Cargando…

315. Oral Vs. Intravenous Antibiotic Treatment for Gram-Positive Prosthetic Joint Infections: A Retrospective Study

BACKGROUND: Intravenous antibiotic infusion is the current standard for prosthetic joint infections (PJIs) management. antibiotic used for PJIs have a good oral bioavailability, especially rifampicin, suggesting that oral and IV route could be as efficient. Our aim was to compare the outcome of PJIs...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Coehlo, Alexandre, Robineau, Olivier, Titecat, Marie, Putman, Sophie, Blondiaux, Nicolas, Valette, Michel, Beltrand, Eric, Migaud, Henri, Senneville, Eric
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6255525/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofy210.326
_version_ 1783373961577365504
author Coehlo, Alexandre
Robineau, Olivier
Titecat, Marie
Putman, Sophie
Blondiaux, Nicolas
Valette, Michel
Beltrand, Eric
Migaud, Henri
Senneville, Eric
author_facet Coehlo, Alexandre
Robineau, Olivier
Titecat, Marie
Putman, Sophie
Blondiaux, Nicolas
Valette, Michel
Beltrand, Eric
Migaud, Henri
Senneville, Eric
author_sort Coehlo, Alexandre
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Intravenous antibiotic infusion is the current standard for prosthetic joint infections (PJIs) management. antibiotic used for PJIs have a good oral bioavailability, especially rifampicin, suggesting that oral and IV route could be as efficient. Our aim was to compare the outcome of PJIs treated by oral antibiotics to those treated intravenously. METHODS: a retrospective survey was done in two reference centers between 2014 and 2016 and included all patients presenting Gram-positive PJIs. In these centers, patients suffering from Gram-positive PJIs could receive IV or early oral antibiotics regimen (started the day final antibiogram were received). First, we compared these two groups in terms of demographic and infection characteristics. Then, the outcome, judged by the percentage of patient with a relapse or a new infection on the same site during the follow-up, was compared. RESULTS: Within this period, 87 patients were treated for Gram-positive BJIs, 51 (59%) received early oral therapy and 36 were treated intravenously. Median age was 65 [IQR = 56–75], 50 (57%) were female. Overall, 18 cases suffered from polymicrobial BJIs containing at least one staphylococci. S. aureus was found in 30 (34%) cases and 7 (8%) strains were resistant to ampicillin. The median time of follow-up was 467 days [IQR=218–729]. The median time of treatment was 60 days [IQR=44–84]. When comparing the oral therapy group and IV group, we did not find any difference in terms of comorbidities, infection characteristics, type of surgery and infection severity. In the oral therapy group, the oral antibiotic regimen was started before day 7 following surgery for 33 (76%) individuals and before day 10 for 44 (86%). Treatment failures were observed in 9/36 (25%) and 12/51(23.5%) (P = 1) in IV and oral therapy group, respectively. CONCLUSION: Oral antibiotic treatment seems to be as efficient as an intravenous regimen to treat prosthetic Gram-positive prosthetic joint infections. DISCLOSURES: All authors: No reported disclosures.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6255525
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-62555252018-11-28 315. Oral Vs. Intravenous Antibiotic Treatment for Gram-Positive Prosthetic Joint Infections: A Retrospective Study Coehlo, Alexandre Robineau, Olivier Titecat, Marie Putman, Sophie Blondiaux, Nicolas Valette, Michel Beltrand, Eric Migaud, Henri Senneville, Eric Open Forum Infect Dis Abstracts BACKGROUND: Intravenous antibiotic infusion is the current standard for prosthetic joint infections (PJIs) management. antibiotic used for PJIs have a good oral bioavailability, especially rifampicin, suggesting that oral and IV route could be as efficient. Our aim was to compare the outcome of PJIs treated by oral antibiotics to those treated intravenously. METHODS: a retrospective survey was done in two reference centers between 2014 and 2016 and included all patients presenting Gram-positive PJIs. In these centers, patients suffering from Gram-positive PJIs could receive