Cargando…

Imaging sequence for joint myocardial T (1) mapping and fat/water separation

PURPOSE: To develop and evaluate an imaging sequence to simultaneously quantify the epicardial fat volume and myocardial T(1) relaxation time. METHODS: We introduced a novel simultaneous myocardial T(1) mapping and fat/water separation sequence (joint T(1)‐fat/water separation). Dixon reconstruction...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Nezafat, Maryam, Nakamori, Shiro, Basha, Tamer A., Fahmy, Ahmed S., Hauser, Thomas, Botnar, René M.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6258274/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30058096
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/mrm.27390
Descripción
Sumario:PURPOSE: To develop and evaluate an imaging sequence to simultaneously quantify the epicardial fat volume and myocardial T(1) relaxation time. METHODS: We introduced a novel simultaneous myocardial T(1) mapping and fat/water separation sequence (joint T(1)‐fat/water separation). Dixon reconstruction is performed on a dual‐echo data set to generate water/fat images. T(1) maps are computed using the water images, whereas the epicardial fat volume is calculated from the fat images. A phantom experiment using vials with different T(1)/T(2) values and a bottle of oil was performed. Additional phantom experiment using vials of mixed fat/water was performed to show the potential of this sequence to mitigate the effect of intravoxel fat on estimated T(1) maps. In vivo evaluation was performed in 17 subjects. Epicardial fat volume, native myocardial T(1) measurements and precision were compared among slice‐interleaved T(1) mapping, Dixon, and the proposed sequence. RESULTS: In the first phantom, the proposed sequence separated oil from water vials and there were no differences in T(1) of the fat‐free vials (P = .1). In the second phantom, the T(1) error decreased from 22%, 36%, 57%, and 73% to 8%, 9%, 16%, and 26%, respectively. In vivo there was no difference between myocardial T(1) values (1067 ± 17 ms versus 1077 ± 24 ms, P = .6). The epicardial fat volume was similar for both sequences (54.3 ± 33 cm(3) versus 52.4 ± 32 cm(3), P = .8). CONCLUSION: The proposed sequence provides simultaneous quantification of native myocardial T(1) and epicardial fat volume. This will eliminate the need for an additional sequence in the cardiac imaging protocol if both measurements are clinically indicated.