Cargando…

307. Evaluation of the Diagnostic Approach to Native Spondylodiskitis

BACKGROUND: Current approaches for diagnosis of native spondylodiskitis are variable, as is the yield of image guided spinal biopsy. METHODS: This is a retrospective cohort study including adults determined to have native spondylodiskitis at our institution from January 2007 through July 2017. Inclu...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Weihe, Rachel, Burton, Douglas, Jackson, Sean, Reeves, Alan, Rotich, Duncan, He, Jianghua, Atrouni, Wissam El
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6255301/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofy210.318
_version_ 1783373908061192192
author Weihe, Rachel
Burton, Douglas
Jackson, Sean
Reeves, Alan
Rotich, Duncan
He, Jianghua
Atrouni, Wissam El
author_facet Weihe, Rachel
Burton, Douglas
Jackson, Sean
Reeves, Alan
Rotich, Duncan
He, Jianghua
Atrouni, Wissam El
author_sort Weihe, Rachel
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Current approaches for diagnosis of native spondylodiskitis are variable, as is the yield of image guided spinal biopsy. METHODS: This is a retrospective cohort study including adults determined to have native spondylodiskitis at our institution from January 2007 through July 2017. Inclusion criteria were imaging suggestive of spondylodiskitis, with either positive blood culture and/or a spinal biopsy culture or histopathology. Those with historical diagnosis or surgical site infections were excluded. Histopathology was the gold standard test for sensitivity/specificity calculation. Univariate logistic regression was used to predict positive biopsy culture. RESULTS: A total of 221 patients met our inclusion criteria, of which 203 (91.8%) had blood cultures done (112/203 positive, 55.2%), and 173 (78.2%) had spinal biopsy done of which 113 (65.0%) had received antibiotics within the preceding 2 weeks and 63 (36.4%) had positive culture. Forty-three bone specimens were cultured, and six (13.9%) were positive, while 136 disk specimens were cultured, and 58 (42.6%) were positive. There were 84 (48.5%) biopsies with histopathology performed on either bone or disk specimens, of which 47 (55.9%) were diagnostic. The sensitivity of bone culture was 27.3%, with a specificity of 91.7%. The sensitivity of disk culture was 52.6%, with a specificity of 75.0%. A single biopsy episode sensitivity was 48.9%, and specificity was 80.8%. A total of 23 (13.4%) patients had repeat biopsies (10 bone, 14 disk), five of which had positive cultures (21.7%). On univariate logistic regression, only a positive blood culture was predictive of a positive biopsy culture (odds ratio (OR) 13.08, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.97–86.81, P = 0.007). Disk culture had a higher yield than bone culture (OR 2.29; CI 0.91–5.73, P = 0.077) and prior antibiotics decreased the yield (OR 0.17; 95% CI 0.02–1.21, P = 0.078). CONCLUSION: The combination of histopathology and cultures including both bone and disk from spinal biopsies improve the diagnostic yield of native spondylodiskitis. Some patients require repeat biopsy. DISCLOSURES: All authors: No reported disclosures.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6255301
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-62553012018-11-28 307. Evaluation of the Diagnostic Approach to Native Spondylodiskitis Weihe, Rachel Burton, Douglas Jackson, Sean Reeves, Alan Rotich, Duncan He, Jianghua Atrouni, Wissam El Open Forum Infect Dis Abstracts BACKGROUND: Current approaches for diagnosis of native spondylodiskitis are variable, as is the yield of image guided spinal biopsy. METHODS: This is a retrospective cohort study including adults determined to have native spondylodiskitis at our institution from January 2007 through July 2017. Inclusion criteria were imaging suggestive of spondylodiskitis, with either positive blood culture and/or a spinal biopsy culture or histopathology. Those with historical diagnosis or surgical site infections were excluded. Histopathology was the gold standard test for sensitivity/specificity calculation. Univariate logistic regression was used to predict positive biopsy culture. RESULTS: A total of 221 patients met our inclusion criteria, of which 203 (91.8%) had blood cultures done (112/203 positive, 55.2%), and 173 (78.2%) had spinal biopsy done of which 113 (65.0%) had received antibiotics within the preceding 2 weeks and 63 (36.4%) had positive culture. Forty-three bone specimens were cultured, and six (13.9%) were positive, while 136 disk specimens were cultured, and 58 (42.6%) were positive. There were 84 (48.5%) biopsies with histopathology performed on either bone or disk specimens, of which 47 (55.9%) were diagnostic. The sensitivity of bone culture was 27.3%, with a specificity of 91.7%. The sensitivity of disk culture was 52.6%, with a specificity of 75.0%. A single biopsy episode sensitivity was 48.9%, and specificity was 80.8%. A total of 23 (13.4%) patients had repeat biopsies (10 bone, 14 disk), five of which had positive cultures (21.7%). On univariate logistic regression, only a positive blood culture was predictive of a positive biopsy culture (odds ratio (OR) 13.08, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.97–86.81, P = 0.007). Disk culture had a higher yield than bone culture (OR 2.29; CI 0.91–5.73, P = 0.077) and prior antibiotics decreased the yield (OR 0.17; 95% CI 0.02–1.21, P = 0.078). CONCLUSION: The combination of histopathology and cultures including both bone and disk from spinal biopsies improve the diagnostic yield of native spondylodiskitis. Some patients require repeat biopsy. DISCLOSURES: All authors: No reported disclosures. Oxford University Press 2018-11-26 /pmc/articles/PMC6255301/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofy210.318 Text en © The Author(s) 2018. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Infectious Diseases Society of America. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial reproduction and distribution of the work, in any medium, provided the original work is not altered or transformed in any way, and that the work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com
spellingShingle Abstracts
Weihe, Rachel
Burton, Douglas
Jackson, Sean
Reeves, Alan
Rotich, Duncan
He, Jianghua
Atrouni, Wissam El
307. Evaluation of the Diagnostic Approach to Native Spondylodiskitis
title 307. Evaluation of the Diagnostic Approach to Native Spondylodiskitis
title_full 307. Evaluation of the Diagnostic Approach to Native Spondylodiskitis
title_fullStr 307. Evaluation of the Diagnostic Approach to Native Spondylodiskitis
title_full_unstemmed 307. Evaluation of the Diagnostic Approach to Native Spondylodiskitis
title_short 307. Evaluation of the Diagnostic Approach to Native Spondylodiskitis
title_sort 307. evaluation of the diagnostic approach to native spondylodiskitis
topic Abstracts
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6255301/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofy210.318
work_keys_str_mv AT weiherachel 307evaluationofthediagnosticapproachtonativespondylodiskitis
AT burtondouglas 307evaluationofthediagnosticapproachtonativespondylodiskitis
AT jacksonsean 307evaluationofthediagnosticapproachtonativespondylodiskitis
AT reevesalan 307evaluationofthediagnosticapproachtonativespondylodiskitis
AT rotichduncan 307evaluationofthediagnosticapproachtonativespondylodiskitis
AT hejianghua 307evaluationofthediagnosticapproachtonativespondylodiskitis
AT atrouniwissamel 307evaluationofthediagnosticapproachtonativespondylodiskitis