostridiumdifficileinfection
AT youngheather 516implementationofaprobioticfortheprimarypreventionofhospitalonsetclostridiumdifficileinfection
AT knepperbryan 516implementationofaprobioticfortheprimarypreventionofhospitalonsetclostridiumdifficileinfection
AT tapiarobert 516implementationofaprobioticfortheprimarypreventionofhospitalonsetclostridiumdifficileinfection
AT jenkinstimothyc 516implementationofaprobioticfortheprimarypreventionofhospitalonsetclostridiumdifficileinfection