Cargando…

1045. A Multicenter Propensity Score-Adjusted Retrospective Study for Comparison of the Outcome of Treatment With Third-Generation Cephalosporin vs. Broad-Spectrum Antibiotics for Enterobacter Bacteremia

BACKGROUND: Enterobacter spp. can develop resistance during prolonged therapy with third-generation cephalosporins (3GC: ceftriaxone, cefotaxime, or ceftazidime) because of derepression of AmpC β-lactamase. However, the clinical significance of this phenomena remains undetermined. This study aims to...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hayano, Satoshi, Yamamoto, Shungo, Hase, Ryota, Toguchi, Akihiro, Otsuka, Yoshihito, Hosokawa, Naoto
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6255107/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofy210.882
_version_ 1783373880978571264
author Hayano, Satoshi
Yamamoto, Shungo
Hase, Ryota
Toguchi, Akihiro
Otsuka, Yoshihito
Hosokawa, Naoto
author_facet Hayano, Satoshi
Yamamoto, Shungo
Hase, Ryota
Toguchi, Akihiro
Otsuka, Yoshihito
Hosokawa, Naoto
author_sort Hayano, Satoshi
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Enterobacter spp. can develop resistance during prolonged therapy with third-generation cephalosporins (3GC: ceftriaxone, cefotaxime, or ceftazidime) because of derepression of AmpC β-lactamase. However, the clinical significance of this phenomena remains undetermined. This study aims to assess the outcome of patients with 3GC-susceptible Enterobacter bacteremia (EB) who received definite therapy with 3GC or broad-spectrum antibiotics (BSA) using propensity score analysis. METHODS: In this retrospective, cohort study conducted at two tertiary care hospitals in Japan, we determined consecutive patients with EB identified from the laboratory databases between January 2010 and December 2017. We enrolled patients with 3GC-susceptible EB treated with 3GC or BSA (defined as fourth-generation cephalosporins, carbapenems, and piperacillin/tazobactam) as definitive therapy. The primary outcome was 28-day mortality. The secondary outcome was the emergence of antimicrobial-resistant strain during antimicrobial therapy. We compared outcomes using the propensity scores and inverse-probability-weighting (IPW) adjustment to decrease the confounding by indication. RESULTS: We identified 320 patients with EB; of these, 191 cases were eligible (86 treated with 3GC and 105 treated with BSA). All the measured covariates were well balanced after the IPW adjustment. We observed no significant differences in the unadjusted mortality [5.8% in the 3GC group vs. 13.3% in the BSA group; risk difference, −7.5%; 95% confidence interval (CI): −15.7–0.6; P = 0.09], and the IPW-adjusted mortality (5.1% vs. 9.4%; risk difference −4.3%; 95% CI: −12.2–3.5; P = 0.3) between the groups. The results of the propensity score-matched analysis and sensitivity analysis were similar. Furthermore, we did not observe the emergence of antimicrobial resistance during antimicrobial therapy in both groups. CONCLUSION: Definitive therapy with 3GC for susceptible EB was not associated with an increased risk of the 28-day mortality after adjustment for potential confounders with the propensity score analysis or with the emergence of antimicrobial-resistant strain. DISCLOSURES: All authors: No reported disclosures.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6255107
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-62551072018-11-28 1045. A Multicenter Propensity Score-Adjusted Retrospective Study for Comparison of the Outcome of Treatment With Third-Generation Cephalosporin vs. Broad-Spectrum Antibiotics for Enterobacter Bacteremia Hayano, Satoshi Yamamoto, Shungo Hase, Ryota Toguchi, Akihiro Otsuka, Yoshihito Hosokawa, Naoto Open Forum Infect Dis Abstracts BACKGROUND: Enterobacter spp. can develop resistance during prolonged therapy with third-generation cephalosporins (3GC: ceftriaxone, cefotaxime, or ceftazidime) because of derepression of AmpC β-lactamase. However, the clinical significance of this phenomena remains undetermined. This study aims to assess the outcome of patients with 3GC-susceptible Enterobacter bacteremia (EB) who received definite therapy with 3GC or broad-spectrum antibiotics (BSA) using propensity score analysis. METHODS: In this retrospective, cohort study conducted at two tertiary care hospitals in Japan, we determined consecutive patients with EB identified from the laboratory databases between January 2010 and December 2017. We enrolled patients with 3GC-susceptible EB treated with 3GC or BSA (defined as fourth-generation cephalosporins, carbapenems, and piperacillin/tazobactam) as definitive therapy. The primary outcome was 28-day mortality. The