Cargando…

653. To Treat or Not to Treat Corynebacterium striatum? That is the Question

BACKGROUND: As part of normal skin flora, Corynebacterium striatum (CS) can be isolated in clinical specimens and dismissed as a contaminant or colonizer. However, this organism is an emerging multi-drug-resistant opportunistic pathogen that causes serious infections and demonstrates worrisome resis...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Soriano, Katrina, Zuckerman, Richard
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6255649/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofy210.660
_version_ 1783373991105265664
author Soriano, Katrina
Zuckerman, Richard
author_facet Soriano, Katrina
Zuckerman, Richard
author_sort Soriano, Katrina
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: As part of normal skin flora, Corynebacterium striatum (CS) can be isolated in clinical specimens and dismissed as a contaminant or colonizer. However, this organism is an emerging multi-drug-resistant opportunistic pathogen that causes serious infections and demonstrates worrisome resistance to antimicrobials. CS has been implicated in both osteomyelitis (OM) and septic arthritis (including prosthetic joint infections (PJI)), for which aggressive source control and antibiotics are needed. Because there is no accepted treatment standard when CS is found, we performed a retrospective analysis of patients with CS isolated from orthopedic sites. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed cultures in which CS was isolated from 2015 to 2017. We restricted this analysis to patients with orthopedic cultures, bone and PJI. Charts were reviewed for clinical and microbiological data. Duration of follow-up was calculated to the last follow-up visit in our system for the patient after treatment of the infection. “Targeted” treatment was defined as treatment based on antimicrobial susceptibilities of the CS. RESULTS: We identified 20 cases of OM and 6 PJI with CS identified in culture. 17/26 (65%) were multi-drug resistant. CS was the only organism (monomicrobial) in 46% (12/26) of cultures (8/20 OM, 4/6 PJI). All monomicrobial OM and PJI received targeted treatment and were cured clinically at the last follow-up (average 201 days OM and 124 days PJI). Of 12 polymicrobial OM infections, all improved clinically by last follow-up; 75% (9/12) were treated with targeted treatment for CS and 25% (3/12) without targeted treatment. All polymicrobial PJI (2/2, 100%) improved without targeted treatment. CONCLUSION: Our review suggests that CS can cause OM and PJI, with a high rate of drug resistance. Cure rates are excellent in monomicrobial infections when therapy is targeted to susceptibility. The role of targeted therapy for polymicrobial infections in which another more likely pathogen is found is not clear, particularly in the setting of effective surgical source control. Further prospective research is necessary to clarify the prevalence and factors associated with CS infections, and the importance of treatment of this organism in orthopedic infections. DISCLOSURES: All authors: No reported disclosures.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6255649
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-62556492018-11-28 653. To Treat or Not to Treat Corynebacterium striatum? That is the Question Soriano, Katrina Zuckerman, Richard Open Forum Infect Dis Abstracts BACKGROUND: As part of normal skin flora, Corynebacterium striatum (CS) can be isolated in clinical specimens and dismissed as a contaminant or colonizer. However, this organism is an emerging multi-drug-resistant opportunistic pathogen that causes serious infections and demonstrates worrisome resistance to antimicrobials. CS has been implicated in both osteomyelitis (OM) and septic arthritis (including prosthetic joint infections (PJI)), for which aggressive source control and antibiotics are needed. Because there is no accepted treatment standard when CS is found, we performed a retrospective analysis of patients with CS isolated from orthopedic sites. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed cultures in which CS was isolated from 2015 to 2017. We restricted this analysis to patients with orthopedic cultures, bone and PJI. Charts were reviewed for clinical and microbiological data. Duration of follow-up was calculated to the last follow-up visit in our system for the patient after treatment of the infection. “Targeted” treatment was defined as treatment based on antimicrobial susceptibilities of the CS. RESULTS: We identified 20 cases of OM and 6 PJI with CS identified in culture. 17/26 (65%) were multi-drug resistant. CS was the only organism (monomicrobial) in 46% (12/26) of cultures (8/20 OM, 4/6 PJI). All monomicrobial OM and PJI received targeted treatment and were cured clinically at the last follow-up (average 201 days OM and 124 days PJI). Of 12 polymicrobial OM infections, all improved clinically by last follow-up; 75% (9/12) were treated with targeted treatment for CS and 25% (3/12) without targeted treatment. All polymicrobial PJI (2/2, 100%) improved without targeted treatment. CONCLUSION: Our review suggests that CS can cause OM and PJI, with a high rate of drug resistance. Cure rates are excellent in monomicrobial infections when therapy is targeted to susceptibility. The role of targeted therapy for polymicrobial infections in which another more likely pathogen is found is not clear, particularly in the setting of effective surgical source control. Further prospective research is necessary to clarify the prevalence and factors associated with CS infections, and the importance of treatment of this organism in orthopedic infections. DISCLOSURES: All authors: No reported disclosures. Oxford University Press 2018-11-26 /pmc/articles/PMC6255649/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofy210.660 Text en © The Author(s) 2018. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Infectious Diseases Society of America. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial reproduction and distribution of the work, in any medium, provided the original work is not altered or transformed in any way, and that the work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com
spellingShingle Abstracts
Soriano, Katrina
Zuckerman, Richard
653. To Treat or Not to Treat Corynebacterium striatum? That is the Question
title 653. To Treat or Not to Treat Corynebacterium striatum? That is the Question
title_full 653. To Treat or Not to Treat Corynebacterium striatum? That is the Question
title_fullStr 653. To Treat or Not to Treat Corynebacterium striatum? That is the Question
title_full_unstemmed 653. To Treat or Not to Treat Corynebacterium striatum? That is the Question
title_short 653. To Treat or Not to Treat Corynebacterium striatum? That is the Question
title_sort 653. to treat or not to treat corynebacterium striatum? that is the question
topic Abstracts
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6255649/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofy210.660
work_keys_str_mv AT sorianokatrina 653totreatornottotreatcorynebacteriumstriatumthatisthequestion
AT zuckermanrichard 653totreatornottotreatcorynebacteriumstriatumthatisthequestion