Cargando…

Evaluation of a quality improvement intervention for labour and birth care in Brazilian private hospitals: a protocol

BACKGROUND: In Brazilian private hospitals, caesarean section (CS) is almost universal (88%) and is integrated into the model of birth care. A quality improvement intervention, “Adequate Birth” (PPA), based on four driving components (governance, participation of women and families, reorganisation o...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Torres, Jacqueline Alves, Leal, Maria do Carmo, Domingues, Rosa Maria Soares Madeira, Esteves-Pereira, Ana Paula, Nakano, Andreza Rodrigues, Gomes, Maysa Luduvice, Figueiró, Ana Claudia, Nakamura-Pereira, Marcos, de Oliveira, Elaine Fernandes Viellas, Ayres, Bárbara Vasques da Silva, Sandall, Jane, Belizán, José M, Hartz, Zulmira
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6257968/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30477517
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12978-018-0636-y
_version_ 1783374432577781760
author Torres, Jacqueline Alves
Leal, Maria do Carmo
Domingues, Rosa Maria Soares Madeira
Esteves-Pereira, Ana Paula
Nakano, Andreza Rodrigues
Gomes, Maysa Luduvice
Figueiró, Ana Claudia
Nakamura-Pereira, Marcos
de Oliveira, Elaine Fernandes Viellas
Ayres, Bárbara Vasques da Silva
Sandall, Jane
Belizán, José M
Hartz, Zulmira
author_facet Torres, Jacqueline Alves
Leal, Maria do Carmo
Domingues, Rosa Maria Soares Madeira
Esteves-Pereira, Ana Paula
Nakano, Andreza Rodrigues
Gomes, Maysa Luduvice
Figueiró, Ana Claudia
Nakamura-Pereira, Marcos
de Oliveira, Elaine Fernandes Viellas
Ayres, Bárbara Vasques da Silva
Sandall, Jane
Belizán, José M
Hartz, Zulmira
author_sort Torres, Jacqueline Alves
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: In Brazilian private hospitals, caesarean section (CS) is almost universal (88%) and is integrated into the model of birth care. A quality improvement intervention, “Adequate Birth” (PPA), based on four driving components (governance, participation of women and families, reorganisation of care, and monitoring), has been implemented to help 23 hospitals reduce their CS rate. This is a protocol designed to evaluate the implementation of PPA and its effectiveness at reducing CS as a primary outcome of birth care. METHODS: Case study of PPA intervention conducted in 2017/2018. We integrated quantitative and qualitative methods into data collection and analysis. For the quantitative stage, we selected a convenient sample of twelve hospitals. In each of these hospitals, we included 400 women. This resulted in a total sample of 4800 women. We used this sample to detect a 2.5% reduction in CS rate. We interviewed managers and puerperal women, and extracted data from hospital records. In the qualitative stage, we evaluated a subsample of eight hospitals by means of systematic observation and semi-structured interviews with managers, health professionals and women. We used specific forms for each of the four PPA driving components. Forms for managers and professionals addressed the decision-making process, implemented strategies, participatory process in strategy design, and healthcare practice. Forms for women and neonatal care addressed socio-economic, demographic and health condition; prenatal and birth care; tour of the hospital before delivery; labour expectation vs. real experience; and satisfaction with care received. We will estimate the degree of implementation of PPA strategies related to two of the four driving components: “participation of women and families” and “reorganisation of care”. We will then assess its effect on CS rate and secondary outcomes for each of the twelve selected hospitals, and for the total sample. To allow for clinical, socio-demographic and obstetric characteristics in women, we will conduct multivariate analysis. Additionally, we will evaluate the influence of internal context variables (the PPA driving components “governance” and “monitoring”) on the degree of implementation of the components “participation of women and families” and “reorganisation of care”, by means of thematic content analysis. This analysis will include both quantitative and qualitative data. DISCUSSION: The effectiveness of quality improvement interventions that reduce CS rates requires examination. This study will identify strategies that could promote healthier births. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s12978-018-0636-y) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6257968
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-62579682018-11-29 Evaluation of a quality improvement intervention for labour and birth care in Brazilian private hospitals: a protocol Torres, Jacqueline Alves Leal, Maria do Carmo Domingues, Rosa Maria Soares Madeira Esteves-Pereira, Ana Paula Nakano, Andreza Rodrigues Gomes, Maysa Luduvice Figueiró, Ana Claudia Nakamura-Pereira, Marcos de Oliveira, Elaine Fernandes Viellas Ayres, Bárbara Vasques da Silva Sandall, Jane Belizán, José M Hartz, Zulmira Reprod Health Study Protocol BACKGROUND: In Brazilian private hospitals, caesarean section (CS) is almost universal (88%) and is integrated into the model of birth care. A quality improvement intervention, “Adequate Birth” (PPA), based on four driving components (governance, participation of women and families, reorganisation of care, and monitoring), has been implemented to help 23 hospitals reduce their CS rate. This is a protocol designed to evaluate the implementation of PPA and its effectiveness at reducing CS as a