Cargando…
315. Oral Vs. Intravenous Antibiotic Treatment for Gram-Positive Prosthetic Joint Infections: A Retrospective Study
BACKGROUND: Intravenous antibiotic infusion is the current standard for prosthetic joint infections (PJIs) management. antibiotic used for PJIs have a good oral bioavailability, especially rifampicin, suggesting that oral and IV route could be as efficient. Our aim was to compare the outcome of PJIs...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Oxford University Press
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6255525/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofy210.326 |
_version_ | 1783373961577365504 |
---|---|
author | Coehlo, Alexandre Robineau, Olivier Titecat, Marie Putman, Sophie Blondiaux, Nicolas Valette, Michel Beltrand, Eric Migaud, Henri Senneville, Eric |
author_facet | Coehlo, Alexandre Robineau, Olivier Titecat, Marie Putman, Sophie Blondiaux, Nicolas Valette, Michel Beltrand, Eric Migaud, Henri Senneville, Eric |
author_sort | Coehlo, Alexandre |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Intravenous antibiotic infusion is the current standard for prosthetic joint infections (PJIs) management. antibiotic used for PJIs have a good oral bioavailability, especially rifampicin, suggesting that oral and IV route could be as efficient. Our aim was to compare the outcome of PJIs treated by oral antibiotics to those treated intravenously. METHODS: a retrospective survey was done in two reference centers between 2014 and 2016 and included all patients presenting Gram-positive PJIs. In these centers, patients suffering from Gram-positive PJIs could receive IV or early oral antibiotics regimen (started the day final antibiogram were received). First, we compared these two groups in terms of demographic and infection characteristics. Then, the outcome, judged by the percentage of patient with a relapse or a new infection on the same site during the follow-up, was compared. RESULTS: Within this period, 87 patients were treated for Gram-positive BJIs, 51 (59%) received early oral therapy and 36 were treated intravenously. Median age was 65 [IQR = 56–75], 50 (57%) were female. Overall, 18 cases suffered from polymicrobial BJIs containing at least one staphylococci. S. aureus was found in 30 (34%) cases and 7 (8%) strains were resistant to ampicillin. The median time of follow-up was 467 days [IQR=218–729]. The median time of treatment was 60 days [IQR=44–84]. When comparing the oral therapy group and IV group, we did not find any difference in terms of comorbidities, infection characteristics, type of surgery and infection severity. In the oral therapy group, the oral antibiotic regimen was started before day 7 following surgery for 33 (76%) individuals and before day 10 for 44 (86%). Treatment failures were observed in 9/36 (25%) and 12/51(23.5%) (P = 1) in IV and oral therapy group, respectively. CONCLUSION: Oral antibiotic treatment seems to be as efficient as an intravenous regimen to treat prosthetic Gram-positive prosthetic joint infections. DISCLOSURES: All authors: No reported disclosures. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6255525 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | Oxford University Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-62555252018-11-28 315. Oral Vs. Intravenous Antibiotic Treatment for Gram-Positive Prosthetic Joint Infections: A Retrospective Study Coehlo, Alexandre Robineau, Olivier Titecat, Marie Putman, Sophie Blondiaux, Nicolas Valette, Michel Beltrand, Eric Migaud, Henri Senneville, Eric Open Forum Infect Dis Abstracts BACKGROUND: Intravenous antibiotic infusion is the current standard for prosthetic joint infections (PJIs) management. antibiotic used for PJIs have a good oral bioavailability, especially rifampicin, suggesting that oral and IV route could be as efficient. Our aim was to compare the outcome of PJIs treated by oral antibiotics to those treated intravenously. METHODS: a retrospective survey was done in two reference centers between 2014 and 2016 and included all patients presenting Gram-positive PJIs. In these centers, patients suffering from Gram-positive PJIs could receive IV or early oral antibiotics regimen (started the