Cargando…

1135. Strongyloides Stercolaris Serology in Transplant Patients: To Test or Not?

BACKGROUND: Strongyloides stercoralis is an intestinal nematode endemic to the tropics, subtropics, and to a limited extent the United States and Europe. The global estimates of strongyloidiasis are reported to range from 3 to 100 million infected worldwide; however, the true US prevalence is unclea...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Rivera, Karla Rivera, Shah, Tulsi, Garcia-Diaz, Julia, Hand, Jonathan
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6255632/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofy210.968
_version_ 1783373987105996800
author Rivera, Karla Rivera
Shah, Tulsi
Garcia-Diaz, Julia
Hand, Jonathan
author_facet Rivera, Karla Rivera
Shah, Tulsi
Garcia-Diaz, Julia
Hand, Jonathan
author_sort Rivera, Karla Rivera
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Strongyloides stercoralis is an intestinal nematode endemic to the tropics, subtropics, and to a limited extent the United States and Europe. The global estimates of strongyloidiasis are reported to range from 3 to 100 million infected worldwide; however, the true US prevalence is unclear. The seroprevalence of infection in solid-organ transplant candidates and recipients in the New Orleans, Louisiana region is also unknown. The purpose of this study was to identify the prevalence of Strongyloides seropositivity within transplant candidates at Ochsner Medical Center (OMC). METHODS: Patients were identified using EPIC-CLARITY with ICD-9 and ICD-10 codes for any solid-organ transplant at OMC from July 2012 to December 2016. Inclusion criteria were age 18 or older, patients evaluated for solid-organ transplant, and Strongyloides IgG testing. Patients were excluded if they had other immunocompromising conditions or exposures including but not limited to steroids, TNF-alpha, or biologic agent use. The primary outcome was the overall prevalence rate of strongyloidiasis at OMC. Secondary outcome was the comparison of prevalence between January 1, 2012 to July 31, 2016 (when testing was ordered based on risk stratification) vs. August 1, 2016 to December 31, 2016 (when routine testing was implemented). RESULTS: We analyzed a total of 1,047 patients which had 1,128 tests ordered for Strongyloides. Of those, 985 were unique patients (62 patients had multiple serological tests resulting in 81 repeat tests). During July 1, 2012 to July 31, 2016 testing yielded a total of 822 tests. From August 1, 2016 to December 31, 2016 testing yielded 306 tests. Overall, 43/1,128 (3.8%) tests were positive for Strongyloides. The remaining 1,085/1,128 (96.2%) tested negative. For our secondary outcome, we found that testing based on risk stratification yielded 22/822 (2.7%) positives while testing for all patients we had 21/306 (6.9%) positives. CONCLUSION: Our data suggest that testing based on risk stratification yielded a lower prevalence rate as compared with generalized testing, underestimating the true incidence of disease (2.7% vs. 6.9%). Testing all patients being evaluated for transplantation will capture a greater number of patients with positive serology. DISCLOSURES: J. Garcia-Diaz, Astellas Pharma: Speaker’s Bureau, Speaker honorarium.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6255632
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-62556322018-11-28 1135. Strongyloides Stercolaris Serology in Transplant Patients: To Test or Not? Rivera, Karla Rivera Shah, Tulsi Garcia-Diaz, Julia Hand, Jonathan Open Forum Infect Dis Abstracts BACKGROUND: Strongyloides stercoralis is an intestinal nematode endemic to the tropics, subtropics, and to a limited extent the United States and Europe. The global estimates of strongyloidiasis are reported to range from 3 to 100 million infected worldwide; however, the true US prevalence is unclear. The seroprevalence of infection in solid-organ transplant candidates and recipients in the New Orleans, Louisiana region is also unknown. The purpose of this study was to identify the prevalence of Strongyloides seropositivity within transplant candidates at Ochsner Medical Center (OMC). METHODS: Patients were identified using EPIC-CLARITY with ICD-9 and ICD-10 codes for any solid-organ transplant at OMC from July 2012 to December 2016. Inclusion criteria were age 18 or older, patients evaluated for solid-organ transplant, and Strongyloides IgG testing. Patients were excluded if they had other immunocompromising conditions or exposures including but not limited to steroids, TNF-alpha, or biologic agent use. The primary outcome was the overall prevalence rate of strongyloidiasis at OMC. Secondary outcome was the comparison of prevalence between January 1, 2012 to July 31, 2016 (when testing was ordered based on risk stratification) vs. August 1, 2016 to December 31, 2016 (when routine testing was implemented). RESULTS: We analyzed a total of 1,047 patients which had 1,128 tests ordered for Strongyloides. Of those, 985 were unique patients (62 patients had multiple serological tests resulting in 81 repeat tests). During July 1, 2012 to July 31, 2016 testing yielded a total of 822 tests. From August 1, 2016 to December 31, 2016 testing yielded 306 tests. Overall, 43/1,128 (3.8%) tests were positive for Strongyloides. The remaining 1,085/1,128 (96.2%) tested negative. For our secondary outcome, we found that testing based on risk stratification yielded 22/822 (2.7%) positives while testing for all patients we had 21/306 (6.9%) positives. CONCLUSION: Our data suggest that testing based on risk stratification yielded a lower prevalence rate as compared with generalized testing, underestimating the true incidence of disease (2.7% vs. 6.9%). Testing all patients being evaluated for transplantation will capture a greater number of patients with positive serology. DISCLOSURES: J. Garcia-Diaz, Astellas Pharma: Speaker’s Bureau, Speaker honorarium. Oxford University Press 2018-11-26 /pmc/articles/PMC6255632/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofy210.968 Text en © The Author(s) 2018. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Infectious Diseases Society of America. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial reproduction and distribution of the work, in any medium, provided the original work is not altered or transformed in any way, and that the work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com
spellingShingle Abstracts
Rivera, Karla Rivera
Shah, Tulsi
Garcia-Diaz, Julia
Hand, Jonathan
1135. Strongyloides Stercolaris Serology in Transplant Patients: To Test or Not?
title 1135. Strongyloides Stercolaris Serology in Transplant Patients: To Test or Not?
title_full 1135. Strongyloides Stercolaris Serology in Transplant Patients: To Test or Not?
title_fullStr 1135. Strongyloides Stercolaris Serology in Transplant Patients: To Test or Not?
title_full_unstemmed 1135. Strongyloides Stercolaris Serology in Transplant Patients: To Test or Not?
title_short 1135. Strongyloides Stercolaris Serology in Transplant Patients: To Test or Not?
title_sort 1135. strongyloides stercolaris serology in transplant patients: to test or not?
topic Abstracts
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6255632/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofy210.968
work_keys_str_mv AT riverakarlarivera 1135strongyloidesstercolarisserologyintransplantpatientstotestornot
AT shahtulsi 1135strongyloidesstercolarisserologyintransplantpatientstotestornot
AT garciadiazjulia 1135strongyloidesstercolarisserologyintransplantpatientstotestornot
AT handjonathan 1135strongyloidesstercolarisserologyintransplantpatientstotestornot