Cargando…
Application of shaft method assisted biological mesh in laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair
To compare the feasibility and advantage of traditional tiling method and shaft method to place biological mesh following laparoscopic repair of inguinal hernia. Sixty cases from January 2013 to January 2014 treated with laparoscopic inguinal hernia neoplasty with biological patches were included. A...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Wolters Kluwer Health
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6257570/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30431567 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000012923 |
_version_ | 1783374345301655552 |
---|---|
author | Weng, Hanqin Ye, Liqin Lu, Peilin Sun, Hongwu |
author_facet | Weng, Hanqin Ye, Liqin Lu, Peilin Sun, Hongwu |
author_sort | Weng, Hanqin |
collection | PubMed |
description | To compare the feasibility and advantage of traditional tiling method and shaft method to place biological mesh following laparoscopic repair of inguinal hernia. Sixty cases from January 2013 to January 2014 treated with laparoscopic inguinal hernia neoplasty with biological patches were included. All the cases were randomly divided into control group and observation group. Observation group was treated with shaft method to place biological mesh, while control group was treated with traditional tiling method. The length of the operation, hospital fees, and rate of occurrence of surgical complications were compared. All 60 cases were successfully treated with laparoscope inguinal hernia repair. None were converted to open operations. Total operation times for the observation group and control group were 54 ± 4.5 and 71 ± 7.2 minutes, respectively (P < .05). The hospital fees of the observation group and control group were 21,280 ± 365 RenMinBi Yuan (RMB) and 24,280 ± 428 RMB, respectively (P < .05). The rates of occurrence of surgical complications were 3.33% (1/30) and 16.7% (5/30), respectively (P < .05). The shaft method can be applied in laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair with biological mesh. Compared with the traditional method, the shaft method has apparent advantages, fewer complications during and after the operation. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6257570 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | Wolters Kluwer Health |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-62575702018-12-17 Application of shaft method assisted biological mesh in laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair Weng, Hanqin Ye, Liqin Lu, Peilin Sun, Hongwu Medicine (Baltimore) Research Article To compare the feasibility and advantage of traditional tiling method and shaft method to place biological mesh following laparoscopic repair of inguinal hernia. Sixty cases from January 2013 to January 2014 treated with laparoscopic inguinal hernia neoplasty with biological patches were included. All the cases were randomly divided into control group and observation group. Observation group was treated with shaft method to place biological mesh, while control group was treated with traditional tiling method. The length of the operation, hospital fees, and rate of occurrence of surgical complications were compared. All 60 cases were successfully treated with laparoscope inguinal hernia repair. None were converted to open operations. Total operation times for the observation group and control group were 54 ± 4.5 and 71 ± 7.2 minutes, respectively (P < .05). The hospital fees of the observation group and control group were 21,280 ± 365 RenMinBi Yuan (RMB) and 24,280 ± 428 RMB, respectively (P < .05). The rates of occurrence of surgical complications were 3.33% (1/30) and 16.7% (5/30), respectively (P < .05). The shaft method can be applied in laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair with biological mesh. Compared with the traditional method, the shaft method has apparent advantages, fewer complications during and after the operation. Wolters Kluwer Health 2018-11-16 /pmc/articles/PMC6257570/ /pubmed/30431567 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000012923 Text en Copyright © 2018 the Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-No Derivatives License 4.0 (CCBY-NC-ND), where it is permissible to download and share the work provided it is properly cited. The work cannot be changed in any way or used commercially without permission from the journal. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 |
spellingShingle | Research Article Weng, Hanqin Ye, Liqin Lu, Peilin Sun, Hongwu Application of shaft method assisted biological mesh in laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair |
title | Application of shaft method assisted biological mesh in laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair |
title_full | Application of shaft method assisted biological mesh in laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair |
title_fullStr | Application of shaft method assisted biological mesh in laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair |
title_full_unstemmed | Application of shaft method assisted biological mesh in laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair |
title_short | Application of shaft method assisted biological mesh in laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair |
title_sort | application of shaft method assisted biological mesh in laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6257570/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30431567 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000012923 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT wenghanqin applicationofshaftmethodassistedbiologicalmeshinlaparoscopicinguinalherniarepair AT yeliqin applicationofshaftmethodassistedbiologicalmeshinlaparoscopicinguinalherniarepair AT lupeilin applicationofshaftmethodassistedbiologicalmeshinlaparoscopicinguinalherniarepair AT sunhongwu applicationofshaftmethodassistedbiologicalmeshinlaparoscopicinguinalherniarepair |