Cargando…

Hydrodynamic Evaluations of Four Mock Femoral Venous Cannulas

OBJECTIVE: To report the results of four mock femoral venous cannulas and the hydrodynamical superiority of one of them, which is the completely punched (CP) model, upon the other three. METHODS: Four simulated femoral venous cannulas (single-stage, two-stage, multi-stage, and CP model) were designe...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Şahin, Türker, Tezer, Murat, Cerit, Levent
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Sociedade Brasileira de Cirurgia Cardiovascular 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6257525/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30517250
http://dx.doi.org/10.21470/1678-9741-2018-0036
_version_ 1783374336327942144
author Şahin, Türker
Tezer, Murat
Cerit, Levent
author_facet Şahin, Türker
Tezer, Murat
Cerit, Levent
author_sort Şahin, Türker
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: To report the results of four mock femoral venous cannulas and the hydrodynamical superiority of one of them, which is the completely punched (CP) model, upon the other three. METHODS: Four simulated femoral venous cannulas (single-stage, two-stage, multi-stage, and CP model) were designed from a 1/4” x 1/16” x 68 cm polyvinyl chloride (PVC) tubing line for testing. Holes on the PVC tubes were opened by a 5 mm aortic punch. In order to evaluate the cannulas' drainage performance, gelofusine was used as fluid. The fluid was drained for 60 seconds by gravitation and then measured for each model separately. RESULTS: Mean drained volumes of single-stage, two-stage, and multi-stage cannulas were 2.483, 2.561, and 2.603 mL, respectively. However, the CP cannula provided us a mean drained volume of 2.988 mL. There were significant differences among the variables of the CP cannula and the other three mock cannulas concerning the drained fluid flow (P<0.01). CONCLUSION: In our study, the measured mean volumes showed us that more drainage surface area provides better fluid drainage.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6257525
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Sociedade Brasileira de Cirurgia Cardiovascular
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-62575252018-12-03 Hydrodynamic Evaluations of Four Mock Femoral Venous Cannulas Şahin, Türker Tezer, Murat Cerit, Levent Braz J Cardiovasc Surg Original Article OBJECTIVE: To report the results of four mock femoral venous cannulas and the hydrodynamical superiority of one of them, which is the completely punched (CP) model, upon the other three. METHODS: Four simulated femoral venous cannulas (single-stage, two-stage, multi-stage, and CP model) were designed from a 1/4” x 1/16” x 68 cm polyvinyl chloride (PVC) tubing line for testing. Holes on the PVC tubes were opened by a 5 mm aortic punch. In order to evaluate the cannulas' drainage performance, gelofusine was used as fluid. The fluid was drained for 60 seconds by gravitation and then measured for each model separately. RESULTS: Mean drained volumes of single-stage, two-stage, and multi-stage cannulas were 2.483, 2.561, and 2.603 mL, respectively. However, the CP cannula provided us a mean drained volume of 2.988 mL. There were significant differences among the variables of the CP cannula and the other three mock cannulas concerning the drained fluid flow (P<0.01). CONCLUSION: In our study, the measured mean volumes showed us that more drainage surface area provides better fluid drainage. Sociedade Brasileira de Cirurgia Cardiovascular 2018 /pmc/articles/PMC6257525/ /pubmed/30517250 http://dx.doi.org/10.21470/1678-9741-2018-0036 Text en http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Şahin, Türker
Tezer, Murat
Cerit, Levent
Hydrodynamic Evaluations of Four Mock Femoral Venous Cannulas
title Hydrodynamic Evaluations of Four Mock Femoral Venous Cannulas
title_full Hydrodynamic Evaluations of Four Mock Femoral Venous Cannulas
title_fullStr Hydrodynamic Evaluations of Four Mock Femoral Venous Cannulas
title_full_unstemmed Hydrodynamic Evaluations of Four Mock Femoral Venous Cannulas
title_short Hydrodynamic Evaluations of Four Mock Femoral Venous Cannulas
title_sort hydrodynamic evaluations of four mock femoral venous cannulas
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6257525/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30517250
http://dx.doi.org/10.21470/1678-9741-2018-0036
work_keys_str_mv AT sahinturker hydrodynamicevaluationsoffourmockfemoralvenouscannulas
AT tezermurat hydrodynamicevaluationsoffourmockfemoralvenouscannulas
AT ceritlevent hydrodynamicevaluationsoffourmockfemoralvenouscannulas