primary outcome of birth care. METHODS: Case study of PPA intervention conducted in 2017/2018. We integrated quantitative and qualitative methods into data collection and analysis. For the quantitative stage, we selected a convenient sample of twelve hospitals. In each of these hospitals, we included 400 women. This resulted in a total sample of 4800 women. We used this sample to detect a 2.5% reduction in CS rate. We interviewed managers and puerperal women, and extracted data from hospital records. In the qualitative stage, we evaluated a subsample of eight hospitals by means of systematic observation and semi-structured interviews with managers, health professionals and women. We used specific forms for each of the four PPA driving components. Forms for managers and professionals addressed the decision-making process, implemented strategies, participatory process in strategy design, and healthcare practice. Forms for women and neonatal care addressed socio-economic, demographic and health condition; prenatal and birth care; tour of the hospital before delivery; labour expectation vs. real experience; and satisfaction with care received. We will estimate the degree of implementation of PPA strategies related to two of the four driving components: “participation of women and families” and “reorganisation of care”. We will then assess its effect on CS rate and secondary outcomes for each of the twelve selected hospitals, and for the total sample. To allow for clinical, socio-demographic and obstetric characteristics in women, we will conduct multivariate analysis. Additionally, we will evaluate the influence of internal context variables (the PPA driving components “governance” and “monitoring”) on the degree of implementation of the components “participation of women and families” and “reorganisation of care”, by means of thematic content analysis. This analysis will include both quantitative and qualitative data. DISCUSSION: The effectiveness of quality improvement interventions that reduce CS rates requires examination. This study will identify strategies that could promote healthier births. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s12978-018-0636-y) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2018-11-26 /pmc/articles/PMC6257968/ /pubmed/30477517 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12978-018-0636-y Text en © The Author(s). 2018 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Study Protocol
Torres, Jacqueline Alves
Leal, Maria do Carmo
Domingues, Rosa Maria Soares Madeira
Esteves-Pereira, Ana Paula
Nakano, Andreza Rodrigues
Gomes, Maysa Luduvice
Figueiró, Ana Claudia
Nakamura-Pereira, Marcos
de Oliveira, Elaine Fernandes Viellas
Ayres, Bárbara Vasques da Silva
Sandall, Jane
Belizán, José M
Hartz, Zulmira
Evaluation of a quality improvement intervention for labour and birth care in Brazilian private hospitals: a protocol
title Evaluation of a quality improvement intervention for labour and birth care in Brazilian private hospitals: a protocol
title_full Evaluation of a quality improvement intervention for labour and birth care in Brazilian private hospitals: a protocol
title_fullStr Evaluation of a quality improvement intervention for labour and birth care in Brazilian private hospitals: a protocol
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of a quality improvement intervention for labour and birth care in Brazilian private hospitals: a protocol
title_short Evaluation of a quality improvement intervention for labour and birth care in Brazilian private hospitals: a protocol
title_sort evaluation of a quality improvement intervention for labour and birth care in brazilian private hospitals: a protocol
topic Study Protocol
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6257968/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30477517
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12978-018-0636-y
work_keys_str_mv AT torresjacquelinealves evaluationofaqualityimprovementinterventionforlabourandbirthcareinbrazilianprivatehospitalsaprotocol
AT lealmariadocarmo evaluationofaqualityimprovementinterventionforlabourandbirthcareinbrazilianprivatehospitalsaprotocol
AT dominguesrosamariasoaresmadeira evaluationofaqualityimprovementinterventionforlabourandbirthcareinbrazilianprivatehospitalsaprotocol
AT estevespereiraanapaula evaluationofaqualityimprovementinterventionforlabourandbirthcareinbrazilianprivatehospitalsaprotocol
AT nakanoandrezarodrigues evaluationofaqualityimprovementinterventionforlabourandbirthcareinbrazilianprivatehospitalsaprotocol
AT gomesmaysaluduvice evaluationofaqualityimprovementinterventionforlabourandbirthcareinbrazilianprivatehospitalsaprotocol
AT figueiroanaclaudia evaluationofaqualityimprovementinterventionforlabourandbirthcareinbrazilianprivatehospitalsaprotocol
AT nakamurapereiramarcos evaluationofaqualityimprovementinterventionforlabourandbirthcareinbrazilianprivatehospitalsaprotocol
AT deoliveiraelainefernandesviellas evaluationofaqualityimprovementinterventionforlabourandbirthcareinbrazilianprivatehospitalsaprotocol
AT ayresbarbaravasquesdasilva evaluationofaqualityimprovementinterventionforlabourandbirthcareinbrazilianprivatehospitalsaprotocol
AT sandalljane evaluationofaqualityimprovementinterventionforlabourandbirthcareinbrazilianprivatehospitalsaprotocol
AT belizanjosem evaluationofaqualityimprovementinterventionforlabourandbirthcareinbrazilianprivatehospitalsaprotocol
AT hartzzulmira evaluationofaqualityimprovementinterventionforlabourandbirthcareinbrazilianprivatehospitalsaprotocol