Cargando…

464. The Efficacy of Alcohol Based Wipes, Gel, Foam, and Spray Compared With Liquid Soap in Eliminating Transient Hand Bacteria

BACKGROUND: Hand hygiene is a proven method of preventing the spread of pathogens and reducing healthcare-associated infections. Studies have shown that up to 50% of healthcare professionals’ (HCPs) hands were contaminated with the same pathogen as a patient with a confirmed multidrug-resistant orga...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Truitt, Christopher, Goldwater, Wesley
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6255669/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofy210.473
_version_ 1783373995933958144
author Truitt, Christopher
Goldwater, Wesley
author_facet Truitt, Christopher
Goldwater, Wesley
author_sort Truitt, Christopher
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Hand hygiene is a proven method of preventing the spread of pathogens and reducing healthcare-associated infections. Studies have shown that up to 50% of healthcare professionals’ (HCPs) hands were contaminated with the same pathogen as a patient with a confirmed multidrug-resistant organism, such as MRSA or VRE, after exiting the room. This suggests that these bacteria were obtained through contact with the environment and/or patient. The objective of this study was to compare the efficacy of alcohol based hand rubs and liquid soap at the removal of transient hand bacteria. METHODS: Seventy-five healthy adults were randomly chosen to participate in one of the five hand hygiene tests. Before implementing hand hygiene, moistened sterile swabs were used to rub the fingers, thumbs, and palms of both hands. The volunteers then performed one of the hand hygiene methods following WHO recommendations for hand washing and hand rubs. Wipes were used by applying a pulling motion on fingers and thumbs followed by rubbing the palms. The swabs were agitated for 15 seconds in a peptone broth and poured onto Petrifilms for incubation of 48 hours at 37ºC. RESULTS: The percent reduction in transient hand bacteria using aerobic colony counts were enumerated and calculated as follows: 90% for wipes, 82% for liquid soap, 80% for gel, 72% for foam, and 71% for spray. The wipes eliminated hand bacteria significantly better then the liquid soap (P = 0.0247) while the gel (P = 0.7239) and foam (P = 0.0661) showed no significance. Lastly, the soap preformed significantly better than the spray (P = 0.0182). CONCLUSION: This study demonstrated that alcohol-based wipes performed better at removing transient bacteria from the hands than liquid soap and water. This result potentially provides another method for HCPs in reducing the risk of infection for their next patient and decreasing the likelihood of transmitting an infectious agent via hands. DISCLOSURES: All authors: No reported disclosures.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6255669
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-62556692018-11-28 464. The Efficacy of Alcohol Based Wipes, Gel, Foam, and Spray Compared With Liquid Soap in Eliminating Transient Hand Bacteria Truitt, Christopher Goldwater, Wesley Open Forum Infect Dis Abstracts BACKGROUND: Hand hygiene is a proven method of preventing the spread of pathogens and reducing healthcare-associated infections. Studies have shown that up to 50% of healthcare professionals’ (HCPs) hands were contaminated with the same pathogen as a patient with a confirmed multidrug-resistant organism, such as MRSA or VRE, after exiting the room. This suggests that these bacteria were obtained through contact with the environment and/or patient. The objective of this study was to compare the efficacy of alcohol based hand rubs and liquid soap at the removal of transient hand bacteria. METHODS: Seventy-five healthy adults were randomly chosen to participate in one of the five hand hygiene tests. Before implementing hand hygiene, moistened sterile swabs were used to rub the fingers, thumbs, and palms of both hands. The volunteers then performed one of the hand hygiene methods following WHO recommendations for hand washing and hand rubs. Wipes were used by applying a pulling motion on fingers and thumbs followed by rubbing the palms. The swabs were agitated for 15 seconds in a peptone broth and poured onto Petrifilms for incubation of 48 hours at 37ºC. RESULTS: The percent reduction in transient hand bacteria using aerobic colony counts were enumerated and calculated as follows: 90% for wipes, 82% for liquid soap, 80% for gel, 72% for foam, and 71% for spray. The wipes eliminated hand bacteria significantly better then the liquid soap (P = 0.0247) while the gel (P = 0.7239) and foam (P = 0.0661) showed no significance. Lastly, the soap preformed significantly better than the spray (P = 0.0182). CONCLUSION: This study demonstrated that alcohol-based wipes performed better at removing transient bacteria from the hands than liquid soap and water. This result potentially provides another method for HCPs in reducing the risk of infection for their next patient and decreasing the likelihood of transmitting an infectious agent via hands. DISCLOSURES: All authors: No reported disclosures. Oxford University Press 2018-11-26 /pmc/articles/PMC6255669/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofy210.473 Text en © The Author(s) 2018. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Infectious Diseases Society of America. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial reproduction and distribution of the work, in any medium, provided the original work is not altered or transformed in any way, and that the work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com
spellingShingle Abstracts
Truitt, Christopher
Goldwater, Wesley
464. The Efficacy of Alcohol Based Wipes, Gel, Foam, and Spray Compared With Liquid Soap in Eliminating Transient Hand Bacteria
title 464. The Efficacy of Alcohol Based Wipes, Gel, Foam, and Spray Compared With Liquid Soap in Eliminating Transient Hand Bacteria
title_full 464. The Efficacy of Alcohol Based Wipes, Gel, Foam, and Spray Compared With Liquid Soap in Eliminating Transient Hand Bacteria
title_fullStr 464. The Efficacy of Alcohol Based Wipes, Gel, Foam, and Spray Compared With Liquid Soap in Eliminating Transient Hand Bacteria
title_full_unstemmed 464. The Efficacy of Alcohol Based Wipes, Gel, Foam, and Spray Compared With Liquid Soap in Eliminating Transient Hand Bacteria
title_short 464. The Efficacy of Alcohol Based Wipes, Gel, Foam, and Spray Compared With Liquid Soap in Eliminating Transient Hand Bacteria
title_sort 464. the efficacy of alcohol based wipes, gel, foam, and spray compared with liquid soap in eliminating transient hand bacteria
topic Abstracts
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6255669/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofy210.473
work_keys_str_mv AT truittchristopher 464theefficacyofalcoholbasedwipesgelfoamandspraycomparedwithliquidsoapineliminatingtransienthandbacteria
AT goldwaterwesley 464theefficacyofalcoholbasedwipesgelfoamandspraycomparedwithliquidsoapineliminatingtransienthandbacteria