Cargando…
The levonorgestrel intrauterine device in Australia: analysis of prescribing data 2008–2012
BACKGROUND: Unplanned pregnancy is a significant problem in Australia. Local data pertaining to use of the levonorgestrel-releasing intra-uterine device (LNG-IUD), and associated factors are limited. The aim of this analysis was to calculate prescribing rates of the LNG-IUD in Australia, including t...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6257965/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30482186 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12905-018-0680-3 |
_version_ | 1783374431838535680 |
---|---|
author | Bingham, Amie L. Garrett, Cameryn C. Bayly, Christine Kavanagh, Anne M. Keogh, Louise A. Bentley, Rebecca J. Hocking, Jane S. |
author_facet | Bingham, Amie L. Garrett, Cameryn C. Bayly, Christine Kavanagh, Anne M. Keogh, Louise A. Bentley, Rebecca J. Hocking, Jane S. |
author_sort | Bingham, Amie L. |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Unplanned pregnancy is a significant problem in Australia. Local data pertaining to use of the levonorgestrel-releasing intra-uterine device (LNG-IUD), and associated factors are limited. The aim of this analysis was to calculate prescribing rates of the LNG-IUD in Australia, including trends in prescribing and associations with socio-demographic factors, in order to increase understanding regarding potential use. METHODS: We examined prescriptions for the LNG-IUD recorded in the national Pharmaceutical Benefits Scheme (PBS) from 2008 to 2012. Prescribing trends were examined according to patient age, remoteness of residential location, and proximity to relevant specialist health services. Associations between these factors and prescription rates were examined using poisson regression. Analyses were stratified by 5-year age-groups. RESULTS: Age-adjusted prescription rates rose from 11.50 per 1000 women aged 15–49 (95% CI: 11.41–11.59) in 2008 to 15.95 (95% CI:15.85–16.01) in 2012. Prescription rates increased most among 15–19-year-olds but remain very low at 2.76 per 1000 women (95% CI: 2.52–3.01). Absolute increases in prescriptions were greatest among 40–44-year-olds, rising from 16.73 per 1000 women in 2008 (95% CI: 16.12–17.34) to 23.77 in 2012 (95% CI: 22.58–24.29). Rates increased significantly within all geographical locations (p < 0.01). Non-metropolitan location was significantly associated with increased prescribing rates, the association diminishing with increasing age groups. CONCLUSIONS: Prescription of LNG-IUD in Australia is very low, especially among young women and those in major cities. Service providers and young women may benefit from targeted education outlining use of the LNG-IUD, strengthened training and referral pathways. Disparities in prescription according to location require further investigation. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6257965 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-62579652018-11-29 The levonorgestrel intrauterine device in Australia: analysis of prescribing data 2008–2012 Bingham, Amie L. Garrett, Cameryn C. Bayly, Christine Kavanagh, Anne M. Keogh, Louise A. Bentley, Rebecca J. Hocking, Jane S. BMC Womens Health Research Article BACKGROUND: Unplanned pregnancy is a significant problem in Australia. Local data pertaining to use of the levonorgestrel-releasing intra-uterine device (LNG-IUD), and associated factors are limited. The aim of this analysis was to calculate prescribing rates of the LNG-IUD in Australia, including trends in prescribing and associations with socio-demographic factors, in order to increase understanding regarding potential use. METHODS: We examined prescriptions for the LNG-IUD recorded in the national Pharmaceutical Benefits Scheme (PBS) from 2008 to 2012. Prescribing trends were examined according to patient age, remoteness of residential location, and proximity to relevant specialist health services. Associations between these factors and prescription rates were examined using poisson regression. Analyses were stratified by 5-year age-groups. RESULTS: Age-adjusted prescription rates rose from 11.50 per 1000 women aged 15–49 (95% CI: 11.41–11.59) in 2008 to 15.95 (95% CI:15.85–16.01) in 2012. Prescription rates increased most among 15–19-year-olds but remain very low at 2.76 per 1000 women (95% CI: 2.52–3.01). Absolute increases in prescriptions were greatest among 40–44-year-olds, rising from 16.73 per 1000 women in 2008 (95% CI: 16.12–17.34) to 23.77 in 2012 (95% CI: 22.58–24.29). Rates increased significantly within all geographical locations (p < 0.01). Non-metropolitan location was significantly associated with increased prescribing rates, the association diminishing with increasing age groups. CONCLUSIONS: Prescription of LNG-IUD in Australia is very low, especially among young women and those in major cities. Service providers and young women may benefit from targeted education outlining use of the LNG-IUD, strengthened training and referral pathways. Disparities in prescription according to location require further investigation. BioMed Central 2018-11-27 /pmc/articles/PMC6257965/ /pubmed/30482186 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12905-018-0680-3 Text en © The Author(s). 2018 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Bingham, Amie L. Garrett, Cameryn C. Bayly, Christine Kavanagh, Anne M. Keogh, Louise A. Bentley, Rebecca J. Hocking, Jane S. The levonorgestrel intrauterine device in Australia: analysis of prescribing data 2008–2012 |
title | The levonorgestrel intrauterine device in Australia: analysis of prescribing data 2008–2012 |
title_full | The levonorgestrel intrauterine device in Australia: analysis of prescribing data 2008–2012 |
title_fullStr | The levonorgestrel intrauterine device in Australia: analysis of prescribing data 2008–2012 |
title_full_unstemmed | The levonorgestrel intrauterine device in Australia: analysis of prescribing data 2008–2012 |
title_short | The levonorgestrel intrauterine device in Australia: analysis of prescribing data 2008–2012 |
title_sort | levonorgestrel intrauterine device in australia: analysis of prescribing data 2008–2012 |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6257965/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30482186 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12905-018-0680-3 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT binghamamiel thelevonorgestrelintrauterinedeviceinaustraliaanalysisofprescribingdata20082012 AT garrettcamerync thelevonorgestrelintrauterinedeviceinaustraliaanalysisofprescribingdata20082012 AT baylychristine thelevonorgestrelintrauterinedeviceinaustraliaanalysisofprescribingdata20082012 AT kavanaghannem thelevonorgestrelintrauterinedeviceinaustraliaanalysisofprescribingdata20082012 AT keoghlouisea thelevonorgestrelintrauterinedeviceinaustraliaanalysisofprescribingdata20082012 AT bentleyrebeccaj thelevonorgestrelintrauterinedeviceinaustraliaanalysisofprescribingdata20082012 AT hockingjanes thelevonorgestrelintrauterinedeviceinaustraliaanalysisofprescribingdata20082012 AT binghamamiel levonorgestrelintrauterinedeviceinaustraliaanalysisofprescribingdata20082012 AT garrettcamerync levonorgestrelintrauterinedeviceinaustraliaanalysisofprescribingdata20082012 AT baylychristine levonorgestrelintrauterinedeviceinaustraliaanalysisofprescribingdata20082012 AT kavanaghannem levonorgestrelintrauterinedeviceinaustraliaanalysisofprescribingdata20082012 AT keoghlouisea levonorgestrelintrauterinedeviceinaustraliaanalysisofprescribingdata20082012 AT bentleyrebeccaj levonorgestrelintrauterinedeviceinaustraliaanalysisofprescribingdata20082012 AT hockingjanes levonorgestrelintrauterinedeviceinaustraliaanalysisofprescribingdata20082012 |