Cargando…
Evaluation of different doses of transcutaneous nerve stimulation for pain relief during labour: a randomized controlled trial
BACKGROUND: Pain during labour is one of the most intense pain that women may experience in their lifetime. There are several non-pharmacological analgesic methods to relieve pain during labour, among them transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS). TENS is a low-frequency electrotherapy tec...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6258317/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30477529 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-018-3036-2 |
_version_ | 1783374472586199040 |
---|---|
author | Báez-Suárez, Aníbal Martín-Castillo, Estela García-Andújar, Josué García-Hernández, José Ángel Quintana-Montesdeoca, María P. Loro-Ferrer, Juan Francisco |
author_facet | Báez-Suárez, Aníbal Martín-Castillo, Estela García-Andújar, Josué García-Hernández, José Ángel Quintana-Montesdeoca, María P. Loro-Ferrer, Juan Francisco |
author_sort | Báez-Suárez, Aníbal |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Pain during labour is one of the most intense pain that women may experience in their lifetime. There are several non-pharmacological analgesic methods to relieve pain during labour, among them transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS). TENS is a low-frequency electrotherapy technique, analgesic type, generally used in musculoskeletal pathology, but it has also come to be used as an alternative treatment during labour. The purpose of this study is to investigate the pain-relieving effect of a TENS application during labour and to find out the most effective dose. METHODS: This study is a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. TENS therapy was initiated at the beginning of the active phase of labour. Participants were randomly assigned to three groups (21 per group: two active TENS and one placebo). Active TENS 1 intervention consisted in a constant frequency of 100-Hz, 100-μs, active TENS 2 intervention consisted in a varying high-frequency (80–100 Hz), 350 μs, and in a placebo group, participants were connected to the TENS unit without electrical stimulation. TENS was applied with two self-adhesive electrodes placed parallel to the spinal cord (T10–L1 and S2–S4 levels). The primary outcome was pain intensity (0–10 cm) measured on a visual analogue scale (VAS) at several stages (at baseline and at 10 and 30 min later). Secondary outcomes included women’s satisfaction (via the Care in Obstetrics: Measure for Testing Satisfaction scale). RESULTS: Sixty-three women participated. Regarding baseline characteristics, no differences were found among the three groups. The active TENS 2 group obtained an improvement with clinically significant VAS results (− 2.9, 95% confidence interval – 4.1 to − 1.6, p < 0.001). Regarding satisfaction, the results also revealed better results in the active TENS than in the placebo group. CONCLUSIONS: TENS with high frequencies modified in time as well as high pulse width are effective for relieving labour pain, and they are well considered by pregnant participants. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03137251. Registered on 2 May 2017. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6258317 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-62583172018-11-29 Evaluation of different doses of transcutaneous nerve stimulation for pain relief during labour: a randomized controlled trial Báez-Suárez, Aníbal Martín-Castillo, Estela García-Andújar, Josué García-Hernández, José Ángel Quintana-Montesdeoca, María P. Loro-Ferrer, Juan Francisco Trials Research BACKGROUND: Pain during labour is one of the most intense pain that women may experience in their lifetime. There are several non-pharmacological analgesic methods to relieve pain during labour, among them transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS). TENS is a low-frequency electrotherapy technique, analgesic type, generally used in musculoskeletal pathology, but it has also come to be used as an alternative treatment during labour. The purpose of this study is to investigate the pain-relieving effect of a TENS application during labour and to find out the most effective dose. METHODS: This study is a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. TENS therapy was initiated at the beginning of the active phase of labour. Participants were randomly assigned to three groups (21 per group: two active TENS and one placebo). Active TENS 1 intervention consisted in a constant frequency of 100-Hz, 100-μs, active TENS 2 intervention consisted in a varying high-frequency (80–100 Hz), 350 μs, and in a placebo group, participants were connected to the TENS unit without electrical stimulation. TENS was applied with two self-adhesive electrodes placed parallel to the spinal cord (T10–L1 and S2–S4 levels). The primary outcome was pain intensity (0–10 cm) measured on a visual analogue scale (VAS) at several stages (at baseline and at 10 and 30 min later). Secondary outcomes included women’s satisfaction (via the Care in Obstetrics: Measure for Testing Satisfaction scale). RESULTS: Sixty-three women participated. Regarding baseline characteristics, no differences were found among the three groups. The active TENS 2 group obtained an improvement with clinically significant VAS results (− 2.9, 95% confidence interval – 4.1 to − 1.6, p < 0.001). Regarding satisfaction, the results also revealed better results in the active TENS than in the placebo group. CONCLUSIONS: TENS with high frequencies modified in time as well as high pulse width are effective for relieving labour pain, and they are well considered by pregnant participants. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03137251. Registered on 2 May 2017. BioMed Central 2018-11-26 /pmc/articles/PMC6258317/ /pubmed/30477529 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-018-3036-2 Text en © The Author(s). 2018 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Research Báez-Suárez, Aníbal Martín-Castillo, Estela García-Andújar, Josué García-Hernández, José Ángel Quintana-Montesdeoca, María P. Loro-Ferrer, Juan Francisco Evaluation of different doses of transcutaneous nerve stimulation for pain relief during labour: a randomized controlled trial |
title | Evaluation of different doses of transcutaneous nerve stimulation for pain relief during labour: a randomized controlled trial |
title_full | Evaluation of different doses of transcutaneous nerve stimulation for pain relief during labour: a randomized controlled trial |
title_fullStr | Evaluation of different doses of transcutaneous nerve stimulation for pain relief during labour: a randomized controlled trial |
title_full_unstemmed | Evaluation of different doses of transcutaneous nerve stimulation for pain relief during labour: a randomized controlled trial |
title_short | Evaluation of different doses of transcutaneous nerve stimulation for pain relief during labour: a randomized controlled trial |
title_sort | evaluation of different doses of transcutaneous nerve stimulation for pain relief during labour: a randomized controlled trial |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6258317/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30477529 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-018-3036-2 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT baezsuarezanibal evaluationofdifferentdosesoftranscutaneousnervestimulationforpainreliefduringlabourarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT martincastilloestela evaluationofdifferentdosesoftranscutaneousnervestimulationforpainreliefduringlabourarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT garciaandujarjosue evaluationofdifferentdosesoftranscutaneousnervestimulationforpainreliefduringlabourarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT garciahernandezjoseangel evaluationofdifferentdosesoftranscutaneousnervestimulationforpainreliefduringlabourarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT quintanamontesdeocamariap evaluationofdifferentdosesoftranscutaneousnervestimulationforpainreliefduringlabourarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT loroferrerjuanfrancisco evaluationofdifferentdosesoftranscutaneousnervestimulationforpainreliefduringlabourarandomizedcontrolledtrial |