Cargando…

224. Cost Analysis of a Significant Decrease in Vancomycin Use as a Result of an Antimicrobial Stewardship Intervention

BACKGROUND: A previous pre–post quasi-experimental study performed at an academic medical center assessed benefits of daily stewardship review with and without rapid diagnostic technology (RDT). The study found no difference in time to effective antibiotic therapy when comparing daily stewardship re...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hodgson, Hayley, O’Donnell, Paul, Won, Sarah, Wang, Sheila K
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6255631/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofy210.235
_version_ 1783373986869018624
author Hodgson, Hayley
O’Donnell, Paul
Won, Sarah
Wang, Sheila K
author_facet Hodgson, Hayley
O’Donnell, Paul
Won, Sarah
Wang, Sheila K
author_sort Hodgson, Hayley
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: A previous pre–post quasi-experimental study performed at an academic medical center assessed benefits of daily stewardship review with and without rapid diagnostic technology (RDT). The study found no difference in time to effective antibiotic therapy when comparing daily stewardship review to RDT and historical control groups. However, vancomycin duration of therapy significantly decreased with daily stewardship review compared with control (31.8 vs. 66 hours, P < 0.001). Subsequent elimination of this RDT saved the institution $53,000 in annual costs. However, the effect of the decrease in vancomycin use on this institution’s annual costs is unknown. METHODS: The purpose of the present study is to determine the difference in institutional costs associated with vancomycin after implementation of a stewardship intervention. A retrospective cost analysis was performed which included hospitalized adults on vancomcyin for positive blood cultures from June to October 2014 (preintervention) and June to October 2015 (postintervention). The primary outcome was the amount of institutional cost saved, including drug, phlebotomy, laboratory, nursing, and pharmacy costs. Secondary outcomes included vancomycin DOT/1,000 patient-days, nephrotoxicity, in-hospital mortality, and length of stay. RESULTS: Institutional cost savings associated with vancomycin over 5 months amounted to $2,900 for an extrapolated cost savings of $6,960 per year. Although this cost savings was minimal, there were decreases in each individual vancomycin cost component. Drug acquisition was associated with the largest cost reduction represented by a 26% decline. Next, phlebotomy and laboratory costs each decreased by 24%, while nursing and pharmacy costs decreased by 7% and 4%, respectively. There were no differences in vancomycin DOT/1,000 patient-days, nephrotoxicity, in-hospital mortality, or length of stay. CONCLUSION: Vancomycin is associated with many hidden ancillary costs, and pharmacy and nursing labor remain substantial despite a reduction in its use. The tracking of antimicrobial stewardship actions is highly recommended; however, more research is needed to determine the optimal process for a vancomycin cost analysis. DISCLOSURES: All authors: No reported disclosures.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6255631
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-62556312018-11-28 224. Cost Analysis of a Significant Decrease in Vancomycin Use as a Result of an Antimicrobial Stewardship Intervention Hodgson, Hayley O’Donnell, Paul Won, Sarah Wang, Sheila K Open Forum Infect Dis Abstracts BACKGROUND: A previous pre–post quasi-experimental study performed at an academic medical center assessed benefits of daily stewardship review with and without rapid diagnostic technology (RDT). The study found no difference in time to effective antibiotic therapy when comparing daily stewardship review to RDT and historical control groups. However, vancomycin duration of therapy significantly decreased with daily stewardship review compared with control (31.8 vs. 66 hours, P < 0.001). Subsequent elimination of this RDT saved the institution $53,000 in annual costs. However, the effect of the decrease in vancomycin use on this institution’s annual costs is unknown. METHODS: The purpose of the present study is to determine the difference in institutional costs associated with vancomycin after implementation of a stewardship intervention. A retrospective cost analysis was performed which included hospitalized adults on vancomcyin for positive blood cultures from June to October 2014 (preintervention) and June to October 2015 (postintervention). The primary outcome was the amount of institutional cost saved, including drug, phlebotomy, laboratory, nursing, and pharmacy costs. Secondary outcomes included vancomycin DOT/1,000 patient-days, nephrotoxicity, in-hospital mortality, and length of stay. RESULTS: Institutional cost savings associated with vancomycin over 5 months amounted to $2,900 for an extrapolated cost savings of $6,960 per year. Although this cost savings was minimal, there were decreases in each individual vancomycin cost component. Drug acquisition was associated with the largest cost reduction represented by a 26% decline. Next, phlebotomy and laboratory costs each decreased by 24%, while nursing and pharmacy costs decreased by 7% and 4%, respectively. There were no differences in vancomycin DOT/1,000 patient-days, nephrotoxicity, in-hospital mortality, or length of stay. CONCLUSION: Vancomycin is associated with many hidden ancillary costs, and pharmacy and nursing labor remain substantial despite a reduction in its use. The tracking of antimicrobial stewardship actions is highly recommended; however, more research is needed to determine the optimal process for a vancomycin cost analysis. DISCLOSURES: All authors: No reported disclosures. Oxford University Press 2018-11-26 /pmc/articles/PMC6255631/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofy210.235 Text en © The Author(s) 2018. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Infectious Diseases Society of America. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial reproduction and distribution of the work, in any medium, provided the original work is not altered or transformed in any way, and that the work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com
spellingShingle Abstracts
Hodgson, Hayley
O’Donnell, Paul
Won, Sarah
Wang, Sheila K
224. Cost Analysis of a Significant Decrease in Vancomycin Use as a Result of an Antimicrobial Stewardship Intervention
title 224. Cost Analysis of a Significant Decrease in Vancomycin Use as a Result of an Antimicrobial Stewardship Intervention
title_full 224. Cost Analysis of a Significant Decrease in Vancomycin Use as a Result of an Antimicrobial Stewardship Intervention
title_fullStr 224. Cost Analysis of a Significant Decrease in Vancomycin Use as a Result of an Antimicrobial Stewardship Intervention
title_full_unstemmed 224. Cost Analysis of a Significant Decrease in Vancomycin Use as a Result of an Antimicrobial Stewardship Intervention
title_short 224. Cost Analysis of a Significant Decrease in Vancomycin Use as a Result of an Antimicrobial Stewardship Intervention
title_sort 224. cost analysis of a significant decrease in vancomycin use as a result of an antimicrobial stewardship intervention
topic Abstracts
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6255631/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofy210.235
work_keys_str_mv AT hodgsonhayley 224costanalysisofasignificantdecreaseinvancomycinuseasaresultofanantimicrobialstewardshipintervention
AT odonnellpaul 224costanalysisofasignificantdecreaseinvancomycinuseasaresultofanantimicrobialstewardshipintervention
AT wonsarah 224costanalysisofasignificantdecreaseinvancomycinuseasaresultofanantimicrobialstewardshipintervention
AT wangsheilak 224costanalysisofasignificantdecreaseinvancomycinuseasaresultofanantimicrobialstewardshipintervention