Cargando…

340. Clinical Use of a Multiplex PCR Meningitis/Encephalitis Panel at an Urban Tertiary Care Center

BACKGROUND: The FilmArray® Meningitis/Encephalitis (ME) Panel (BioFire Diagnostics, Salt Lake City, Utah) is the first multiplex polymerase chain reaction (PCR) test for detection of 14 pathogens in cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) that are commonly associated with meningitis and encephalitis. Its impact o...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Geadas, Carolina, Asundi, Archana, Lapidot, Rotem, Miller, Nancy, Assoumou, Sabrina A
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6255398/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofy210.351
_version_ 1783373930785931264
author Geadas, Carolina
Asundi, Archana
Lapidot, Rotem
Miller, Nancy
Assoumou, Sabrina A
author_facet Geadas, Carolina
Asundi, Archana
Lapidot, Rotem
Miller, Nancy
Assoumou, Sabrina A
author_sort Geadas, Carolina
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The FilmArray® Meningitis/Encephalitis (ME) Panel (BioFire Diagnostics, Salt Lake City, Utah) is the first multiplex polymerase chain reaction (PCR) test for detection of 14 pathogens in cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) that are commonly associated with meningitis and encephalitis. Its impact on clinical management has not been well evaluated. Our aim was to describe the experience using the ME panel since its implementation at an urban tertiary care center. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective chart review of all patients aged >21 who had CSF samples analyzed by the ME panel from January 1 to July 31, 2017. We abstracted demographic, clinical, laboratory, and imaging data to assess ME panel results and their influence on clinical management. RESULTS: We reviewed the charts of 93 patients aged 21 to 85 who had the ME panel performed. Forty-nine (53%) were males and eight (9%) were immunosuppressed. Eight (9%) patients had a positive test for at least one target pathogen: four for a bacterial target (S. pneumoniae, N. meningitidis, or H. influenza), three for a viral target (HSV-2 or VZV), and one for both a bacterial and a viral target (S. pneumoniae and HSV-2). CSF cultures were negative for all five cases with bacteria detected. Confirmatory uniplex PCR was not performed for the positive viral results. Four of the five patients with positive results for a bacterial pathogen had received broad-spectrum antibiotics prior to lumbar puncture. In all five, antibiotics were modified (either started or de-escalated) based on the pathogen identified on the ME panel. All four patients with a positive result for a viral target received anti-viral therapy—in one case this was started empirically, while in the remaining three treatment was started only after the ME panel had resulted. Antibiotic management in the 85 patients with a negative ME panel varied widely based on clinical suspicion and other laboratory data. Three (3%) of the 93 patients had positive cultures for pathogens that are not ME panel targets (S. aureus and S. hominis). CONCLUSION: The ME panel yielded positive results in cases where conventional tests did not, including when antibiotics had been initiated prior to CSF sampling. While a positive ME panel prompted changes in therapy, negative results, in the majority of cases, did not supersede clinical suspicion. DISCLOSURES: N. Miller, BioFire Diagnostics: Paid speaker, single day event (1 time only): 4/6/2017, BioFire Diagnostics, Syndromic Testing Symposium, Burlington, MA, Speaker honorarium.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6255398
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-62553982018-11-28 340. Clinical Use of a Multiplex PCR Meningitis/Encephalitis Panel at an Urban Tertiary Care Center Geadas, Carolina Asundi, Archana Lapidot, Rotem Miller, Nancy Assoumou, Sabrina A Open Forum Infect Dis Abstracts BACKGROUND: The FilmArray® Meningitis/Encephalitis (ME) Panel (BioFire Diagnostics, Salt Lake City, Utah) is the first multiplex polymerase chain reaction (PCR) test for detection of 14 pathogens in cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) that are commonly associated with meningitis and encephalitis. Its impact on clinical management has not been well evaluated. Our aim was to describe the experience using the ME panel since its implementation at an urban tertiary care center. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective chart review of all patients aged >21 who had CSF samples analyzed by the ME panel from January 1 to July 31, 2017. We abstracted demographic, clinical, laboratory, and imaging data to assess ME panel results and their influence on clinical management. RESULTS: We reviewed the charts of 93 patients aged 21 to 85 who had the ME panel performed. Forty-nine (53%) were males and eight (9%) were immunosuppressed. Eight (9%) patients had a positive test for at least one target pathogen: four for a bacterial target (S. pneumoniae, N. meningitidis, or H. influenza), three for a viral target (HSV-2 or VZV), and one for both a bacterial and a viral target (S. pneumoniae and HSV-2). CSF cultures were negative for all five cases with bacteria detected. Confirmatory uniplex PCR was not performed for the positive viral results. Four of the five patients with positive results for a bacterial pathogen had received broad-spectrum antibiotics prior to lumbar puncture. In all five, antibiotics were modified (either started or de-escalated) based on the pathogen identified on the ME panel. All four patients with a positive result for a viral target received anti-viral therapy—in one case this was started empirically, while in the remaining three treatment was started only after the ME panel had resulted. Antibiotic management in the 85 patients with a negative ME panel varied widely based on clinical suspicion and other laboratory data. Three (3%) of the 93 patients had positive cultures for pathogens that are not ME panel targets (S. aureus and S. hominis). CONCLUSION: The ME panel yielded positive results in cases where conventional tests did not, including when antibiotics had been initiated prior to CSF sampling. While a positive ME panel prompted changes in therapy, negative results, in the majority of cases, did not supersede clinical suspicion. DISCLOSURES: N. Miller, BioFire Diagnostics: Paid speaker, single day event (1 time only): 4/6/2017, BioFire Diagnostics, Syndromic Testing Symposium, Burlington, MA, Speaker honorarium. Oxford University Press 2018-11-26 /pmc/articles/PMC6255398/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofy210.351 Text en © The Author(s) 2018. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Infectious Diseases Society of America. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial reproduction and distribution of the work, in any medium, provided the original work is not altered or transformed in any way, and that the work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com
spellingShingle Abstracts
Geadas, Carolina
Asundi, Archana
Lapidot, Rotem
Miller, Nancy
Assoumou, Sabrina A
340. Clinical Use of a Multiplex PCR Meningitis/Encephalitis Panel at an Urban Tertiary Care Center
title 340. Clinical Use of a Multiplex PCR Meningitis/Encephalitis Panel at an Urban Tertiary Care Center
title_full 340. Clinical Use of a Multiplex PCR Meningitis/Encephalitis Panel at an Urban Tertiary Care Center
title_fullStr 340. Clinical Use of a Multiplex PCR Meningitis/Encephalitis Panel at an Urban Tertiary Care Center
title_full_unstemmed 340. Clinical Use of a Multiplex PCR Meningitis/Encephalitis Panel at an Urban Tertiary Care Center
title_short 340. Clinical Use of a Multiplex PCR Meningitis/Encephalitis Panel at an Urban Tertiary Care Center
title_sort 340. clinical use of a multiplex pcr meningitis/encephalitis panel at an urban tertiary care center
topic Abstracts
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6255398/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofy210.351
work_keys_str_mv AT geadascarolina 340clinicaluseofamultiplexpcrmeningitisencephalitispanelatanurbantertiarycarecenter
AT asundiarchana 340clinicaluseofamultiplexpcrmeningitisencephalitispanelatanurbantertiarycarecenter
AT lapidotrotem 340clinicaluseofamultiplexpcrmeningitisencephalitispanelatanurbantertiarycarecenter
AT millernancy 340clinicaluseofamultiplexpcrmeningitisencephalitispanelatanurbantertiarycarecenter
AT assoumousabrinaa 340clinicaluseofamultiplexpcrmeningitisencephalitispanelatanurbantertiarycarecenter