Cargando…

Outcomes of concurrent chemoradiotherapy versus chemotherapy alone for stage IV esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: a retrospective controlled study

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study is to compare the efficacy and safety of concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) versus chemotherapy alone for patients with stage IV esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC). METHODS: Eligible patients were retrospectively enrolled at the authors’s institution fro...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lyu, Jiahua, Li, Tao, Wang, Qifeng, Li, Fang, Diao, Peng, Liu, Li, Li, Churong, Lang, Jinyi
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6257959/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30477531
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13014-018-1183-y
_version_ 1783374430438686720
author Lyu, Jiahua
Li, Tao
Wang, Qifeng
Li, Fang
Diao, Peng
Liu, Li
Li, Churong
Lang, Jinyi
author_facet Lyu, Jiahua
Li, Tao
Wang, Qifeng
Li, Fang
Diao, Peng
Liu, Li
Li, Churong
Lang, Jinyi
author_sort Lyu, Jiahua
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study is to compare the efficacy and safety of concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) versus chemotherapy alone for patients with stage IV esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC). METHODS: Eligible patients were retrospectively enrolled at the authors’s institution from January 2010 to October 2015. Of the 141 patients enrolled, 55 (39.0%) received CCRT and 86 (61.0%) received chemotherapy alone. The outcomes and adverse events (AEs) were compared between the two groups. RESULTS: The baseline clinical characteristics of the two groups were similar. However, the CCRT group showed a significantly better primary tumor objective response rate (ORR) than that of the chemotherapy group (74.5% versus 45.3%, p = 0.001). The 1-year, 2-year, 3-year overall survival (OS) rates and median OS were 58.0% versus 43.0%, 25.5% versus 14.0%, 10.7% versus 4.7%, and 14 months versus 11 months for patients treated with CCRT or chemotherapy, respectively (p = 0.007). The 1-year and median progression-free survival (PFS) were 29.8% versus 14.9% and 8 months versus 6 months (p = 0.005). Multivariate analysis identified CCRT (p = 0.013) and solitary metastasis (p = 0.037) as independent factors for greater OS. The frequency of leucocytopenia (grade 3 or higher) was significantly higher in the CCRT group than in the chemotherapy-alone group (p = 0.040), whereas the rates of other AEs did not differ. CONCLUSIONS: In this study, it is suggested that CCRT is more effective than chemotherapy alone for stage IV ESCC, yielding better primary responses and survival outcomes with tolerable side effects.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6257959
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-62579592018-11-29 Outcomes of concurrent chemoradiotherapy versus chemotherapy alone for stage IV esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: a retrospective controlled study Lyu, Jiahua Li, Tao Wang, Qifeng Li, Fang Diao, Peng Liu, Li Li, Churong Lang, Jinyi Radiat Oncol Research BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study is to compare the efficacy and safety of concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) versus chemotherapy alone for patients with stage IV esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC). METHODS: Eligible patients were retrospectively enrolled at the authors’s institution from January 2010 to October 2015. Of the 141 patients enrolled, 55 (39.0%) received CCRT and 86 (61.0%) received chemotherapy alone. The outcomes and adverse events (AEs) were compared between the two groups. RESULTS: The baseline clinical characteristics of the two groups were similar. However, the CCRT group showed a significantly better primary tumor objective response rate (ORR) than that of the chemotherapy group (74.5% versus 45.3%, p = 0.001). The 1-year, 2-year, 3-year overall survival (OS) rates and median OS were 58.0% versus 43.0%, 25.5% versus 14.0%, 10.7% versus 4.7%, and 14 months versus 11 months for patients treated with CCRT or chemotherapy, respectively (p = 0.007). The 1-year and median progression-free survival (PFS) were 29.8% versus 14.9% and 8 months versus 6 months (p = 0.005). Multivariate analysis identified CCRT (p = 0.013) and solitary metastasis (p = 0.037) as independent factors for greater OS. The frequency of leucocytopenia (grade 3 or higher) was significantly higher in the CCRT group than in the chemotherapy-alone group (p = 0.040), whereas the rates of other AEs did not differ. CONCLUSIONS: In this study, it is suggested that CCRT is more effective than chemotherapy alone for stage IV ESCC, yielding better primary responses and survival outcomes with tolerable side effects. BioMed Central 2018-11-26 /pmc/articles/PMC6257959/ /pubmed/30477531 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13014-018-1183-y Text en © The Author(s). 2018 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research
Lyu, Jiahua
Li, Tao
Wang, Qifeng
Li, Fang
Diao, Peng
Liu, Li
Li, Churong
Lang, Jinyi
Outcomes of concurrent chemoradiotherapy versus chemotherapy alone for stage IV esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: a retrospective controlled study
title Outcomes of concurrent chemoradiotherapy versus chemotherapy alone for stage IV esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: a retrospective controlled study
title_full Outcomes of concurrent chemoradiotherapy versus chemotherapy alone for stage IV esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: a retrospective controlled study
title_fullStr Outcomes of concurrent chemoradiotherapy versus chemotherapy alone for stage IV esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: a retrospective controlled study
title_full_unstemmed Outcomes of concurrent chemoradiotherapy versus chemotherapy alone for stage IV esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: a retrospective controlled study
title_short Outcomes of concurrent chemoradiotherapy versus chemotherapy alone for stage IV esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: a retrospective controlled study
title_sort outcomes of concurrent chemoradiotherapy versus chemotherapy alone for stage iv esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: a retrospective controlled study
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6257959/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30477531
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13014-018-1183-y
work_keys_str_mv AT lyujiahua outcomesofconcurrentchemoradiotherapyversuschemotherapyaloneforstageivesophagealsquamouscellcarcinomaaretrospectivecontrolledstudy
AT litao outcomesofconcurrentchemoradiotherapyversuschemotherapyaloneforstageivesophagealsquamouscellcarcinomaaretrospectivecontrolledstudy
AT wangqifeng outcomesofconcurrentchemoradiotherapyversuschemotherapyaloneforstageivesophagealsquamouscellcarcinomaaretrospectivecontrolledstudy
AT lifang outcomesofconcurrentchemoradiotherapyversuschemotherapyaloneforstageivesophagealsquamouscellcarcinomaaretrospectivecontrolledstudy
AT diaopeng outcomesofconcurrentchemoradiotherapyversuschemotherapyaloneforstageivesophagealsquamouscellcarcinomaaretrospectivecontrolledstudy
AT liuli outcomesofconcurrentchemoradiotherapyversuschemotherapyaloneforstageivesophagealsquamouscellcarcinomaaretrospectivecontrolledstudy
AT lichurong outcomesofconcurrentchemoradiotherapyversuschemotherapyaloneforstageivesophagealsquamouscellcarcinomaaretrospectivecontrolledstudy
AT langjinyi outcomesofconcurrentchemoradiotherapyversuschemotherapyaloneforstageivesophagealsquamouscellcarcinomaaretrospectivecontrolledstudy