Cargando…

The levonorgestrel intrauterine device in Australia: analysis of prescribing data 2008–2012

BACKGROUND: Unplanned pregnancy is a significant problem in Australia. Local data pertaining to use of the levonorgestrel-releasing intra-uterine device (LNG-IUD), and associated factors are limited. The aim of this analysis was to calculate prescribing rates of the LNG-IUD in Australia, including t...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Bingham, Amie L., Garrett, Cameryn C., Bayly, Christine, Kavanagh, Anne M., Keogh, Louise A., Bentley, Rebecca J., Hocking, Jane S.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6257965/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30482186
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12905-018-0680-3
_version_ 1783374431838535680
author Bingham, Amie L.
Garrett, Cameryn C.
Bayly, Christine
Kavanagh, Anne M.
Keogh, Louise A.
Bentley, Rebecca J.
Hocking, Jane S.
author_facet Bingham, Amie L.
Garrett, Cameryn C.
Bayly, Christine
Kavanagh, Anne M.
Keogh, Louise A.
Bentley, Rebecca J.
Hocking, Jane S.
author_sort Bingham, Amie L.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Unplanned pregnancy is a significant problem in Australia. Local data pertaining to use of the levonorgestrel-releasing intra-uterine device (LNG-IUD), and associated factors are limited. The aim of this analysis was to calculate prescribing rates of the LNG-IUD in Australia, including trends in prescribing and associations with socio-demographic factors, in order to increase understanding regarding potential use. METHODS: We examined prescriptions for the LNG-IUD recorded in the national Pharmaceutical Benefits Scheme (PBS) from 2008 to 2012. Prescribing trends were examined according to patient age, remoteness of residential location, and proximity to relevant specialist health services. Associations between these factors and prescription rates were examined using poisson regression. Analyses were stratified by 5-year age-groups. RESULTS: Age-adjusted prescription rates rose from 11.50 per 1000 women aged 15–49 (95% CI: 11.41–11.59) in 2008 to 15.95 (95% CI:15.85–16.01) in 2012. Prescription rates increased most among 15–19-year-olds but remain very low at 2.76 per 1000 women (95% CI: 2.52–3.01). Absolute increases in prescriptions were greatest among 40–44-year-olds, rising from 16.73 per 1000 women in 2008 (95% CI: 16.12–17.34) to 23.77 in 2012 (95% CI: 22.58–24.29). Rates increased significantly within all geographical locations (p < 0.01). Non-metropolitan location was significantly associated with increased prescribing rates, the association diminishing with increasing age groups. CONCLUSIONS: Prescription of LNG-IUD in Australia is very low, especially among young women and those in major cities. Service providers and young women may benefit from targeted education outlining use of the LNG-IUD, strengthened training and referral pathways. Disparities in prescription according to location require further investigation.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6257965
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-62579652018-11-29 The levonorgestrel intrauterine device in Australia: analysis of prescribing data 2008–2012 Bingham, Amie L. Garrett, Cameryn C. Bayly, Christine Kavanagh, Anne M. Keogh, Louise A. Bentley, Rebecca J. Hocking, Jane S. BMC Womens Health Research Article BACKGROUND: Unplanned pregnancy is a significant problem in Australia. Local data pertaining to use of the levonorgestrel-releasing intra-uterine device (LNG-IUD), and associated factors are limited. The aim of this analysis was to calculate prescribing rates of the LNG-IUD in Australia, including trends in prescribing and associations with socio-demographic factors, in order to increase understanding regarding potential use. METHODS: We examined prescriptions for the LNG-IUD recorded in the national Pharmaceutical Benefits Scheme (PBS) from 2008 to 2012. Prescribing trends were examined according to patient age, remoteness of residential location, and proximity to relevant specialist health services. Associations between these factors and prescription rates were examined using poisson regression. Analyses were stratified by 5-year age-groups. RESULTS: Age-adjusted prescription rates rose from 11.50 per 1000 women aged 15–49 (95% CI: 11.41–11.59) in 2008 to 15.95 (95% CI:15.85–16.01) in 2012. Prescription rates increased most among 15–19-year-olds but remain very low at 2.76 per 1000 women (95% CI: 2.52–3.01). Absolute increases in prescriptions were greatest among 40–44-year-olds, rising from 16.73 per 1000 women in 2008 (95% CI: 16.12–17.34) to 23.77 in 2012 (95% CI: 22.58–24.29). Rates increased significantly within all geographical locations (p < 0.01). Non-metropolitan location was significantly associated with increased prescribing rates, the association diminishing with increasing age groups. CONCLUSIONS: Prescription of LNG-IUD in Australia is very low, especially among young women and those in major cities. Service providers and young women may benefit from targeted education outlining use of the LNG-IUD, strengthened training and referral pathways. Disparities in prescription according to location require further investigation. BioMed Central 2018-11-27 /pmc/articles/PMC6257965/ /pubmed/30482186 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12905-018-0680-3 Text en © The Author(s). 2018 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Bingham, Amie L.
Garrett, Cameryn C.
Bayly, Christine
Kavanagh, Anne M.
Keogh, Louise A.
Bentley, Rebecca J.
Hocking, Jane S.
The levonorgestrel intrauterine device in Australia: analysis of prescribing data 2008–2012
title The levonorgestrel intrauterine device in Australia: analysis of prescribing data 2008–2012
title_full The levonorgestrel intrauterine device in Australia: analysis of prescribing data 2008–2012
title_fullStr The levonorgestrel intrauterine device in Australia: analysis of prescribing data 2008–2012
title_full_unstemmed The levonorgestrel intrauterine device in Australia: analysis of prescribing data 2008–2012
title_short The levonorgestrel intrauterine device in Australia: analysis of prescribing data 2008–2012
title_sort levonorgestrel intrauterine device in australia: analysis of prescribing data 2008–2012
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6257965/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30482186
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12905-018-0680-3
work_keys_str_mv AT binghamamiel thelevonorgestrelintrauterinedeviceinaustraliaanalysisofprescribingdata20082012
AT garrettcamerync thelevonorgestrelintrauterinedeviceinaustraliaanalysisofprescribingdata20082012
AT baylychristine thelevonorgestrelintrauterinedeviceinaustraliaanalysisofprescribingdata20082012
AT kavanaghannem thelevonorgestrelintrauterinedeviceinaustraliaanalysisofprescribingdata20082012
AT keoghlouisea thelevonorgestrelintrauterinedeviceinaustraliaanalysisofprescribingdata20082012
AT bentleyrebeccaj thelevonorgestrelintrauterinedeviceinaustraliaanalysisofprescribingdata20082012
AT hockingjanes thelevonorgestrelintrauterinedeviceinaustraliaanalysisofprescribingdata20082012
AT binghamamiel levonorgestrelintrauterinedeviceinaustraliaanalysisofprescribingdata20082012
AT garrettcamerync levonorgestrelintrauterinedeviceinaustraliaanalysisofprescribingdata20082012
AT baylychristine levonorgestrelintrauterinedeviceinaustraliaanalysisofprescribingdata20082012
AT kavanaghannem levonorgestrelintrauterinedeviceinaustraliaanalysisofprescribingdata20082012
AT keoghlouisea levonorgestrelintrauterinedeviceinaustraliaanalysisofprescribingdata20082012
AT bentleyrebeccaj levonorgestrelintrauterinedeviceinaustraliaanalysisofprescribingdata20082012
AT hockingjanes levonorgestrelintrauterinedeviceinaustraliaanalysisofprescribingdata20082012