day final antibiogram were received). First, we compared these two groups in terms of demographic and infection characteristics. Then, the outcome, judged by the percentage of patient with a relapse or a new infection on the same site during the follow-up, was compared. RESULTS: Within this period, 87 patients were treated for Gram-positive BJIs, 51 (59%) received early oral therapy and 36 were treated intravenously. Median age was 65 [IQR = 56–75], 50 (57%) were female. Overall, 18 cases suffered from polymicrobial BJIs containing at least one staphylococci. S. aureus was found in 30 (34%) cases and 7 (8%) strains were resistant to ampicillin. The median time of follow-up was 467 days [IQR=218–729]. The median time of treatment was 60 days [IQR=44–84]. When comparing the oral therapy group and IV group, we did not find any difference in terms of comorbidities, infection characteristics, type of surgery and infection severity. In the oral therapy group, the oral antibiotic regimen was started before day 7 following surgery for 33 (76%) individuals and before day 10 for 44 (86%). Treatment failures were observed in 9/36 (25%) and 12/51(23.5%) (P = 1) in IV and oral therapy group, respectively. CONCLUSION: Oral antibiotic treatment seems to be as efficient as an intravenous regimen to treat prosthetic Gram-positive prosthetic joint infections. DISCLOSURES: All authors: No reported disclosures. Oxford University Press 2018-11-26 /pmc/articles/PMC6255525/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofy210.326 Text en © The Author(s) 2018. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Infectious Diseases Society of America. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial reproduction and distribution of the work, in any medium, provided the original work is not altered or transformed in any way, and that the work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com |
spellingShingle | Abstracts Coehlo, Alexandre Robineau, Olivier Titecat, Marie Putman, Sophie Blondiaux, Nicolas Valette, Michel Beltrand, Eric Migaud, Henri Senneville, Eric 315. Oral Vs. Intravenous Antibiotic Treatment for Gram-Positive Prosthetic Joint Infections: A Retrospective Study |
title | 315. Oral Vs. Intravenous Antibiotic Treatment for Gram-Positive Prosthetic Joint Infections: A Retrospective Study |
title_full | 315. Oral Vs. Intravenous Antibiotic Treatment for Gram-Positive Prosthetic Joint Infections: A Retrospective Study |
title_fullStr | 315. Oral Vs. Intravenous Antibiotic Treatment for Gram-Positive Prosthetic Joint Infections: A Retrospective Study |
title_full_unstemmed | 315. Oral Vs. Intravenous Antibiotic Treatment for Gram-Positive Prosthetic Joint Infections: A Retrospective Study |
title_short | 315. Oral Vs. Intravenous Antibiotic Treatment for Gram-Positive Prosthetic Joint Infections: A Retrospective Study |
title_sort | 315. oral vs. intravenous antibiotic treatment for gram-positive prosthetic joint infections: a retrospective study |
topic | Abstracts |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6255525/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofy210.326 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT coehloalexandre 315oralvsintravenousantibiotictreatmentforgrampositiveprostheticjointinfectionsaretrospectivestudy AT robineauolivier 315oralvsintravenousantibiotictreatmentforgrampositiveprostheticjointinfectionsaretrospectivestudy AT titecatmarie 315oralvsintravenousantibiotictreatmentforgrampositiveprostheticjointinfectionsaretrospectivestudy AT putmansophie 315oralvsintravenousantibiotictreatmentforgrampositiveprostheticjointinfectionsaretrospectivestudy AT blondiauxnicolas 315oralvsintravenousantibiotictreatmentforgrampositiveprostheticjointinfectionsaretrospectivestudy AT valettemichel 315oralvsintravenousantibiotictreatmentforgrampositiveprostheticjointinfectionsaretrospectivestudy AT beltranderic 315oralvsintravenousantibiotictreatmentforgrampositiveprostheticjointinfectionsaretrospectivestudy AT migaudhenri 315oralvsintravenousantibiotictreatmentforgrampositiveprostheticjointinfectionsaretrospectivestudy AT sennevilleeric 315oralvsintravenousantibiotictreatmentforgrampositiveprostheticjointinfectionsaretrospectivestudy |