Cargando…
627. Differences in C. difficile Toxin A Binding in Humans: Adults vs. Infants
BACKGROUND: Children less than 1 year of age are commonly colonized with toxin-producing C. difficile, but appear to be immune to the associated colitis. Animal studies suggest that young infants lack receptors for C. difficile toxin, though this has never been documented in humans. METHODS: Tissue...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Oxford University Press
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6255571/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofy210.634 |
_version_ | 1783373972697513984 |
---|---|
author | Goldman, David Elshazly, Ahmed Dadachova, Ekaterina Ewart, Michelle |
author_facet | Goldman, David Elshazly, Ahmed Dadachova, Ekaterina Ewart, Michelle |
author_sort | Goldman, David |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Children less than 1 year of age are commonly colonized with toxin-producing C. difficile, but appear to be immune to the associated colitis. Animal studies suggest that young infants lack receptors for C. difficile toxin, though this has never been documented in humans. METHODS: Tissue from infants (<6 months) and adults > 21 years were studied. Toxin A binding was assessed using an indirect staining method, which included incubation with toxin A (List Labs) and detection with a rabbit polyclonal anti-sera (Lee Labs). A trained pediatric pathologist assessed the extent of staining in a blinded fashion. In other studies, toxin A was labeled with rhenium-188 and incubated with albumin-blocked tissue sections (four-infant and six-adult) for 1 hour. After washing, gamma counts were measured and the average percentage of retained radiolabeled toxin A calculated. Fisher exact tests and ANOVA were used for analyses. All studies were done in compliance with our institutional IRB. RESULTS: Six of 13 (46%) adult specimens were found to have reactivity on both the apical epithelial surface as well as crypt staining. Another six had reactivity localized only to the basal and lateral surface of the crypts. One specimen demonstrated no reactivity at all. For neonates (n = 15), no specimens were found to have reactivity localized to the apical epithelial surface, though four specimens had reactivity at the basal epithelial surface (P value for comparison of apical staining 0.0046) (see figure). Average percentage of retained counts for control (no tissue), infant and adult colon sections were, 0.318 ± 0.147, 0.305 ± 0.079 and 0.48 ± 0.114, respectively (P = 0.051). [Image: see text] CONCLUSION: Immunohistochemistry and radiolabelling studies indicate that neonatal colon section binds C. difficile toxin A less strongly and in a different distribution pattern (i.e., without apical staining) when compared with adult colon sections. These findings are consistent with previous animal studies and support the paradigm that a lack of toxin receptors in the infant colon contributes to immunity against C. difficile colitis. Additional studies are needed to define the presence of specific receptors and determine if a similar phenomenon applies to toxin B binding. DISCLOSURES: All authors: No reported disclosures. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6255571 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | Oxford University Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-62555712018-11-28 627. Differences in C. difficile Toxin A Binding in Humans: Adults vs. Infants Goldman, David Elshazly, Ahmed Dadachova, Ekaterina Ewart, Michelle Open Forum Infect Dis Abstracts BACKGROUND: Children less than 1 year of age are commonly colonized with toxin-producing C. difficile, but appear to be immune to the associated colitis. Animal studies suggest that young infants lack receptors for C. difficile toxin, though this has never been documented in humans. METHODS: Tissue from infants (<6 months) and adults > 21 years were studied. Toxin A binding was assessed using an indirect staining method, which included incubation with toxin A (List Labs) and detection with a rabbit polyclonal anti-sera (Lee Labs). A trained pediatric pathologist assessed the extent of staining in a blinded fashion. In other studies, toxin A was labeled with rhenium-188 and incubated with albumin-blocked tissue sections (four-infant and six-adult) for 1 hour. After washing, gamma counts were measured and the average percentage of retained radiolabeled toxin A calculated. Fisher exact tests and ANOVA were used for analyses. All studies were done in compliance with our institutional IRB. RESULTS: Six of 13 (46%) adult specimens were found to have reactivity on both the apical epithelial surface as well as crypt staining. Another six had reactivity localized only to the basal and lateral surface of the crypts. One specimen demonstrated no reactivity at all. For neonates (n = 15), no specimens were found to have reactivity localized to the apical epithelial surface, though four specimens had reactivity at the basal epithelial surface (P value for comparison of apical staining 0.0046) (see figure). Average percentage of retained counts for control (no tissue), infant and adult colon sections were, 0.318 ± 0.147, 0.305 ± 0.079 and 0.48 ± 0.114, respectively (P = 0.051). [Image: see text] CONCLUSION: Immunohistochemistry and radiolabelling studies indicate that neonatal colon section binds C. difficile toxin A less strongly and in a different distribution pattern (i.e., without apical staining) when compared with adult colon sections. These findings are consistent with previous animal studies and support the paradigm that a lack of toxin receptors in the infant colon contributes to immunity against C. difficile colitis. Additional studies are needed to define the presence of specific receptors and determine if a similar phenomenon applies to toxin B binding. DISCLOSURES: All authors: No reported disclosures. Oxford University Press 2018-11-26 /pmc/articles/PMC6255571/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofy210.634 Text en © The Author(s) 2018. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Infectious Diseases Society of America. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial reproduction and distribution of the work, in any medium, provided the original work is not altered or transformed in any way, and that the work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com |
spellingShingle | Abstracts Goldman, David Elshazly, Ahmed Dadachova, Ekaterina Ewart, Michelle 627. Differences in C. difficile Toxin A Binding in Humans: Adults vs. Infants |
title | 627. Differences in C. difficile Toxin A Binding in Humans: Adults vs. Infants |
title_full | 627. Differences in C. difficile Toxin A Binding in Humans: Adults vs. Infants |
title_fullStr | 627. Differences in C. difficile Toxin A Binding in Humans: Adults vs. Infants |
title_full_unstemmed | 627. Differences in C. difficile Toxin A Binding in Humans: Adults vs. Infants |
title_short | 627. Differences in C. difficile Toxin A Binding in Humans: Adults vs. Infants |
title_sort | 627. differences in c. difficile toxin a binding in humans: adults vs. infants |
topic | Abstracts |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6255571/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofy210.634 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT goldmandavid 627differencesincdifficiletoxinabindinginhumansadultsvsinfants AT elshazlyahmed 627differencesincdifficiletoxinabindinginhumansadultsvsinfants AT dadachovaekaterina 627differencesincdifficiletoxinabindinginhumansadultsvsinfants AT ewartmichelle 627differencesincdifficiletoxinabindinginhumansadultsvsinfants |