Cargando…
1092. Tuning Down Clostridioides difficile PCR Sensitivity Reduces Treatment for C. difficile Infection in Toxin-Negative Patients With No Increase in Adverse Outcomes
BACKGROUND: Studies have shown that toxin detection identifies those who require treatment for C. difficile infection (CDI) and free toxin can be predicted with high negative predictive value from PCR cycle threshold (CT). CT-toxin was introduced at our institution in two phases: from October 2016 t...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Oxford University Press
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6255294/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofy210.927 |
_version_ | 1783373906398150656 |
---|---|
author | Hitchcock, Matthew Holubar, Marisa Tompkins, Lucy Banaei, Niaz |
author_facet | Hitchcock, Matthew Holubar, Marisa Tompkins, Lucy Banaei, Niaz |
author_sort | Hitchcock, Matthew |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Studies have shown that toxin detection identifies those who require treatment for C. difficile infection (CDI) and free toxin can be predicted with high negative predictive value from PCR cycle threshold (CT). CT-toxin was introduced at our institution in two phases: from October 2016 to October 2017, CT-toxin was reported with the PCR result (split reporting) and CDI therapy was discouraged if CT-toxin was negative (PCR+/CTtox−). Interim analysis showed that CDI treatment had no effect on outcomes in these CTtox− patients, so starting November 2017, only CT-toxin was reported. Outcomes in PCR+/CTtox− patients treated during split reporting and untreated during the toxin-only period are detailed here. METHODS: Patients tested from October 2016 to February. 2018 with a positive Xpert tcdB PCR (Cepheid, Sunnyvale, CA) and CTtox− result were included. Clinical data were collected by retrospective chart review in the split reporting period and prospective review in the toxin-only period and analyzed using SPSS at α = 0.01. RESULTS: Of 186 unique PCR+/CTtox- patients during split reporting, 99 (53%) were treated, compared with 6 (12%, n = 51) in the toxin-only period (P < 0.001). In comparing treated patients during split reporting to untreated patients during toxin-only reporting (n = 45), there were no significant differences in age, sex, prior antibiotic use, CDI in the previous 6 months, Charlson Comorbidity Index, patient location, immune status, or data at testing, including WBC count, creatinine, albumin, and stools/day. There were no cases of fulminant CDI in either group and no difference in outcomes (table). CONCLUSION: Reporting of CT-toxin alone significantly reduced treatment for CDI compared with split reporting in CTtox− patients with no increase in adverse outcomes in short-term follow-up. Further study is needed to confirm these findings in a larger cohort. DISCLOSURES: All authors: No reported disclosures. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6255294 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | Oxford University Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-62552942018-11-28 1092. Tuning Down Clostridioides difficile PCR Sensitivity Reduces Treatment for C. difficile Infection in Toxin-Negative Patients With No Increase in Adverse Outcomes Hitchcock, Matthew Holubar, Marisa Tompkins, Lucy Banaei, Niaz Open Forum Infect Dis Abstracts BACKGROUND: Studies have shown that toxin detection identifies those who require treatment for C. difficile infection (CDI) and free toxin can be predicted with high negative predictive value from PCR cycle threshold (CT). CT-toxin was introduced at our institution in two phases: from October 2016 to October 2017, CT-toxin was reported with the PCR result (split reporting) and CDI therapy was discouraged if CT-toxin was negative (PCR+/CTtox−). Interim analysis showed that CDI treatment had no effect on outcomes in these CTtox− patients, so starting November 2017, only CT-toxin was reported. Outcomes in PCR+/CTtox− patients treated during split reporting and untreated during the toxin-only period are detailed here. METHODS: Patients tested from October 2016 to February. 2018 with a positive Xpert tcdB PCR (Cepheid, Sunnyvale, CA) and CTtox− result were included. Clinical data were collected by retrospective chart review in the split reporting period and prospective review in the toxin-only period and analyzed using SPSS at α = 0.01. RESULTS: Of 186 unique PCR+/CTtox- patients during split reporting, 99 (53%) were treated, compared with 6 (12%, n = 51) in the toxin-only period (P < 0.001). In comparing treated patients during split reporting to untreated patients during toxin-only reporting (n = 45), there were no significant differences in age, sex, prior antibiotic use, CDI in the previous 6 months, Charlson Comorbidity Index, patient location, immune status, or data at testing, including WBC count, creatinine, albumin, and stools/day. There were no cases of fulminant CDI in either group and no difference in outcomes (table). CONCLUSION: Reporting of CT-toxin alone significantly reduced treatment for CDI compared with split reporting in CTtox− patients with no increase in adverse outcomes in short-term follow-up. Further study is needed to confirm these findings in a larger cohort. DISCLOSURES: All authors: No reported disclosures. Oxford University Press 2018-11-26 /pmc/articles/PMC6255294/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofy210.927 Text en © The Author(s) 2018. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Infectious Diseases Society of America. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial reproduction and distribution of the work, in any medium, provided the original work is not altered or transformed in any way, and that the work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com |
spellingShingle | Abstracts Hitchcock, Matthew Holubar, Marisa Tompkins, Lucy Banaei, Niaz 1092. Tuning Down Clostridioides difficile PCR Sensitivity Reduces Treatment for C. difficile Infection in Toxin-Negative Patients With No Increase in Adverse Outcomes |
title | 1092. Tuning Down Clostridioides difficile PCR Sensitivity Reduces Treatment for C. difficile Infection in Toxin-Negative Patients With No Increase in Adverse Outcomes |
title_full | 1092. Tuning Down Clostridioides difficile PCR Sensitivity Reduces Treatment for C. difficile Infection in Toxin-Negative Patients With No Increase in Adverse Outcomes |
title_fullStr | 1092. Tuning Down Clostridioides difficile PCR Sensitivity Reduces Treatment for C. difficile Infection in Toxin-Negative Patients With No Increase in Adverse Outcomes |
title_full_unstemmed | 1092. Tuning Down Clostridioides difficile PCR Sensitivity Reduces Treatment for C. difficile Infection in Toxin-Negative Patients With No Increase in Adverse Outcomes |
title_short | 1092. Tuning Down Clostridioides difficile PCR Sensitivity Reduces Treatment for C. difficile Infection in Toxin-Negative Patients With No Increase in Adverse Outcomes |
title_sort | 1092. tuning down clostridioides difficile pcr sensitivity reduces treatment for c. difficile infection in toxin-negative patients with no increase in adverse outcomes |
topic | Abstracts |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6255294/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofy210.927 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT hitchcockmatthew 1092tuningdownclostridioidesdifficilepcrsensitivityreducestreatmentforcdifficileinfectionintoxinnegativepatientswithnoincreaseinadverseoutcomes AT holubarmarisa 1092tuningdownclostridioidesdifficilepcrsensitivityreducestreatmentforcdifficileinfectionintoxinnegativepatientswithnoincreaseinadverseoutcomes AT tompkinslucy 1092tuningdownclostridioidesdifficilepcrsensitivityreducestreatmentforcdifficileinfectionintoxinnegativepatientswithnoincreaseinadverseoutcomes AT banaeiniaz 1092tuningdownclostridioidesdifficilepcrsensitivityreducestreatmentforcdifficileinfectionintoxinnegativepatientswithnoincreaseinadverseoutcomes |