Cargando…

2438. Ceftolozane/Tazobactam (C/T) Against Multidrug-Resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa (MDR-Pa) Infections: Clinical Efficacy, and Baseline and Emergent Resistance

BACKGROUND: Experience is mounting for C/T against MDR-Pa infections. More data are needed on efficacy for different infections, and baseline and emergent resistance. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed patients receiving >48 hours of C/T for MDR-Pa infections. Clinical success was defined at 30...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Shields, Ryan K, Haidar, Ghady, Potoski, Brian A, Doi, Yohei, Marini, Rachel V, Nguyen, M Hong, Clancy, Cornelius J
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6255415/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofy210.2091
_version_ 1783373934841823232
author Shields, Ryan K
Haidar, Ghady
Potoski, Brian A
Doi, Yohei
Marini, Rachel V
Nguyen, M Hong
Clancy, Cornelius J
author_facet Shields, Ryan K
Haidar, Ghady
Potoski, Brian A
Doi, Yohei
Marini, Rachel V
Nguyen, M Hong
Clancy, Cornelius J
author_sort Shields, Ryan K
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Experience is mounting for C/T against MDR-Pa infections. More data are needed on efficacy for different infections, and baseline and emergent resistance. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed patients receiving >48 hours of C/T for MDR-Pa infections. Clinical success was defined at 30 days as survival, improved symptoms, and absence of recurrent infection. Microbiologic failures were defined as isolation of MDR-Pa following ≥7 days of C/T. Minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) were determined by broth microdilution. RESULTS: 63 patients were included. Median age was 58 (range: 23–91), 54% were men, and median Charlson score was 4 (0–12). 35% were transplant recipients. At onset of infection, median APACHE II and SOFA scores were 21 (2–49) and 5 (0–17), respectively. Infections included pneumonia (n = 45), tracheobronchitis (n = 4), intra-abdominal (n = 4), skin/soft tissue (n = 3), urinary tract (n = 3), bacteremia (n = 2), endocarditis and empyema (n = 1 each). Median duration of C/T was 13 days (3–52). 58% of patients with pneumonia received concomitant inhaled antibiotics. 30% patients received concomitant intravenous antibiotics. Overall rates of clinical success and survival at 30 days were 57% and 78%, respectively. Failures were due to death (n = 14), recurrent infection (n = 7), lack of clinical improvement (n = 5), or early discontinuation of C/T (n = 1). Rates of success and survival for pneumonia were 53% and 71%, respectively. Success rates were 67% and 51% among patients receiving C/T mono- vs. combination therapy (P = 0.29). Among surviving patients (n = 49), microbiologic failures occurred in 49% at a median of 23 days (7–64) from C/T initiation. Micro failures were due to recurrent pneumonia (n = 6) or colonization (n = 18). 56% of patients survived at 90 days. Median C/T MIC vs. baseline MDR-Pa isolates was 2 µg/mL (range: 0.5–>256); 10% of patients had C/T resistant isolates at baseline. Among patients with microbiologic failures infected by C/T susceptible isolates at baseline (n = 21), 38% developed resistance. The median duration of treatment prior to the emergence of resistance was 17 days (6–53). CONCLUSION: C/T was effective for treatment of various MDR-Pa infections. MDR-Pa cannot be assumed to be C/T susceptible at baseline, and MICs should be measured before treatment and following microbiologic failure. DISCLOSURES: R. K. Shields, Allergan: Grant Investigator, Research grant. Pfizer: Consultant and Scientific Advisor, Speaker honorarium. Shionogi: Scientific Advisor, Consulting fee. Roche: Grant Investigator, Research grant. Venatorx: Grant Investigator, Research grant. Medicines Company: Grant Investigator and Scientific Advisor, Consulting fee and Research grant. Accelerate Diagnostics: Scientific Advisor, Consulting fee. M. H. Nguyen, Merck: Grant Investigator, Research grant. Astellas: Grant Investigator, Research grant.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6255415
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-62554152018-11-28 2438. Ceftolozane/Tazobactam (C/T) Against Multidrug-Resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa (MDR-Pa) Infections: Clinical Efficacy, and Baseline and Emergent Resistance Shields, Ryan K Haidar, Ghady Potoski, Brian A Doi, Yohei Marini, Rachel V Nguyen, M Hong Clancy, Cornelius J Open Forum Infect Dis Abstracts BACKGROUND: Experience is mounting for C/T against MDR-Pa infections. More data are needed on efficacy for different infections, and baseline and emergent resistance. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed patients receiving >48 hours of C/T for MDR-Pa infections. Clinical success was defined at 30 days as survival, improved symptoms, and absence of recurrent infection. Microbiologic failures were defined as isolation of MDR-Pa following ≥7 days of C/T. Minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) were determined by broth microdilution. RESULTS: 63 patients were included. Median age was 58 (range: 23–91), 54% were men, and median Charlson score was 4 (0–12). 