Cargando…

Evaluation of different doses of transcutaneous nerve stimulation for pain relief during labour: a randomized controlled trial

BACKGROUND: Pain during labour is one of the most intense pain that women may experience in their lifetime. There are several non-pharmacological analgesic methods to relieve pain during labour, among them transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS). TENS is a low-frequency electrotherapy tec...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Báez-Suárez, Aníbal, Martín-Castillo, Estela, García-Andújar, Josué, García-Hernández, José Ángel, Quintana-Montesdeoca, María P., Loro-Ferrer, Juan Francisco
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6258317/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30477529
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-018-3036-2
_version_ 1783374472586199040
author Báez-Suárez, Aníbal
Martín-Castillo, Estela
García-Andújar, Josué
García-Hernández, José Ángel
Quintana-Montesdeoca, María P.
Loro-Ferrer, Juan Francisco
author_facet Báez-Suárez, Aníbal
Martín-Castillo, Estela
García-Andújar, Josué
García-Hernández, José Ángel
Quintana-Montesdeoca, María P.
Loro-Ferrer, Juan Francisco
author_sort Báez-Suárez, Aníbal
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Pain during labour is one of the most intense pain that women may experience in their lifetime. There are several non-pharmacological analgesic methods to relieve pain during labour, among them transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS). TENS is a low-frequency electrotherapy technique, analgesic type, generally used in musculoskeletal pathology, but it has also come to be used as an alternative treatment during labour. The purpose of this study is to investigate the pain-relieving effect of a TENS application during labour and to find out the most effective dose. METHODS: This study is a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. TENS therapy was initiated at the beginning of the active phase of labour. Participants were randomly assigned to three groups (21 per group: two active TENS and one placebo). Active TENS 1 intervention consisted in a constant frequency of 100-Hz, 100-μs, active TENS 2 intervention consisted in a varying high-frequency (80–100 Hz), 350 μs, and in a placebo group, participants were connected to the TENS unit without electrical stimulation. TENS was applied with two self-adhesive electrodes placed parallel to the spinal cord (T10–L1 and S2–S4 levels). The primary outcome was pain intensity (0–10 cm) measured on a visual analogue scale (VAS) at several stages (at baseline and at 10 and 30 min later). Secondary outcomes included women’s satisfaction (via the Care in Obstetrics: Measure for Testing Satisfaction scale). RESULTS: Sixty-three women participated. Regarding baseline characteristics, no differences were found among the three groups. The active TENS 2 group obtained an improvement with clinically significant VAS results (− 2.9, 95% confidence interval – 4.1 to − 1.6, p <  0.001). Regarding satisfaction, the results also revealed better results in the active TENS than in the placebo group. CONCLUSIONS: TENS with high frequencies modified in time as well as high pulse width are effective for relieving labour pain, and they are well considered by pregnant participants. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03137251. Registered on 2 May 2017.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6258317
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-62583172018-11-29 Evaluation of different doses of transcutaneous nerve stimulation for pain relief during labour: a randomized controlled trial Báez-Suárez, Aníbal Martín-Castillo, Estela García-Andújar, Josué García-Hernández, José Ángel Quintana-Montesdeoca, María P. Loro-Ferrer, Juan Francisco Trials Research BACKGROUND: Pain during labour is one of the most intense pain that women may experience in their lifetime. There are several non-pharmacological analgesic methods to relieve pain during labour, among them transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS). TENS is a low-frequency electrotherapy technique, analgesic type, generally used in musculoskeletal pathology, but it has also come to be used as an alternative treatment during labour. The purpose of this study is to investigate the pain-relieving effect of a TENS application during labour and to find out the most effective dose. METHODS: This study is a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. TENS therapy was initiated at the beginning of the active phase of labour. Participants were randomly assigned to three groups (21 per group: two active TENS and one placebo). Active TENS 1 intervention consisted in a constant frequency of 100-Hz, 100-μs, active TENS 2 intervention consisted in a varying high-frequency (80–100 Hz), 350 μs, and in a placebo group, participants were connected to the TENS unit without electrical stimulation. TENS was applied with two self-adhesive electrodes placed parallel to the spinal cord (T10–L1 and S2–S4 levels). The primary outcome was pain intensity (0–10 cm) measured on a visual analogue scale (VAS) at several stages (at baseline and at 10 and 30 min later). Secondary outcomes included women’s satisfaction (via the Care in Obstetrics: Measure for Testing Satisfaction scale). RESULTS: Sixty-three women participated. Regarding baseline characteristics, no differences were found among the three groups. The active TENS 2 group obtained an improvement with clinically significant VAS results (− 2.9, 95% confidence interval – 4.1 to − 1.6, p <  0.001). Regarding satisfaction, the results also revealed better results in the active TENS than in the placebo group. CONCLUSIONS: TENS with high frequencies modified in time as well as high pulse width are effective for relieving labour pain, and they are well considered by pregnant participants. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03137251. Registered on 2 May 2017. BioMed Central 2018-11-26 /pmc/articles/PMC6258317/ /pubmed/30477529 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-018-3036-2 Text en © The Author(s). 2018 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research
Báez-Suárez, Aníbal
Martín-Castillo, Estela
García-Andújar, Josué
García-Hernández, José Ángel
Quintana-Montesdeoca, María P.
Loro-Ferrer, Juan Francisco
Evaluation of different doses of transcutaneous nerve stimulation for pain relief during labour: a randomized controlled trial
title Evaluation of different doses of transcutaneous nerve stimulation for pain relief during labour: a randomized controlled trial
title_full Evaluation of different doses of transcutaneous nerve stimulation for pain relief during labour: a randomized controlled trial
title_fullStr Evaluation of different doses of transcutaneous nerve stimulation for pain relief during labour: a randomized controlled trial
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of different doses of transcutaneous nerve stimulation for pain relief during labour: a randomized controlled trial
title_short Evaluation of different doses of transcutaneous nerve stimulation for pain relief during labour: a randomized controlled trial
title_sort evaluation of different doses of transcutaneous nerve stimulation for pain relief during labour: a randomized controlled trial
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6258317/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30477529
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-018-3036-2
work_keys_str_mv AT baezsuarezanibal evaluationofdifferentdosesoftranscutaneousnervestimulationforpainreliefduringlabourarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT martincastilloestela evaluationofdifferentdosesoftranscutaneousnervestimulationforpainreliefduringlabourarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT garciaandujarjosue evaluationofdifferentdosesoftranscutaneousnervestimulationforpainreliefduringlabourarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT garciahernandezjoseangel evaluationofdifferentdosesoftranscutaneousnervestimulationforpainreliefduringlabourarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT quintanamontesdeocamariap evaluationofdifferentdosesoftranscutaneousnervestimulationforpainreliefduringlabourarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT loroferrerjuanfrancisco evaluationofdifferentdosesoftranscutaneousnervestimulationforpainreliefduringlabourarandomizedcontrolledtrial