Cargando…

345. Diagnosis of Acute Bacterial Meningitis by Polymerase Chain Reaction Vis-a-vis Conventional Culture Method

BACKGROUND: Bacterial Meningitis is one of the leading causes of mortality and morbidity worldwide requiring immediate diagnosis followed by medical intervention to prevent sequeale. Molecular methods can help to detect the pathogens offering a prompt and accurate diagnosis. METHODS: One hundred CSF...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Gokhale, Vaishali, Pol, Sae
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6255558/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofy210.356
_version_ 1783373969573806080
author Gokhale, Vaishali
Pol, Sae
author_facet Gokhale, Vaishali
Pol, Sae
author_sort Gokhale, Vaishali
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Bacterial Meningitis is one of the leading causes of mortality and morbidity worldwide requiring immediate diagnosis followed by medical intervention to prevent sequeale. Molecular methods can help to detect the pathogens offering a prompt and accurate diagnosis. METHODS: One hundred CSF and blood samples were collected from suspected/clinically diagnosed cases of meningitis over a period of 1year. CSF samples were processed by conventional and molecular methods. The objectives of the study were to identify the common bacterial etiological agent, to assess the utility of PCR in diagnosis of acute bacterial meningitis, and to know the antimicrobial susceptibility pattern. RESULTS: Out of 100 samples, maximum cases presented with frank meningeal signs (45%) followed by clinically suspected cases (42%). Microscopic examination, CSF culture, PCR detected 7%, 24%, and 40% positive cases, respectively. Thirteen percent were detected positive by blood culture. The positivity on CSF culture was comparable to the study done by Mani et al. (40.5%). The predominant pathogens isolated were K. pneumoniae (37.5%) followed by Streptococcus pneumoniae and Acinetobacter spp. (each 16.67%). PCR positive followed by Gene sequencing revealed Pseudomonas aeruginosa (34.78%) as the predominant pathogen. Culture is considered as the gold standard. However, it fails to identify fastidious organisms and often gives false-negative results. Therefore, the gold standard was modified to consider parameters like-clinical signs of meningitis, CSF biochemistry indicative of meningitis and CSF positive on any one microbiological test (CSF staining/CSF culture/blood culture). The performance of PCR was then improved to sensitivity (67.74%); specificity (72.46%); diagnostic accuracy (71%); PPV 52.50% and NPV 83.34%. The kappa coefficient −0.372 showed a fair agreement, considering the modified gold standard. This criterian was also used in study done by Welinder-Olsson et al. CONCLUSION: Gram-negative enteric bacteria were the most common etiology reported by both the methods. PCR could detect more cases than conventional culture method indicating its utility in the diagnosis of acute meningitis. Apart from microbiological parameters, clinical and other laboratory parameters should be considered to achieve a precise diagnosis. DISCLOSURES: All authors: No reported disclosures.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6255558
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-62555582018-11-28 345. Diagnosis of Acute Bacterial Meningitis by Polymerase Chain Reaction Vis-a-vis Conventional Culture Method Gokhale, Vaishali Pol, Sae Open Forum Infect Dis Abstracts BACKGROUND: Bacterial Meningitis is one of the leading causes of mortality and morbidity worldwide requiring immediate diagnosis followed by medical intervention to prevent sequeale. Molecular methods can help to detect the pathogens offering a prompt and accurate diagnosis. METHODS: One hundred CSF and blood samples were collected from suspected/clinically diagnosed cases of meningitis over a period of 1year. CSF samples were processed by conventional and molecular methods. The objectives of the study were to identify the common bacterial etiological agent, to assess the utility of PCR in diagnosis of acute bacterial meningitis, and to know the antimicrobial susceptibility pattern. RESULTS: Out of 100 samples, maximum cases presented with frank meningeal signs (45%) followed by clinically suspected cases (42%). Microscopic examination, CSF culture, PCR detected 7%, 24%, and 40% positive cases, respectively. Thirteen percent were detected positive by blood culture. The positivity on CSF culture was comparable to the study done by Mani et al. (40.5%). The predominant pathogens isolated were K. pneumoniae (37.5%) followed by Streptococcus pneumoniae and Acinetobacter spp. (each 16.67%). PCR positive followed by Gene sequencing revealed Pseudomonas aeruginosa (34.78%) as the predominant pathogen. Culture is considered as the gold standard. However, it fails to identify fastidious organisms and often gives false-negative results. Therefore, the gold standard was modified to consider parameters like-clinical signs of meningitis, CSF biochemistry indicative of meningitis and CSF positive on any one microbiological test (CSF staining/CSF culture/blood culture). The performance of PCR was then improved to sensitivity (67.74%); specificity (72.46%); diagnostic accuracy (71%); PPV 52.50% and NPV 83.34%. The kappa coefficient −0.372 showed a fair agreement, considering the modified gold standard. This criterian was also used in study done by Welinder-Olsson et al. CONCLUSION: Gram-negative enteric bacteria were the most common etiology reported by both the methods. PCR could detect more cases than conventional culture method indicating its utility in the diagnosis of acute meningitis. Apart from microbiological parameters, clinical and other laboratory parameters should be considered to achieve a precise diagnosis. DISCLOSURES: All authors: No reported disclosures. Oxford University Press 2018-11-26 /pmc/articles/PMC6255558/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofy210.356 Text en © The Author(s) 2018. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Infectious Diseases Society of America. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial reproduction and distribution of the work, in any medium, provided the original work is not altered or transformed in any way, and that the work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com
spellingShingle Abstracts
Gokhale, Vaishali
Pol, Sae
345. Diagnosis of Acute Bacterial Meningitis by Polymerase Chain Reaction Vis-a-vis Conventional Culture Method
title 345. Diagnosis of Acute Bacterial Meningitis by Polymerase Chain Reaction Vis-a-vis Conventional Culture Method
title_full 345. Diagnosis of Acute Bacterial Meningitis by Polymerase Chain Reaction Vis-a-vis Conventional Culture Method
title_fullStr 345. Diagnosis of Acute Bacterial Meningitis by Polymerase Chain Reaction Vis-a-vis Conventional Culture Method
title_full_unstemmed 345. Diagnosis of Acute Bacterial Meningitis by Polymerase Chain Reaction Vis-a-vis Conventional Culture Method
title_short 345. Diagnosis of Acute Bacterial Meningitis by Polymerase Chain Reaction Vis-a-vis Conventional Culture Method
title_sort 345. diagnosis of acute bacterial meningitis by polymerase chain reaction vis-a-vis conventional culture method
topic Abstracts
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6255558/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofy210.356
work_keys_str_mv AT gokhalevaishali 345diagnosisofacutebacterialmeningitisbypolymerasechainreactionvisavisconventionalculturemethod
AT polsae 345diagnosisofacutebacterialmeningitisbypolymerasechainreactionvisavisconventionalculturemethod