Cargando…

Application of shaft method assisted biological mesh in laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair

To compare the feasibility and advantage of traditional tiling method and shaft method to place biological mesh following laparoscopic repair of inguinal hernia. Sixty cases from January 2013 to January 2014 treated with laparoscopic inguinal hernia neoplasty with biological patches were included. A...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Weng, Hanqin, Ye, Liqin, Lu, Peilin, Sun, Hongwu
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Wolters Kluwer Health 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6257570/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30431567
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000012923
_version_ 1783374345301655552
author Weng, Hanqin
Ye, Liqin
Lu, Peilin
Sun, Hongwu
author_facet Weng, Hanqin
Ye, Liqin
Lu, Peilin
Sun, Hongwu
author_sort Weng, Hanqin
collection PubMed
description To compare the feasibility and advantage of traditional tiling method and shaft method to place biological mesh following laparoscopic repair of inguinal hernia. Sixty cases from January 2013 to January 2014 treated with laparoscopic inguinal hernia neoplasty with biological patches were included. All the cases were randomly divided into control group and observation group. Observation group was treated with shaft method to place biological mesh, while control group was treated with traditional tiling method. The length of the operation, hospital fees, and rate of occurrence of surgical complications were compared. All 60 cases were successfully treated with laparoscope inguinal hernia repair. None were converted to open operations. Total operation times for the observation group and control group were 54 ± 4.5 and 71 ± 7.2 minutes, respectively (P < .05). The hospital fees of the observation group and control group were 21,280 ± 365 RenMinBi Yuan (RMB) and 24,280 ± 428 RMB, respectively (P < .05). The rates of occurrence of surgical complications were 3.33% (1/30) and 16.7% (5/30), respectively (P < .05). The shaft method can be applied in laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair with biological mesh. Compared with the traditional method, the shaft method has apparent advantages, fewer complications during and after the operation.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6257570
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Wolters Kluwer Health
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-62575702018-12-17 Application of shaft method assisted biological mesh in laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair Weng, Hanqin Ye, Liqin Lu, Peilin Sun, Hongwu Medicine (Baltimore) Research Article To compare the feasibility and advantage of traditional tiling method and shaft method to place biological mesh following laparoscopic repair of inguinal hernia. Sixty cases from January 2013 to January 2014 treated with laparoscopic inguinal hernia neoplasty with biological patches were included. All the cases were randomly divided into control group and observation group. Observation group was treated with shaft method to place biological mesh, while control group was treated with traditional tiling method. The length of the operation, hospital fees, and rate of occurrence of surgical complications were compared. All 60 cases were successfully treated with laparoscope inguinal hernia repair. None were converted to open operations. Total operation times for the observation group and control group were 54 ± 4.5 and 71 ± 7.2 minutes, respectively (P < .05). The hospital fees of the observation group and control group were 21,280 ± 365 RenMinBi Yuan (RMB) and 24,280 ± 428 RMB, respectively (P < .05). The rates of occurrence of surgical complications were 3.33% (1/30) and 16.7% (5/30), respectively (P < .05). The shaft method can be applied in laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair with biological mesh. Compared with the traditional method, the shaft method has apparent advantages, fewer complications during and after the operation. Wolters Kluwer Health 2018-11-16 /pmc/articles/PMC6257570/ /pubmed/30431567 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000012923 Text en Copyright © 2018 the Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-No Derivatives License 4.0 (CCBY-NC-ND), where it is permissible to download and share the work provided it is properly cited. The work cannot be changed in any way or used commercially without permission from the journal. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0
spellingShingle Research Article
Weng, Hanqin
Ye, Liqin
Lu, Peilin
Sun, Hongwu
Application of shaft method assisted biological mesh in laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair
title Application of shaft method assisted biological mesh in laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair
title_full Application of shaft method assisted biological mesh in laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair
title_fullStr Application of shaft method assisted biological mesh in laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair
title_full_unstemmed Application of shaft method assisted biological mesh in laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair
title_short Application of shaft method assisted biological mesh in laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair
title_sort application of shaft method assisted biological mesh in laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6257570/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30431567
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000012923
work_keys_str_mv AT wenghanqin applicationofshaftmethodassistedbiologicalmeshinlaparoscopicinguinalherniarepair
AT yeliqin applicationofshaftmethodassistedbiologicalmeshinlaparoscopicinguinalherniarepair
AT lupeilin applicationofshaftmethodassistedbiologicalmeshinlaparoscopicinguinalherniarepair
AT sunhongwu applicationofshaftmethodassistedbiologicalmeshinlaparoscopicinguinalherniarepair