secondary outcome was the emergence of antimicrobial-resistant strain during antimicrobial therapy. We compared outcomes using the propensity scores and inverse-probability-weighting (IPW) adjustment to decrease the confounding by indication. RESULTS: We identified 320 patients with EB; of these, 191 cases were eligible (86 treated with 3GC and 105 treated with BSA). All the measured covariates were well balanced after the IPW adjustment. We observed no significant differences in the unadjusted mortality [5.8% in the 3GC group vs. 13.3% in the BSA group; risk difference, −7.5%; 95% confidence interval (CI): −15.7–0.6; P = 0.09], and the IPW-adjusted mortality (5.1% vs. 9.4%; risk difference −4.3%; 95% CI: −12.2–3.5; P = 0.3) between the groups. The results of the propensity score-matched analysis and sensitivity analysis were similar. Furthermore, we did not observe the emergence of antimicrobial resistance during antimicrobial therapy in both groups. CONCLUSION: Definitive therapy with 3GC for susceptible EB was not associated with an increased risk of the 28-day mortality after adjustment for potential confounders with the propensity score analysis or with the emergence of antimicrobial-resistant strain. DISCLOSURES: All authors: No reported disclosures. Oxford University Press 2018-11-26 /pmc/articles/PMC6255107/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofy210.882 Text en © The Author(s) 2018. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Infectious Diseases Society of America. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial reproduction and distribution of the work, in any medium, provided the original work is not altered or transformed in any way, and that the work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com
spellingShingle Abstracts
Hayano, Satoshi
Yamamoto, Shungo
Hase, Ryota
Toguchi, Akihiro
Otsuka, Yoshihito
Hosokawa, Naoto
1045. A Multicenter Propensity Score-Adjusted Retrospective Study for Comparison of the Outcome of Treatment With Third-Generation Cephalosporin vs. Broad-Spectrum Antibiotics for Enterobacter Bacteremia
title 1045. A Multicenter Propensity Score-Adjusted Retrospective Study for Comparison of the Outcome of Treatment With Third-Generation Cephalosporin vs. Broad-Spectrum Antibiotics for Enterobacter Bacteremia
title_full 1045. A Multicenter Propensity Score-Adjusted Retrospective Study for Comparison of the Outcome of Treatment With Third-Generation Cephalosporin vs. Broad-Spectrum Antibiotics for Enterobacter Bacteremia
title_fullStr 1045. A Multicenter Propensity Score-Adjusted Retrospective Study for Comparison of the Outcome of Treatment With Third-Generation Cephalosporin vs. Broad-Spectrum Antibiotics for Enterobacter Bacteremia
title_full_unstemmed 1045. A Multicenter Propensity Score-Adjusted Retrospective Study for Comparison of the Outcome of Treatment With Third-Generation Cephalosporin vs. Broad-Spectrum Antibiotics for Enterobacter Bacteremia
title_short 1045. A Multicenter Propensity Score-Adjusted Retrospective Study for Comparison of the Outcome of Treatment With Third-Generation Cephalosporin vs. Broad-Spectrum Antibiotics for Enterobacter Bacteremia
title_sort 1045. a multicenter propensity score-adjusted retrospective study for comparison of the outcome of treatment with third-generation cephalosporin vs. broad-spectrum antibiotics for enterobacter bacteremia
topic Abstracts
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6255107/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofy210.882
work_keys_str_mv AT hayanosatoshi 1045amulticenterpropensityscoreadjustedretrospectivestudyforcomparisonoftheoutcomeoftreatmentwiththirdgenerationcephalosporinvsbroadspectrumantibioticsforenterobacterbacteremia
AT yamamotoshungo 1045amulticenterpropensityscoreadjustedretrospectivestudyforcomparisonoftheoutcomeoftreatmentwiththirdgenerationcephalosporinvsbroadspectrumantibioticsforenterobacterbacteremia
AT haseryota 1045amulticenterpropensityscoreadjustedretrospectivestudyforcomparisonoftheoutcomeoftreatmentwiththirdgenerationcephalosporinvsbroadspectrumantibioticsforenterobacterbacteremia
AT toguchiakihiro 1045amulticenterpropensityscoreadjustedretrospectivestudyforcomparisonoftheoutcomeoftreatmentwiththirdgenerationcephalosporinvsbroadspectrumantibioticsforenterobacterbacteremia
AT otsukayoshihito 1045amulticenterpropensityscoreadjustedretrospectivestudyforcomparisonoftheoutcomeoftreatmentwiththirdgenerationcephalosporinvsbroadspectrumantibioticsforenterobacterbacteremia
AT hosokawanaoto 1045amulticenterpropensityscoreadjustedretrospectivestudyforcomparisonoftheoutcomeoftreatmentwiththirdgenerationcephalosporinvsbroadspectrumantibioticsforenterobacterbacteremia