35% were transplant recipients. At onset of infection, median APACHE II and SOFA scores were 21 (2–49) and 5 (0–17), respectively. Infections included pneumonia (n = 45), tracheobronchitis (n = 4), intra-abdominal (n = 4), skin/soft tissue (n = 3), urinary tract (n = 3), bacteremia (n = 2), endocarditis and empyema (n = 1 each). Median duration of C/T was 13 days (3–52). 58% of patients with pneumonia received concomitant inhaled antibiotics. 30% patients received concomitant intravenous antibiotics. Overall rates of clinical success and survival at 30 days were 57% and 78%, respectively. Failures were due to death (n = 14), recurrent infection (n = 7), lack of clinical improvement (n = 5), or early discontinuation of C/T (n = 1). Rates of success and survival for pneumonia were 53% and 71%, respectively. Success rates were 67% and 51% among patients receiving C/T mono- vs. combination therapy (P = 0.29). Among surviving patients (n = 49), microbiologic failures occurred in 49% at a median of 23 days (7–64) from C/T initiation. Micro failures were due to recurrent pneumonia (n = 6) or colonization (n = 18). 56% of patients survived at 90 days. Median C/T MIC vs. baseline MDR-Pa isolates was 2 µg/mL (range: 0.5–>256); 10% of patients had C/T resistant isolates at baseline. Among patients with microbiologic failures infected by C/T susceptible isolates at baseline (n = 21), 38% developed resistance. The median duration of treatment prior to the emergence of resistance was 17 days (6–53). CONCLUSION: C/T was effective for treatment of various MDR-Pa infections. MDR-Pa cannot be assumed to be C/T susceptible at baseline, and MICs should be measured before treatment and following microbiologic failure. DISCLOSURES: R. K. Shields, Allergan: Grant Investigator, Research grant. Pfizer: Consultant and Scientific Advisor, Speaker honorarium. Shionogi: Scientific Advisor, Consulting fee. Roche: Grant Investigator, Research grant. Venatorx: Grant Investigator, Research grant. Medicines Company: Grant Investigator and Scientific Advisor, Consulting fee and Research grant. Accelerate Diagnostics: Scientific Advisor, Consulting fee. M. H. Nguyen, Merck: Grant Investigator, Research grant. Astellas: Grant Investigator, Research grant. Oxford University Press 2018-11-26 /pmc/articles/PMC6255415/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofy210.2091 Text en © The Author(s) 2018. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Infectious Diseases Society of America. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial reproduction and distribution of the work, in any medium, provided the original work is not altered or transformed in any way, and that the work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com
spellingShingle Abstracts
Shields, Ryan K
Haidar, Ghady
Potoski, Brian A
Doi, Yohei
Marini, Rachel V
Nguyen, M Hong
Clancy, Cornelius J
2438. Ceftolozane/Tazobactam (C/T) Against Multidrug-Resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa (MDR-Pa) Infections: Clinical Efficacy, and Baseline and Emergent Resistance
title 2438. Ceftolozane/Tazobactam (C/T) Against Multidrug-Resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa (MDR-Pa) Infections: Clinical Efficacy, and Baseline and Emergent Resistance
title_full 2438. Ceftolozane/Tazobactam (C/T) Against Multidrug-Resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa (MDR-Pa) Infections: Clinical Efficacy, and Baseline and Emergent Resistance
title_fullStr 2438. Ceftolozane/Tazobactam (C/T) Against Multidrug-Resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa (MDR-Pa) Infections: Clinical Efficacy, and Baseline and Emergent Resistance
title_full_unstemmed 2438. Ceftolozane/Tazobactam (C/T) Against Multidrug-Resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa (MDR-Pa) Infections: Clinical Efficacy, and Baseline and Emergent Resistance
title_short 2438. Ceftolozane/Tazobactam (C/T) Against Multidrug-Resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa (MDR-Pa) Infections: Clinical Efficacy, and Baseline and Emergent Resistance
title_sort 2438. ceftolozane/tazobactam (c/t) against multidrug-resistant pseudomonas aeruginosa (mdr-pa) infections: clinical efficacy, and baseline and emergent resistance
topic Abstracts
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6255415/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofy210.2091
work_keys_str_mv AT shieldsryank 2438ceftolozanetazobactamctagainstmultidrugresistantpseudomonasaeruginosamdrpainfectionsclinicalefficacyandbaselineandemergentresistance
AT haidarghady 2438ceftolozanetazobactamctagainstmultidrugresistantpseudomonasaeruginosamdrpainfectionsclinicalefficacyandbaselineandemergentresistance
AT potoskibriana 2438ceftolozanetazobactamctagainstmultidrugresistantpseudomonasaeruginosamdrpainfectionsclinicalefficacyandbaselineandemergentresistance
AT doiyohei 2438ceftolozanetazobactamctagainstmultidrugresistantpseudomonasaeruginosamdrpainfectionsclinicalefficacyandbaselineandemergentresistance
AT marinirachelv 2438ceftolozanetazobactamctagainstmultidrugresistantpseudomonasaeruginosamdrpainfectionsclinicalefficacyandbaselineandemergentresistance
AT nguyenmhong 2438ceftolozanetazobactamctagainstmultidrugresistantpseudomonasaeruginosamdrpainfectionsclinicalefficacyandbaselineandemergentresistance
AT clancycorneliusj 2438ceftolozanetazobactamctagainstmultidrugresistantpseudomonasaeruginosamdrpainfectionsclinicalefficacyandbaselineandemergentresistance