Cargando…

1151. A Safer, More Effective Method for Cleaning and Disinfecting GI Endoscopic Procedure Rooms

BACKGROUND: Healthcare acquired infections are increasing. Current cleaning and disinfecting (C&D) methods subject staff to toxic chemicals and can be damaging to the facility. Hypochlorous acid (HOCl) is a disinfecting solution that is 80–200 times more effective than bleach in surface disinfec...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Overholt, Bergein, Reynolds, Karen, Wheeler, Donald
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6255518/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofy210.984
_version_ 1783373959758086144
author Overholt, Bergein
Reynolds, Karen
Wheeler, Donald
author_facet Overholt, Bergein
Reynolds, Karen
Wheeler, Donald
author_sort Overholt, Bergein
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Healthcare acquired infections are increasing. Current cleaning and disinfecting (C&D) methods subject staff to toxic chemicals and can be damaging to the facility. Hypochlorous acid (HOCl) is a disinfecting solution that is 80–200 times more effective than bleach in surface disinfection of bacteria yet is nontoxic to humans. The aim of this study was to determine whether HOCl is as effective as standard cleaning methods for C&D GI ambulatory surgery center (ASC) rooms as determined by ATP (adenosine triphosphate) measurements over a 2-week period. METHODS: Two similar GI ASCs, each with two procedure rooms, were studied. One ASC received postprocedure STANDARD C&D with quaternary ammonium compounds in nonwoven fabric for surface wiping of high touch areas followed by terminal benzalkonium chloride foam/spray on these areas. The second ASC received HOCl C&D using on-site freshly prepared HOCl, 1,000 ppm. Microfiber cloths semi-wet with HOCl were used for wiping surfaces for both C&D. In the HOCl rooms, after terminal manual wiping, misting with HOCl of the entire room was performed. Selected high touch area ATP testing was performed in all rooms before procedures in the AM and 10 minutes after terminal manual cleaning. In the HOCL rooms, testing was also performed 10 minutes after misting. High touch areas tested in each room included: endoscopic cart (three locations/cart), both gurney bed rails, computer mouse (two), working counters (two areas), light switch, door knob. ATP scores were compared within each site using analysis of means (ANOM). RESULTS: After terminal cleaning, the average ATP score in the HOCl CLEANING and DISINFECTING study arm was significantly lower than that for the STANDARD CLEANING and DISINFECTING rooms (P < 0.0017) (Figure 1). In evaluating the effect of the HOCl misting, the ATP scores in the HOCl rooms had a post cleaning, pre-misting average score of 2.7. The post misting average score was 1.7, showing that misting produced a further significant reduction (improvement) in ATP scores (P = 0.01). CONCLUSION: HOCl cleaning and disinfection in GI ASCs is more effective than standard procedures in lowering ATP scores following endoscopic procedures in procedure rooms. HOCl terminal misting of the rooms further improves the cleaning and disinfecting results. DISCLOSURES: B. Overholt, HOCl Solutions: Shareholder, none to date.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6255518
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-62555182018-11-28 1151. A Safer, More Effective Method for Cleaning and Disinfecting GI Endoscopic Procedure Rooms Overholt, Bergein Reynolds, Karen Wheeler, Donald Open Forum Infect Dis Abstracts BACKGROUND: Healthcare acquired infections are increasing. Current cleaning and disinfecting (C&D) methods subject staff to toxic chemicals and can be damaging to the facility. Hypochlorous acid (HOCl) is a disinfecting solution that is 80–200 times more effective than bleach in surface disinfection of bacteria yet is nontoxic to humans. The aim of this study was to determine whether HOCl is as effective as standard cleaning methods for C&D GI ambulatory surgery center (ASC) rooms as determined by ATP (adenosine triphosphate) measurements over a 2-week period. METHODS: Two similar GI ASCs, each with two procedure rooms, were studied. One ASC received postprocedure STANDARD C&D with quaternary ammonium compounds in nonwoven fabric for surface wiping of high touch areas followed by terminal benzalkonium chloride foam/spray on these areas. The second ASC received HOCl C&D using on-site freshly prepared HOCl, 1,000 ppm. Microfiber cloths semi-wet with HOCl were used for wiping surfaces for both C&D. In the HOCl rooms, after terminal manual wiping, misting with HOCl of the entire room was performed. Selected high touch area ATP testing was performed in all rooms before procedures in the AM and 10 minutes after terminal manual cleaning. In the HOCL rooms, testing was also performed 10 minutes after misting. High touch areas tested in each room included: endoscopic cart (three locations/cart), both gurney bed rails, computer mouse (two), working counters (two areas), light switch, door knob. ATP scores were compared within each site using analysis of means (ANOM). RESULTS: After terminal cleaning, the average ATP score in the HOCl CLEANING and DISINFECTING study arm was significantly lower than that for the STANDARD CLEANING and DISINFECTING rooms (P < 0.0017) (Figure 1). In evaluating the effect of the HOCl misting, the ATP scores in the HOCl rooms had a post cleaning, pre-misting average score of 2.7. The post misting average score was 1.7, showing that misting produced a further significant reduction (improvement) in ATP scores (P = 0.01). CONCLUSION: HOCl cleaning and disinfection in GI ASCs is more effective than standard procedures in lowering ATP scores following endoscopic procedures in procedure rooms. HOCl terminal misting of the rooms further improves the cleaning and disinfecting results. DISCLOSURES: B. Overholt, HOCl Solutions: Shareholder, none to date. Oxford University Press 2018-11-26 /pmc/articles/PMC6255518/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofy210.984 Text en © The Author(s) 2018. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Infectious Diseases Society of America. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial reproduction and distribution of the work, in any medium, provided the original work is not altered or transformed in any way, and that the work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com
spellingShingle Abstracts
Overholt, Bergein
Reynolds, Karen
Wheeler, Donald
1151. A Safer, More Effective Method for Cleaning and Disinfecting GI Endoscopic Procedure Rooms
title 1151. A Safer, More Effective Method for Cleaning and Disinfecting GI Endoscopic Procedure Rooms
title_full 1151. A Safer, More Effective Method for Cleaning and Disinfecting GI Endoscopic Procedure Rooms
title_fullStr 1151. A Safer, More Effective Method for Cleaning and Disinfecting GI Endoscopic Procedure Rooms
title_full_unstemmed 1151. A Safer, More Effective Method for Cleaning and Disinfecting GI Endoscopic Procedure Rooms
title_short 1151. A Safer, More Effective Method for Cleaning and Disinfecting GI Endoscopic Procedure Rooms
title_sort 1151. a safer, more effective method for cleaning and disinfecting gi endoscopic procedure rooms
topic Abstracts
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6255518/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofy210.984
work_keys_str_mv AT overholtbergein 1151asafermoreeffectivemethodforcleaninganddisinfectinggiendoscopicprocedurerooms
AT reynoldskaren 1151asafermoreeffectivemethodforcleaninganddisinfectinggiendoscopicprocedurerooms
AT wheelerdonald 1151asafermoreeffectivemethodforcleaninganddisinfectinggiendoscopicprocedurerooms