Cargando…

Systematic Analysis and Biomarker Study for Alzheimer’s Disease

Revealing the relationship between dysfunctional genes in blood and brain tissues from patients with Alzheimer’s Disease (AD) will help us to understand the pathology of this disease. In this study, we conducted the first such large systematic analysis to identify differentially expressed genes (DEG...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Li, Xinzhong, Wang, Haiyan, Long, Jintao, Pan, Genhua, He, Taigang, Anichtchik, Oleg, Belshaw, Robert, Albani, Diego, Edison, Paul, Green, Elaine K, Scott, James
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group UK 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6255913/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30478411
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-35789-3
_version_ 1783374046379900928
author Li, Xinzhong
Wang, Haiyan
Long, Jintao
Pan, Genhua
He, Taigang
Anichtchik, Oleg
Belshaw, Robert
Albani, Diego
Edison, Paul
Green, Elaine K
Scott, James
author_facet Li, Xinzhong
Wang, Haiyan
Long, Jintao
Pan, Genhua
He, Taigang
Anichtchik, Oleg
Belshaw, Robert
Albani, Diego
Edison, Paul
Green, Elaine K
Scott, James
author_sort Li, Xinzhong
collection PubMed
description Revealing the relationship between dysfunctional genes in blood and brain tissues from patients with Alzheimer’s Disease (AD) will help us to understand the pathology of this disease. In this study, we conducted the first such large systematic analysis to identify differentially expressed genes (DEGs) in blood samples from 245 AD cases, 143 mild cognitive impairment (MCI) cases, and 182 healthy control subjects, and then compare these with DEGs in brain samples. We evaluated our findings using two independent AD blood datasets and performed a gene-based genome-wide association study to identify potential novel risk genes. We identified 789 and 998 DEGs common to both blood and brain of AD and MCI subjects respectively, over 77% of which had the same regulation directions across tissues and disease status, including the known ABCA7, and the novel TYK2 and TCIRG1. A machine learning classification model containing NDUFA1, MRPL51, and RPL36AL, implicating mitochondrial and ribosomal function, was discovered which discriminated between AD patients and controls with 85.9% of area under the curve and 78.1% accuracy (sensitivity = 77.6%, specificity = 78.9%). Moreover, our findings strongly suggest that mitochondrial dysfunction, NF-κB signalling and iNOS signalling are important dysregulated pathways in AD pathogenesis.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6255913
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Nature Publishing Group UK
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-62559132018-12-03 Systematic Analysis and Biomarker Study for Alzheimer’s Disease Li, Xinzhong Wang, Haiyan Long, Jintao Pan, Genhua He, Taigang Anichtchik, Oleg Belshaw, Robert Albani, Diego Edison, Paul Green, Elaine K Scott, James Sci Rep Article Revealing the relationship between dysfunctional genes in blood and brain tissues from patients with Alzheimer’s Disease (AD) will help us to understand the pathology of this disease. In this study, we conducted the first such large systematic analysis to identify differentially expressed genes (DEGs) in blood samples from 245 AD cases, 143 mild cognitive impairment (MCI) cases, and 182 healthy control subjects, and then compare these with DEGs in brain samples. We evaluated our findings using two independent AD blood datasets and performed a gene-based genome-wide association study to identify potential novel risk genes. We identified 789 and 998 DEGs common to both blood and brain of AD and MCI subjects respectively, over 77% of which had the same regulation directions across tissues and disease status, including the known ABCA7, and the novel TYK2 and TCIRG1. A machine learning classification model containing NDUFA1, MRPL51, and RPL36AL, implicating mitochondrial and ribosomal function, was discovered which discriminated between AD patients and controls with 85.9% of area under the curve and 78.1% accuracy (sensitivity = 77.6%, specificity = 78.9%). Moreover, our findings strongly suggest that mitochondrial dysfunction, NF-κB signalling and iNOS signalling are important dysregulated pathways in AD pathogenesis. Nature Publishing Group UK 2018-11-26 /pmc/articles/PMC6255913/ /pubmed/30478411 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-35789-3 Text en © The Author(s) 2018 Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Article
Li, Xinzhong
Wang, Haiyan
Long, Jintao
Pan, Genhua
He, Taigang
Anichtchik, Oleg
Belshaw, Robert
Albani, Diego
Edison, Paul
Green, Elaine K
Scott, James
Systematic Analysis and Biomarker Study for Alzheimer’s Disease
title Systematic Analysis and Biomarker Study for Alzheimer’s Disease
title_full Systematic Analysis and Biomarker Study for Alzheimer’s Disease
title_fullStr Systematic Analysis and Biomarker Study for Alzheimer’s Disease
title_full_unstemmed Systematic Analysis and Biomarker Study for Alzheimer’s Disease
title_short Systematic Analysis and Biomarker Study for Alzheimer’s Disease
title_sort systematic analysis and biomarker study for alzheimer’s disease
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6255913/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30478411
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-35789-3
work_keys_str_mv AT lixinzhong systematicanalysisandbiomarkerstudyforalzheimersdisease
AT wanghaiyan systematicanalysisandbiomarkerstudyforalzheimersdisease
AT longjintao systematicanalysisandbiomarkerstudyforalzheimersdisease
AT pangenhua systematicanalysisandbiomarkerstudyforalzheimersdisease
AT hetaigang systematicanalysisandbiomarkerstudyforalzheimersdisease
AT anichtchikoleg systematicanalysisandbiomarkerstudyforalzheimersdisease
AT belshawrobert systematicanalysisandbiomarkerstudyforalzheimersdisease
AT albanidiego systematicanalysisandbiomarkerstudyforalzheimersdisease
AT edisonpaul systematicanalysisandbiomarkerstudyforalzheimersdisease
AT greenelainek systematicanalysisandbiomarkerstudyforalzheimersdisease
AT scottjames systematicanalysisandbiomarkerstudyforalzheimersdisease