IV or early oral antibiotics regimen (started the day final antibiogram were received). First, we compared these two groups in terms of demographic and infection characteristics. Then, the outcome, judged by the percentage of patient with a relapse or a new infection on the same site during the follow-up, was compared. RESULTS: Within this period, 87 patients were treated for Gram-positive BJIs, 51 (59%) received early oral therapy and 36 were treated intravenously. Median age was 65 [IQR = 56–75], 50 (57%) were female. Overall, 18 cases suffered from polymicrobial BJIs containing at least one staphylococci. S. aureus was found in 30 (34%) cases and 7 (8%) strains were resistant to ampicillin. The median time of follow-up was 467 days [IQR=218–729]. The median time of treatment was 60 days [IQR=44–84]. When comparing the oral therapy group and IV group, we did not find any difference in terms of comorbidities, infection characteristics, type of surgery and infection severity. In the oral therapy group, the oral antibiotic regimen was started before day 7 following surgery for 33 (76%) individuals and before day 10 for 44 (86%). Treatment failures were observed in 9/36 (25%) and 12/51(23.5%) (P = 1) in IV and oral therapy group, respectively. CONCLUSION: Oral antibiotic treatment seems to be as efficient as an intravenous regimen to treat prosthetic Gram-positive prosthetic joint infections. DISCLOSURES: All authors: No reported disclosures. Oxford University Press 2018-11-26 /pmc/articles/PMC6255525/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofy210.326 Text en © The Author(s) 2018. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Infectious Diseases Society of America. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial reproduction and distribution of the work, in any medium, provided the original work is not altered or transformed in any way, and that the work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com
spellingShingle Abstracts
Coehlo, Alexandre
Robineau, Olivier
Titecat, Marie
Putman, Sophie
Blondiaux, Nicolas
Valette, Michel
Beltrand, Eric
Migaud, Henri
Senneville, Eric
315. Oral Vs. Intravenous Antibiotic Treatment for Gram-Positive Prosthetic Joint Infections: A Retrospective Study
title 315. Oral Vs. Intravenous Antibiotic Treatment for Gram-Positive Prosthetic Joint Infections: A Retrospective Study
title_full 315. Oral Vs. Intravenous Antibiotic Treatment for Gram-Positive Prosthetic Joint Infections: A Retrospective Study
title_fullStr 315. Oral Vs. Intravenous Antibiotic Treatment for Gram-Positive Prosthetic Joint Infections: A Retrospective Study
title_full_unstemmed 315. Oral Vs. Intravenous Antibiotic Treatment for Gram-Positive Prosthetic Joint Infections: A Retrospective Study
title_short 315. Oral Vs. Intravenous Antibiotic Treatment for Gram-Positive Prosthetic Joint Infections: A Retrospective Study
title_sort 315. oral vs. intravenous antibiotic treatment for gram-positive prosthetic joint infections: a retrospective study
topic Abstracts
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6255525/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofy210.326
work_keys_str_mv AT coehloalexandre 315oralvsintravenousantibiotictreatmentforgrampositiveprostheticjointinfectionsaretrospectivestudy
AT robineauolivier 315oralvsintravenousantibiotictreatmentforgrampositiveprostheticjointinfectionsaretrospectivestudy
AT titecatmarie 315oralvsintravenousantibiotictreatmentforgrampositiveprostheticjointinfectionsaretrospectivestudy
AT putmansophie 315oralvsintravenousantibiotictreatmentforgrampositiveprostheticjointinfectionsaretrospectivestudy
AT blondiauxnicolas 315oralvsintravenousantibiotictreatmentforgrampositiveprostheticjointinfectionsaretrospectivestudy
AT valettemichel 315oralvsintravenousantibiotictreatmentforgrampositiveprostheticjointinfectionsaretrospectivestudy
AT beltranderic 315oralvsintravenousantibiotictreatmentforgrampositiveprostheticjointinfectionsaretrospectivestudy
AT migaudhenri 315oralvsintravenousantibiotictreatmentforgrampositiveprostheticjointinfectionsaretrospectivestudy
AT sennevilleeric 315oralvsintravenousantibiotictreatmentforgrampositiveprostheticjointinfectionsaretrospectivestudy