Cargando…

Assessing Response to Therapy for Nontuberculous Mycobacterial Lung Disease: Quo Vadis?

Assessing progression of disease or response to treatment remains a major challenge in the clinical management of nontuberculous mycobacterial (NTM) infections of the lungs. Serial assessments of validated measures of treatment response address whether the current therapeutic approach is on track to...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Vinnard, Christopher, Mezochow, Alyssa, Oakland, Hannah, Klingsberg, Ross, Hansen-Flaschen, John, Hamilton, Keith
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6256187/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30524407
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2018.02813
_version_ 1783374097482252288
author Vinnard, Christopher
Mezochow, Alyssa
Oakland, Hannah
Klingsberg, Ross
Hansen-Flaschen, John
Hamilton, Keith
author_facet Vinnard, Christopher
Mezochow, Alyssa
Oakland, Hannah
Klingsberg, Ross
Hansen-Flaschen, John
Hamilton, Keith
author_sort Vinnard, Christopher
collection PubMed
description Assessing progression of disease or response to treatment remains a major challenge in the clinical management of nontuberculous mycobacterial (NTM) infections of the lungs. Serial assessments of validated measures of treatment response address whether the current therapeutic approach is on track toward clinical cure, which remains a fundamental question for clinicians and patients during the course of NTM disease treatment. The 2015 NTM Research Consortium Workshop, which included a patient advisory panel, identified treatment response biomarkers as a priority area for investigation. Limited progress in addressing this challenge also hampers drug development efforts. The Biomarker Qualification Program at the FDA supports the use of a validated treatment response biomarker across multiple drug development programs. Current approaches in clinical practice include microbiologic and radiographic monitoring, along with symptomatic and quality-of-life assessments. Blood-based monitoring, including assessments of humoral and cell-mediated NTM-driven immune responses, remain under investigation. Alignment of data collection schemes in prospective multicenter studies, including the support of biosample repositories, will support identification of treatment response biomarkers under standard-of-care and investigational therapeutic strategies. In this review, we outline the role of treatment monitoring biomarkers in both clinical practice and drug development frameworks.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6256187
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-62561872018-12-06 Assessing Response to Therapy for Nontuberculous Mycobacterial Lung Disease: Quo Vadis? Vinnard, Christopher Mezochow, Alyssa Oakland, Hannah Klingsberg, Ross Hansen-Flaschen, John Hamilton, Keith Front Microbiol Microbiology Assessing progression of disease or response to treatment remains a major challenge in the clinical management of nontuberculous mycobacterial (NTM) infections of the lungs. Serial assessments of validated measures of treatment response address whether the current therapeutic approach is on track toward clinical cure, which remains a fundamental question for clinicians and patients during the course of NTM disease treatment. The 2015 NTM Research Consortium Workshop, which included a patient advisory panel, identified treatment response biomarkers as a priority area for investigation. Limited progress in addressing this challenge also hampers drug development efforts. The Biomarker Qualification Program at the FDA supports the use of a validated treatment response biomarker across multiple drug development programs. Current approaches in clinical practice include microbiologic and radiographic monitoring, along with symptomatic and quality-of-life assessments. Blood-based monitoring, including assessments of humoral and cell-mediated NTM-driven immune responses, remain under investigation. Alignment of data collection schemes in prospective multicenter studies, including the support of biosample repositories, will support identification of treatment response biomarkers under standard-of-care and investigational therapeutic strategies. In this review, we outline the role of treatment monitoring biomarkers in both clinical practice and drug development frameworks. Frontiers Media S.A. 2018-11-20 /pmc/articles/PMC6256187/ /pubmed/30524407 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2018.02813 Text en Copyright © 2018 Vinnard, Mezochow, Oakland, Klingsberg, Hansen-Flaschen and Hamilton. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Microbiology
Vinnard, Christopher
Mezochow, Alyssa
Oakland, Hannah
Klingsberg, Ross
Hansen-Flaschen, John
Hamilton, Keith
Assessing Response to Therapy for Nontuberculous Mycobacterial Lung Disease: Quo Vadis?
title Assessing Response to Therapy for Nontuberculous Mycobacterial Lung Disease: Quo Vadis?
title_full Assessing Response to Therapy for Nontuberculous Mycobacterial Lung Disease: Quo Vadis?
title_fullStr Assessing Response to Therapy for Nontuberculous Mycobacterial Lung Disease: Quo Vadis?
title_full_unstemmed Assessing Response to Therapy for Nontuberculous Mycobacterial Lung Disease: Quo Vadis?
title_short Assessing Response to Therapy for Nontuberculous Mycobacterial Lung Disease: Quo Vadis?
title_sort assessing response to therapy for nontuberculous mycobacterial lung disease: quo vadis?
topic Microbiology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6256187/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30524407
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2018.02813
work_keys_str_mv AT vinnardchristopher assessingresponsetotherapyfornontuberculousmycobacteriallungdiseasequovadis
AT mezochowalyssa assessingresponsetotherapyfornontuberculousmycobacteriallungdiseasequovadis
AT oaklandhannah assessingresponsetotherapyfornontuberculousmycobacteriallungdiseasequovadis
AT klingsbergross assessingresponsetotherapyfornontuberculousmycobacteriallungdiseasequovadis
AT hansenflaschenjohn assessingresponsetotherapyfornontuberculousmycobacteriallungdiseasequovadis
AT hamiltonkeith assessingresponsetotherapyfornontuberculousmycobacteriallungdiseasequovadis