Cargando…

627. Differences in C. difficile Toxin A Binding in Humans: Adults vs. Infants

BACKGROUND: Children less than 1 year of age are commonly colonized with toxin-producing C. difficile, but appear to be immune to the associated colitis. Animal studies suggest that young infants lack receptors for C. difficile toxin, though this has never been documented in humans. METHODS: Tissue...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Goldman, David, Elshazly, Ahmed, Dadachova, Ekaterina, Ewart, Michelle
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6255571/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofy210.634
_version_ 1783373972697513984
author Goldman, David
Elshazly, Ahmed
Dadachova, Ekaterina
Ewart, Michelle
author_facet Goldman, David
Elshazly, Ahmed
Dadachova, Ekaterina
Ewart, Michelle
author_sort Goldman, David
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Children less than 1 year of age are commonly colonized with toxin-producing C. difficile, but appear to be immune to the associated colitis. Animal studies suggest that young infants lack receptors for C. difficile toxin, though this has never been documented in humans. METHODS: Tissue from infants (<6 months) and adults > 21 years were studied. Toxin A binding was assessed using an indirect staining method, which included incubation with toxin A (List Labs) and detection with a rabbit polyclonal anti-sera (Lee Labs). A trained pediatric pathologist assessed the extent of staining in a blinded fashion. In other studies, toxin A was labeled with rhenium-188 and incubated with albumin-blocked tissue sections (four-infant and six-adult) for 1 hour. After washing, gamma counts were measured and the average percentage of retained radiolabeled toxin A calculated. Fisher exact tests and ANOVA were used for analyses. All studies were done in compliance with our institutional IRB. RESULTS: Six of 13 (46%) adult specimens were found to have reactivity on both the apical epithelial surface as well as crypt staining. Another six had reactivity localized only to the basal and lateral surface of the crypts. One specimen demonstrated no reactivity at all. For neonates (n = 15), no specimens were found to have reactivity localized to the apical epithelial surface, though four specimens had reactivity at the basal epithelial surface (P value for comparison of apical staining 0.0046) (see figure). Average percentage of retained counts for control (no tissue), infant and adult colon sections were, 0.318 ± 0.147, 0.305 ± 0.079 and 0.48 ± 0.114, respectively (P = 0.051). [Image: see text] CONCLUSION: Immunohistochemistry and radiolabelling studies indicate that neonatal colon section binds C. difficile toxin A less strongly and in a different distribution pattern (i.e., without apical staining) when compared with adult colon sections. These findings are consistent with previous animal studies and support the paradigm that a lack of toxin receptors in the infant colon contributes to immunity against C. difficile colitis. Additional studies are needed to define the presence of specific receptors and determine if a similar phenomenon applies to toxin B binding. DISCLOSURES: All authors: No reported disclosures.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6255571
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-62555712018-11-28 627. Differences in C. difficile Toxin A Binding in Humans: Adults vs. Infants Goldman, David Elshazly, Ahmed Dadachova, Ekaterina Ewart, Michelle Open Forum Infect Dis Abstracts BACKGROUND: Children less than 1 year of age are commonly colonized with toxin-producing C. difficile, but appear to be immune to the associated colitis. Animal studies suggest that young infants lack receptors for C. difficile toxin, though this has never been documented in humans. METHODS: Tissue from infants (<6 months) and adults > 21 years were studied. Toxin A binding was assessed using an indirect staining method, which included incubation with toxin A (List Labs) and detection with a rabbit polyclonal anti-sera (Lee Labs). A trained pediatric pathologist assessed the extent of staining in a blinded fashion. In other studies, toxin A was labeled with rhenium-188 and incubated with albumin-blocked tissue sections (four-infant and six-adult) for 1 hour. After washing, gamma counts were measured and the average percentage of retained radiolabeled toxin A calculated. Fisher exact tests and ANOVA were used for analyses. All studies were done in compliance with our institutional IRB. RESULTS: Six of 13 (46%) adult specimens were found to have reactivity on both the apical epithelial surface as well as crypt staining. Another six had reactivity localized only to the basal and lateral surface of the crypts. One specimen demonstrated no reactivity at all. For neonates (n = 15), no specimens were found to have reactivity localized to the apical epithelial surface, though four specimens had reactivity at the basal epithelial surface (P value for comparison of apical staining 0.0046) (see figure). Average percentage of retained counts for control (no tissue), infant and adult colon sections were, 0.318 ± 0.147, 0.305 ± 0.079 and 0.48 ± 0.114, respectively (P = 0.051). [Image: see text] CONCLUSION: Immunohistochemistry and radiolabelling studies indicate that neonatal colon section binds C. difficile toxin A less strongly and in a different distribution pattern (i.e., without apical staining) when compared with adult colon sections. These findings are consistent with previous animal studies and support the paradigm that a lack of toxin receptors in the infant colon contributes to immunity against C. difficile colitis. Additional studies are needed to define the presence of specific receptors and determine if a similar phenomenon applies to toxin B binding. DISCLOSURES: All authors: No reported disclosures. Oxford University Press 2018-11-26 /pmc/articles/PMC6255571/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofy210.634 Text en © The Author(s) 2018. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Infectious Diseases Society of America. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial reproduction and distribution of the work, in any medium, provided the original work is not altered or transformed in any way, and that the work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com
spellingShingle Abstracts
Goldman, David
Elshazly, Ahmed
Dadachova, Ekaterina
Ewart, Michelle
627. Differences in C. difficile Toxin A Binding in Humans: Adults vs. Infants
title 627. Differences in C. difficile Toxin A Binding in Humans: Adults vs. Infants
title_full 627. Differences in C. difficile Toxin A Binding in Humans: Adults vs. Infants
title_fullStr 627. Differences in C. difficile Toxin A Binding in Humans: Adults vs. Infants
title_full_unstemmed 627. Differences in C. difficile Toxin A Binding in Humans: Adults vs. Infants
title_short 627. Differences in C. difficile Toxin A Binding in Humans: Adults vs. Infants
title_sort 627. differences in c. difficile toxin a binding in humans: adults vs. infants
topic Abstracts
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6255571/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofy210.634
work_keys_str_mv AT goldmandavid 627differencesincdifficiletoxinabindinginhumansadultsvsinfants
AT elshazlyahmed 627differencesincdifficiletoxinabindinginhumansadultsvsinfants
AT dadachovaekaterina 627differencesincdifficiletoxinabindinginhumansadultsvsinfants
AT ewartmichelle 627differencesincdifficiletoxinabindinginhumansadultsvsinfants