Cargando…
Retention strategies in longitudinal cohort studies: a systematic review and meta-analysis
BACKGROUND: Participant retention strategies that minimise attrition in longitudinal cohort studies have evolved considerably in recent years. This study aimed to assess, via systematic review and meta-analysis, the effectiveness of both traditional strategies and contemporary innovations for retent...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6258319/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30477443 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12874-018-0586-7 |
_version_ | 1783374472815837184 |
---|---|
author | Teague, Samantha Youssef, George J. Macdonald, Jacqui A. Sciberras, Emma Shatte, Adrian Fuller-Tyszkiewicz, Matthew Greenwood, Chris McIntosh, Jennifer Olsson, Craig A. Hutchinson, Delyse |
author_facet | Teague, Samantha Youssef, George J. Macdonald, Jacqui A. Sciberras, Emma Shatte, Adrian Fuller-Tyszkiewicz, Matthew Greenwood, Chris McIntosh, Jennifer Olsson, Craig A. Hutchinson, Delyse |
author_sort | Teague, Samantha |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Participant retention strategies that minimise attrition in longitudinal cohort studies have evolved considerably in recent years. This study aimed to assess, via systematic review and meta-analysis, the effectiveness of both traditional strategies and contemporary innovations for retention adopted by longitudinal cohort studies in the past decade. METHODS: Health research databases were searched for retention strategies used within longitudinal cohort studies published in the 10-years prior, with 143 eligible longitudinal cohort studies identified (141 articles; sample size range: 30 to 61,895). Details on retention strategies and rates, research designs, and participant demographics were extracted. Meta-analyses of retained proportions were performed to examine the association between cohort retention rate and individual and thematically grouped retention strategies. RESULTS: Results identified 95 retention strategies, broadly classed as either: barrier-reduction, community-building, follow-up/reminder, or tracing strategies. Forty-four of these strategies had not been identified in previous reviews. Meta-regressions indicated that studies using barrier-reduction strategies retained 10% more of their sample (95%CI [0.13 to 1.08]; p = .01); however, studies using follow-up/reminder strategies lost an additional 10% of their sample (95%CI [− 1.19 to − 0.21]; p = .02). The overall number of strategies employed was not associated with retention. CONCLUSIONS: Employing a larger number of retention strategies may not be associated with improved retention in longitudinal cohort studies, contrary to earlier narrative reviews. Results suggest that strategies that aim to reduce participant burden (e.g., flexibility in data collection methods) might be most effective in maximising cohort retention. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s12874-018-0586-7) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6258319 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-62583192018-11-29 Retention strategies in longitudinal cohort studies: a systematic review and meta-analysis Teague, Samantha Youssef, George J. Macdonald, Jacqui A. Sciberras, Emma Shatte, Adrian Fuller-Tyszkiewicz, Matthew Greenwood, Chris McIntosh, Jennifer Olsson, Craig A. Hutchinson, Delyse BMC Med Res Methodol Research Article BACKGROUND: Participant retention strategies that minimise attrition in longitudinal cohort studies have evolved considerably in recent years. This study aimed to assess, via systematic review and meta-analysis, the effectiveness of both traditional strategies and contemporary innovations for retention adopted by longitudinal cohort studies in the past decade. METHODS: Health research databases were searched for retention strategies used within longitudinal cohort studies published in the 10-years prior, with 143 eligible longitudinal cohort studies identified (141 articles; sample size range: 30 to 61,895). Details on retention strategies and rates, research designs, and participant demographics were extracted. Meta-analyses of retained proportions were performed to examine the association between cohort retention rate and individual and thematically grouped retention strategies. RESULTS: Results identified 95 retention strategies, broadly classed as either: barrier-reduction, community-building, follow-up/reminder, or tracing strategies. Forty-four of these strategies had not been identified in previous reviews. Meta-regressions indicated that studies using barrier-reduction strategies retained 10% more of their sample (95%CI [0.13 to 1.08]; p = .01); however, studies using follow-up/reminder strategies lost an additional 10% of their sample (95%CI [− 1.19 to − 0.21]; p = .02). The overall number of strategies employed was not associated with retention. CONCLUSIONS: Employing a larger number of retention strategies may not be associated with improved retention in longitudinal cohort studies, contrary to earlier narrative reviews. Results suggest that strategies that aim to reduce participant burden (e.g., flexibility in data collection methods) might be most effective in maximising cohort retention. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s12874-018-0586-7) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2018-11-26 /pmc/articles/PMC6258319/ /pubmed/30477443 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12874-018-0586-7 Text en © The Author(s). 2018 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Teague, Samantha Youssef, George J. Macdonald, Jacqui A. Sciberras, Emma Shatte, Adrian Fuller-Tyszkiewicz, Matthew Greenwood, Chris McIntosh, Jennifer Olsson, Craig A. Hutchinson, Delyse Retention strategies in longitudinal cohort studies: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
title | Retention strategies in longitudinal cohort studies: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_full | Retention strategies in longitudinal cohort studies: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_fullStr | Retention strategies in longitudinal cohort studies: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_full_unstemmed | Retention strategies in longitudinal cohort studies: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_short | Retention strategies in longitudinal cohort studies: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_sort | retention strategies in longitudinal cohort studies: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6258319/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30477443 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12874-018-0586-7 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT teaguesamantha retentionstrategiesinlongitudinalcohortstudiesasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT youssefgeorgej retentionstrategiesinlongitudinalcohortstudiesasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT macdonaldjacquia retentionstrategiesinlongitudinalcohortstudiesasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT sciberrasemma retentionstrategiesinlongitudinalcohortstudiesasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT shatteadrian retentionstrategiesinlongitudinalcohortstudiesasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT fullertyszkiewiczmatthew retentionstrategiesinlongitudinalcohortstudiesasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT greenwoodchris retentionstrategiesinlongitudinalcohortstudiesasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT mcintoshjennifer retentionstrategiesinlongitudinalcohortstudiesasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT olssoncraiga retentionstrategiesinlongitudinalcohortstudiesasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT hutchinsondelyse retentionstrategiesinlongitudinalcohortstudiesasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT retentionstrategiesinlongitudinalcohortstudiesasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis |