Cargando…
340. Clinical Use of a Multiplex PCR Meningitis/Encephalitis Panel at an Urban Tertiary Care Center
BACKGROUND: The FilmArray® Meningitis/Encephalitis (ME) Panel (BioFire Diagnostics, Salt Lake City, Utah) is the first multiplex polymerase chain reaction (PCR) test for detection of 14 pathogens in cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) that are commonly associated with meningitis and encephalitis. Its impact o...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Oxford University Press
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6255398/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofy210.351 |
_version_ | 1783373930785931264 |
---|---|
author | Geadas, Carolina Asundi, Archana Lapidot, Rotem Miller, Nancy Assoumou, Sabrina A |
author_facet | Geadas, Carolina Asundi, Archana Lapidot, Rotem Miller, Nancy Assoumou, Sabrina A |
author_sort | Geadas, Carolina |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: The FilmArray® Meningitis/Encephalitis (ME) Panel (BioFire Diagnostics, Salt Lake City, Utah) is the first multiplex polymerase chain reaction (PCR) test for detection of 14 pathogens in cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) that are commonly associated with meningitis and encephalitis. Its impact on clinical management has not been well evaluated. Our aim was to describe the experience using the ME panel since its implementation at an urban tertiary care center. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective chart review of all patients aged >21 who had CSF samples analyzed by the ME panel from January 1 to July 31, 2017. We abstracted demographic, clinical, laboratory, and imaging data to assess ME panel results and their influence on clinical management. RESULTS: We reviewed the charts of 93 patients aged 21 to 85 who had the ME panel performed. Forty-nine (53%) were males and eight (9%) were immunosuppressed. Eight (9%) patients had a positive test for at least one target pathogen: four for a bacterial target (S. pneumoniae, N. meningitidis, or H. influenza), three for a viral target (HSV-2 or VZV), and one for both a bacterial and a viral target (S. pneumoniae and HSV-2). CSF cultures were negative for all five cases with bacteria detected. Confirmatory uniplex PCR was not performed for the positive viral results. Four of the five patients with positive results for a bacterial pathogen had received broad-spectrum antibiotics prior to lumbar puncture. In all five, antibiotics were modified (either started or de-escalated) based on the pathogen identified on the ME panel. All four patients with a positive result for a viral target received anti-viral therapy—in one case this was started empirically, while in the remaining three treatment was started only after the ME panel had resulted. Antibiotic management in the 85 patients with a negative ME panel varied widely based on clinical suspicion and other laboratory data. Three (3%) of the 93 patients had positive cultures for pathogens that are not ME panel targets (S. aureus and S. hominis). CONCLUSION: The ME panel yielded positive results in cases where conventional tests did not, including when antibiotics had been initiated prior to CSF sampling. While a positive ME panel prompted changes in therapy, negative results, in the majority of cases, did not supersede clinical suspicion. DISCLOSURES: N. Miller, BioFire Diagnostics: Paid speaker, single day event (1 time only): 4/6/2017, BioFire Diagnostics, Syndromic Testing Symposium, Burlington, MA, Speaker honorarium. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6255398 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | Oxford University Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-62553982018-11-28 340. Clinical Use of a Multiplex PCR Meningitis/Encephalitis Panel at an Urban Tertiary Care Center Geadas, Carolina Asundi, Archana Lapidot, Rotem Miller, Nancy Assoumou, Sabrina A Open Forum Infect Dis Abstracts BACKGROUND: The FilmArray® Meningitis/Encephalitis (ME) Panel (BioFire Diagnostics, Salt Lake City, Utah) is the first multiplex polymerase chain reaction (PCR) test for detection of 14 pathogens in cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) that are commonly associated with meningitis and encephalitis. Its impact on clinical management has not been well evaluated. Our aim was to describe the experience using the ME panel since its implementation at an urban tertiary care center. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective chart review of all patients aged >21 who had CSF samples analyzed by the ME panel from January 1 to July 31, 2017. We abstracted demographic, clinical, laboratory, and imaging data to assess ME panel results and their influence on clinical management. RESULTS: We reviewed the charts of 93 patients aged 21 to 85 who had the ME panel performed. Forty-nine (53%) were males and eight (9%) were immunosuppressed. Eight (9%) patients had a positive test for at least one target pathogen: four for a bacterial target (S. pneumoniae, N. meningitidis, or H. influenza), three for a viral target (HSV-2 or VZV), and one for both a bacterial and a viral target (S. pneumoniae and HSV-2). CSF cultures were negative for all five cases with bacteria detected. Confirmatory uniplex PCR was not performed for the positive viral results. Four of the five patients with positive results for a bacterial pathogen had received broad-spectrum antibiotics prior to lumbar puncture. In all five, antibiotics were modified (either started or de-escalated) based on the pathogen identified on the ME panel. All four patients with a positive result for a viral target received anti-viral therapy—in one case this was started empirically, while in the remaining three treatment was started only after the ME panel had resulted. Antibiotic management in the 85 patients with a negative ME panel varied widely based on clinical suspicion and other laboratory data. Three (3%) of the 93 patients had positive cultures for pathogens that are not ME panel targets (S. aureus and S. hominis). CONCLUSION: The ME panel yielded positive results in cases where conventional tests did not, including when antibiotics had been initiated prior to CSF sampling. While a positive ME panel prompted changes in therapy, negative results, in the majority of cases, did not supersede clinical suspicion. DISCLOSURES: N. Miller, BioFire Diagnostics: Paid speaker, single day event (1 time only): 4/6/2017, BioFire Diagnostics, Syndromic Testing Symposium, Burlington, MA, Speaker honorarium. Oxford University Press 2018-11-26 /pmc/articles/PMC6255398/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofy210.351 Text en © The Author(s) 2018. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Infectious Diseases Society of America. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial reproduction and distribution of the work, in any medium, provided the original work is not altered or transformed in any way, and that the work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com |
spellingShingle | Abstracts Geadas, Carolina Asundi, Archana Lapidot, Rotem Miller, Nancy Assoumou, Sabrina A 340. Clinical Use of a Multiplex PCR Meningitis/Encephalitis Panel at an Urban Tertiary Care Center |
title | 340. Clinical Use of a Multiplex PCR Meningitis/Encephalitis Panel at an Urban Tertiary Care Center |
title_full | 340. Clinical Use of a Multiplex PCR Meningitis/Encephalitis Panel at an Urban Tertiary Care Center |
title_fullStr | 340. Clinical Use of a Multiplex PCR Meningitis/Encephalitis Panel at an Urban Tertiary Care Center |
title_full_unstemmed | 340. Clinical Use of a Multiplex PCR Meningitis/Encephalitis Panel at an Urban Tertiary Care Center |
title_short | 340. Clinical Use of a Multiplex PCR Meningitis/Encephalitis Panel at an Urban Tertiary Care Center |
title_sort | 340. clinical use of a multiplex pcr meningitis/encephalitis panel at an urban tertiary care center |
topic | Abstracts |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6255398/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofy210.351 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT geadascarolina 340clinicaluseofamultiplexpcrmeningitisencephalitispanelatanurbantertiarycarecenter AT asundiarchana 340clinicaluseofamultiplexpcrmeningitisencephalitispanelatanurbantertiarycarecenter AT lapidotrotem 340clinicaluseofamultiplexpcrmeningitisencephalitispanelatanurbantertiarycarecenter AT millernancy 340clinicaluseofamultiplexpcrmeningitisencephalitispanelatanurbantertiarycarecenter AT assoumousabrinaa 340clinicaluseofamultiplexpcrmeningitisencephalitispanelatanurbantertiarycarecenter |